Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Dome/ Indoor teams rarely win SuperBowls....


Recommended Posts

Does teams that play outside most of the time, have a better chance of winning a SuperBowl?

 

I know it's nothing new, but looking at the past winners, only a few Dome/indoor teams have won the big one.

Latest indoor team to win was the Saints in 2009, and before that, the Colts in 2006. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions

 

So my question is, do you think it really matters or have any significant part to say for a teams chances of winning i January, that they play most of their games indoor?

 

Sometimes it looks like, that indoor teams do worse in January compared to outdoor teams, that are used to play outside and that they just have easier to win in the elements.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ThorstenDenmark said:

Does teams that play outside most of the time, have a better chance of winning a SuperBowl?

 

I know it's nothing new, but looking at the past winners, only a few Dome/indoor teams have won the big one.

Latest indoor team to win was the Saints in 2009, and before that, the Colts in 2006. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions

 

So my question is, do you think it really matters or have any significant part to say for a teams chances of winning i January, that they play most of their games indoor?

 

Sometimes it looks like, that indoor teams do worse in January compared to outdoor teams, that are used to play outside and that they just have easier to win in the elements.

 

 

There are only 10 teams with dome/retractable roofs in the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

There are only 10 teams with dome/retractable roofs in the league. 

I know the majority of the teams play outside... but when looking at the teams that qualify for the playoffs, there are always dome teams in the mix, so its more even/ balanced regarding the number of teams playing outside vs. indoor.

 

Im note 100% sure, but I think that the last dome team to reach the super bowl was the Falcons who had homefield advantage throughout the playoffs, as the cowboys lost to GreenBay. 

 

But beside that, its very rare that dome teams do well in the postseason.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, ThorstenDenmark said:

I know the majority of the teams play outside... but when looking at the teams that qualify for the playoffs, there are always dome teams in the mix, so its more even/ balanced regarding the number of teams playing outside vs. indoor.

 

Im note 100% sure, but I think that the last dome team to reach the super bowl was the Falcons who had homefield advantage throughout the playoffs, as the cowboys lost to GreenBay. 

 

But beside that, its very rare that dome teams do well in the postseason.

 

I think it has more to do with certain teams just having more talent. GMs, drafting and the coaching have a lot to do with it. If you look at the history of the NFL it is a cycle of teams. 

Those teams who seem to never make "it" are the ones who are mismanaged. I am not sure the weather has anything to do with it. 

Good debate regardless. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I think it has more to do with certain teams just having more talent. GMs, drafting and the coaching have a lot to do with it. If you look at the history of the NFL it is a cycle of teams. 

Those teams who seem to never make "it" are the ones who are mismanaged. I am not sure the weather has anything to do with it. 

Good debate regardless. 

 

I agree that some teams are better managed than other and that some teams just never make it.

 

I just wonder if a team that plays outdoor more than a dome team, in a way are better equipped or prepared to do better in the postseason, as they more often have the elements to work with and against compared to a dome team.

 

A dome team always (more often) have the perfect conditions for playing football in, than a team that plays regularly outside, and in that way, dome teams in a way need "perfect" conditions to perform.

 

I remember a Colts team with Manning that were blown out in the postseason several times, when they had to play outside.

So it took them a couple of tries before cracking the big one in New England, but more often than other teams, they failed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a fan who has attended winter games in Indy, Cleveland, Nashville and New Jersey, I'm fine with having reduced odds of winning the Super Bowl, while having a domed stadium with a Skywalk connected to my hotel and a lot of the fine local restaurants and watering holes.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually if you look at the entire picture since the divisions got re-aligned in 2002 we would be the only team out of the 4 teams (others being the Texans, Titans, and Jags) that have even been relevant. Those other teams have never even played in a SB (Titans did in 1999) but I am talking since the AFC South was formed. We have been to 2 SB's and won 1. No other teams have ever been scared of the Texans, Titans, or Jags I would be safe to say but when we had Peyton that were scared poopless to face us and even when we had a healthy Luck teams were scared as well. In 2018 when we won the playoff game at Houston with Luck that showed everyone that we were the better team when healthy. Houston was loaded that season with Watson, Hopkins, Watt, and Clowney and the game was over at halftime with Luck healthy.   As long as we make the playoffs it doesn't even bother me that we don't win the division. A lot of teams that win their division stink it up in the playoffs. I would rather make a Title Game or a SB than win my division if I had to choose between the choices. 
    • Based on this, we can actually get the Browns' 1st rounder No.26 and pick No.91 for our pick No.21 if we move back just 5 spots, I like it     I have read Rich Hill's articles on PatsPulpit. He is good with numbers. Of course, there will always be a Patriots bias on a Patriots SB Nation article, especially when there are gray areas for interpretation but the quality of his numbers he puts out is a good one. Similarly, I like Scott Kacsmar articles too.    Ultimately, in trades, two hands need to be willing to clap based on a value agreed. The rest is pundit and draft day fan speak fodder.
    • There have been times in the recent years, where the secondary looked confused and out of position. I hope this coach can eliminate those mistakes. Maybe it was just that the players were young or not used to playing together. 
    • If he plays bad and we start something like 1-4, this forum will implode. Rivers was good this past season for a 38 yr old, Luck was very good when he played, Peyton was a top 3 QB of all-time, who knows what we have here in reality? Can Wentz play at least as good as Rivers did or will he be like JB = a .500 QB?? 
    • Drafting Montez Sweat would have been Sweet instead of trading down. Hopefully, Rock and Banogu develop and show something in 2021.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...