Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Poll - QB Preference (now that PR has officially retired) (merge)


Poll - QB Preference  

208 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your current choice for QB

    • Roll with Eason
    • Roll with JB
    • Unlock the Swag
    • Sign FA Fitzmagic
    • Sign FA Winston
    • Sign FA Trubisky
    • Trade our next two first round picks to move up for Lance
    • Trade our next two first round picks to move up for Wilson
    • Draft Mack with our 21st pic
    • Trade our 2nd and 3rd round picks to move up earlier in the 2nd to draft Trask
    • Use our 2nd round pick to draft Newman
    • Trade a 1st round pick for Stafford
    • Trade a 1st round pick for Carr
    • Trade a 1st round pick for Wentz
    • Trade a 1st round pick for Darnold
    • Trade a 1st round pick for Tua
    • Mortgage the future biggly, and trade our next three first round picks and next two to three 2nd round picks to get Watson.
    • Other - please list
  2. 2. Would you have preferred Rivers stayed one more year?

  3. 3. How much faith and confidence do you have in Ballard to make the right call on QB?

    • Blind faith, I have a picture of him in my house that I worship daily
    • Pretty confident
    • Not sure right now
    • Not a lot, but hoping for the best
    • Zero confidence

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 02/01/2021 at 02:03 AM

Recommended Posts

This is a great video. Something I found interesting was how Lance does a lot of presnap stuff. Something Reich says is very important in his system. He just isn’t ready to play so who starts for a year. You almost would need to bring Jacoby back for another year and see what he does for next season.

 

 

This is a great video. Something I found interesting was how Lance does a lot of presnap stuff. Something Reich says is very important in his system. He just isn’t ready to play so who starts for a year. You almost would need to bring Jacoby back for another year and see what he does for next season.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Eason was starter got hurt, Fromm came in played well and they elected to stay with him and Eason transferred       If you want to go that route then, Justin Fields couldn't beat o

I just wish this Wentz story would end 

The Texans aren't trading Watson to the Colts under any scenario.  Imo

Posted Images

28 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is a great video. Something I found interesting was how Lance does a lot of presnap stuff. Something Reich says is very important in his system. He just isn’t ready to play so who starts for a year. You almost would need to bring Jacoby back for another year and see what he does for next season.

 

 

This is a great video. Something I found interesting was how Lance does a lot of presnap stuff. Something Reich says is very important in his system. He just isn’t ready to play so who starts for a year. You almost would need to bring Jacoby back for another year and see what he does for next season.

 

 

I like Lance but to be brutally honest I doubt if he's there at #21, so CB would likely have to trade up to get him. Also, even if Ballard could pull that off, I don't think Lance would be able to step in in EITHER 2021 or 2022 and QB this roster to a Super Bowl. If you draft Lance, almost by definition you're in a modified "rebuild" unless you plan on opening up the bank to re-sign most of the OL, Leonard and some other defenders, etc.....

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, poilucelt said:

I like Lance but to be brutally honest I doubt if he's there at #21, so CB would likely have to trade up to get him. Also, even if Ballard could pull that off, I don't think Lance would be able to step in in EITHER 2021 or 2022 and QB this roster to a Super Bowl. If you draft Lance, almost by definition you're in a modified "rebuild" unless you plan on opening up the bank to re-sign most of the OL, Leonard and some other defenders, etc.....

I would say he needs a year. With him only having one game and the combine being cancelled I could see him dropping. But there are so many QB needy teams. Here is another video about him. Something that stuck out was how mature they say he is and how good his footwork is.  The team is good enough around him. The question is how much offseason will there be. Any chance they sign Stafford and draft lance if he is there at 21 and Stafford doesn’t require a 1st round pick.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I haven been dragging Mac Jones but a lot of stuff I have been researching is how good he goes through his reads and his pocket awareness. I don’t want to get on accuracy to much because of so many little dump offs. They are saying he actually does have a strong arm. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I would say he needs a year. With him only having one game and the combine being cancelled I could see him dropping. But there are so many QB needy teams. Here is another video about him. Something that stuck out was how mature they say he is and how good his footwork is.  The team is good enough around him. The question is how much offseason will there be. Any chance they sign Stafford and draft lance if he is there at 21 and Stafford doesn’t require a 1st round pick.

 

gotta think he needs at least TWO years, given the somewhat simplified offense he ran in college--not to mention the limited defenses he faced

 

my suspicion is that Lions would want (at least) a 1st round pick for Stafford and (again) IMO he ISN"T WORTH ONE at this point in his career

 

so if the Colts sacrifice draft capital to move up for Lance, it's a risky move--give up a lot of opportunity to bolster the roster long-term in order to draft a guy who (again, IMO) won't be ready to lead the 2021 or even 2022 Colts to a Super Bowl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colin has some great points here on Mac Jones. How do you evaluate him. He never plays from behind and is never pressured. Plus he is throwing to wide open receivers. The plus side is he seems mature. Very smart and knows how to go through his reads.

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Thebrashandthebold said:

Cam Newton. He is back. His arm is sound. His running ability is as good as ever and he would be an All Pro behind our line. He is a former MVP, he has been to a Super Bowl, he has unique talents that other teams have to change their normal defense to cope with him. He was rusty last year but he showed more than a few flashes of the old Cam. He is still young. He wouldn't take draft picks and he should be signed for a reasonable amount of money. Get Cam Newton as soon as possible so that he can learn the offense and the offense can be changed to fit his unique talents.

Newton looked done, finished, in New England all season long

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Mat I suggest that you look at the Colts history to find the reasons for a lot of things. 

I have and this is why it needs to change. We are not winning anything other than 10/11 games a season. That's not the prize. Passing quarterbacks got us 1 ring in the last 18 years and forever before that. go get Watson 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, conklincolt said:

I have and this is why it needs to change. We are not winning anything other than 10/11 games a season. That's not the prize. Passing quarterbacks got us 1 ring in the last 18 years and forever before that. go get Watson 

 

You can’t just snap your fingers and go get someone. You have to have a trade partner. They aren’t trading him in the division and they might not even trade him at all.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam's every forward pass looks awkward, as if the surgeries were only partially successful.

Mariota looks like a bargain for LV, but he always gets injured.

Garopolo looks expensive, and also is injury prone.

Stafford has taken too many hits for too many years on a bad team.

In the 2018 opener vs the Jets, Patricia should have pulled him out sooner.

I voted 'roll with Eason' in the poll, but could have added my vote to logan59's, doubling the count for Trubisky, who also may have had injuries of unknown severity, but could cost less than 3 out of the 4 above.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, conklincolt said:

I have and this is why it needs to change. We are not winning anything other than 10/11 games a season. That's not the prize. Passing quarterbacks got us 1 ring in the last 18 years and forever before that. go get Watson 

 

Be honest with yourself. Do you really think the Texans would trade their franchise QB to a division rival?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, conklincolt said:

I have and this is why it needs to change. We are not winning anything other than 10/11 games a season. That's not the prize. Passing quarterbacks got us 1 ring in the last 18 years and forever before that. go get Watson 

 

Do you realize since we won the SB in 2006, only 2 teams have won 2 or more SB's. The Giants did in 2007 and 2011 and of course the Pats did in 2014, 2016, and 2018. That is a 15 year sample size of only 2 franchises winning 2 or more SB's (2006-2020). You make it sound like winning SB's is easy lmao . We did win 1 at least. You think we can get Watson by snapping our fingers? homer simpson stars GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I know I haven been dragging Mac Jones but a lot of stuff I have been researching is how good he goes through his reads and his pocket awareness. I don’t want to get on accuracy to much because of so many little dump offs. They are saying he actually does have a strong arm. 

https://www.sportscasting.com/mac-jones-could-have-a-better-rookie-season-than-trevor-lawrence-and-justin-fields-if-a-mock-draft-proves-to-be-true/

 

I fully support Mac Jones and still think he would be an absolute asset on this team. Colts certainly have a team that can help him tremendously.

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, krunk said:

Is Matt Ryan finished?

 

This is who I was thinking may be a more realistic target.

 

He is a little older than Stafford, but IMO, is a better overall QB.

 

Falcons have the 4th overall selection and therefore, may take a QB, making Ryan expendable.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SR711 said:

 

This is who I was thinking may be a more realistic target.

 

He is a little older than Stafford, but IMO, is a better overall QB.

 

Falcons have the 4th overall selection and therefore, may take a QB, making Ryan expendable.

I'm pretty sure they are stuck with Ryan

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

https://www.sportscasting.com/mac-jones-could-have-a-better-rookie-season-than-trevor-lawrence-and-justin-fields-if-a-mock-draft-proves-to-be-true/

 

I fully support Mac Jones and still think he would be an absolute asset on this team. Colts certainly have a team that can help him tremendously.

The problem is how do you evaluate him. He never gets pressured and WR are wide open. Because of the talent around him everything is eash.

 

I  am leaning toward Jacoby starting again. Getting Stafford is going to depend on if he wants out or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

The problem is how do you evaluate him. He never gets pressured and WR are wide open. Because of the talent around him everything is eash.

 

I  am leaning toward Jacoby starting again. Getting Stafford is going to depend on if he wants out or not. 

Jacoby would be near the bottom of my list. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

The problem is how do you evaluate him. He never gets pressured and WR are wide open. Because of the talent around him everything is eash.

 

I  am leaning toward Jacoby starting again. Getting Stafford is going to depend on if he wants out or not. 

He wouldn't get pressured here granted Colts get good LT

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, danlhart87 said:

Jacoby would be near the bottom of my list. 

He might be the only Option as a vet to bridge it to Eason. 

1 minute ago, danlhart87 said:

He wouldn't get pressured here granted Colts get good LT

It’s the nfl not college. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

He might be the only Option as a vet to bridge it to Eason. 

That's a terrible attitude to have going into the season 

2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

It’s the nfl not college. 

What does that to do with anything? Colts have a very high quality pass OL.

 

If they can get a good LT they should continue to be a top 10 unit 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Colts go into 21 with Jacoby Brissett as the starter that's peak 9 - 7 tops and absolutely no shot as SB. 

 

I love JB and hope he stays on as a backup but if he's the starter hope Colts draft a QB for beyond that cause 21 it's over 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

If the Colts go into 21 with Jacoby Brissett as the starter that's peak 9 - 7 tops and absolutely no shot as SB. 

 

I love JB and hope he stays on as a backup but if he's the starter hope Colts draft a QB for beyond that cause 21 it's over 

There might not be any other options. The FA are all bad. We might not be able to get Stafford. So that leaves Jacoby and Eason or a rookie. Ballard needs to pull a rabbit out of his hat. Chances are it’s Jacoby with Eason or a rookie backing him up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

There might not be any other options. The FA are all bad. We might not be able to get Stafford. So that leaves Jacoby and Eason or a rookie. Ballard needs to pull a rabbit out of his hat. Chances are it’s Jacoby with Eason or a rookie backing him up.

Its very early in the process. Lets hope Ballard doesn't have the same attitude you do. Seems like you have accepted possible failure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matt Ryan is only 35 2/3 old today, but will cost $41 in 21 and $40 in 22.

Doesn't Ryan Fitzpatrick seem like a bargain at only $5.5 per year, with one year remaining in Miami?

Overpaying QBs or any players seems risky.

Any of them could just retire at any nanosecond, and be living next day in Venice Beach, CA, with a new career, writing children's books, or cartoons.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

There might not be any other options. The FA are all bad. We might not be able to get Stafford. So that leaves Jacoby and Eason or a rookie. Ballard needs to pull a rabbit out of his hat. Chances are it’s Jacoby with Eason or a rookie backing him up.

 

Jacoby as starter is a wasted season (I don't think I could stomach another season of JB).  A mediocre record not good enough to really compete and not bad enough to get a top pick. They either need to invest in a vet like Stafford, Ryan, etc that gives us a realistic chance to compete next season or go all in on a "boom/bust" whether that is getting someone like a Winston or Darnold, throwing Eason into the fire, or paying the price to move up for a rookie; that way we at least have a good shot of getting a good draft pick if it doesn't work out.  

 

Jacoby. Dalton, Fitz, etc ... just keep the Colts stuck in mediocrity. Ballard is eventually going to have to take a chance one way or the other.  You can only sit on the fence waiting for the "perfect prospect" for so long ; especially drafting in the middle void of round 1.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, esmort said:

 

Jacoby as starter is a wasted season (I don't think I could stomach another season of JB).  A mediocre record not good enough to really compete and not bad enough to get a top pick. They either need to invest in a vet like Stafford, Ryan, etc that gives us a realistic chance to compete next season or go all in on a "boom/bust" whether that is getting someone like a Winston or Darnold, throwing Eason into the fire, or paying the price to move up for a rookie; that way we at least have a good shot of getting a good draft pick if it doesn't work out.  

 

Jacoby. Dalton, Fitz, etc ... just keep the Colts stuck in mediocrity. Ballard is eventually going to have to take a chance one way or the other.  You can only sit on the fence waiting for the "perfect prospect" for so long ; especially drafting in the middle void of round 1.

Agreed. I'll take an up and down roller coaster of a season with Winston or Fitz

over a year of JB.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

There might not be any other options. The FA are all bad. We might not be able to get Stafford. So that leaves Jacoby and Eason or a rookie. Ballard needs to pull a rabbit out of his hat. Chances are it’s Jacoby with Eason or a rookie backing him up.

Not necessarily. They could move Eason to a starter role and sign an aged vet. Kind of like what we did with Luck and Hasselbeck

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, esmort said:

 

Jacoby as starter is a wasted season (I don't think I could stomach another season of JB).  A mediocre record not good enough to really compete and not bad enough to get a top pick. They either need to invest in a vet like Stafford, Ryan, etc that gives us a realistic chance to compete next season or go all in on a "boom/bust" whether that is getting someone like a Winston or Darnold, throwing Eason into the fire, or paying the price to move up for a rookie; that way we at least have a good shot of getting a good draft pick if it doesn't work out.  

 

Jacoby. Dalton, Fitz, etc ... just keep the Colts stuck in mediocrity. Ballard is eventually going to have to take a chance one way or the other.  You can only sit on the fence waiting for the "perfect prospect" for so long ; especially drafting in the middle void of round 1.

What if Stafford doesn’t ask for a trade? What if they don’t want to trade him? Can’t just say I want Stafford. No Ryan and Fitz are not options.  If they believe Eason can be ready in a year it just might be Jacoby. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

Not necessarily. They could move Eason to a starter role and sign an aged vet. Kind of like what we did with Luck and Hasselbeck

If we can’t get Stafford this would be my preferred option. Just see what Eason can do.  I just don’t see it. Would Jacoby come back if they told him he had to compete with Eason for the starter role? It. Might very well come down to Jacoby, Eason, or a rookie starting. Not many options out there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Stafford doesn't work out, I'm starting to like the idea of Winston while hoping Reich and company can help him cut down on turnovers. I'd like to have a quarterback again who can throw the deep ball. That would also give Eason a chance to develop.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Be honest with yourself. Do you really think the Texans would trade their franchise QB to a division rival?

 

This.... Times 1000..... nice to think about what ifs..... 1000 to 1 long shot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what unlock the swag means, but I picked it anyway.  Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Lance dropped into the 2nd at all.  He's got one full season as starter unless you count their lone 2020 game as a "full season."  One year wonders are incredibly difficult to project.  You're not surprised if someone takes him in the first, but you wouldn't be surprised if he fell into day 2 or even day 3.  Trey Lance looked amazing in 2019 . . . against Div-II competition mind you.  

 

So move up to take Trey?  It may not be necessary.  Belicheck is definitely a guy that I could foresee taking him in the first.  But I have a hard time projecting where guys like Trey Lance are valued by NFL brass.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I have no idea what unlock the swag means, but I picked it anyway.  Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Lance dropped into the 2nd at all.  He's got one full season as starter unless you count their lone 2020 game as a "full season."  One year wonders are incredibly difficult to project.  You're not surprised if someone takes him in the first, but you wouldn't be surprised if he fell into day 2 or even day 3.  Trey Lance looked amazing in 2019 . . . against Div-II competition mind you.  

To me I think he goes around where Love went.

 

Isnt it crazy almost all the elite QB never went to a huge school. Just kind of shows you that when you get surrounded by so much talent at these mega schools it’s hard to evaluate.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

What if Stafford doesn’t ask for a trade? What if they don’t want to trade him? Can’t just say I want Stafford. No Ryan and Fitz are not options.  If they believe Eason can be ready in a year it just might be Jacoby. 

 

Then you choose one of the other options I listed ...just about any option is better than JB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Shive locked this topic
  • Shive pinned this topic
  • Shive unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Another reason why I think the Steelers might be ideal second trade partners is that they have a 4th Round compensation pick 13 picks later but no pick in Round 5.   Do like the Walker Little pick and hope he does slide to say the 4th and we could nab him.
    • JB is not my favorite QB. But even I would never compare him to the likes of the guys on that list. He is much more in the Hasselback group.    But I also disagree with putting Grigs on that list as well. He wasn’t a disaster or an embarrassment...he was just a disappointment in the end. A guy who couldn’t evaluate talent nearly as well as he did early in his career. And he was an unlikeable guy (which has always made me wonder how he sold Irsay on giving him the job).    But plenty of GMs fail to get there with a star QB...especially early in that QB’s career. Only one team gets to win the SB each year.    I mean...just look at Polian. He got there eventually...but he was gifted PFM...and didn’t win a playoff game until the 6th season. Grigs had won 3 by his 3rd season...and had just as many playoff appearances (3) as Polian over their first 5 seasons. Polian is a HOFer...but my point is that it’s not easy even when you get a great QB.   And as I have said before...Luck was great and my favorite player of all time...but he wasn’t quite Mahomes or Rodgers good...they are true Ferraris. He made mistakes and also didn’t exactly light it it up in January either. I think his prime would have been something to behold and maybe he would have taken his game to a new level...but injuries unfortunately derailed that (which I think many parties are to blame for...not just Grigs).   The guys on that list brought nothing to this org...Grigs at least managed to oversee a winning roster for years. A 49-31 record (.612 winning %) with a 3-3 playoff record, in 5 years, is far from a disaster. If you want to see what a true disaster looks like...it’s what has happened in HOU...where their FO has wasted a QB who (IMO) might be even better than Luck.   So far, Ballard has been superior in just about every facet. But the results are still the results. We can discount 2017...but without it the Colts are still just 28-20 (a .583 winning %) and 1-2 in the playoffs so far. Yes, he has only had Luck for one of those seasons...but that’s just another way of saying he needed Luck to win more games (to win more playoff games). And that’s the argument I always hear to vilify Grigs...that he only won because of Luck. Seems like a double standard...and not the only one.   I think most Colts fans have become huge fans of the process...and that’s great. It’s might be my favorite part of sports. But there are those that are still results-oriented...and I can understand why some might be asking what does it all without the results? This season will be huge to answering that question. 
    • Relax....i was paraphrasing a Bill Tobin quote . Tobin went off on Kiper when the Colts drafted Trev Alberta instead of Trent Dilfer. 
    • @Superman   @w87r   So, among many things, I get e-mail from Sports Illustrated every day.   And the other day,  there was this article written by Andew Brandt, who used to handle the contracts and salary cap issues for the Packers for 10 years.    And one thing he wrote jumped off the page at me.     Now, here's why I remind our two resident Salary Cap experts I noted above about something they have both talked about,  but I haven't seen either of them talk about this year.   Roll Over.   According to Brandt,  the Colts have the MOST SALARY CAP ROLLOVER in the NFL.   $30 MIl.    So, whatever the general 2021 team salary cap turns out to be,  you can add $30 Mill for the Colts.     I'm going to do two things.     I'm going to link the entire article for everyone.    It's free, non-premium,   and I'm also going to cut and paste the key section for everyone to read right here.      OK....    here's the article...      And just for discussion purposes,  Brandt uses a projected salary cap of $185.   He's NOT saying that's what the final number will be,  only his own hypothetical number for his article.   https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/03/02/business-of-football-understanding-the-salary-cap-dead-money?suid=5cc1cc3a3f92a475c0234f43&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SI Extra 030221&utm_term=SI Extra - USE THIS - List     Here is the key text:   Myth: Every NFL team’s cap number is going to be $185 million   No. Actually, no team’s cap number is going to be $185 million (or whatever the final cap number is). The 2011 CBA, for the first time, allowed teams to carry over unused cap room from one year to the next. In managing the cap for the Packers, we did not have that option; it was use it or lose it. I had to negotiate * incentives—such as a clause giving our third-string quarterback $20 million if he threw seven touchdowns in our last game—to carry over cap room. (When he didn’t earn the incentive, we would get it as a credit toward the next year.) Now teams don’t have to play those games. As per NFLPA numbers, every team in the league has carried over 2020 cap room, from a low of roughly $500,000 for the Ravens to a high of more than $30 million for the Colts. Teams carrying over $20-plus million of cap include the Jets, Browns, Eagles, Cowboys and Jaguars. Thus, although the team cap is $185 million, the Colts’ adjusted cap will be around $215 million, and so on. And again, these teams have been preparing, or should have been preparing, for this reduced cap for months.   What say you both, Superman and w87r?     What do you think of what Brandt has written?    Does everyone have to re-do their off-season mocks reflecting a team figure of $215?     I look forward to hearing from both of you and others!
  • Members

    • OhioColt

      OhioColt 99

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 403

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 75

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 6,430

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 576

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...