Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

I think with AC retiring Colts should look for a mobile QB


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, JediXMan said:

Either through free agency or Draft. I love what Rivers has done this season. It’s was one of the Funnest seasons in a long time. This team really struggled without AC. I think a mobile QB can do a better job at masking that. Just look at the final 4 AFC QBs what do they all have in common? 

Kind of my thought, too.  
 

Love Rivers.  He’s like Peyton Manning from the field general perspective, but the protection just has to be so perfect with him.  I think it would be best to find THE guy that can make things happen when all is breaking down around him.  Kind of like an Andrew Luck.  
 

Too much to ask?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just get Phillip a Segway.  Problem solved

All I know is, Buffalo is headed to the AFC Championship Game after their dominant victory over Baltimore and we came alot closer to beating them with our "statue" QB Philip Rivers than the Ravens did

Either through free agency or Draft. I love what Rivers has done this season. It’s was one of the Funnest seasons in a long time. This team really struggled without AC. I think a mobile QB can do a be

Losing AC  creates a hole that has to be filled - draft and FA market. We may need to find seasoned FA who can  play tackle and draft hight to build depth on the roster. 

I think it also puts more focus on getting a mobile QB who can run and pass. Josh Allen evading the Colts pass rush contributed to the Bills win on Saturday. Both games we played against Houston showed just how much a force Watsson was in both games. He almost single handedly beat us with his mobility as well as some good throws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AC this morning sounded happy to be retired, with his ankle 'elevated'.

I listened to many Parcels press conferences, expressing concern with moving linemen, so I like anchoring Q eternally at LG.

If Bakhtiari recovers OK, Veldheer may not want to play backup in Green Bay, so maybe we'll have another chance.

Or, can we just make Veldheer an offer he can't refuse?

(he may prefer to head back to the Raiders, now that they're in Vegas...that's where I'd be aiming...)

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still day Nelson to Tackle makes the best sense. 

 

He was a Tackle going into ND but the 5 olinemen put McGlinchey at LT. Heck, there was an interview with the two of them where he admitted Nelson was both the best option at LT but also at LG.....

 

Pinter played well in his spot duties and can move well enough to pull and trap. He won't pancake a bunch of folks like Q.....but who does?

 

The answer to LT and to young, mobile QB with big arm are both in house.

 

Having said that, I would take Winston and his corrected vision or Dak and his repaired ankle over everyone at this point as street free agents over Wentz or Stafford in trade or whatever scraps are left for us at 21.....

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/13/2021 at 11:44 PM, Scott Pennock said:

Still day Nelson to Tackle makes the best sense. 

 

He was a Tackle going into ND but the 5 olinemen put McGlinchey at LT. Heck, there was an interview with the two of them where he admitted Nelson was both the best option at LT but also at LG.....

 

Pinter played well in his spot duties and can move well enough to pull and trap. He won't pancake a bunch of folks like Q.....but who does?

 

The answer to LT and to young, mobile QB with big arm are both in house.

 

Having said that, I would take Winston and his corrected vision or Dak and his repaired ankle over everyone at this point as street free agents over Wentz or Stafford in trade or whatever scraps are left for us at 21.....

winston likes to leave supermarkets without seeing the checkout girls.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2021 at 10:53 AM, JediXMan said:

Either through free agency or Draft. I love what Rivers has done this season. It’s was one of the Funnest seasons in a long time. This team really struggled without AC. I think a mobile QB can do a better job at masking that. Just look at the final 4 AFC QBs what do they all have in common? 

Or they do like Tennessee. Build a strong running cheap Oline

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Thunderbolt said:

Isn't Eason mobile enough? Betcha he's more mobile than Rivers and Brissett.

If not, he  reportedly has a very quick release which to me is equivalent to being mobile 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I know is, Buffalo is headed to the AFC Championship Game after their dominant victory over Baltimore and we came alot closer to beating them with our "statue" QB Philip Rivers than the Ravens did with their very mobile, MVP caliber QB in Lamar Jackson.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Lancer1 said:

All I know is, Buffalo is headed to the AFC Championship Game after their dominant victory over Baltimore and we came alot closer to beating them with our "statue" QB Philip Rivers than the Ravens did with their very mobile, MVP caliber QB in Lamar Jackson.

Yeah it’s amazing how the statue drove the offense up and down the field on Bills defense. I thought mobile QBs were so much more effective because they can extend plays. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

Yeah it’s amazing how the statue drove the offense up and down the field on Bills defense. I thought mobile QBs were so much more effective because they can extend plays. 

 

Rivers put up 24 points (would've been 34 with the made 33-yarder and Pittman hauling in the 4th down pass) against the Bills D.

 

The reigning MVP, who was ranked 7th in QBR for 2020, did virtually nothing against the Bills.

 

And yet, half of Colts nation is trying to run Rivers out of town because "mobility."  Not to mention the fact that he played half of the season with a broken toe/foot that may need to be surgically repaired.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

The Colts -- with their statue leader -- played the closest game of the playoffs against the hottest team of all time. 

 

Should have won. 

Not to mention that Brady or Brees game is going to be in the NFC title game.  People are way too hung up on the mobility factor.  Don’t get me wrong it’s nice and I am not against getting a QB who can move around but I don’t think it’s make or break like some are making it out to be.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Bolts2Colts said:

Yeah it’s amazing how the statue drove the offense up and down the field on Bills defense. I thought mobile QBs were so much more effective because they can extend plays. 

Lamar Jackson, probably the best running QB the NFL has seen since Michael Vick,  is now 1-3 in the postseason.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lancer1 said:

Lamar Jackson, probably the best running QB the NFL has seen since Michael Vick,  is now 1-3 in the postseason.

So true.  I'll take an easy pass on a running mobile QB.  Allen won't have a long career either.  I'll take the Brady's, Rogers, Brees, Rivers all the time for my franchise QB.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

So true.  I'll take an easy pass on a running mobile QB.  Allen won't have a long career either.  I'll take the Brady's, Rogers, Brees, Rivers all the time for my franchise QB.  

The “statute “ QBs play the longest

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

So true.  I'll take an easy pass on a running mobile QB.  Allen won't have a long career either.  I'll take the Brady's, Rogers, Brees, Rivers all the time for my franchise QB.  

Aaron Rodgers can run effectively but he picks his spots, and is primarily a thrower - if Josh Allen (who has a terrific arm) follows suit, he too could have a lengthy & productive career.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, zibby43 said:

 

Rivers put up 24 points (would've been 34 with the made 33-yarder and Pittman hauling in the 4th down pass) against the Bills D.

 

The reigning MVP, who was ranked 7th in QBR for 2020, did virtually nothing against the Bills.

 

And yet, half of Colts nation is trying to run Rivers out of town because "mobility."  Not to mention the fact that he played half of the season with a broken toe/foot that may need to be surgically repaired.

Two of the bills tds were luck as well. Allen completing a ridiculous  pass while falling down. Turay extending  a drive. Not to mention  not getting  any turnovers. Bills might pass their way to superbowl 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

Not to mention that Brady or Brees game is going to be in the NFC title game.  People are way too hung up on the mobility factor.  Don’t get me wrong it’s nice and I am not against getting a QB who can move around but I don’t think it’s make or break like some are making it out to be.  

If the ravens had rivers they would be going to afc championship 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Stephen said:

If the ravens had rivers they would be going to afc championship 

Honestly the colts with Rivers should have won last week.  The Bills playoff run is reminding of '06.  A high powered offense stalled in the post season and doing just enough to advance.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sumo63 said:

Honestly the colts with Rivers should have won last week.  The Bills playoff run is reminding of '06.  A high powered offense stalled in the post season and doing just enough to advance.

I agree. Funny how ravens defense  always  seem to play better than ours

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Stephen said:

If the ravens had rivers they would be going to afc championship 

I don’t know about that but I do think it would have been a closer game like last week was for the Colts at the very least.  I think Rivers would have made it a true 50/50 game where as the Bills seemed in control most of the night tonight, at least to me, even if the score didn’t show that.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Lancer1 said:

Aaron Rodgers can run effectively but he picks his spots, and is primarily a thrower - if Josh Allen (who has a terrific arm) follows suit, he too could have a lengthy & productive career.

Josh Allen has one of the best arms I’ve ever seen.  If he continues to develop I don’t think it’s long before he’s the best QB in the league with all due respect to Mahomes.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Stephen said:

I agree. Funny how ravens defense  always  seem to play better than ours

I'm still dead inside over our loss.  It was in hand!  We played good enough to win that game.  Just a couple, literally like 2, missed opportunities.  "Damn".......(Gordon Ramsay voice)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sumo63 said:

I'm still dead inside over our loss.  It was in hand!  We played good enough to win that game.  Just a couple, literally like 2, missed opportunities.  "Damn".......(Gordon Ramsay voice)

Yep sadly that’s often the difference in playoff games.  You aren’t offered the opportunity to make mistakes.  Still I hope people are seeing this team isn’t as far away as some thought they were even a few weeks ago.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Yep sadly that’s often the difference in playoff games.  You aren’t offered the opportunity to make mistakes.  Still I hope people are seeing this team isn’t as far away as some thought they were even a few weeks ago.  

I had super high expectations this year, maybe even unrealistic.  They were almost lived up to.  Almost, but I've been back on earth since the second Titans game......2020....*Ramsay..... I just need to move on......Colts should have played today tho.......*Ramsay

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sumo63 said:

I had super high expectations this year, maybe even unrealistic.  They were almost lived up to.  Almost, but I've been back on earth since the second Titans game......2020....*Ramsay..... I just need to move on......Colts should have played today tho.......*Ramsay

Need to add more explosiveness to  offense  and get better pash rush and we'll be  there

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Stephen said:

Need to add more explosiveness to  offense  and get better pash rush and we'll be  there

Need some help in the secondary too and a new left tackle.  Maybe a new QB too depending on what Rivers and the Colts decide. Some key positions to be addressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Sumo63 said:

Honestly the colts with Rivers should have won last week.  The Bills playoff run is reminding of '06.  A high powered offense stalled in the post season and doing just enough to advance.

Honestly  if rogers had had his hands under the ball for the int that is 7 less points for bills

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Need some help in the secondary too and a new left tackle.  Maybe a new QB too depending on what Rivers and the Colts decide. Some key positions to be addressed.

Got to get pass defense  to play like run defense 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Need some help in the secondary too and a new left tackle.  Maybe a new QB too depending on what Rivers and the Colts decide. Some key positions to be addressed.

We get tell back for secondary.  I am more concerned with  edge rusher

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Stephen said:

We get tell back for secondary.  I am more concerned with  edge rusher

tell will help but they could also lose Rhodes and I don’t expect Carrie back.  While I don’t think the Colts are giving up on Rock his struggles are real.  The secondary is going to need work and the safety position needs depth too.  I agree edge rusher is probably a bigger need, Especially with Houston and Autry being free agents, but the secondary needs help too.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Need to add more explosiveness to  offense  and get better pash rush and we'll be  there

I think there might be a touch more dysfunction philosophically.

Our (overly?) aggressive offense doesnt sit well with our passive (pass) defense.

We seem, in big games, to be giving up points at both ends.  Colts are close as you say, but they need to reconsile those two and form a solid identity.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Honestly  if rogers had had his hands under the ball for the int that is 7 less points for bills

It came down to a razor thin margin on execution and/or coaching. Colts had every opportunity to win.  I dont think Buffalo or the Ravens are unstoppable juggernauts.  That's why it hurts so much.

 

I'm pulling for the Browns now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Lancer1 said:

All I know is, Buffalo is headed to the AFC Championship Game after their dominant victory over Baltimore and we came alot closer to beating them with our "statue" QB Philip Rivers than the Ravens did with their very mobile, MVP caliber QB in Lamar Jackson.

Seriously? Where I agree we should have beaten Buffalo last week, the Ravens are a one trick pony tied to a QB who is not very good. Yes I said it, Jackson is terrible. He is a superior athlete making him highly efficient from a running standpoint sprinkled with very little passing efficiency. Once you consistently stop the Ravens running game which involves containing Jackson, the Ravens are not hard to beat. They might have given and/or give Lamar MVP awards but MVP he is not. He falls into same category with those who keep trying to convince all who will listen that Cam Newton was/is great QB... Ha!! What a joke. Either way, the Rivers not mobile vs. Jackson mobile argument is fine as your opinion but in reality is moot here. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, richard pallo said:

So true.  I'll take an easy pass on a running mobile QB.  Allen won't have a long career either.  I'll take the Brady's, Rogers, Brees, Rivers all the time for my franchise QB.  

Allen is not Jackson. Buffalo looks to throw from the pocket first. Him running and extending plays is just a extension of what he goes.  Jackson is basically run first. It’s easy to shut him down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobility is nice, but I don't want my franchise popping his AC joint on a scramble in Tennessee, only to have the coaching staff decide that letting the franchise play through it was the best bet to save their butt.

 

Or Mobility is nice, but Tom Brady and Peyton Manning and Ben Roethlisberger..

 

Or Mobility is nice, but we were all waiting on what happened to Lamar Jackson last night. (Not saying I wanted it to happen, just that I figured at some point he'd get rocked- he's only got a few of those).

 

I really think that skill set is overrated in relationship to winning SB's. Being a pocket passer is what a QB needs to be best at and the close second is personality/intelligence ect.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is some false equivalency at play in this topic. I'd argue if your line is worse, and is going to let up more pressure, then I'd rather take quick release over mobility. Quick release will cover a multitude of sins on a line, mobility is more helpful when the play breaks down and you're playing backyard football.

 

The issue with that, as we know all too well is that it exposes your QB to more physical risk. You don't see many old QBs you rely on their legs to get them out of trouble.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be a good deal for the Pats, not the most unbelievable trade either.
    • You ask a lot of good questions.    Unfortunately, I don't think that I, or anyone else,  has a lot of good answers.   Here's what I think we know.   Over The Cap has the Colts with just over $26 Mill.   Spotrac shows less,  and after the Carrie signing, I think we're going to be at $22.4 or so.   I also think we'd like to find a way to thread the financial needle and sign both Houston and Ertz (as a FA).   Even if you allowed $12 Mil for that, (Houston $7 mill and Ertz $5m)  that would leave us with roughly 10-$12 mill, give or take.   Currently, with our 6 picks,  Spotrac shows that will take roughly $6.5 to sign them.   But we all know Ballard has never had a draft class with less than 8 picks,  so expect two more, and that will bring the money needed to sign them to roughly $8 Mill.   Suddenly, we'd be down to $2-4 Mill and change.   Now, this is the part, where I don't know if @w87r  will step in for more financial adjustments that will show that we will have a few more $ than my math shows.    He's a wiz that way!      But typically, teams want 5-10% in reserve for in-season transactions.   BUT....   can you afford to have that much in reserve when your cap has shrunk to $185?     Yes?    No?    I don't know?     Who knows?   So....    lots of questions that need answers....    and we just don't know?    Both Houston and Ertz look like situations that might not resolve themselves until May......    So, we're left hanging....  
    • I vaguely remembered something like this but misremembered that I saw it on Hard Knocks so figured it couldn't haven't been the Colts.   Now that you mention this though, I think you're right.
    • OK....    I thought what I was saying was pretty obvious, but perhaps not,  so I'll try again....   If Chris Ballard wants to blow up and destroy everything he's spent the last 4 years building, I can't think of anything that would do it better than what you suggest.   I'm NOT saying CB should give Q and Darius blank contracts and say "fill in with the numbers you want"....   but CB will re-sign them and they will be big and generous contracts done without a lot of public fighting (unless someone gets WAY out of line with what they're asking.   But I'm not expecting that.)   Ballard has built a franchise built on culture.   We talk about here.   The team talks about it non-stop.    It's buzzing all over the city of Indianapolis.   It's even now buzzing around the NFL.    To suddenly play hardball with your best players, or worse,  trade them because they don't play the right position,  would literally destroy what he's built.   Blow-up the locker room.  Undercut  the relationships Frank Reich has with his players.   The rest of the team would see how we treated Q and Darius and think....   "why should I play hard for this franchise?   F*** them!   I'll ask to be traded the first chance I get."   In case you haven't noticed,  players demanding to be traded has caught on in the NFL.   It's not just for basketball or baseball anymore.   Ballard would lose all credibility with everyone.   He'd have wasted his 4 years here.   Reich would be screwed.   The front office would be furious.   Irsay would likely want to fire him.   It would destroy this franchise.   Final thought....    since you love to throw around what Belichick does....    deal with this...   when the Patriots were winning Super Bowls and making deep playoff runs year after year...     do you know who some of the top players were, besides Brady?     Logan Mankins,  offensive guard.   Rob Gronkowski,  Tight End.    Vince Wilfork,  Nose Tackle.  Donte Hightower, Inside linebacker.    Four key players.    All paid very well.    All Belichick favorites.    None, with the possible exception of Gronk played a sexy, glamour position that you obsess about.       I expect to agree with NONE of this.    But as someone who covered the NFL for 30 years as a member of the media,  and has followed football as close as I could for 25 more years (55 in all)  this is my judgement what would happen if Ballard would do what you suggest.     Sorry.    Good luck.....  
    • There are a few national writers who have speculated that Justin Houston will sign elsewhere either during or just after the draft. A fair question if that happens is: what are the Colts’ remaining options?  1. Sign someone like Melvin Ingram or Ryan Kerrigan. Not very good options, but I’d take Ingram.  2. Draft at least one DE early. This is the best and most obvious option, but after the second round, the pickings are going to be slim. So it will have to be a Day 1 or early Day 2 pick.  3. Roll with what you’ve got. Ugly option to even think about.  Conclusion: At this point, the Colts’ pass rush is seriously hurting if Houston isn’t resigned. Ballard of course knows this. Here’s hoping there’s a breakthrough in negotiations pre-draft, because signing Houston gives the team flexibility in the draft.  If the Colts allow Houston to sign elsewhere, given that this is a weak DE draft class, the Colts are putting themselves in a position where they HAVE to get a top DE early. And that could have them reaching Day 1 to make sure they do. To avoid that, give Houston a sweetener in the offer and get him signed!
  • Members

    • Solid84

      Solid84 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 310

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mackrel829

      Mackrel829 180

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 9,268

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNextGM

      TheNextGM 333

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 292

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 301

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Trace Pyott

      Trace Pyott 229

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James

      James 376

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...