Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Would you make another first round pick trade?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

I said Smith is an exception. He wasn't even supposed to play RT and now he's one of the best.

And I’ve said two things you continue to ignore....

 

1.   Success at right tackle does not mean success at left tackle.

 

2.   Left tackle is not a position you want to gamble on.  
 

I’m done with this.  We’ve said what we have to say.    Maybe you’ll get your wish, but I wouldn’t count on it. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

You don't think Lattimore is a top 5 corner?

He's definitely not a top 5 cornerback at all..

 

Alexander, Ramsey, White, Howard, Humphrey, and tons of others have been way better than him this year

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Stafford trade is contingent on 2 things:

 

. Rivers retires 

. Lions plan on drafting QB

 

Both are possible

I doubt it happens

Whelp....

Jim Carrey Chance GIF

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The scenario that brought Buckner to the Colts is one you must deploy very infrequently when constructing a sustainable winning roster.  You can’t load up on big contracts and trade away your first round picks repeatedly.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/19/2021 at 7:44 PM, CR91 said:

 

 

 

An amazing offseason for Indy that could easily make them SB contenders for at least a few seasons would include dealing their 1st round pick to New Orleans for CB Marshon Lattimore and their 2022 3rd.

 

Then deal Indy's 3rd rounder, plus 2022 4th to Detroit for QB Matthew Stafford, to man the QB position for 2-3 years until Eason is fully ready.

 

In free agency, sign a somewhat prominent DE like Bud Dupree or Carl Lawson to replace either Autry or Houston, whoever Ballard lets walk.

 

Then in the draft, get your longterm LT in the 2nd or trading down into the 3rd round (Jackson Carman, Liam Eichenberg are options)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BProland85 said:

 

An amazing offseason for Indy that could easily make them SB contenders for at least a few seasons would include dealing their 1st round pick to New Orleans for CB Marshon Lattimore and their 2022 3rd.

 

Then deal Indy's 3rd rounder, plus 2022 4th to Detroit for QB Matthew Stafford, to man the QB position for 2-3 years until Eason is fully ready.

 

In free agency, sign a somewhat prominent DE like Bud Dupree or Carl Lawson to replace either Autry or Houston, whoever Ballard lets walk.

 

Then in the draft, get your longterm LT in the 2nd or trading down into the 3rd round (Jackson Carman, Liam Eichenberg are options)

 

How do you expect to pay Lattimore, Stafford, and Dupree? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t hate making a trade with our 1st. I would hate making THAT trade with our 1st. We have larger and more pressing concerns than CB.

 

Especially not a CB that is about to get PAID

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, UKColt13 said:

I wouldn’t hate making a trade with our 1st. I would hate making THAT trade with our 1st. We have larger and more pressing concerns than CB.

 

Especially not a CB that is about to get PAID

I think we are in need of more talent at CB but not trading a first for one. I'd try signing Rhodes and one more vet to throw into the mix. I dont know how much Mike Hilton would cost but I like him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BProland85 said:

 

An amazing offseason for Indy that could easily make them SB contenders for at least a few seasons would include dealing their 1st round pick to New Orleans for CB Marshon Lattimore and their 2022 3rd.

 

Then deal Indy's 3rd rounder, plus 2022 4th to Detroit for QB Matthew Stafford, to man the QB position for 2-3 years until Eason is fully ready.

 

In free agency, sign a somewhat prominent DE like Bud Dupree or Carl Lawson to replace either Autry or Houston, whoever Ballard lets walk.

 

Then in the draft, get your longterm LT in the 2nd or trading down into the 3rd round (Jackson Carman, Liam Eichenberg are options)

Do you understand salary caps? No chance of that happening from a money stance. Now again another ridiculously low trade offer for a good QB. This just makes no sense to me at all. The Lions would not entertain this trade at all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard traded our 1st pick twice since his arrival.  To the Jets and to San Francisco last year.  Both trades were made at the start of FA.  March 16th and 17th of those years.  Not during the draft but well before.  Other picks were traded during the draft.  It certainly looks like this is done by design with the 1st pick.  So given his prior history I would think it's reasonable to expect he will do it again this year with the target being our new QB.  So the good news is I think there is a good chance we will know the plan for our future QB by the start of FA this year.  

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, BProland85 said:

 

An amazing offseason for Indy that could easily make them SB contenders for at least a few seasons would include dealing their 1st round pick to New Orleans for CB Marshon Lattimore and their 2022 3rd.

 

Then deal Indy's 3rd rounder, plus 2022 4th to Detroit for QB Matthew Stafford, to man the QB position for 2-3 years until Eason is fully ready.

 

In free agency, sign a somewhat prominent DE like Bud Dupree or Carl Lawson to replace either Autry or Houston, whoever Ballard lets walk.

 

Then in the draft, get your longterm LT in the 2nd or trading down into the 3rd round (Jackson Carman, Liam Eichenberg are options)

Lions aren't gonna trade Stafford for a 3rd no matter how much you fight the issue. 

 

Colts don't have the cap space for Stafford Lattimore and Dupree no matter how much that you want it.

 

Explain It Season 5 GIF by The Office

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

In another situation that wouldn't be a bad trade.  But we have no QB other than Easton and no left tackle.  

 

I think we need our draft assets to fix those issues. 

 

That is why we need to sign a WR like Allen Robinson or Nelson Agholor or JuJu in free agency. That should give us more freedom with our draft capital.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, richard pallo said:

 So the good news is I think there is a good chance we will know the plan for our future QB by the start of FA this year.  

 

^^^This.

 

If you are going after a WR like Allen Robinson or JuJu, guess what the second question after the contract amount will be? Who is your starting QB? Have to have the trigger man to make it enticing for offensive free agents at least. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've enjoyed reading through the back and forth in this thread and feel there's merits on many topics on both sides.

 

A few of my thoughts that are purely my opinion but are rooted in experience in some cases:

 

1) I never understand the logic of "fixing" one position by moving guys who are studs at their position around in hopes that they can be good elsewhere. For a game or two I get it (like when AC goes out and Nelson slides over). But right now we have a Center , LG and RT who are all top-5 at their position. Keep them there and fix the other areas.

 

2) I played OL in college and semi-pro ball. I started as a LG, was moved to LT and then my last couple years played Center. I personally found Center to be by far the most challenging. I got moved to RT for one game in an all-star game when there was another Center who was older and only played C. RT was a new world when going up against All-Star talent and that wasn't even close to NFL ball. So I would not be trying to shift Smith around when he was going to be a RG and settled into a stellar RT. Then if he doesn't succeed at LT and we drafted someone to play RT, we now have two RTs and no LT. Just does not make a ton of sense.

 

3) There are players out there who can be good LTs who don't have elite measureables but just plain get it. I badly wanted Orlando Brown Jr. He played like a beast in college. He looked the part. His measureables were atrocious and he fell to the third round. Bmore stole him. He is now an All-Pro caliber RT and played LT when Ronnie Stanley was out. Some guys can do that and they just look the part despite their measureables. Some guys don't measure well and it is a precursor for failure. identifying which it is is the key and why personnel guys have such a challenging job.

 

4) I think we can possibly piece-part together the offense if we get a good LT and a placeholder QB. I think we can piece-part it with a better QB and an average LT....we probably cannot piece-part it with a avg or below LT and and avg or below  QB......so something has to give and we are going to need to make some moves to probably get a QB worth anything. If we aren't willing to make that move up in the draft or out of the first in a trade, then we need to sign an avg or above LT and go bargain hunting at QB for a year. That just wastes another year of our best financial years of some of our studs (Nelson, Leonard, Smith, etc).

 

I am actually excited for this off-season because there are a lot of directions we can go in in terms of building up the team. The future is bright, but this is a pretty critical off-season.

 

The teams in the AFC with the brightest future have addressed their QB with young rising players (Chiefs, Bills, Ravens). If we are not going to go young and try to win with a QB on his rookie contract (i.e. Eagles superbowl on Wentz rookie deal, Rams Superbowl w Goff, Chiefs w Mahomes, etc) then we are just on borrowed time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think that the OTs worth taking in Round One will be gone before #21, so maybe Ballard should try to sign one of the FA guys like Williams, Robinson, or Villanueva, then use #21 on one of the edge guys or one of the WRs if one slides

 

and maybe sign Fitzpatrick to mentor Eason for a year, unless CB could somehow swing a trade for Stafford--if I'm the Lions GM I'm not sure it's worth it to keep Stafford (and his contract) around during what will be, no matter how you slice it, a serious rebuild.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know what... screw it. I'm in. lol

 

Here we go:

 

Trade 1st round pick for Lattimore

49ers part ways with Trent Williams and Colts pounce on that.

Colts sign T. Taylor or Fitzmagic to start 2021 and let Eason be groomed fully in a backup role.

Draft a DE, or LB in round 2.

- Let Rhodes walk obviously

- Probably have to let Hilton, and/or Houston walk along with the others we expect to walk like Walker, Hooker, and Mack

 

 

In all seriousness I am not for this, but I'm surprised that I was able to come up with a quick offseason plan I'd be okay with, but that would take some big ole IFs. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to see the Colts trade their first for another veteran unless it's for a QB.

 

It might sound crazy given the Colts have cap space but some guys on rookie deals will be signing some big extensions soon. If the Colts are going to have Nelson, Kelly, and Smith on bigger contracts then it would sure be nice to have a LT on a rookie contract. 

 

Players on rookie contracts is going to soon become really important to balance out the salary. Given the need/importance of QB that's really the only position i'm in favor of trading a pick for a veteran or trading multiple picks to make a significant move up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/19/2021 at 10:11 PM, NewColtsFan said:

If you try to compile a list of left tackles with 32 inch arms, the list might not be one deep.  In other words, zero. 

 

Left tackle is not a place you want to gamble on.   

Joe Thomas had 32 inch arms... There were several other decent players too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, life long said:

Joe Thomas had 32 inch arms... There were several other decent players too.

I’m not saying there aren’t exceptions to the rule...    but they are exceptions.   Not the rule. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I’m not saying there aren’t exceptions to the rule...    but they are exceptions.   Not the rule. 

Well yes no one is denying having longer arms helps.  Just like height in the NBA helps, but you had made it sound like not one LT in the NFL has ever had 32 inch arms. That is why I feel your response seems to be back tracking your original quip. Truth be told one of the best LTs of the modern era had very short arms. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, life long said:

Well yes no one is denying having longer arms helps.  Just like height in the NBA helps, but you had made it sound like not one LT in the NFL has ever had 32 inch arms. That is why I feel your response seems to be back tracking your original quip. Truth be told one of the best LTs of the modern era had very short arms. 

I just went back and looked again at my comment.   No where did I say the word ever. I was not dealing with the entire history of the NFL.  I was inferring today — currently.  There may indeed be a current left tackle with sub-33 inch arms.  If there is, I’m not aware of him, and no one has come forward with a name.  
 

If you want to point to Joe Thomas — great.  But that doesn’t change anything I said, or my view of what we’d like to acquire.  
 

If you want to say I’m not 100 percent right, I’m only 99.8 percent right, so be it.   Otherwise, not sure what else I can say....

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I just went back and looked again at my comment.   No where did I say the word ever. I was not dealing with the entire history of the NFL.  I was inferring today — currently.  There may indeed be a current left tackle with sub-33 inch arms.  If there is, I’m not aware of him, and no one has come forward with a name.  
 

If you want to point to Joe Thomas — great.  But that doesn’t change anything I said, or my view of what we’d like to acquire.  
 

If you want to say I’m not 100 percent right, I’m only 99.8 percent right, so be it.   Otherwise, not sure what else I can say....

Fair enough I just thought you implied that no nfl team would gamble playing a LT with 32 inch arms. I was merely trying to inform you that is not accurate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

I just went back and looked again at my comment.   No where did I say the word ever. I was not dealing with the entire history of the NFL.  I was inferring today — currently.  There may indeed be a current left tackle with sub-33 inch arms.  If there is, I’m not aware of him, and no one has come forward with a name.  
 

If you want to point to Joe Thomas — great.  But that doesn’t change anything I said, or my view of what we’d like to acquire.  
 

If you want to say I’m not 100 percent right, I’m only 99.8 percent right, so be it.   Otherwise, not sure what else I can say....

Animated GIF

 

:spit:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, life long said:

Fair enough I just thought you implied that no nfl team would gamble playing a LT with 32 inch arms. I was merely trying to inform you that is not accurate. 

I’ve spent my adult life in the word business.   Either writing them or speaking them.   Words matter.

 

While I wouldn’t rule out a left tackle with sub-33 inch arms, I’d simply say it’s very rare.  Joe Thomas, who I looked up to confirm, had 32 1/2 inch arms.   He was a Hall of Fame talent.   He had exceptional talent and skills.  I suspect he succeeded not because of his arms, but in spite of them.  He was that good. 
 

Typically, if you’re a quality OL with short arms, you’ll be moved inside to guard.  Ballard had to be convinced that Smith could play the less demanding RT because his arms were only 32 1/2.    It’s hard to see Ballard even considering trying him on the left side, but I shouldn’t say never.   I’m reminded of the old saying...  “necessity is the mother of invention”.   So it’s possible.   But I’d call it the longest of long shots.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...