Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Chris Ballard end of season presser tomorrow 1 pm


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

I think a lot of teams do and will pay handsomely to move up to get him if the Jets foolishly pass on him and trade the pick. 

I am sure lots of teams do I am not debating that.  I just think he’s very overrated much like Haskins.  That’s just my personal opinion though.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 377
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My takes:  wants to keep Rivers but both sides need time   likes Eason but isn’t sold on him as the backup yet let alone the starter.  I don’t expect the Colts to roll with him as the starte

Btw, if there's no Combine, this is gonna be one of the worst drafts in a while for a lot of teams.

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

I am sure lots of teams do I am not debating that.  I just think he’s very overrated much like Haskins.  That’s just my personal opinion though.  

 

You could be right, I personally think he's a good prospect and you keep trying to find a QB until you have one.

And the colts desperately need one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

You could be right, I personally think he's a good prospect and you keep trying to find a QB until you have one.

And the colts desperately need one.

I don’t disagree about the later I just don’t think Fields is the answer but I am also not a NFL scout or GM obviously.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Lol, not only is Ballard the greatest Draft guru & GM of all time, but he's also a tough guy that can kick anybody's rear end....haha

 

Theres no way in hell Ballard does what is needed to make that trade up happen. At that cost you better get a sure fire franchise QB and youre not getting that in nearly anyone in the draft. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t pretend to be a college scout.  I don’t watch much CFB and I have thought guys are going to be good that sucked and guys I thought would suck were good.

 

but.  I saw 4 games by fields this year.  He sucked v, IU. NW, and Bama.  He was great v. Clemson.  I have serious doubts.  But I have seen a couple of rare throws., and he’s pretty sporty with the feet.

 

I would hate to be ina position to have to draft him,  I lean bust on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, coltsfanatic24 said:

My takeaway from Ballard is that they are looking for something long term. Rivers and the Colts will part ways.

 

I think if Mac Jones is available at 21 we draft him. He has great pocket presence and one of the best deep ball throwers I’ve seen enter the league. 

Sounds like you just described a young QB already on the team roster...    :^)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ztboiler said:

2018 1 & 2017 3

Thats the price for the swap to trade up.  You don’t get to count the benefit in the cost.

If I'm Ballard and want to move up to get a certain QB I would consider offering Leonard as part of a trade package.  Especially to an NFC team.  We would still have playmakers like Buckner and Moore on defense and possibly Blackmon and Willis as well.  His trade value would be very high now and it's one less big contract we would avoid paying.  He's a great player no doubt but if by trading him we get the guy Ballard thinks is our future I would bring him up as part of the discussion.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If I'm Ballard and want to move up to get a certain QB I would consider offering Leonard as part of a trade package.  Especially to an NFC team.  We would still have playmakers like Buckner and Moore on defense and possibly Blackmon and Willis as well.  His trade value would be very high now and it's one less big contract we would avoid paying.  He's a great player no doubt but if by trading him we get the guy Ballard thinks is our future I would bring him up as part of the discussion.  

Football No GIF by Indianapolis Colts

 

No thanks

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, w87r said:

Football No GIF by Indianapolis Colts

 

No thanks

We got Buckner for the 13th straight up.  No other picks involved.  Ballard loves his picks.  I don't think you can rule it out.  But I would still rather trade for Stafford though.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

We got Buckner for the 13th straight up.  No other picks involved.  Ballard loves his picks.  I don't think you can rule it out.  But I would still rather trade for Stafford though.  

If Rivers does wind up coming back he could do this to get his future QB to sit behind Rivers for a year ,like Mahomes did, and still keep his picks and avoid paying a big new contract for Leonard down the road.  I don't think it's entirely out of the realm of possibility. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

We got Buckner for the 13th straight up.  No other picks involved.  Ballard loves his picks.  I don't think you can rule it out.  But I would still rather trade for Stafford though.  

I get it, you just don't trade a proven All Pro, for what essentially is a dice roll.

 

Open another huge hole and maybe not even fill the one you traded for in the first place.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I am not sure this is the epic qb draft that people r saying it is.

Hard telling, its a gamble no doubt.

 

I like a few of the guys but am not trading an All Pro on a gamble. I trade picks first.

 

Here's to hoping Eason can be that guy in the future. No one knows yet, but imo, he has all the tools Allen came into the league with.

 

If Rivers comes back, we should know by next season if Eason has any potential to be long term answer.

 

If Rivers retires, hopefully Stafford comes available. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Rivers comes back you for sure need a QB for '22, probably a youngster. 

 

If you trade for Stafford,  his replacement doesn't have to be addressed for a few years.

This is why I think Ballard may go for Stafford. Wentz would also be in the equation but the Eagles probably fired Pederson for him to stay.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Superman   @w87r   So, among many things, I get e-mail from Sports Illustrated every day.   And the other day,  there was this article written by Andew Brandt, who used to handle the contracts and salary cap issues for the Packers for 10 years.    And one thing he wrote jumped off the page at me.     Now, here's why I remind our two resident Salary Cap experts I noted above about something they have both talked about,  but I haven't seen either of them talk about this year.   Roll Over.   According to Brandt,  the Colts have the MOST SALARY CAP ROLLOVER in the NFL.   $30 MIl.    So, whatever the general 2021 team salary cap turns out to be,  you can add $30 Mill for the Colts.     I'm going to do two things.     I'm going to link the entire article for everyone.    It's free, non-premium,   and I'm also going to cut and paste the key section for everyone to read right here.      OK....    here's the article...      And just for discussion purposes,  Brandt uses a projected salary cap of $185.   He's NOT saying that's what the final number will be,  only his own hypothetical number for his article.   https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/03/02/business-of-football-understanding-the-salary-cap-dead-money?suid=5cc1cc3a3f92a475c0234f43&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SI Extra 030221&utm_term=SI Extra - USE THIS - List     Here is the key text:   Myth: Every NFL team’s cap number is going to be $185 million   No. Actually, no team’s cap number is going to be $185 million (or whatever the final cap number is). The 2011 CBA, for the first time, allowed teams to carry over unused cap room from one year to the next. In managing the cap for the Packers, we did not have that option; it was use it or lose it. I had to negotiate * incentives—such as a clause giving our third-string quarterback $20 million if he threw seven touchdowns in our last game—to carry over cap room. (When he didn’t earn the incentive, we would get it as a credit toward the next year.) Now teams don’t have to play those games. As per NFLPA numbers, every team in the league has carried over 2020 cap room, from a low of roughly $500,000 for the Ravens to a high of more than $30 million for the Colts. Teams carrying over $20-plus million of cap include the Jets, Browns, Eagles, Cowboys and Jaguars. Thus, although the team cap is $185 million, the Colts’ adjusted cap will be around $215 million, and so on. And again, these teams have been preparing, or should have been preparing, for this reduced cap for months.   What say you both, Superman and w87r?     What do you think of what Brandt has written?    Does everyone have to re-do their off-season mocks reflecting a team figure of $215?     I look forward to hearing from both of you and others!
    • Jets take Zach Wilson  dolphins up
    • I have to agree. His draft order is not always spot on but his ability to evaluate talent is always in the ballpark as to what GMs agree on.  As it turned out Tobin's rant ended up being pretty lame after Trev Alberts ended up being one of the Colts all time bust. Not only was Alberts a bust, so was Tobin. 
    • I don’t know why after so many years there are so many people who still believe Kiper  doesn’t know what he’s talking about? The exact opposite is true.   Always has been.   He’s lasted more than 35 years and for very good reason.    But I’ve been reading this here since I showed up nearly nine years ago.  Some falsehoods die slowly around here.   
  • Members

    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 399

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dgierhart

      dgierhart 1

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 8,375

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 538

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...