Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Qb for next year/QB class of 2021 (merge)


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LionsFan2021 said:

What's up Colts fans. I'm a huge Lions fan and an even bigger Stafford fan. I pray that they get a deal done sending him to the Colts. The Lions wasted his early years but he's a straight up baller with a cannon. Stafford was nothing but amazing in the community and the locker room loves him. The Lions got the best QB that they've ever had and wasted him with head coaches like Jim Schwartz (a defensive coach) aka Jim Shorts as we call him, Jim Caldwell (need I digress?) and Matt Patricia (I would say that he's a defensive coach but he's garbage).

 

Stafford had to deal with garbage ever changing OC's, terrible HC's and a non existent running game. We didn't have a 100 yard rusher for a game that spanned almost 5 seasons. FIVE SEASONS!

 

Stafford is a perfect fit for Reich and I pray it gets done. He deserves a ring. Either way the Colts have put together a nice team and I wish you guys the best either way.

Caldwell was actually decent for yall. I would be happy with Stafford too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I love how good people are at reaching conclusions, based on absolutely no information at all.    First, we were definitely getting Stafford. Now, we're definitely not. (And we will definite

Stafford was always my #1 choice among veteran options. (He was my preferred choice last offseason, someone posted a poll and I picked him.)   I'M ALL IN ON STAFFORD YALL.

Posted Images

Man, I have this weird feeling for this off season. It's going to be super interesting. With the potential suiters for Stafford, who all knows who is involved. But, the more you look at it, we're most likely drafting lower in the draft compared to other potential suiters. So as a trade aspect, we're going to have to sweeten the pot to land Stafford. I see most are saying give up 1st round #21, and possibly a 3rd. However, with the other suiters, I'm kinda feeling like the Colts could potentially give up more.... Not saying I'm right, but could be 1st round #21 plus future #1st round pick. I know what you're probably thinking... TWO first round picks for 33 year old QB? Hell no! I'm glad I'm not in Ballard's position but I'm anxious to see what happens if he's going to be serious about getting Stafford. We know how Stafford is as a QB, but moving up in the draft for a rookie QB could be potentially fatal to Ballards career (possibly hot seat) if the QB doesn't pan out. Just my thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Caldwell was actually decent for yall. I would be happy with Stafford too. 

 

The Caldwell hire was a complete waste of time. He was the OC for one of the worst offenses in the league when we hired him. Yes he had a calming impact on the team from the nonsense that we had with Schwartz but he wasn't going to take that team anywhere. 

 

Of course he's lightyears better than Patricia was.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, LionsFan2021 said:

 

The Caldwell hire was a complete waste of time. He was the OC for one of the worst offenses in the league when we hired him. Yes he had a calming impact on the team from the nonsense that we had with Schwartz but he wasn't going to take that team anywhere. 

 

Of course he's lightyears better than Patricia was.

Hey, that's the best coach you guys have ever had or something..

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, pgt_rob said:

Man, I have this weird feeling for this off season. It's going to be super interesting. With the potential suiters for Stafford, who all knows who is involved. But, the more you look at it, we're most likely drafting lower in the draft compared to other potential suiters. So as a trade aspect, we're going to have to sweeten the pot to land Stafford. I see most are saying give up 1st round #21, and possibly a 3rd. However, with the other suiters, I'm kinda feeling like the Colts could potentially give up more.... Not saying I'm right, but could be 1st round #21 plus future #1st round pick. I know what you're probably thinking... TWO first round picks for 33 year old QB? Hell no! I'm glad I'm not in Ballard's position but I'm anxious to see what happens if he's going to be serious about getting Stafford. We know how Stafford is as a QB, but moving up in the draft for a rookie QB could be potentially fatal to Ballards career (possibly hot seat) if the QB doesn't pan out. Just my thoughts.

 

He took this job because Andrew Luck was here..

He can't get it wrong, everyone knows it. I don't care how you spin it, cynically or pragmatically, but yes, he's buying himself time to build the roster.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Take this with a grain of salt. Just fun speculation and rumor.

 

 

How do you take a grain of salt? Drink it? Eat it? Other!?

 

Anyway, I hope that's correct. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen many people from all over the spectrum weigh in... I personally would give up 2 #1's and not a penny more. Maybe try to get them to pick up a portion more of the contract than obligated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, The Fish said:

 

He took this job because Andrew Luck was here..

He can't get it wrong, everyone knows it. I don't care how you spin it, cynically or pragmatically, but yes, he's buying himself time to build the roster.

 

  The 'roster' has been built. Now comes the much harder part; finding elite players or 

   prospects to be fill the marquee spots (QB, L-OT, Edge rusher and with a bit less

   urgency, WR-1 and CB-1).

 

   Wether via trade, FA or the Draft, he needs to fill at least 2 of those 5 in the next 3

   months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I'm hoping Stafford becomes a Colt and I believe you can compete with him, but people have been calling him underrated for so long that now I think he's a little overrated.  He's not Manning or Luck.  He won't carry a flawed or bad team.  Where Stafford truly lands on the spectrum, I don't know.  I'm not sure what would be a good comp for him, but you should certainly be able to get what you had in Rivers out of him, or better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, indykmj said:

 

  The 'roster' has been built. Now comes the much harder part; finding elite players or 

   prospects to be fill the marquee spots (QB, L-OT, Edge rusher and with a bit less

   urgency, WR-1 and CB-1).

 

   Wether via trade, FA or the Draft, he needs to fill at least 2 of those 5 in the next 3

   months.

The roster can't be built when the list of needs is as long as it is..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Fish said:

How do you take a grain of salt? Drink it? Eat it? Other!?

I usually just inject it right into the blood stream. Don’t knock it till you try it. One day I wish to be able to breathe under the sea. Maybe in an octopus’ garden. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HoosierHero said:

I usually just inject it right into the blood stream. Don’t knock it till you try it. One day I wish to be able to breathe under the sea. Maybe in an octopus’ garden. 

That's the other, other and anything is possible if you set your mind to it (I think?)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, #12. said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm hoping Stafford becomes a Colt and I believe you can compete with him, but people have been calling him underrated for so long that now I think he's a little overrated.  He's not Manning or Luck.  He won't carry a flawed or bad team.  Where Stafford truly lands on the spectrum, I don't know.  I'm not sure what would be a good comp for him, but you should certainly be able to get what you had in Rivers out of him, or better.

Id value wise compare him to Carson Palmer. JMO

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

 

 

That's an easy question...no. Stafford alone does not put them over the top.

 

But that's not the question to be asking. The question is that "IF you trade draft capital AND give Stafford a big contract...are you still able and willing to do what it takes to build a top 5 offense?" That means bringing in an alpha WR1...and perhaps a TE as well.

 

If they are willing to go all in on the offense to build a top 5 offense...then yes I think they can compete for a SB.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

This might sound crazy but I wonder what the chances are of Eason being done trade bait for the lions. Not that he isnt proven but maybe insurance or a backup plan. 

 

Probably not. They have Chase Daniel already locked in as the QB2. My guess is that he will be the de facto starter and they will draft a QB (who will take over at some point during the season).

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shasta519 said:

 

Probably not. They have Chase Daniel already locked in as the QB2. My guess is that he will be the de facto starter and they will draft a QB (who will take over at some point during the season).

Not saying they would want him as a starter. Maybe as a better backup. Chances are though they would want a veteran if they draft a young QB. I go back to what Ballard said about another team seeing Eason throw. Just a thought. I doubt that happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Not saying they would want him as a starter. Maybe as a better backup. Chances are though they would want a veteran if they draft a young QB. I go back to what Ballard said about another team seeing Eason throw. Just a thought. I doubt that happens.

 

They would possibly take him...but he would be their QB3 (like he is on the Colts)...so he wouldn't add any value to the trade. Daniel is already under contract for next season. Since they will more than likely go for a rookie QB...that player will serve as the backup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irsay is basically not giving anything away lol. He says this team is ready to win so ideally if you can find a vet who can come in that would be great. Then he says ideally if you can find the guy in the draft for the next 15 years that is the right path. So not giving anything away. It does sound though like they want a vet that can give them 3-5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

I think one of the reasons they are actively going after Stafford is because there are no guarantees any of the top 4 QBs fall to 21.

 

They could miss out on Stafford then top 4 QBs go before 21 then be totally unprepared. I would think from that standpoint Ballard would be aggressive and trade up.

 

I like Mac Jones who could easily be had in trade down scenario but who knows if Ballard even likes him.

 

I just don't want to roll out with JB again. I am fine with JB as a backup though. 

 

I would even throw a player in the deal to get Stafford. Even Leonard if that eliminated the threat of losing pick 21.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I think one of the reasons they are actively going after Stafford is because there are no guarantees any of the top 4 QBs fall to 21.

 

They could miss out on Stafford then top 4 QBs go before 21 then be totally unprepared. I would think from that standpoint Ballard would be aggressive and trade up.

 

I like Mac Jones who could easily be had in trade down scenario but who knows if Ballard even likes him.

 

I just don't want to roll out with JB again. I am fine with JB as a backup though. 

 

I would even throw a player in the deal to get Stafford. Even Leonard if that eliminated the threat of losing pick 21.

Sure Lawrence, field, wilson, lance and jones could becgobe, but Trask and Newman  would probably  still be there

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

This might sound crazy but I wonder what the chances are of Eason being done trade bait for the lions. Not that he isnt proven but maybe insurance or a backup plan. 

Honestly  could happen,  but be better if we kept him

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the millionth time.. the roster is way too good to waste a year with a rookie QB.

 

Trask, Neman, Jones, Wilson and Lance are not leading a team to the playoffs much less a Super Bowl.

 

Go get Stafford or Rodgers and let’s win the whole damn thing. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stephen said:

Sure Lawrence, field, wilson, lance and jones could becgobe, but Trask and Newman  would probably  still be there

These next few months are gonna be important for Jones and Lance. Jones from his limited skills set and Lance because he only played 1 game.

 

Lawrence Fields and Wilson will all go top 12

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNextGM said:

For the millionth time.. the roster is way too good to waste a year with a rookie QB.

 

Trask, Neman, Jones, Wilson and Lance are not leading a team to the playoffs much less a Super Bowl.

 

Go get Stafford or Rodgers and let’s win the whole damn thing. 

No thanks to Rodgers 

I'm ok with Stafford as long as we don't give up too much 

 

And getting a solid rookie to build around would be a very smart decision especially from a financial standpoint 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, #12. said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm hoping Stafford becomes a Colt and I believe you can compete with him, but people have been calling him underrated for so long that now I think he's a little overrated.  He's not Manning or Luck.  He won't carry a flawed or bad team.  Where Stafford truly lands on the spectrum, I don't know.  I'm not sure what would be a good comp for him, but you should certainly be able to get what you had in Rivers out of him, or better.

This whole thing is definitely getting extremely hyped, giving me that feeling as well. I do think that Stafford is an upgrade over Rivers in most areas. Rivers was really heady and his anticipation elite due to lack of mobility. He had to be both. Wish we could just get Stafford for the same $25 mil Rivers got lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@NewColtsFanto answer your question, again, I don't know.  But I do know that trading, signing or otherwise acquiring another aged Vet at QB, one who's been beaten to hell by a crap team isn't a good solution, long term or short term.  Signing one would be one thing, but trading for one is giving up way too much, even a 7th for Wentz would be dumb. Stafford, not much better. 

 

If Eason isn't the guy, and I have no idea if he is or isn't, then trade up in the draft and lets take a swing that way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TheNextGM said:

For the millionth time.. the roster is way too good to waste a year with a rookie QB.

 

I'm not sure the roster is that good. There are parts of the roster that are really good, some depth at others, but we're deficient (IMO) at edge and corner, and probably WR. Improving those areas of the team and adding a "right now" QB might not be attainable in 2021.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

With the amount of teams interested and how stupid/desperate most GMs are, I can see teams giving up multiple first rounders for Stafford. Ballard isn't going to overpay for any player, even if the hype train behind the person is at a high amongst the fanbase

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Mr.NotSoCreative said:

This whole thing is definitely getting extremely hyped, giving me that feeling as well. I do think that Stafford is an upgrade over Rivers in most areas. Rivers was really heady and his anticipation elite due to lack of mobility. He had to be both. Wish we could just get Stafford for the same $25 mil Rivers got lol.

 

I somewhat brought this up early on.

 

Stafford, historically with Ebron (who dropped a lot of passes, surprise?? :)or Hockenson that were first round draft picks, has not looked to his TEs as much (only after several injuries to his WRs did he look to Hockenson), though he does throw enough to his RBs. There is still some gunslinger in him, you like it sometimes but sometimes you wonder if it can be contained like with Favre. Rivers played within his limitations and doubled down on his strengths of mind and anticipation while Stafford never felt like he could trust his run game. Rivers has had the benefit of LT, Michael Turner etc. in his heyday that his tendencey to cede to the run came automatically.

 

Will Stafford bring over any bad habits of not trusting his run and TEs? How much baggage will we be inheriting with this new QB? We had the same doubts with Rivers after a bad 2019 as well, and it turned out fine, a turnaround from his 5-11 year to 11-5 with the Colts. You have to go in with the glass half full at this point if we go the Stafford route, IMO, and trust in Frank's offensive system and our OL. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

@NewColtsFanto answer your question, again, I don't know.  But I do know that trading, signing or otherwise acquiring another aged Vet at QB, one who's been beaten to hell by a crap team isn't a good solution, long term or short term.  Signing one would be one thing, but trading for one is giving up way too much, even a 7th for Wentz would be dumb. Stafford, not much better. 

 

If Eason isn't the guy, and I have no idea if he is or isn't, then trade up in the draft and lets take a swing that way. 

 

Why is drafting an unknown entity considered so much better than trading for a known performer?

 

I've seen a lot of research the last couple of days that confirmed what we already know: it's really hard to find a good QB in the draft, including in the first round. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No doubt any move is a gamble of some kind or another. If its an older guy, is the player injury prone or on the downhill side of his career? If a younger guy, will he still perform with serious coin in his pocket for the first time? But in the end, you have to look at recent production. If the guy has a good rep for being a hard worker and improved his play such that he's become an impact player, he's worth the gamble, IMO. Maybe not for a contract longer than 3 years, but I like taking a shot at an ascending talent.    More importantly, if you believe, as I do, that the defense HAS to get much better at rushing the passer, especially since our D coordinator seems to have a serious allergy to blitzing, then the push to find that missing piece has to take its place front and center over other needs. 
    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...