Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Trying to Recruit Rivers for TV Annalist. I feel there going to ask everyone in the NFL eventually 

 

 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/now/report-espn-will-talk-to-philip-rivers-about-joining-network-as-nfl-analyst-214021449.html

I don’t know if Rivers will be good or not, but you might think he would be.   All that genuine Southern Charm...

 

But even if it doesn’t work out, isn’t it worth a conversation?  Or two?   Or three?   What’s the lol part?   What’s funny about it?   Just seems like good business.    Who predicted Tony Romo would be great at broadcasting? 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t know if Rivers will be good or not, but you might think he would be.   All that genuine Southern Charm...

 

But even if it doesn’t work out, isn’t it worth a conversation?  Or two?   Or three?   What’s the lol part?   What’s funny about it?   Just seems like good business.    Who predicted Tony Romo would be great at broadcasting? 

You Got It Yes GIF by NETFLIX

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t know if Rivers will be good or not, but you might think he would be.   All that genuine Southern Charm...

 

But even if it doesn’t work out, isn’t it worth a conversation?  Or two?   Or three?   What’s the lol part?   What’s funny about it?   Just seems like good business.    Who predicted Tony Romo would be great at broadcasting? 

Tony Romo a good Broadcaster? hahaha ok we can agree to disagree on that one. But the Lol was towards ESPN for always trying to add everyone however i would love to listen to Rivers talk.

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Tony Romo a good Broadcaster? hahaha ok we can agree to disagree on that one. But the Lol was towards ESPN for always trying to add everyone however i would love to listen to Rivers talk.

I don’t listen to many games that don’t involve the Colts.   But Romo quickly became the highest paid NFL TV analyst in the business.   That’s because every network desperately wanted him.  You get offers like that when you’re very good at your job.   So it’s not my opinion, it’s the opinion of everyone in the broadcast industry. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t listen to many games that don’t involve the Colts.   But Romo quickly became the highest paid NFL TV analyst in the business.   That’s because every network desperately wanted him.  You get offers like that when you’re very good at your job.   So it’s not my opinion, it’s the opinion of everyone in the broadcast industry. 


What he said

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t listen to many games that don’t involve the Colts.   But Romo quickly became the highest paid NFL TV analyst in the business.   That’s because every network desperately wanted him.  You get offers like that when you’re very good at your job.   So it’s not my opinion, it’s the opinion of everyone in the broadcast industry. 

Tony Romo is by far the best TV analyst in the NFL.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t know if Rivers will be good or not, but you might think he would be.   All that genuine Southern Charm...

 

But even if it doesn’t work out, isn’t it worth a conversation?  Or two?   Or three?   What’s the lol part?   What’s funny about it?   Just seems like good business.    Who predicted Tony Romo would be great at broadcasting? 

Yeah, I could see him being a guest analyst here and there. At least for the time being, his sights are on that coaching job. He’s got a great mind for it, that’s for sure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Tony Romo a good Broadcaster? hahaha ok we can agree to disagree on that one. But the Lol was towards ESPN for always trying to add everyone however i would love to listen to Rivers talk.


so let me get this right...

 

you are laughing at ESPN for wanting to add a voice that you admit you would listen to. 
 

Every single one of your posts are Dear God worthy. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

ESPN has been going down hill for quite a while now. 

What was once a great sports channel has turned into a joke. 

 

When ESPN 1st came out on cable back in 1980 I believe, I thought it was the greatest thing ever, that and MTV lmao . ESPN was great up until around 10 years ago, roughly since around 2010 it has went Abc Love GIF by The Bachelor

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Tony Romo a good Broadcaster? hahaha ok we can agree to disagree on that one. But the Lol was towards ESPN for always trying to add everyone however i would love to listen to Rivers talk.

 

It's almost an objective fact that Tony Romo is an excellent broadcaster and analyst. It's obviously not objective, but so many people share the same subjective opinion that it might as well be.

 

You have every right to do so, but you're agreeing to disagree with a hell of a lot of people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Meh i would listen to Gus Johnson any day before Romo he's just more lively 

Gus Johnson is a play by play guy.   Romo is color commentator.   They don't have the same job.    Both are very good at what they do,  but they do different things

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the sound turned off on 90% of the games on TV. 

On the Colts games I have the radio on. It's broadcast is a second or two off but I enjoy the radio announcers much more than any TV announcers. 

I don't have cable so I don't have ESPN, the NFL network or CBS sports. 

To be honest, I don't miss any of them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Romo is the consensus #1 color guy on TV for the last three years. ESPN offered him half the network last year to go to MNF; CBS countered with a long term deal at $17m/year, which I think is more than Romo ever made in the NFL. He's the top dog.

 

Number 2 is Collinsworth, and he's so polarizing and unpopular that it makes Romo #1 by a long shot. I personally don't mind CC at all, I think he's pretty good, but a lot of people seem to dislike him. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/23/2021 at 6:31 PM, Superman said:

Romo is the consensus #1 color guy on TV for the last three years. ESPN offered him half the network last year to go to MNF; CBS countered with a long term deal at $17m/year, which I think is more than Romo ever made in the NFL. He's the top dog.

 

Number 2 is Collinsworth, and he's so polarizing and unpopular that it makes Romo #1 by a long shot. I personally don't mind CC at all, I think he's pretty good, but a lot of people seem to dislike him. 

Where does Talib tank for you? haha

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy has 9 kids and just took a job as a HS head coach.  He's on to the next thing, and I don't think he's looking back (and good for him).  I could see him maybe doing a guest spot once or twice, but I'll be shocked if he ends up doing any kind of broadcasting on a regular basis.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESPN has been trying to get Peyton Manning as an analyst-no luck. They won't have any more success with Rivers, as he already has plans to coach HS football.  Maybe people just don't like the way ESPN runs things. 

 

I saw that Greg Olsen is signing with FOX as an analyst. I liked him as guest commentator, so he will do a good job. Maybe he could replace Troy Aikman, who is dry and boring IMO. 

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/22/2021 at 5:47 PM, Shadow_Creek said:

Tony Romo a good Broadcaster? hahaha ok we can agree to disagree on that one. But the Lol was towards ESPN for always trying to add everyone however i would love to listen to Rivers talk.

This. I'l never understand what folks see in Romo as a color guy. I'm not a fan at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, indykmj said:

This. I'l never understand what folks see in Romo as a color guy. I'm not a fan at all.

To the best of my knowledge, Romo is the only broadcaster who will see the offense at the line of scrimmage and tell the viewer what the okay is before the play is even run.  
 

That’s been one of his claims to fame. 

 

What do you object to? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/22/2021 at 7:07 PM, Shadow_Creek said:

Meh i would listen to Gus Johnson any day before Romo he's just more lively 

Who cares about lively?  Romo actually knows what he's talking about and IMHO he's "lively" enough.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No doubt any move is a gamble of some kind or another. If its an older guy, is the player injury prone or on the downhill side of his career? If a younger guy, will he still perform with serious coin in his pocket for the first time? But in the end, you have to look at recent production. If the guy has a good rep for being a hard worker and improved his play such that he's become an impact player, he's worth the gamble, IMO. Maybe not for a contract longer than 3 years, but I like taking a shot at an ascending talent.    More importantly, if you believe, as I do, that the defense HAS to get much better at rushing the passer, especially since our D coordinator seems to have a serious allergy to blitzing, then the push to find that missing piece has to take its place front and center over other needs. 
    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...