Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should the Colts have contracted with Brady instead of Rivers?


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Read between the lines. Colts wanted a shorter deal. Brady wanted two years and probably control over certain roster moves. They couldn't come to an agreement.

 

I think you're reading way to much between the lines. Brady wanted to go to FL too. He had better O toys in TB too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The only mistake the Colts made with Brady is not drafting him in the 5th round in 2000 to back up Manning. 

Indy his first choice? Seems kinda doubtful that’s true... 

If the Colts defense forced 4 turnovers in the playoff game or stopped playing Jekyll and Hyde throughout the year, we might have been just as good as the Bucs in terms of results. 

7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Read between the lines. Colts wanted a shorter deal. Brady wanted two years and probably control over certain roster moves. They couldn't come to an agreement.

 

That doesn’t mean that we were Brady’s first choice or that Brady was our first choice.

 

I think you’re reading way too much into way too little. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

That doesn’t mean that we were Brady’s first choice or that Brady was our first choice.

 

I think you’re reading way too much into way too little. 

 

It was just a question after Brady went to the championship again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I think you're reading way to much between the lines. Brady wanted to go to FL too. He had better O toys in TB too. 

 

How exactly? Sure they have Evans and Godwin, but what else after that? Not much til Brady asked for Gronk and Brown. You can argue our weapons while not as talented were way more diverse with a way better o-line and run game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

The Bucs went 10-6 in the NFC, if they were in the AFC they would've missed the playoffs. 11-5 barely got us in.

They actually went 11-5 but still may of missed the playoffs due to several other teams being 11-5.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

It was just a question after Brady went to the championship again.

I understand....   I’m not objecting to discussing what played out last March. 
 

Im objecting to jumping to conclusions based on opinion and then stating in the discussion that it was fact, when there’s no evidence to support that.  
 

A bridge too far for me. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I understand....   I’m not objecting to discussing what played out last March. 
 

Im objecting to jumping to conclusions based on opinion and then stating in the discussion that it was fact, when there’s no evidence to support that.  
 

A bridge too far for me. 
 

 

The article to me just made it sound like Brady would have been a colt if the colts agreed to his demends

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Playing in the NFC made it much easier for him. You need to look at everything.

 

I wasn't advocating this. Just rose a question.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

How exactly? Sure they have Evans and Godwin, but what else after that? Not much til Brady asked for Gronk and Brown. You can argue our weapons while not as talented were way more diverse with a way better o-line and run game.

Evans and Godwin were both 1000 yard guys last year before they even added Brown or Gronk. Come on... 

 

And... Look at their O scheme compared to ours, and look at the pieces. I don't really like Arians scheme, but Tom knew he could do what he wanted. Arians is too risky, and Tom could simply be less risky. Reich was less aggressive with worse pieces, and Tom couldn't control risk averse play calling.

 

It's not even close IMO if you're looking at the pure situation. Then add in sunny SW FL on top of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I wasn't advocating this. Just rose a question.

He had the same record Rivers did = 11-5, they drew Washington and we drew at Buffalo lol. I wonder if the Bucs win at Buffalo I doubt it, that is all I am saying. Tom is a top 3 QB of all-time IMO, maybe the GOAT along with Peyton and Montana but he caught a break this year playing in the NFC. That was my main point. GB is the first team they will play that is great, lets see how that goes down. Drew Brees looked washed up last week.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He had the same record Rivers did = 11-5, they drew Washington and we drew at Buffalo lol. I wonder if the Bucs win at Buffalo I doubt it, that is all I am saying. Tom is a top 3 QB of all-time IMO, maybe the GOAT along with Peyton and Montana but he caught a break this year playing in the NFC. That was my main point. GB is the first team they will play that is great, lets see how that goes down. Drew Brees looked washed up last week.

TB had the #1 ranked SoS....

 

Colts had the #32 ranked SoS....

 

both 11-5... caught a break? and TB peaking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

The article to me just made it sound like Brady would have been a colt if the colts agreed to his demends


I think that’s your read.   And it might be true.  But I think it’s just as likely, if not more that it was never going to happen. 
 

For example, where did you come up with Brady having control of roster issues?   He doesn’t have that in Tampa, though the front office clearly tries to keep him happy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NewColtsFan said:


I think that’s your read.   And it might be true.  But I think it’s just as likely, if not more that it was never going to happen. 
 

For example, where did you come up with Brady having control of roster issues?   He doesn’t have that in Tampa, though the front office clearly tries to keep him happy. 

 

Well he wanted Gronk and Brown and he got Gronk and Brown

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Well he wanted Gronk and Brown and he got Gronk and Brown

It’s one thing to get what you want, to have management try to keep you happy.   It’s quite another to say Brady has control over the roster.   
 

It’s too big of a leap. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

TB had the #1 ranked SoS....

 

Colts had the #32 ranked SoS....

 

both 11-5... caught a break? and TB peaking.

Entering the playoffs, who would you rather play, at Washington or at Buffalo? If Rivers played Washington we would've at least been in the divisional round. Lets see how the Bucs do at GB. I can't wait for this. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2021 at 10:17 PM, AustinnKaine said:

Hopefully we don't make the mistake of resigning Rivers. 

You cant say that here. They will boo you for the truth. Once it's ugly head is shown, this fan base will just say run it back lol.

 

As we have just seen TB vs GB (NFC) 31-26 , now Bills vs Chiefs (AFC). This fan base believes that Rivers wasnt the problem when we only scored 24 points against the Bills. What you wanted the defense to hold the likes of Bills/GB/TB/Chiefs to under 24 points? Mahomes and Tom Brady to under 24 points because the road to the Superbowl will go them them.

 

We need young fire power if not TB12, AR, Brees, etc to win deep into the Playoffs. Not RIvers who cant throw a Hail mary from the 47 yard line into the endzone (ball landed at the 6 yardline, Bills game). Nor who could scramble inside or outside the pocket. These are facts which will get you killed by playoff teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yep I was wrong on that one lmao . GB's defense sucked in the 1st half and GB just made too many mistakes. 

That was my one concern; GB's D. I thought Brady would play well in the cold as he came from NE.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Rackeen305 said:

You cant say that here. They will boo you for the truth. Once it's ugly head is shown, this fan base will just say run it back lol.

 

As we have just seen TB vs GB (NFC) 31-26 , now Bills vs Chiefs (AFC). This fan base believes that Rivers wasnt the problem when we only scored 24 points against the Bills. What you wanted the defense to hold the likes of Bills/GB/TB/Chiefs to under 24 points? Mahomes and Tom Brady to under 24 points because the road to the Superbowl will go them them.

 

We need young fire power if not TB12, AR, Brees, etc to win deep into the Playoffs. Not RIvers who cant throw a Hail mary from the 47 yard line into the endzone (ball landed at the 6 yardline, Bills game). Nor who could scramble inside or outside the pocket. These are facts which will get you killed by playoff teams.

Rivers is gone so it is old news now. He wasn't the main reason why lost to Buffalo either. Brees actually screwed the pooch against the Bucs and he was a huge reason why they lost. Yeah Tom made it to the SB, good for him. Funny Tom has zero mobility and medium arm strength but makes the SB and you guys don't say anything bad about him at all. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah I struck out on that one homer falling GIF- glad I didn't actually bet any money.

LOL. I just logged in and was checking my alerts/responses and that one was the first that came up. 

And Brady's pass catcher dropped a bunch too. I just don't think GB is that good. Good, just not great.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EastStreet said:

LOL. I just logged in and was checking my alerts/responses and that one was the first that came up. 

And Brady's pass catcher dropped a bunch too. I just don't think GB is that good. Good, just not great.

Normally I am good at predicting games, still wrong quite often but right a lot. GB's defense surprised me at how bad they played. Tom had something to do with it but their D in the 1st half looked like ours at Jacks on opening day lmao . I usually never say book it unless I believe it, I am normally real accurate with that but I am eating crow now. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Normally I am good at predicting games, still wrong quite often but right a lot. GB's defense surprised me at how bad they played. Tom had something to do with it but their D in the 1st half looked like ours at Jacks on opening day lmao . I usually never say book it unless I believe it, I am normally real accurate with that but I am eating crow now. 

I'm pretty accurate when I dig into the teams, hit or miss off the cuff. I had already looked closely at GB when we played them, and have kept an eye on TB all year. I just thought TB had the advantage on both sides of the ball, and had played a lot tougher schedule. Only advantage for GB was home field. If KC wins and I go 2 for 2, the SB should be really good. Will be good regardless, but a Mahomes/Brady matchup is awesome.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

I'm pretty accurate when I dig into the teams, hit or miss off the cuff. I had already looked closely at GB when we played them, and have kept an eye on TB all year. I just thought TB had the advantage on both sides of the ball, and had played a lot tougher schedule. Only advantage for GB was home field. If KC wins and I go 2 for 2, the SB should be really good. Will be good regardless, but a Mahomes/Brady matchup is awesome.

I have said all year that KC would win the SB, it was them and everyone else. I have to admit though, the Bucs are playing out their minds and they have a QB that just wins in the post season.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I have said all year that KC would win the SB, it was them and everyone else. I have to admit though, the Bucs are playing out their minds and they have a QB that just wins in the post season.

KC was my pre season pick to win the SB, and I think most people's pick. 

 

NFC wise, I thought it would be NO. They choked again. 

 

If it's TB vs KC, not sure who I'll pick. Will need to dig a bit on the matchup. If it's TB vs Buf, I'd off the cuff go with TB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

KC was my pre season pick to win the SB, and I think most people's pick. 

 

NFC wise, I thought it would be NO. They choked again. 

 

If it's TB vs KC, not sure who I'll pick. Will need to dig a bit on the matchup. If it's TB vs Buf, I'd off the cuff go with TB. 

I can't remember but I think I had GB in the NFC before the season and once again Rodgers doesn't get it done.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

KC was my pre season pick to win the SB, and I think most people's pick. 

 

NFC wise, I thought it would be NO. They choked again. 

 

If it's TB vs KC, not sure who I'll pick. Will need to dig a bit on the matchup. If it's TB vs Buf, I'd off the cuff go with TB. 

I am not making a prediction for at least a week on the SB but I still have a hard time seeing anyone beating the Chiefs.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I can't remember but I think I had GB in the NFC before the season and once again Rodgers doesn't get it done.

Wouldn't really put it all on Rodgers. He threw for 350ish and 3 TDs. Brady just did more despite his INTs. If anything, I'd put it on GB's D. I expected them to both have around 300 and 2 to 3 TDs. Brady was just more clutch when needed. He also has better toys.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not making a prediction for at least a week on the SB but I still have a hard time seeing anyone beating the Chiefs.

My gut says KC right now, but I'm hearing whispers saying TB. 

 

IDK. Need to look deeper before I pick. TB is peaking and Fournette made a huge difference today. If they get AB back, TB just has an amazing toybox. KC's toybox isn't bad either. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I can't remember but I think I had GB in the NFC before the season and once again Rodgers doesn't get it done.

1-4 in championship games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Superman   @w87r   So, among many things, I get e-mail from Sports Illustrated every day.   And the other day,  there was this article written by Andew Brandt, who used to handle the contracts and salary cap issues for the Packers for 10 years.    And one thing he wrote jumped off the page at me.     Now, here's why I remind our two resident Salary Cap experts I noted above about something they have both talked about,  but I haven't seen either of them talk about this year.   Roll Over.   According to Brandt,  the Colts have the MOST SALARY CAP ROLLOVER in the NFL.   $30 MIl.    So, whatever the general 2021 team salary cap turns out to be,  you can add $30 Mill for the Colts.     I'm going to do two things.     I'm going to link the entire article for everyone.    It's free, non-premium,   and I'm also going to cut and paste the key section for everyone to read right here.      OK....    here's the article...      And just for discussion purposes,  Brandt uses a projected salary cap of $185.   He's NOT saying that's what the final number will be,  only his own hypothetical number for his article.   https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/03/02/business-of-football-understanding-the-salary-cap-dead-money?suid=5cc1cc3a3f92a475c0234f43&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SI Extra 030221&utm_term=SI Extra - USE THIS - List     Here is the key text:   Myth: Every NFL team’s cap number is going to be $185 million   No. Actually, no team’s cap number is going to be $185 million (or whatever the final cap number is). The 2011 CBA, for the first time, allowed teams to carry over unused cap room from one year to the next. In managing the cap for the Packers, we did not have that option; it was use it or lose it. I had to negotiate * incentives—such as a clause giving our third-string quarterback $20 million if he threw seven touchdowns in our last game—to carry over cap room. (When he didn’t earn the incentive, we would get it as a credit toward the next year.) Now teams don’t have to play those games. As per NFLPA numbers, every team in the league has carried over 2020 cap room, from a low of roughly $500,000 for the Ravens to a high of more than $30 million for the Colts. Teams carrying over $20-plus million of cap include the Jets, Browns, Eagles, Cowboys and Jaguars. Thus, although the team cap is $185 million, the Colts’ adjusted cap will be around $215 million, and so on. And again, these teams have been preparing, or should have been preparing, for this reduced cap for months.   What say you both, Superman and w87r?     What do you think of what Brandt has written?    Does everyone have to re-do their off-season mocks reflecting a team figure of $215?     I look forward to hearing from both of you and others!
    • Jets take Zach Wilson  dolphins up
    • I have to agree. His draft order is not always spot on but his ability to evaluate talent is always in the ballpark as to what GMs agree on.  As it turned out Tobin's rant ended up being pretty lame after Trev Alberts ended up being one of the Colts all time bust. Not only was Alberts a bust, so was Tobin. 
    • I don’t know why after so many years there are so many people who still believe Kiper  doesn’t know what he’s talking about? The exact opposite is true.   Always has been.   He’s lasted more than 35 years and for very good reason.    But I’ve been reading this here since I showed up nearly nine years ago.  Some falsehoods die slowly around here.   
  • Members

    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 399

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dgierhart

      dgierhart 1

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 8,375

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 538

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 12

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 161

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...