-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By NewColtsFan · Posted
Phillips may not be, but Paye absolutely is. That's what reviews of his work say..... He has barely scratched the surface of his ability and needs NFL coaching. Not sure what you're reading, but what I'm reading says the opposite. -
By CurBeatElite · Posted
Well, AC did sign a 2 year deal and he hasn't really dealt with injuries the way he did last year throughout most of his career. Part of me thinks Ballard thought 2 years with AC meant two years - though I understand your stance as AC openly stated he was contemplating retirement before last season. I think Ballard is also very big on keeping the trenches solid. He's said that since day 1 and he took one of the worst OLs in the NFL and has turned it into one of, if not the best in the NFL in a relatively short time. One thing I really like about Ballard is that he looks multiple years out in drafts -- my gut tells me he probably didn't do a ton to address the LT position as much last year (at least in the draft) due to the fact that this draft is very deep with OT talent. For all I know, Ballard and the coaching staff could be content with what we have on the OL as is -- or we can still address it in FA (e.g., Villaneuva) or in the draft -- either way, I trust that Ballard's not going to allow this team to go into the upcoming season with an OL he's uncomfortable with. -
Kwity Paye and Jaelan Phillips aren't developmental projects -
Not sure but Raiders run D was pretty poor. Maybe he was getting manhandled. I dont know. His pass rush numbers look pretty decent though. -
By NewColtsFan · Posted
I confess, the sentence I put into bold has me scratching my head. Can you elaborate?
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts