Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Chris Ballard end of season presser tomorrow 1 pm


Recommended Posts

Like last year it will be streamed live. Facebook, Colts app, and colts.com. At 1:00 pm.

 

What do you hope to hear? Ballard usually is just a straight shooter. Maybe we can keep everything in this thread from the presser.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 377
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My takes:  wants to keep Rivers but both sides need time   likes Eason but isn’t sold on him as the backup yet let alone the starter.  I don’t expect the Colts to roll with him as the starte

Btw, if there's no Combine, this is gonna be one of the worst drafts in a while for a lot of teams.

How he handles the Phillip Rivers questions.  Will he come right out and say he would like him to return for another year.  I want him to say we will evaluate all of our options and will not commit one way or the other at this time.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate the season ending but this is my favorite part after the season ends. Ballard can easily avoid the rivers question. He can just say rivers played great football and we will see what he decides. Yeah that’s vague but doesn’t force him to answer it. I actually expect more from him. He usually just tells or like it is. I can also see him saying rivers played great football but he knows at his age this is a business. Reich already basically said that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be an interesting one, Rivers is an elephant in the room.  Personally i think they will invite him back.  Im sure they will ask him about Luck again too

 

lots of free agents to talk about and a glaring hole at left tackle now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully expect Ballard to take the blame for LT. He does usually go through players and talk about how they played. This will have a much different tone though then last years 7-9 team. He should be much happier. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I’m the Colts, I’d want to be vague on Rivers other than he was awesome. If they want to trade, Rivers provides leverage because other teams think they will stick with Rivers if price too steep. Similarly, in draft, it’s good if other teams don’t know your plans and deepest desires because it can be used against you. Best example is 2004 draft where everyone knew how badly Giants wanted Eli and they got reamed. 
 

I wonder if Colts will wait until after draft (or trade if applicable) to make a decision on Rivers. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

If I’m the Colts, I’d want to be vague on Rivers other than he was awesome. If they want to trade, Rivers provides leverage because other teams think they will stick with Rivers if price too steep. Similarly, in draft, it’s good if other teams don’t know your plans and deepest desires because it can be used against you. Best example is 2004 draft where everyone knew how badly Giants wanted Eli and they got reamed. 
 

I wonder if Colts will wait until after draft (or trade if applicable) to make a decision on Rivers. 

It worked out for the Giants

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

If I’m the Colts, I’d want to be vague on Rivers other than he was awesome. If they want to trade, Rivers provides leverage because other teams think they will stick with Rivers if price too steep. Similarly, in draft, it’s good if other teams don’t know your plans and deepest desires because it can be used against you. Best example is 2004 draft where everyone knew how badly Giants wanted Eli and they got reamed. 
 

I wonder if Colts will wait until after draft (or trade if applicable) to make a decision on Rivers. 

My guess is if we don’t hear something on rivers in the next few weeks then something else could be going down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

At this point I don't think he'll say too much. He'll be pretty vague. Too many things are up in the air right now......

He will be honest like he always is but like you said too much up in the air for him to be specific.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Rivers is our starting QB at this time” is not something he can really say (since he’s not under contract). I think it will be intentionally vague...and then Rivers will retire after the SB. Just my prediction. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jvan1973 said:

It worked out for the Giants

Perhaps, but the Chargers didn’t even want Eli. Giants could have had him for nothing, rather than giving up a king’s ransom. In fact, that trade alone is one reason why Bolts were so loaded from 2004-2009. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

Perhaps, but the Chargers didn’t even want Eli. Giants could have had him for nothing, rather than giving up a king’s ransom. In fact, that trade alone is one reason why Bolts were so loaded from 2004-2009. 

They would have had to traded up to get him.    The raiders or cards could have taken eli or a qb needy team could have moved ahead of the giants. 

 

 I'm sure they are happy with the 2 rings they got

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

They could have already decided that yes they want rivers to come back and not look elsewhere.  In that case they wouldn’t need to be vague.

If Rivers comes back, that makes the QB solution pretty simple. Rivers starts, Eason is the backup. If that happens I would draft a LT at 21 and then take a pass rusher in round 2.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bolts2Colts said:

If I’m the Colts, I’d want to be vague on Rivers other than he was awesome. If they want to trade, Rivers provides leverage because other teams think they will stick with Rivers if price too steep. Similarly, in draft, it’s good if other teams don’t know your plans and deepest desires because it can be used against you. Best example is 2004 draft where everyone knew how badly Giants wanted Eli and they got reamed. 
 

I wonder if Colts will wait until after draft (or trade if applicable) to make a decision on Rivers. 

Um by the draft, they will know whether or not Rivers is a colt so that doesn’t hold much water. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

I still think we go for a cornerback with one of the top two picks.

 

It's a definite possibility.  Tyson Campbell from UGA could be there at #21.  He was teammates with Surtain (#1 overall CB in the draft) in HS.

 

I could see 2 things happening:

 

1) Colts draft either an EDGE or CB in Round 1, and an OT in Round 2.

 

2) Ballard re-signs Rivers for a 1-year deal, then goes for his franchise QB by trading up to the top 10 for someone like Wilson or Lance. 

 

Ballard actually drops some pretty big hints in his press conferences.  The last two years, he has talked about how much he believes in building the trenches, and then he proceeded to draft Nelson in Round 1 and then traded for Buckner the next year. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

If Rivers comes back, that makes the QB solution pretty simple. Rivers starts, Eason is the backup. If that happens I would draft a LT at 21 and then take a pass rusher in round 2.

They could still draft a QB in the first round. 

 

AC retiring might just seal rivers retirement.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, csmopar said:

Um by the draft, they will know whether or not Rivers is a colt so that doesn’t hold much water. 

Sorry what is the timing on when either side has to make a decision? Cam wasn’t signed with NE until after the draft. In 2018 Gates returned at last minute.  I could see a scenario where Rivers is open to returning (and they already know it’s Colts or retirement) but they put him on hold until they see if they get their QB in draft. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

Sorry what is the timing on when either side has to make a decision? Cam wasn’t signed with NE until after the draft. In 2018 Gates returned at last minute.  I could see a scenario where Rivers is open to returning (and they already know it’s Colts or retirement) but they put him on hold until they see if they get their QB in draft. 

I don’t think it will be the draft that determines if rivers comes back. It will be FA time period. After the explore other options like Wentz and Stafford. So my guess is we will know if Rivers comes back sometime in March. Around FA.That is about the time the Buckner trade happened. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

He’ll say “look” and refer to “o-line/d-line” at least a thousand times... 

 

he’ll also say he likes them picks and that the roster is in the right direction and point to players being picked up off the waiver when they release them, and point to coaches and executives on staff getting HC and GM interviews. 
 

He’s pointed to that as a goal of where to get to in order to show the success they are having internally since he came here 4 years ago. He will undoubtedly tout that as it truly is an accomplishment for him. He’s organized and runs a great organization, and it will show with the coaches climbing the ranks and his staff getting promotions elsewhere. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, zibby43 said:

Ballard actually drops some pretty big hints in his press conferences.  The last two years, he has talked about how much he believes in building the trenches, and then he proceeded to draft Nelson in Round 1 and then traded for Buckner the next year. 

This is so true.  Can’t wait to see what is said today

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t think about something. We may not now about rivers until the draft if they think Stafford is a option. Lions are going to want to make sure they get their guy in the draft. Wentz is a different story since they have Hurts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

I didn’t think about something. We may not now about rivers until the draft if they think Stafford is a option. Lions are going to want to make sure they get their guy in the draft. Wentz is a different story since they have Hurts.

They will know about rivers before the draft. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

They will know about rivers before the draft. 

Possibly not if they want to go after Stafford.  They might know his intentions that he wants to come back but if they are at all thinking Stafford is a option that might not be known until the draft. I really do hate having a 4th QB in 4 years so I hope if we go change it’s s longer option. Still have Eason if things go sideways with another vet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to know what he will say today but we do know that at some point in the offseason, he always says quite clearly what he thinks the focus should be, and he sticks to that.

 

With the Nelson pick, he spoke very clearly about the need to be stronger on the line. Picked Q.

Last draft, he spoke clearly about how the 3 tech drove the whole 'thing'. Traded #1 and got Buckner.

He's pretty crystal clear about what the primary focus will be. The interesting part is what the secondary filling is. Last year, outside of Buckner, he added guys like Rhodes who were not heralded but played a huge role at the end of the day. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Superman said:

Getting an interesting vibe from Ballard at the start of this one...

Post some updates if possible, not where I can watch or listen at moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not drafting a QB high. The most animated he got in this whole interview so far was to tell the journalists that drafting a QB will get them off his *, but the question is whether it will solve the problem. This by itself doesn't mean much, but just... something about the way he went about answering this question... it makes me think he's not crazy about the prospect of drafting a QB. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think people in general think this roster is better and further along than it really is...

 

16 minutes ago, stitches said:

In what way? What's the vibe? 

 

I don't know, I was probably being paranoid. Felt like an announcement was coming...

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Superman said:

I think people in general think this roster is better and further along than it really is...

I think Ballard thinks this roster is better than it is too. We are in a horrific shape at the most important positions for winning - QB, LT, DE, CB, WR...

 

We have zero surefire long-term starters at the first 4 of those. And we might or might not have one at WR... still TBD. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ballard has traded his first round pick each of the last three years. Different circumstances in each case, so maybe not a pattern, but the idea that Ballard is willing to give up his first rounder for what he perceives as "value" is not a made up concept.   And we don't have to rehash the 2019 decision, but suggesting it was not the correct path seems to be based on either wanting Sweat, not liking Ya-Sin, or some combination of the two. That sets aside the likelihood that Sweat wasn't on their board. It also misses the point of a trade back, which is based on their idea of value at that point in the draft, not just on who they can/do pick. That trade netted the Colts #34 in the 2020 draft. There's no question that they got great value out of that trade.   Listening to Ballard talk about how he approaches the draft, and comparing it to the moves he's made, he seems to favor having greater value than he does having higher picks. His words: "I love them picks." The trade up for Taylor is an exception, but that cost him a fifth. Compare that to trading back in 2019, and picking up a future second. It's a different story entirely.   Sitting at #21, with the QB position addressed, and IMO the first round being very top heavy with a bit of a logjam of similar talent outside of the top 15 guys (setting aside QBs), I think any team would be exploring a trade, up or down. If you have a major need at a critical position, you can't expect a great prospect to fall to the 20s. And I think there's a clear separation between the first tier and the second tier -- especially at tackle and edge -- with a lot of good prospects at those positions on Day 2.    If I had to bet right now, I'd bet that we trade back. Especially after the Wentz deal, but also after getting a better idea for the way this draft seems to set to go.    One thing worth considering, but that I don't think is likely to happen, is a variation on @richard pallo's scenario. Just because the first three picks will be QBs, and maybe Denver comes up to four, and Philly might take a QB, or Detroit might move down for a team who wants a QB... we might have five QBs in the top ten, probably will have five in the top 20, so there are a couple of top 15 prospects who might last to #21. But I think they'll be DB/LB/WR prospects, not edge/tackle prospects, because again, I think the value for edge/tackle is on Day 2 if you can't get one of the top guys.   So maybe Darrisaw or Slater or Paye -- someone that the Colts really like at one of these high value positions -- is still available at #16, and they have an opportunity to move up. That might result in the Colts having just four or five picks in this year's draft. But I don't realistically see that happening. Ballard likes having more picks, and he doesn't like trading future picks (he's only done it once, for a QB they see as a potential franchise anchor). But I don't think that's likely.
    • If you look at last years draft 7 of the 9 picks were made via trades. Mostly trading down, but we did trade up in the 2nd round to draft Taylor.(great move by the way!) There is nothing wrong with maneuvering around throughout the draft for more picks and better positioning, Ballard is actually pretty good at it.
    • I remember signing to my baby girl, it is so refreshing to see this, thank you.
    • Bengals are willing to trade back in the draft and welcome offers for their no. 5 pick. 
  • Members

    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 263

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,407

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 432

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 8,633

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gspdx

      gspdx 617

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,476

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 1,263

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 112

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 231

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsman1788

      Coltsman1788 1,502

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...