Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Chris Ballard end of season presser tomorrow 1 pm


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 377
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My takes:  wants to keep Rivers but both sides need time   likes Eason but isn’t sold on him as the backup yet let alone the starter.  I don’t expect the Colts to roll with him as the starte

Btw, if there's no Combine, this is gonna be one of the worst drafts in a while for a lot of teams.

A first and a second for Stafford seems very rich.  If we’re giving up that kind of draft capital, I’d rather go up and get us a young guy from the draft who we can groom and mold on our own.  As much as I like Stafford out of all the other veteran options, he’s done a lot of losing in his career.  
 

Can he come here and shed the loser’s moniker or is that just who he is as a QB?  Plus he gets a lot of garbage time yards vs prevent defenses after he’s thrown early interceptions or been ineffective early in games.  Also Stafford’s accuracy can be very erratic. I think we’d need more bigger high pointing receiving options to offset his tendency to spray the ball high. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

A first and a second for Stafford seems very rich.  If we’re giving up that kind of draft capital, I’d rather go up and get us a young guy from the draft who we can groom and mold on our own.  As much as I like Stafford out of all the other veteran options, he’s done a lot of losing in his career.  
 

Can he come here and shed the loser’s moniker or is that just who he is as a QB?  Plus he gets a lot of garbage time yards vs prevent defenses after he’s thrown early interceptions or been ineffective early in games.  Also Stafford’s accuracy can be very erratic. I think we’d need more bigger high pointing receiving options to offset his tendency to spray the ball high. 

You aren't moving up far with a 1st and a second

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

You aren't moving up far with a 1st and a second

I know it would take more but a 1 & a 2 for Stafford just seems like a lot for a guy who has never even won a playoff game.  I’d rather add another 2 & a 1 and get up into the top 5.   Now, if you said a 2nd for Stafford.  Fine. 2nd & a 3rd or 4th.  Fine.  But a 1 & a 2 is too high.  You give that up for an aging Rodgers.  Maybe our first and second for their high 2nd???  Maybe. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

I know it would take more but a 1 & a 2 for Stafford just seems like a lot for a guy who has never even won a playoff game.  I’d rather add another 2 & a 1 and get up into the top 5.   Now, if you said a 2nd for Stafford.  Fine. 2nd & a 3rd or 4th.  Fine.  But a 1 & a 2 is too high.  You give that up for an aging Rodgers.  Maybe our first and second for their high 2nd???  Maybe. 

Moving into the top 5 would cost 3 1s several 2s and 3s and that might not even be enough

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Moving into the top 5 would cost 3 1s several 2s and 3s and that might not even be enough

Well we aren’t giving up that for anybody but Mahomes.  I think two 1’s and a couple 2’s would be the max we’d do.  Maybe throw in a player like Rock. Would Saleh (former 49ers DC & new Jets HC) be interested in Rock?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smoke317 said:

Well we aren’t giving up that for anybody but Mahomes.  I think two 1’s and a couple 2’s would be the max we’d do.  Maybe throw in a player like Rock. Would Saleh (former 49ers DC & new Jets HC) be interested in Rock?

If that's what we offered this is what would happen 200.gif

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Smoke317 said:

A first and a second for Stafford seems very rich.  If we’re giving up that kind of draft capital, I’d rather go up and get us a young guy from the draft who we can groom and mold on our own.  As much as I like Stafford out of all the other veteran options, he’s done a lot of losing in his career.  
 

Can he come here and shed the loser’s moniker or is that just who he is as a QB?  Plus he gets a lot of garbage time yards vs prevent defenses after he’s thrown early interceptions or been ineffective early in games.  Also Stafford’s accuracy can be very erratic. I think we’d need more bigger high pointing receiving options to offset his tendency to spray the ball high. 

Just to give you an idea of how draft trades work when the Redskins moved up nine spots to pick 26 at the end of the first round it cost them two second rounders.  A first and second aren’t going to get you up high enough to take a QB unless someone majorly slips and if that happens you have to wonder why they are falling that far.  Yes Rodgers slipped but so Johnny Football and Brady Quinn and guys who have careers that turn out like that are far more common for QBs who slip that far in the first round than a guy like Rodgers.  They slip because teams don’t think he’s the guy.  
 

Now with that said I do think that’s what Ballard was talking about when he said it takes a little luck.  He knows for them to get a QB early in the draft someone he really likes is going to have to slip some.  So I wouldn’t rule out him going up to get someone if they slip bit picking at 21 your talking mid first round at the earliest for a first and second.  They aren’t going to jump into the top ten for that.  

 

the closet I can find to that kind of move is the Jets going up 12 picks from 17 to 5 to get Sanchez and it cost them a first, a second, and three players.  Point being it didn’t come cheap and 1st and 2nd alone isn’t going to get you where you want to be to get a stud QB when your picking 21 in all likely hood.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2021 at 9:09 PM, jvan1973 said:

Did Ballard pick on you as a child?  Steal your lunch money?  

 I was to poor to have lunch money. Looking at Ballard, I doubt he would have been successful in bullying me or anyone else on this forum. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

 I was to poor to have lunch money. Looking at Ballard, I doubt he would have been successful in bullying me or anyone else on this forum. 

He was a D1 football player.   He grew up in Texas.    I'm guessing he was pretty jacked as a young man.     He lunch money taking ability was probably pretty good.  Assuming he was into that kind of thing

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/15/2021 at 10:25 AM, richard pallo said:

I would be open to Darnold over Wentz.  Considering he was a high pick and only 23 with a lot of playing experience on a very bad team I would not have a problem with bringing him over.  No reason to think he couldn't succeed in the right circumstances like Tannehill did.  He would be my option 3. 

What have u seen out of Darnold that would make u think he would excel with the Colts. Please dont give me the exscuse he has played with no talent. If he is a legit #3 overall pick and a franchise qb, you would have seen some wow moments over the last 3 years. Have u seen anything to suggest he is the answer? If so, please provide proof. Just because he was drafted #3 overall does not mean he has undiscovered talent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My takeaway from Ballard is that they are looking for something long term. Rivers and the Colts will part ways.

 

I think if Mac Jones is available at 21 we draft him. He has great pocket presence and one of the best deep ball throwers I’ve seen enter the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

What have u seen out of Darnold that would make u think he would excel with the Colts. Please dont give me the exscuse he has played with no talent. If he is a legit #3 overall pick and a franchise qb, you would have seen some wow moments over the last 3 years. Have u seen anything to suggest he is the answer? If so, please provide proof. Just because he was drafted #3 overall does not mean he has undiscovered talent.

He has discovered talent alright.  That's why he was drafted No. 3 overall.  I watch Colt's games not Jet's games.  But I have seen plenty of wow moment highlights from him over the last three years on post game highlights.  So he has the talent and the move to a good team with a good OL and a good coach could be a great situation for him.  That's where the Colts come into play.  That said It looks like his new coach is going to keep him and build the team around him.  So I'm expecting they pull a "Ballard" and trade back in the 1st. round.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Interesting there are stories coming out that Wentz is uncoachable. Then I saw a story the eagles wanted to fire Reich and pederson stood up for him.

As the world turns.  Heard that earlier about Wentz.  Reich that's a new one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Smoke317 said:

I know it would take more but a 1 & a 2 for Stafford just seems like a lot    Now, if you said a 2nd for Stafford.  Fine. 2nd & a 3rd or 4th.  Fine.  But a 1 & a 2 is too high.  You give that up for an aging Rodgers.  Maybe our first and second for their high 2nd???  Maybe. 

 

Who's ever won in Detroit?  It's a Franchise so bad that 2 all time greats retired early(Sanders &Calvin) because of frustration of losing so much.

You seem more concerned about amount of compensation we give up to get him than actually if we get him?

 

If he can lead us to a Super Bowl it matters little of the cost of a higher round pick to get him.... if he cant get us to a Super Bowl, it matters even less how cheap he comes.

 

We need a QB that can play at a high level in playoffs to beat QB's like Mahomes, Allen etc... and maybe overcome a dropped pass or two, less than perfect coaching decisions,  and maybe a call against us.

 

Is Stafford the guy, I don't know?

That's the question I'm more concerned with.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

Who's ever won in Detroit?  It's a Franchise so bad that 2 all time greats retired early(Sanders &Calvin) because of frustration of losing so much.

You seem more concerned about amount of compensation we give up to get him than actually if we get him?

 

If he can lead us to a Super Bowl it matters little of the cost of a higher round pick to get him.... if he cant get us to a Super Bowl, it matters even less how cheap he comes.

 

We need a QB that can play at a high level in playoffs to beat QB's like Mahomes, Allen etc... and maybe overcome a dropped pass or two, less than perfect coaching decisions,  and maybe a call against us.

 

Is Stafford the guy, I don't know?

That's the question I'm more concerned with.

 

When you put it like that:  Beat Mahomes, overcome a dropped pass or two or less than perfect coaching decisions then I have more doubts than before about Stafford.  I didn’t follow the Lions much but we all know they’re a crap organization. But was that his M.O. there?  Overcoming the organizations shortcomings?  Or did all this time wallowing in that crap leave him stained and he’s become an underachiever just like the team?  I fear his ceiling will be what Rivers gave us this year.  And if we play a tougher schedule we could easily fall back to 9-7 or 8-8. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

He was a D1 football player.   He grew up in Texas.    I'm guessing he was pretty jacked as a young man.     He lunch money taking ability was probably pretty good.  Assuming he was into that kind of thing

He also looked pretty tough and wanting to punch someone in the nose when they asked if he has the right staff to train a new Qb in his press conference 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, jvan1973 said:

You aren't moving up far with a 1st and a second

The Chefs moved from 27 to 10 to draft Mahomes for a 1 & 3...we can do plenty in the draft with a 1 & 2

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/15/2021 at 11:25 AM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

To follow this up. Moncrief comes to mind as a huge disappointment. I thought he could be a great #2 at least. He was a dud lmao . Campbell I was so excited about but he gets injured too much.

 

Hes on the Jets practice squad..... the jets.....  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, richard pallo said:

He has discovered talent alright.  That's why he was drafted No. 3 overall.  I watch Colt's games not Jet's games.  But I have seen plenty of wow moment highlights from him over the last three years on post game highlights.  So he has the talent and the move to a good team with a good OL and a good coach could be a great situation for him.  That's where the Colts come into play.  That said It looks like his new coach is going to keep him and build the team around him.  So I'm expecting they pull a "Ballard" and trade back in the 1st. round.  

A lot of guys have been drafted in the top 5 and do nothing in the NFL. So tell me. What is it that u like about Darnold. Whst have u seen in his 3 years that leads u to believe he will  become a franchise wb with a change of scenery.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Riversrun said:

He should beg Rivers to come back period .He should go get a LT replace Ya sin and make a JUJU a huge priority.

 

Ballard hasn't given up on rock which he made pretty clear in his end of season talk. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

A lot of guys have been drafted in the top 5 and do nothing in the NFL. So tell me. What is it that u like about Darnold. Whst have u seen in his 3 years that leads u to believe he will  become a franchise wb with a change of scenery.

He went 7-6 in 2019 in the 13 games he played, with terrible team around him. That's pretty impressive in mu book.

 

 

The biggest thing about him is his $4.7m salary if traded. Cheap low risk, potential high reward, kind of guy.

 

That salary would allow the Colts to retain depth and add quite a few pieces to the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, w87r said:

He went 7-6 in 2019 in the 13 games he played, with terrible team around him. That's pretty impressive in mu book.

 

 

The biggest thing about him is his $4.7m salary if traded. Cheap low risk, potential high reward, kind of guy.

 

That salary would allow the Colts to retain depth and add quite a few pieces to the team.

Good point bout salary. U never know....the Jets may keep him and trade out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Good point bout salary. U never know....the Jets may keep him and trade out.

I would trade out if I was the Jets, unless Jags take Fields.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, w87r said:

I would trade out if I was the Jets, unless Jags take Fields.

Yeah I think that’s what the Jets will do.  Hope someone falls in love with Fields and is wanting to come up to get him.  
 

even with hiring Meyer I don’t think the Jags pass on Lawrence.  If they do the Jets will run that pick up to podium.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jags & Meyer are drafting Lawrence. He's probably why Meyer is coming to NFL. 

If the Jets decide to keep Darnold and trade #2 pick, I hope Ballard  tries to win the bidding war to move up to draft Fields.

Bring back Rivers or acquire a veteran QB for a season and let Fields learn from the sidelines for a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Jags & Meyer are drafting Lawrence. He's probably why Meyer is coming to NFL. 

If the Jets decide to keep Darnold and trade #2 pick, I hope Ballard  tries to win the bidding war to move up to draft Fields.

Bring back Rivers or acquire a veteran QB for a season and let Fields learn from the sidelines for a year.

I want nothing to do with Fields.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They were never going to pick Lamar in 2018   Karl Joseph is a bench player and Fitzpatrick is much better than him anyways   Not sure what this post is getting after
    • They are likely kicking the can down the road, and the negative consequence is higher cap numbers for those players in future seasons, and greater cap penalties to move on from those players in future seasons. The thing is there's no much else they can do. they're set to be nearly $70m over the cap in 2021, and other than these restructures, they would not be able to get under the cap by the start of the new league year. They would have to cut or trade all of their highly paid players.
    • I feel the hype about Carl Lawson is from a combination of people who haven't really watched him play, and who overrate "pressures" by assuming that all pressures are equally disruptive.    Lawson is a tough, physical, high effort guy, he tackles well, plays the run reasonably well, he has decent size, and he would fit nicely as a DE for us. He's not a dynamic pass rusher, and I don't think he ever would be a dynamic pass rusher.   He has some quickness and speed, good speed to power, but he's not the kind of explosive pass rusher that blows up the other team's blocking schemes. He has below average bend and closing speed, and he takes a lot of steps, which explains his tragically poor three cone. He also has below average length, and gets neutralized by good blockers. This is all obvious on his tape, it was obvious on his college tape, and it's why he went in the 4th round.   TomDiggs mentioned Lawson's knockdowns/hits and hurries. PFF recorded six edge rushers with at least QB 15 hits; despite the fact that Lawson had 24 hits, he only had five sacks, which is the least sacks among those six players. In fact, there were ten edges with fewer than 15 QB hits, but with at least ten sacks. PFF has 24 edges with at least 30 pressures; Lawson had 34 hurries, but was tied for fifth fewest sacks among those 24 players. In fact, there were five edges with fewer hurries than Lawson, but at least ten sacks.   My point is that QB hits and pressures only show a player that manages to get near the QB at some point during the play. Without context, they don't necessarily show a player that makes a definite impact on the play. That's why I value PFF's pass rush productivity (PRP) stat, because sacks are weighted more heavily than hits and pressures. And that makes sense because a sack ends the play. A QB can be pressured, even hit, and still make a positive play. Recognizing a sack as nearly always a negative play for the offense, PRP shows the difference between a guy who gets near the QB, and a pass rusher who makes plays for the defense. Sometimes the overlap is not as great as you might think.   Lawson's PRP was 8.5, tied for #18, well separated from guys like Bosa (10.6) and Watt (9.7). In general, a player with a bunch of total pressures, but low sack numbers, like Lawson, is a guy who gets a bunch of pass rush snaps but doesn't have the length, bend and closing speed to get home often enough. This is why guys like Trey Hendrickson and Leonard Floyd can have a third fewer total pressures, but twice as many sacks as Lawson (Hendrickson also had 80 fewer pass rush snaps). And Lawson gets a ton of pass rush snaps because he plays for a bad team with no other good edge rushers, so as long as he's healthy he'll have a lot of pressures, but he'll probably never be a big sack guy.   He's Trey Flowers. Better 40, same agility, not as long, mid level edge rusher who is well rounded and a good guy to have on your team, but not a dominant pass rusher. I can't see offering him $14m/year to not sack the QB. Any projection that has him as a big time sack guy is unrealistic, IMO.
    • It's nice to see Pittman, Smith and Okereke get some love.
    • Did I misread your post?   Did you not say you were in favor of moving Nelson to LT?   That if we’re going to pay him top dollar, it would be better to do it with him as our LT instead of at LG?    That wasn’t you?    I’m sorry, I thought that’s what I responded to.... 
  • Members

    • Roosarioo

      Roosarioo 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 559

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • kornstar

      kornstar 137

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 291

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...