Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Eberflus interviewing with Houston


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Texans' front office:  

Hes there to get Intel on Watson   

During an off-season where people are screaming about how bad the interview process is being handled by teams over-looking African-Americans....   Houston now pours gasoline on the fire by interviewin

40 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I bet Watson is happy, NOT! Keegan-Michael Key Lol GIF by HULU


Watson actually has a lot of respect for Eberflus.  Sought him out on the field after the 2nd game this year and told ‘flus how impressed he was by his ability to change the defensive game plan so drastically since the prior meeting just a few weeks before.

 

I’m confident that the right replacements will be found, but the entire staff is in jeopardy of being gutted.

 

Assistant o-line coach (Adams) gone, Sirianni gone, Secondary coach (Gannon) likely gone, and now Eberflus possibly gone.

 

All that said, lots of conflicting information out there: 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, krunk said:

When i saw Caserio get the GM i thought they were going to try to match Mcdaniels with Watson but so far guess not.

 

Even one of their own (Patriots) know what a snake he is, that speaks volumes, IMO. McDaniels is going to be waiting a long time before he is a front runner and not an after thought after he burned that bridge with the Colts with his big faux paus. But then it was LeGarette Blount who pointed out "Patriots assistants under Belichick go elsewhere and try to do it the Patriot way but they don't have the same kind of players. If they adapt and do it their own way like Brian Flores did, they have a greater chance of putting their own stamp as well as adapting to the players and succeeding."

Link to post
Share on other sites

During an off-season where people are screaming about how bad the interview process is being handled by teams over-looking African-Americans....   Houston now pours gasoline on the fire by interviewing a guy who was mostly a career backup who has not coached at all in the NFL.   And they’re interviewing him for Head Coach.   Not QB coach coach.   Not OC.   But head coach. 
 

A worse look the Texans could not be putting out there.   Feel bad for McGowan.   A huge mistake by the Texans.   Or should I say...   yet another self inflicted mistake by Houston. 
 

Josh McGowan may be a good head coach someday.  But that day is not today. 
 

Embarrassing. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

No he is prepared to ruin the Alabama program 

Honestly, I think O’Brien’s boneheaded personnel moves overshadow the fact that he’s an excellent football coach.  I don’t think it’s an accident that both Belichick and Saban — the most successful Pro and College coaches ever — wanted him on their staff.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, luv_pony_express said:

If they wanted to hire Eberflus, why wouldn’t they go ahead and pull the trigger?

 

That they haven’t yet suggests to me that they really want Bieniemy or Frazier.

I don’t think they’ve even interviewed Bienemy yet,  have they?   

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Sorry...   auto-correct went nuts.   I was trying to write Bienemy. 

I thought so but wasn't sure. I had read an article on NFL.com that said they already interviewed him, but I thought I had read something somewhere else that seems to conflict with that article... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...   I just read an ESPN article that says the Texans have indeed interviewed Eric Bienemy.   But I’ve seen nothing about a second interview, or who the front runner is.

 

The latest names interviewed were former Colts HC JIm Caldwell and former QB Josh McGowan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Ok...   I just read an ESPN article that says the Texans have indeed interviewed Eric Bienemy.   But I’ve seen nothing about a second interview, or who the front runner is.

 

The latest names interviewed were former Colts HC JIm Caldwell and former QB Josh McGowan. 

They are still in first round interview mode. I'd expect that to continue assuming they want to interview guys still in the playoffs. Keep in mind the Texans had to get special approval to interview Bieniemy when they did, because they failed to interview him on the off week. They can't interview him again till they are done (unless they seek a waiver from the NFL again).

 

Purely my opinion, but I think it's simple to me.

 

If Watson stays, Bieniemy will be the HC. Anyone other than Bieniemy is a signal that Watson is gone. That assumes though that there are teams willing to mortgage their future... 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Seems like Eberflus won’t get the job.

 

 

DC Eberflus not landing a HC gig is the best thing that could have happened to this team after the Bills game. This defense is as good (statistically) as it has ever been. Considering this is his what 3rd year with the defense.

 

in 2017, Eberflus immediately turned the defense around in just one season to rank No. 10 in scoring defense (21.5 points allowed per game) and No. 11 in total defense (339.4 yards allowed per game) in 2018. Impressively, he did so without major personnel changes, as seven of the team's 11 defensive starters were with the club last season.

 

I say add more pieces for DC Eberflus. Just as we did this year (2020) with DT Buckner.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Seems like Eberflus won’t get the job.

 

 

I don't think this means Flus is out. This is just the next time you can request another interview with these 2 guys while their teams are still playing. Which one will be done after this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

Yeah, the radio silence has been deafening.  If they wanted to hire Eberflus, they already would’ve.

 

Eric Bieniemy is going to get this job.

IMO, Bieniemy only gets the job if Watson stays. If Watson is gone, they'll go with Frazier or someone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EastStreet said:

IMO, Bieniemy only gets the job if Watson stays. If Watson is gone, they'll go with Frazier or someone else.

Problem is one decision needs made before the other.

 

They might hire EB hoping it makes Watson change his mind, but Watson might still ask out?

 

They need to want EB to be the guy either way, which with how their HC process has played out, doesn't seem to be the case?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, w87r said:

Problem is one decision needs made before the other.

 

They might hire EB hoping it makes Watson change his mind, but Watson might still ask out?

 

They need to want EB to be the guy either way, which with how their HC process has played out, doesn't seem to be the case?

I think the decisions will be coordinated. I think right now Houston is trying to salvage the relationship. Shouldn't take too long to get a feel for it that's possible. TBH, I'd trade him and start over. They'll have a whole new FO and staff. I'd cleanse the locker room too. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I think the decisions will be coordinated. I think right now Houston is trying to salvage the relationship. Shouldn't take too long to get a feel for it that's possible. TBH, I'd trade him and start over. They'll have a whole new FO and staff. I'd cleanse the locker room too. 

I would as well. Replenish draft picks and have QB on rookie contract.

 

Would probably be the smartest thing that organization has done in a few years.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, w87r said:

I would as well. Replenish draft picks and have QB on rookie contract.

 

Would probably be the smartest thing that organization has done in a few years.

Yup. With all the draft capital they'd get, they'd have a ton of options. I'd either go Lance or Wilson in the draft, or grab a FA like Stafford if they don't want to go full on rebuild. 

 

Anything that's poison though needs to go. They got rid of a bad FO/Staff. Now get rid of all the locker room malcontents and start anew. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, w87r said:

I would as well. Replenish draft picks and have QB on rookie contract.

 

Would probably be the smartest thing that organization has done in a few years.

Well they have won a lot of games over the last few years. So if they r not smart whay does that make the Colts??

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Well they have won a lot of games over the last few years. So if they r not smart whay does that make the Colts??

Wins and losses don't dictate being smart or not. Decisions do, and they have made bad decision after bad decision. Firing GM, not replacing him, giving GM spot to BOB, BOB trading Hop....

 

Way to show your continued support at the Colts though. :thmup:

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, w87r said:

Wins and losses don't dictate being smart or not. Decisions do, and they have made bad decision after bad decision. Firing GM, not replacing him, giving GM spot to BOB, BOB trading Hop....

 

Way to show your continued support at the Colts though. :thmup:

Lol. I agree Houston has made some head scratcher moves under O'Brien. However, his motivation was to win it all. You r liable to make some good and some bad moves.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, w87r said:

Problem is one decision needs made before the other.

 

They might hire EB hoping it makes Watson change his mind, but Watson might still ask out?

 

They need to want EB to be the guy either way, which with how their HC process has played out, doesn't seem to be the case?


If it’s true that Watson is going to ask for a trade regardless who they hire, what’s he waiting for?  Why just the anonymous leaks to the press about what he’s going to do?

 

It seems pretty apparent to me that he’s machinating to impact the hiring process, if not the hire itself.

 

At one point, wasn’t Houston not even going to interview Bieniemy?  Now he’s reportedly a finalist?

 

I could be wrong.  But I think they’re going to hire Bieniemy and Watson will return there next year.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, luv_pony_express said:

At one point, wasn’t Houston not even going to interview Bieniemy?  Now he’s reportedly a finalist?

Yeah, that was my point with how the process played out. Doesn't seem like EB was "their" guy regardless of what Watson does.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

IMO, Bieniemy only gets the job if Watson stays. If Watson is gone, they'll go with Frazier or someone else.

 

I think they should have offered the GM position to Watson AND make him minority owner of the team.... then maybe, hopefully he be happy and stays in Houston. :funny:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No doubt any move is a gamble of some kind or another. If its an older guy, is the player injury prone or on the downhill side of his career? If a younger guy, will he still perform with serious coin in his pocket for the first time? But in the end, you have to look at recent production. If the guy has a good rep for being a hard worker and improved his play such that he's become an impact player, he's worth the gamble, IMO. Maybe not for a contract longer than 3 years, but I like taking a shot at an ascending talent.    More importantly, if you believe, as I do, that the defense HAS to get much better at rushing the passer, especially since our D coordinator seems to have a serious allergy to blitzing, then the push to find that missing piece has to take its place front and center over other needs. 
    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...