.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By RNGDShobby · Posted
Titans have any needs at (some form of) receiver and also defense. I will not recommend any players as I pick next with the Raiders. -
By MikeCurtis · Posted
If Paye is still on the board at 21, it would be difficult to pass on We REALLY need a LT.... We REALLY need a DE We need these more than other spots of need (TE, CB) IMHO If Paye is there, Id take him, then work (via trade) to get the 54th pick into the 40's to get a starting caliber LT Paye seems ready to play today. -
Turay Lewis Banagu Autry Mohammed Somebody could step up in this group at DE. IMO they should grab BPA at LT, DE or CB at 21. There’s times when signing FA makes sense(Buckner). Too many times though, I see fans clamoring for a “name” when they have capable players in their system already. I like the idea of signing your own but pulling the trigger on FA acquisitions, where appropriate, to make the team better. Ultimately, I trust this organization to make the right moves, more times than not. -
By MikeCurtis · Posted
Brave poster...... Mock number 4........ Essentially you are trading Kelly for Darrisaw Kelly is an excellent player. Darrisaw is a prospect...... I wouldnt do this trade even up, and I highly doubt anyone sitting at 5 would do this trade either for this player. I could see this trade if we were going to get a star QB or DE (but we would have to throw in more picks) Darrisaw isnt expected to be drafted until 12-15 (some mocks have him sliding to 21!) You have him way early Its always fun reading, even when I dont agree with everything listed -
By MikeCurtis · Posted
I think PURE BPA is a bit unrealistic If BPA is a LG, RB, or C at 21, would we take them? I dont believe so.... IMHO it becomes BPA ..........BUT........at a position of need. If you have 5 needs, you pick the BPA of those needs For example, in this draft, If you have a need for LT, DE, CB, TE, and Pitts (TE) somehow slips to 21 To me.... you take Pitts because he is the BPA at a position of need, at 21 (If thats the way CB "sees" the board) I hope we come out of this draft with a starting LT, DE, CB, AND TE...... OF COURSE that is a tall order.......That hope will probably NOT be realized..... so draft what we can, and get FA to complete. The reality is, if we could get 2-3 actual starters, from this draft we would all be happy I see some seemingly good LT that should be around for us to draft, even up to pick 40 or so. (my gut says we will try to find a trade partner to give us a very late 1st or very early 2nd for our 21st pick, as well as give us a late 3rd or early 4th) I believe that there are some TEs or CBs that could start and contribute right away in the 2nd round I think we may go developmental DE in later rounds. Which IMHO means that we need to get at least one DE FA to complete It is always interesting this time of year ........
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now