Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

BProland's Offseason prediction (Post Rivers retirement)


Recommended Posts

I'm starting to believe Ballard will either trade a 3rd round pick for Stafford if he becomes available from the new regime in Detroit, or he will sign QB Andy Dalton to a 1-2 year deal, around 5 mil per season, as his bridge QB for Jacob Eason, if the front office and coaching staff believe in him, which I think they do. They may also bring back Brissett on a team friendly contract. Something like 2 years, 7 mil.

 

I could also see Ballard bringing in a somewhat prominent DE in free agency to replace either Autry or Houston, whoever he lets walk. (Someone like Carl Lawson or Bud Dupree comes to mind.) 

 

Among their other high profile players to hit free agency, I could see bringing back Hilton and Rhodes on short term deals worth approximately 8-10 mil per season. 

 

Then in the draft they will focus on finding their longterm LT, finding a backup swing OT in the middle rounds, and adding young talent at CB, WR, and DE.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Stafford isn't going anywhere for a #3.    Not even to Jack in the Box.

 

It's going to cost much more than that.

 

 

Yep, a first rounder and then a 2nd/3rd is what it might take, based on what Carson Palmer fetched from the Raiders for the Bengals as a 31 year old QB. You could say 33 is the new 31, based on how long QBs are playing now.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Stafford isn't going anywhere for a #3.    Not even to Jack in the Box.

 

It's going to cost much more than that.

 

 

Tannehill was in a very simliar situation with Miami before Tennessee got him for a 4th round pick. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

 

Tannehill was in a very simliar situation with Miami before Tennessee got him for a 4th round pick. 

 

Not the same. Tannehill was going to the Titans as a back up to Mariota, coming off his rookie contract. It just so happened that he eventually replaced Mariota as a starter. Stafford is an established starter for several more years than Tannehill was, who will be traded for becoming a clear cut starter.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 3rd rounder for Stafford.  I can't believe you think that.  It's going to take a lot more than that.  For sure a 1st and then more.    They only have five picks this year.  They are not going to give him away for a 3rd.  Not happening! 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, richard pallo said:

A 3rd rounder for Stafford.  I can't believe you think that.  It's going to take a lot more than that.  For sure a 1st and then more.    They only have five picks this year.  They are not going to give him away for a 3rd.  Not happening! 

I agree it is going to take our 1st rounder this year and maybe a 3rd next year.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Not the same. Tannehill was going to the Titans as a back up to Mariota, coming off his rookie contract. It just so happened that he eventually replaced Mariota as a starter. Stafford is an established starter for several more years than Tannehill was, who will be traded for becoming a clear cut starter.

Tannehill was an established starter in Miami as well. Both Tannehill and Stafford were QBs who didn't really get their teams to the playoffs, which is why Miami was fine with trading him, and why Detroit could be on board with dealing Stafford for a decent pick since they are clearly rebuilding. Plus Stafford won't want to be a part of a rebuilding team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BProland85 said:

Tannehill was an established starter in Miami as well. Both Tannehill and Stafford were QBs who didn't really get their teams to the playoffs, which is why Miami was fine with trading him, and why Detroit could be on board with dealing Stafford for a decent pick since they are clearly rebuilding. Plus Stafford won't want to be a part of a rebuilding team. 

 

Again, you are the ONLY person who thinks on this board Stafford could be had for a 3rd rounder. All of us believe it is going to take at least a 1st rounder. I will leave it at that.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chad72 said:

 

Again, you are the ONLY person who thinks on this board Stafford could be had for a 3rd rounder. All of us believe it is going to take at least a 1st rounder. I will leave it at that.

 

But when you have a QB who most likely wants out, and a front office who is rebuilding from the ground up, you don't have a ton of leverage to get a ton of draft capital in return. Not to mention Stafford is 33 when the season starts. It's not like he is a young 26 year old QB who is on the cusp of stardom. 

 

I'll just conclude by saying I think it would be a mistake giving away a 1st rounder for a guy who will probably only be with the team for 2-3 years most likely. Ballard and company want to see what Eason can do, which is what I'm hearing when they feel he is ready. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BProland85 said:

 

But when you have a QB who most likely wants out, and a front office who is rebuilding from the ground up, you don't have a ton of leverage to get a ton of draft capital in return. Not to mention Stafford is 33 when the season starts. It's not like he is a young 26 year old QB who is on the cusp of stardom. 

 

I'll just conclude by saying I think it would be a mistake giving away a 1st rounder for a guy who will probably only be with the team for 2-3 years most likely. Ballard and company want to see what Eason can do, which is what I'm hearing when they feel he is ready. 

 

These are all assumptions on our part. We know none of that has happened. Stafford hasn't said a single thing, and the front office, like when Pagano and Grigson got together at the beginning of 2012 before Luck was drafted, is getting their feet wet. They would be first deciding all their coaches and evaluating the talent in depth first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come around on Dalton.  I think we're going to sign Dalton to a two-year contract and use the #21 pick on a QB.  It's the best we can do in our present situation without mortgaging our future.  Personally, I think people are selling Kyle Trask short right now.  Yeah, he's never going to be a runner, but he's great at moving around in the pocket and he has great short- to medium-range ball placement.  He's smart and has character/intangibles that Ballard will love.  I see him being well worth our first round pick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Agree and we might even have to throw in a player too.  

A 1st this year and a 3rd next season may do it depending on what direction they want to go. If we trade our 1st this year for him, Ballard still has picks 2-7 and we have at least a QB that can get us to the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Archer said:

I've come around on Dalton.  I think we're going to sign Dalton to a two-year contract and use the #21 pick on a QB.  It's the best we can do in our present situation without mortgaging our future.  Personally, I think people are selling Kyle Trask short right now.  Yeah, he's never going to be a runner, but he's great at moving around in the pocket and he has great short- to medium-range ball placement.  He's smart and has character/intangibles that Ballard will love.  I see him being well worth our first round pick...

 

I suppose that's possible, but I gotta say, the fans reaction (me included) would range from skeptical to outraged because we're a Dalton away 7-9 or so. No upside to doing that. Just hanging out, waiting on CB to decide he likes a QB. If I start exploring this..

 

Can't really judge Trask, some positives are there, but... I'm not really any more convinced that's the move than Eason is. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Fish said:

 

I suppose that's possible, but I gotta say, the fans reaction (me included) would range from skeptical to outraged because we're a Dalton away 7-9 or so. No upside to doing that. Just hanging out, waiting on CB to decide he likes a QB. If I start exploring this..

 

Can't really judge Trask, some positives are there, but... I'm not really any more convinced that's the move than Eason is. 

I am no to Dalton, I just don't even think we make the playoffs with him. 9-7 at best if he stays healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

A 1st this year and a 3rd next season may do it depending on what direction they want to go. If we trade our 1st this year for him, Ballard still has picks 2-7 and we have at least a QB that can get us to the playoffs.

 

You have to understand who Brad Holmes is, the Detroit GM.

 

Holmes was the Los Angeles Rams' college scouting director and helped run their drafts. He helped the Rams draft Aaron Donald, Todd Gurley and Jared Goff.  Holmes does not have pro personnel background. Bob Quinn, who the Lions fired in November, had a pro personnel background. He is not Les Snead who gave up a first rounder for Brandin Cooks, and gave up all those picks for Jalen Ramsey but Brad was with them while all that unfolded. He is a first time GM and we don't know his GM tendencies. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BProland85 said:

 

Tannehill was in a very simliar situation with Miami before Tennessee got him for a 4th round pick. 

Good example...   appreciate it.

 

But here’s the deal.   The broader NFL community was down on Tannehill at the time.  Props to Tennessee for spotting his talent when no one else did. 
 

But Stafford has been a very good quarterback stuck in a bad franchise since the day he was drafted.  Lots of people have coveted him.   NFL people drool for Stafford.  No one has ever drooled for Tannehill. 
 

If Detroit says they’re willing to move him, they will get multiple offers better than a single #3. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BProland85 said:

 

But when you have a QB who most likely wants out, and a front office who is rebuilding from the ground up, you don't have a ton of leverage to get a ton of draft capital in return. Not to mention Stafford is 33 when the season starts. It's not like he is a young 26 year old QB who is on the cusp of stardom. 

 

I'll just conclude by saying I think it would be a mistake giving away a 1st rounder for a guy who will probably only be with the team for 2-3 years most likely. Ballard and company want to see what Eason can do, which is what I'm hearing when they feel he is ready. 

Tell ya what, @BProland85, I'll go ahead and be the only guy on the forums to stand with you.  At least in this:  Stafford is dreaming of the heady days when he used to throw to Megatron, and actually won games.  He probably is not looking all that forward to wasting his final years in the NFL on a team that's rebuilding, and has no hope for playoff success.  As for the Lions front office, Stafford is going to hamper their rebuilding efforts because he counts waaaay too much against their cap.  So...  they'll talk.  No, I don't think offering a #3 will do it.  And they're probably going to ask for a #1 plus more.  But if you offer a #2, at least that will get negotiations started.  A #2 plus what?  A #3?  Next year's #2?  A player or two that are still on their cheap rookie contracts and still have some upside?  I think it can be done without surrendering our #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said in another thread that if Wentz is off the board, like many believe because of the Sirianni signing, that makes Stafford more expensive to get. 

I doubt a 3rd rounder even comes close to getting him.

I'd predict a 1st and a 2nd or 3rd and maybe even multiples 2nd and or 3rds.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy G could be available, Ryan may be available. Stafford would cost our #1 and #3 this year and a #2 next year. If you think that's high there's more than a few teams that would be interested. I still think Winston is going to be a great QB in this league.  I woild like to see us package our #1 and #2 with next years #2 and move up to pick BYU's starting QB, he's going to be a good one.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stafford for a 3rd round pick would be the greatest steal of a trade in the NFL. I think they are going to want a 1st round pick and maybe even another 1st round or 2nd round pick on top of it. Stafford is good. But he's on a crap team.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2021 at 11:33 AM, BProland85 said:

I'm starting to believe Ballard will either trade a 3rd round pick for Stafford


I don’t think this is so far fetched as others.  No one here knows what he will go for.  There have been countless times a team has been expected to get a ton of pick for trading a player and then it turns out to be a lot less. Sometimes a player is shopped and then released for nothing.  
 

manning got us nothing.  Faulk a 2 and a 5 when Rb was a premium position. 
 

if det is known by the rest of the nfl to be drafting a qb then the other teams will send low offers.  And I think nfl teams usually have a good idea of what others are doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Stafford as one of the many options, but it would probably take your first round pick

(maybe they would go for 2 2nds)

 

IMHO Dalton doesnt have a future in this league more than a backup

 

I would MUCH rather take a chance on Stafford and 2ndly Winston over Dalton, as Winston with the "QB  Whisperer" Reich as well as his time this year listening to S. Payton and getting tips from Brees he may be  ready to move forward as a better than average QB 

 

He put up 456 yards and 4 touchdowns on us 2019 (The only game I attended in person)

(he did throw 3 picks)  

 

If the coaching would put a more conservative approach and use the run to set up play action, and deep routes, AND

teach him to throw the ball away, he could be a great VERY CHEAP pickup

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Colts are currently just 1 game behind 7th place, 2 games behind 5th and 6th place. AFCW and AFCN still have a lot of divisional games to play against each other that could help our cause. There’s a strong possibility we get one of the WC spots if we win 10, probably a lock to get one if we win 11 and don’t win the division.
    • There is something weird. Personalities just didn’t mesh. Sams personality I think is what this all came down too. If a guy wasn’t understanding the offense then why was he the backup instead of Hundley. George Bremer said it was Sam that was getting Hundley up to speed on the playbook. That says a lot.
    • He couldnt learn the playbook and catch up mentally its not that hard to comprehend
    • The whole thing is still mind numbingly confusing too me. He goes out and works all offseason with Wentz and our WR's and then goes into TC and plays pretty well. Starts off playing decent whenever he had time to throw and then Reich increasingly called conservative plays with him and then gets benched for Hundly who is god awful and then gets cut for a guy who he easily beat out. I'm still holding firm the Reich had an axe to grind with him.. Still a whole lot of nothing for a back up qb at the end of the day.
    • Lmao I messed that above post up. No team has ravens back to back. I was looking at the ravens schedule. Sorry.
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 4,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CantBeStopped

      CantBeStopped 349

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Misty_B

      Misty_B 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlackTiger

      BlackTiger 277

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 1,572

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan98

      Coltsfan98 156

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dirty Mudflaps

      Dirty Mudflaps 36

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsFan_98

      ColtsFan_98 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pilgrim

      Pilgrim 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...