Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Can the Colts win a Superbowl with Reich and Rivers?


Can the Colts win a Superbowl with Reich and Rivers?  

83 members have voted

  1. 1. Can the Colts win a Superbowl with Reich and Rivers?

    • Yes
      24
    • No
      37
    • Yes with Reich but dont let Rivers return
      23


Recommended Posts

Just now, eaglerockdude said:

So you have a poll, but with an option to not let Rivers return?  He was the main reason you guys were in todays game.

Id say yes is that option

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eaglerockdude said:

So you have a poll, but with an option to not let Rivers return?  He was the main reason you guys were in todays game.

in the game is different from being contenders .  with a top ten QB colts would have blew out the bills . trade QBs and put rivers on the bills it would be a blow out .  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, fire Reich after this game. Plenty of great HC candidates we can replace him with. Rivers looked done in the game today. He's not genuinely horrible, but we could hardly move the ball at times, and he's completely immobile. I want to draft a QB to compete with Eason next year, even if he's not in the first round.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Confused 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Nope, fire Reich after this game. Plenty of great HC candidates we can replace him with. Rivers looked done in the game today. He's not genuinely horrible, but we could hardly move the ball at times, and he's completely immobile. I want to draft a QB to compete with Eason next year, even if he's not in the first round.

Do you believe Rivers is anything as his former years? Even at that level he couldn't get it done. Stop wasting young player years. You need to elevate the QB position. Josh Allen is young and isn't going anywhere.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, eaglerockdude said:

So you have a poll, but with an option to not let Rivers return?  He was the main reason you guys were in todays game.

I'm pretty sure it was from our RBs have multiple 20+ yard runs

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rackeen305 said:

Do you believe Rivers is anything as his former years? Even at that level he couldn't get it done. Stop wasting young player years. You need to elevate the QB position. Josh Allen is young and isn't going anywhere.

Not sure why you gave me the confused emoji. We completely agree here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bottom line is, Rivers showed on the final play that he cant throw 47 yards into the endzone. And he's stiff as a rock. Not gonna win much NFL games with how the game is played now a days. Dont be mad. Improve the QB position so that this team can make a deep playoff push.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Need someone else calling plays for sure Reich has been spotty at best. I'm all for aggressive calls, 4th and 1, 4th and 2 not 4th and 4 in a low scoring battle. Rivers played decent this year, was better before injury on long throws but we can upgrade and get a younger healthier option with so many floating around.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, WalkerPercy said:

Hey genius, you do realize we were down 2tds in the 4th quarter and he led us to quick scores.  Very hard to do.  A couple of close plays here and there and a few different decisions we win that game.  But you want to be negative and dumb so have at it.  You don’t know much about football....that’s obvious.  

Yes and the first drive had runs for 29 and 20 yards and the second drive had a run for 33 yards which were the largest yardage gain in both drives. 
 

but frankly your disrespect and inability to have a civil conversation is not worth my time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Can the Colts win a Superbowl with Reich and Rivers?

Reich gave you your answer today

 

passing up gimme FG with the lead on the road with momentum on Colts side after being down 3-7

 

going into half with all 3 timeouts

 

wasting a timeout in the 4th quarter on a bad challenge which later leads to colts end up running out of time trying to get info field goal range to tie

 

sometimes you have to ignore analytics and keep momentum on your side by coming away with points 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Can the Colts win a Superbowl with Reich and Rivers?

Rivers is not to blame today but there is a ceiling on him. I don’t see him leading Indy to the promised land.  No slight intended to him as he exceeded my expectations and I am satisfied with what he gave us...but it’s not enough to reach the pinnacle.

 

Reich on the other hand was a big disappointment this season. My confidence in him has decreased. I don’t think he is the right coach to lead us to a Super Bowl based on what so witnessed from him this season. I think he lost several football IQ points over the offseason.  He is the biggest reason why the Colts lost to the Bills today. He cost us the game with his obsession with coming off as an analytics guru.  Colts may have to eventually look in another direction if this continues. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at Philly since Reich left. He played a huge role in them winning a SB. He just needs to stop gambling as much. Take the game as it comes. I do think he can be an elite coach.

 

Rivers is done. We must find a QB of the future. Easier said than done though.

 

Would Irsay make a call to Luck to see about possibly returning? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, tucky89 said:

Look at Philly since Reich left. He played a huge role in them winning a SB. He just needs to stop gambling as much. Take the game as it comes. I do think he can be an elite coach.

 

Rivers is done. We must find a QB of the future. Easier said than done though.

 

Would Irsay make a call to Luck to see about possibly returning? 

He is an awesome play designer. He comes up with great plays, the problem is he calls them at bad times and makes poor coaching decisions. He shouldnt ever call plays, or manage games.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

He is an awesome play designer. He comes up with great plays, the problem is he calls them at bad times and makes poor coaching decisions. He shouldnt ever call plays, or manage games.

I'd be in favor of an offensive coordinator. Let Frank focus on everything else.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably not with Rivers, but I really dont mean that as a slight because realistically, he wasn't brought in with the intent of doing that.  The team brought him in so that they could make the playoffs and possibly make a run depending on matchups.  He has met if not exceeded expectations for his play in my opinion.  

 

Jury is still out on Reich.  I think he is a good play designer and can scheme guys open, but he has to take a long look in the mirror with his decision making based on game situation instead of thoughtlessly doing the same thingbecause it is the "aggressive" thing to do.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, eaglerockdude said:

Hilarious.  Another post said since his arm was not strong enough, the hail mary did not work.

 

You guys don't deserve Rivers.  He should probably just go to the Patriots. 

 

 

This, roll with Wentz??  Colts will want Rivers back because the Pats have no qbs and Belly might want Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, CoachKjr said:

This, roll with Wentz??  Colts will want Rivers back because the Pats have no qbs and Belly might want Phil

No to Wentz. Hell no. 

 

It's no coincidence the team wins a SB with Foles. And are a Jeffery drop away from upsetting New Orleans. Only to trade Foles, and start Wentz. They've gone backwards ever since.

 

And he's injury prone.

 

Say what you want about old man Rivers. But at least he's durable.

 

Also not sure why the Patriots would want Rivers. They need a full rebuild of their roster.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Rivers is not to blame today but there is a ceiling on him. I don’t see him leading Indy to the promised land.  No slight intended to him as he exceeded my expectations and I am satisfied with what he gave us...but it’s not enough to reach the pinnacle.

 

Reich on the other hand was a big disappointment this season. My confidence in him has decreased. I don’t think he is the right coach to lead us to a Super Bowl based on what so witnessed from him this season. I think he lost several football IQ points over the offseason.  He is the biggest reason why the Colts lost to the Bills today. He cost us the game with his obsession with coming off as an analytics guru.  Colts may have to eventually look in another direction if this continues. 

 

 

Agreed with this post. We lost too many games including this one where he had to defend poor decisions to be aggressive. If we win all the aggressive calls then he’s coach of the year. But we did not and it’s because the play calls didn’t get it done. So you call what your personnel can accomplish to win games and in that regard I think he deserves evaluation just like anyone else on the team. 
 

he brings a lot of good to the table so not calling for his head, but evaluation and adjustment moving forward. I don’t think we part ways with him 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, eaglerockdude said:

Hilarious.  Another post said since his arm was not strong enough, the hail mary did not work.

 

You guys don't deserve Rivers.  He should probably just go to the Patriots. 

 

 

 I really, really, really agree with your last statement!! Do you think he could take his HC along?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich should have learned to play chess. He would have learned more about strategy, flow and continuity of play - things he obviously doesn't understand. Otherwise, he may be a good coach. Who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Rivers is not to blame today but there is a ceiling on him. I don’t see him leading Indy to the promised land.  No slight intended to him as he exceeded my expectations and I am satisfied with what he gave us...but it’s not enough to reach the pinnacle.

 

Reich on the other hand was a big disappointment this season. My confidence in him has decreased. I don’t think he is the right coach to lead us to a Super Bowl based on what so witnessed from him this season. I think he lost several football IQ points over the offseason.  He is the biggest reason why the Colts lost to the Bills today. He cost us the game with his obsession with coming off as an analytics guru.  Colts may have to eventually look in another direction if this continues. 

 

 

An android and analytics...recipe for mediocrity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have no idea if this 100% true, but I believe Ballards intent was to re-sign Autry and Muhammed, and let Houston go for a high compensatory pick. Think about it, we already re-signed Muhammed. Before that, we tried to get Autry back, and he went with the Titans. Autry is younger, and he signed for 3 years $21,500,000. Houston is older, and will probably sign for a bit more a year. That means we would of not only got a younger player at EDGE, but we would of got a higher compensatory pick in that scenario.   Now Ballard didn't get Autry, is probably going to get a 5th for him or something along those lines, and has to decide whether to re-sign Houston for more, who is older, and not get the higher pick for him. After the draft, I believe you don't give or receive compensatory picks for signing FA's or getting your own signed. So that comes into play as well. Ballard has a big decision here, and he knows better than us if Houston is getting interest elsewhere right now, or if it's worth to sign him for another deal.    Heck, Balllard may be interested in an EDGE rusher on day 1. Never know. We'll see.  
    • Would be a good deal for the Pats, not the most unbelievable trade either.
    • You ask a lot of good questions.    Unfortunately, I don't think that I, or anyone else,  has a lot of good answers.   Here's what I think we know.   Over The Cap has the Colts with just over $26 Mill.   Spotrac shows less,  and after the Carrie signing, I think we're going to be at $22.4 or so.   I also think we'd like to find a way to thread the financial needle and sign both Houston and Ertz (as a FA).   Even if you allowed $12 Mil for that, (Houston $7 mill and Ertz $5m)  that would leave us with roughly 10-$12 mill, give or take.   Currently, with our 6 picks,  Spotrac shows that will take roughly $6.5 to sign them.   But we all know Ballard has never had a draft class with less than 8 picks,  so expect two more, and that will bring the money needed to sign them to roughly $8 Mill.   Suddenly, we'd be down to $2-4 Mill and change.   Now, this is the part, where I don't know if @w87r  will step in for more financial adjustments that will show that we will have a few more $ than my math shows.    He's a wiz that way!      But typically, teams want 5-10% in reserve for in-season transactions.   BUT....   can you afford to have that much in reserve when your cap has shrunk to $185?     Yes?    No?    I don't know?     Who knows?   So....    lots of questions that need answers....    and we just don't know?    Both Houston and Ertz look like situations that might not resolve themselves until May......    So, we're left hanging....  
    • I vaguely remembered something like this but misremembered that I saw it on Hard Knocks so figured it couldn't haven't been the Colts.   Now that you mention this though, I think you're right.
    • OK....    I thought what I was saying was pretty obvious, but perhaps not,  so I'll try again....   If Chris Ballard wants to blow up and destroy everything he's spent the last 4 years building, I can't think of anything that would do it better than what you suggest.   I'm NOT saying CB should give Q and Darius blank contracts and say "fill in with the numbers you want"....   but CB will re-sign them and they will be big and generous contracts done without a lot of public fighting (unless someone gets WAY out of line with what they're asking.   But I'm not expecting that.)   Ballard has built a franchise built on culture.   We talk about here.   The team talks about it non-stop.    It's buzzing all over the city of Indianapolis.   It's even now buzzing around the NFL.    To suddenly play hardball with your best players, or worse,  trade them because they don't play the right position,  would literally destroy what he's built.   Blow-up the locker room.  Undercut  the relationships Frank Reich has with his players.   The rest of the team would see how we treated Q and Darius and think....   "why should I play hard for this franchise?   F*** them!   I'll ask to be traded the first chance I get."   In case you haven't noticed,  players demanding to be traded has caught on in the NFL.   It's not just for basketball or baseball anymore.   Ballard would lose all credibility with everyone.   He'd have wasted his 4 years here.   Reich would be screwed.   The front office would be furious.   Irsay would likely want to fire him.   It would destroy this franchise.   Final thought....    since you love to throw around what Belichick does....    deal with this...   when the Patriots were winning Super Bowls and making deep playoff runs year after year...     do you know who some of the top players were, besides Brady?     Logan Mankins,  offensive guard.   Rob Gronkowski,  Tight End.    Vince Wilfork,  Nose Tackle.  Donte Hightower, Inside linebacker.    Four key players.    All paid very well.    All Belichick favorites.    None, with the possible exception of Gronk played a sexy, glamour position that you obsess about.       I expect to agree with NONE of this.    But as someone who covered the NFL for 30 years as a member of the media,  and has followed football as close as I could for 25 more years (55 in all)  this is my judgement what would happen if Ballard would do what you suggest.     Sorry.    Good luck.....  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...