Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Qb for next year/QB class of 2021 (merge)


Recommended Posts

I think ultimately if he drops the best option at QB for the future would be Trey Lance. I think limited work this year could possibly drop him to the Colts in the 1st round.

 

Lance is definitely gonna need some time to work on his skills which is why I believe they will bring back Rivers 1 year. 

 

The QB outlook in 21 should be as follows 

 

Philip Rivers 1/20

Trey Lance Starter in 22'

Jacob Eason Backup in 22'

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I love how good people are at reaching conclusions, based on absolutely no information at all.    First, we were definitely getting Stafford. Now, we're definitely not. (And we will definite

Stafford was always my #1 choice among veteran options. (He was my preferred choice last offseason, someone posted a poll and I picked him.)   I'M ALL IN ON STAFFORD YALL.

Posted Images

21 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I think ultimately if he drops the best option at QB for the future would be Trey Lance. I think limited work this year could possibly drop him to the Colts in the 1st round.

 

Lance is definitely gonna need some time to work on his skills which is why I believe they will bring back Rivers 1 year. 

 

The QB outlook in 21 should be as follows 

 

Philip Rivers 1/20

Trey Lance Starter in 22'

Jacob Eason Backup in 22'

 

 

This would be the best situation. A team like the Panthers could take him and sit him a year since they have Bridgewater.  Off the top of my head I can’t think of any other teams that could do that. If Smith comes back for WA maybe he could fit in there. But a lot of teams needing QB won’t be in position with a veteran to let him sit. We could also even give him plays every game to get him experience. 

 

He hasn’t played much and a lack of a combine and interviewing in person may cause him to drop. He is the one to watch if he drops. If he starts dropping past ten that should be looked at as a move up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The QBs that will go before Lance are Lawrence Fields and Wilson.

 

Right now I think there is a chance Fields could drop to 7 especially if the Jets decide to stick with Darnold I could see it like this

 

Jaguars Lawrence 

Lions Fields 

Panthers or Football Team Wilson 

(Possibly trading up)

Colts take Lance at 21

or trade down and take Jones 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26.75 is the current average age of the QBs in the AFC. I am perfectly fine bringing Rivers back for 1 year but beyond that Ballard needs to address the QB position aggressively!

 

If Lance or Jones is there and the Colts have a chance to draft either they should be running to the podium.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

The QBs that will go before Lance are Lawrence Fields and Wilson.

 

Right now I think there is a chance Fields could drop to 7 especially if the Jets decide to stick with Darnold I could see it like this

 

Jaguars Lawrence 

Lions Fields 

Panthers or Football Team Wilson 

(Possibly trading up)

Colts take Lance at 21

or trade down and take Jones 

I doubt those guys last that long.  For one there are other QB needy teams before the pick 21.  Second if you can count on anything in the NFL draft it’s teams moving up to over draft a QB.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe somebody could explain something 

Why does everyone and their mother have the Falcons and Panthers drafting a QB in their mocks?

 

Falcons due to his contract are most likely stuck with Ryan at least for the next year or two so drafting a QB as high as 4 would be incredibly dumb and the Panthers just signed Teddy Bridgewater to a 3/63 contract. If they weren't that serious about Teddy they couldve just signed him to a 1 year deal.

 

Both make no sense. 

I think the wildcard team that could possibly go QB above us is the 49ers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Maybe somebody could explain something 

Why does everyone and their mother have the Falcons and Panthers drafting a QB in their mocks?

 

Falcons due to his contract are most likely stuck with Ryan at least for the next year or two so drafting a QB as high as 4 would be incredibly dumb and the Panthers just signed Teddy Bridgewater to a 3/63 contract. If they weren't that serious about Teddy they couldve just signed him to a 1 year deal.

 

Both make no sense. 

I think the wildcard team that could possibly go QB above us is the 49ers.

Well a lot of people think the falcons will start over and move on from Ryan much like the Lions.  Even if they are stuck with him for this year the coach may want his guy to groom for a year not unlike what the chiefs did or the giants did with Eli and Jones.  With the Panthers I don’t think people believe in Bridgewater.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Well a lot of people think the falcons will start over and move on from Ryan much like the Lions.  With the Panthers I don’t think people believe in Bridgewater.

@w87r

 

Can you give me Matt Ryan contract details cause I'm not 100% but I think they are gonna be stuck with him for a couple for years.

 

I don't really know how it effects their cap but I just think it would be dumb to take a QB at 4 and then not play him for 2 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

@w87r

 

Can you give me Matt Ryan contract details cause I'm not 100% but I think they are gonna be stuck with him for a couple for years.

 

I don't really know how it effects their cap but I just think it would be dumb to take a QB at 4 and then not play him for 2 years.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2923703-falcons-will-allow-new-gm-to-part-ways-with-matt-ryan-julio-jones
 

With that said it sounds like their new coach is planning on having Ryan at least for next year.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, danlhart87 said:

Maybe somebody could explain something 

Why does everyone and their mother have the Falcons and Panthers drafting a QB in their mocks?

 

Falcons due to his contract are most likely stuck with Ryan at least for the next year or two so drafting a QB as high as 4 would be incredibly dumb and the Panthers just signed Teddy Bridgewater to a 3/63 contract. If they weren't that serious about Teddy they couldve just signed him to a 1 year deal.

 

Both make no sense. 

I think the wildcard team that could possibly go QB above us is the 49ers.

Because if you don't have your long-term solutions at QB you should be searching for him and this is a good QB class. 36 year old Matt Ryan should not stop you from drafting your QB of the future and Teddy Bridgewater should definitely not stop you from drafting a QB if you think he can be the franchise QB. :dunno:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

@w87r

 

Can you give me Matt Ryan contract details cause I'm not 100% but I think they are gonna be stuck with him for a couple for years.

 

I don't really know how it effects their cap but I just think it would be dumb to take a QB at 4 and then not play him for 2 years.

Colts cap hit if traded:

2021 - $23m

2022 - $23.75m

2023 - $28m

 

Atlanta net negative off $3.5m more than if they would keep him.

 

Keep cap hit:$40.9m

Trade dead cap:$44.4m

 

 

Don't see them moving on from him, unless they designate him a post June 1st cut and taking dead cap over 2 seasons.

 

They can get rid of him after 2021 and save $15m in cap space. With $26.5 m dead cap hit.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

The QBs that will go before Lance are Lawrence Fields and Wilson.

 

Right now I think there is a chance Fields could drop to 7 especially if the Jets decide to stick with Darnold I could see it like this

 

Jaguars Lawrence 

Lions Fields 

Panthers or Football Team Wilson 

(Possibly trading up)

Colts take Lance at 21

or trade down and take Jones 

If Lions are really after Fields then a trade of Stafford to Colts is really looking promising. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If Lions are really after Fields then a trade of Stafford to Colts is really looking promising. 

I think it’s a possibility but I wouldn’t call it promising beyond reports that Indy would be a landing spot that makes sense to him there is zero to report Ballard and the Lions are working on a deal.  Not saying it can’t happen or those conversations haven’t taken place but until it happens or some of those signs start showing up I wouldn’t call it promising.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, w87r said:

Colts cap hit if traded:

2021 - $23m

2022 - $23.75m

2023 - $28m

 

Atlanta net negative off $3.5m more than if they would keep him.

 

Keep cap hit:$40.9m

Trade dead cap:$44.4m

 

 

Don't see them moving on from him, unless they designate him a post June 1st cut and taking dead cap over 2 seasons.

 

They can get rid of him after 2021 and save $15m in cap space. With $26.5 m dead cap hit.

I believe they ultimately draft defense like Micah Parsons. 

 

Panthers draft OL or Pitts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I think we bring Rivers back for one last shot and sit on Kyle Trask in Round 1.     I think Trask is under-rated by fans and draftniks, mainly because he’s not athletic.  But he’s a premier pocket passer, and I’ve seen it written that he’s particularly good at moving within the pocket while keeping his eyes up field.  But really it’s his character, toughness, and football intelligence that Ballard’s going to fall in love with...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Archer said:

Personally, I think we bring Rivers back for one last shot and sit on Kyle Trask in Round 1.     I think Trask is under-rated by fans and draftniks, mainly because he’s not athletic.  But he’s a premier pocket passer, and I’ve seen it written that he’s particularly good at moving within the pocket while keeping his eyes up field.  But really it’s his character, toughness, and football intelligence that Ballard’s going to fall in love with...

Trask will be a day 2 pick

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

The QBs that will go before Lance are Lawrence Fields and Wilson.

 

Right now I think there is a chance Fields could drop to 7 especially if the Jets decide to stick with Darnold I could see it like this

 

Jaguars Lawrence 

Lions Fields 

Panthers or Football Team Wilson 

(Possibly trading up)

Colts take Lance at 21

or trade down and take Jones 

Patriots  will take qb

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, richard pallo said:

If Lions are really after Fields then a trade of Stafford to Colts is really looking promising. 

I would think we’d have some interest...

 

The big question will be the cost in picks?   It may be harder than the trade for Buckner. The price for a quarterback can get expensive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Trask will be a day 2 pick

Could be a steal! Maybe Colts go left tackle or WR in round 1 then trade up to the beginning of round 2 to grab Trask. 
 

Sign Rivers for 1 year, groom Trask, and keep Eason as the fall back option.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aces101 said:

Could be a steal! Maybe Colts go left tackle or WR in round 1 then trade up to the beginning of round 2 to grab Trask. 
 

Sign Rivers for 1 year, groom Trask, and keep Eason as the fall back option.

I don't think there's a need to trade up. He could easily be there at our 2nd pick. 

3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

It’s just a option they should look at. In Reichs system and the running game he might be pretty good.

Like I said he should be nothing more than a backup here 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, stitches said:

Burrow had some of the best pocket movement and awareness I've seen since Luck. Truly special. (thanks to athleticism) He was also making insane plays out of structure. Something that can't exactly be said about Jones... 

Yeah his pocket presence was insane. Mac doesn’t have any elite traits at all. I seriously don’t get the Love.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be interesting, I thought he would play 1 more year.

 

 

Really Stafford is the only vet on my radar right now(Watson, not to realistic), and there is a chance that he might not 3ven be an option.

 

I guess Carr could join that list if made available.

 

If Watson goes to Jets(rumors) Darnold still interest me.

 

 

Rivers retiring just threw me off guard. Glad he did it so soon though so we can move on to find next option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a couple of mock drafts that have us taking Trask.  One mock had us take him in the first, another in the second.  If we could get Trask in the second I'd be thrilled with that.  I don't know enough about him to know if he would be a decent first rounder or not.

 

Feel like we need a veteran guy though.  Is Trask a franchise QB, ready to take over from day one?  Not sure Eason is the guy yet either going forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well thought out mock. Some of the additions I am not the biggest fan of(Ertz), but I can see them happening so, can't really beef with it too much.    I would also prefer we didn't spend a R2 pick on a run stuffing DT after paying 2 DTs long-term big money last year.    Other than that - love Newsome pick up, love Christiansen at that spot in the draft. Like the Patrick Jones pick. Love Deatrich Wise at that money. Overall very solid mock. Good job. 
    • Braden Smith allowed 1 QB hit and 0 sacks in 2020 with Rivers as QB.    
    • To the bolded, the point of having cap room and draft picks is to add good players. I don't think good roster management necessitates getting rid of good players when their contracts come up, not when you have the resources to keep them. Especially not if you're a good team, with contention in reach.    I think some overstate how "close" the Colts are, but I do think we're closer to being a contender than we are to being a team that should be stocking up picks to reshape the roster. And that's why 'forward-thinking Ballard' has been rolling forward tens of millions of cap every year.   As for the five players taking half the cap, that's not really where the Colts are, or will be. To keep it simple, once you factor in the pending cap increases -- the cap will be at $240m/year within the next two years, from the players' revenue split going up from 47% to 48.5%, from the TV contracts that are projected to nearly double to $10b/year, and from the 17th regular season game + 2 more playoff games -- having five $20m/year players is about 42% of your team's cap. And that's without going into contract structure and doing a year by year analysis of how your spending compares to the projected cap.   Teams with highly paid veteran QBs typically have about 40-50% of their cap tied into 6-8 players. Packers, Saints, Rams, Bucs, Chiefs, Steelers, Titans, etc. Pretty soon, you can add the Bills and Ravens to this list (and they're already close). The Cardinals are already there.    Right now, the Colts only have four guys above $10m/year (Wentz, Buckner, Kelly, Stewart). We have some room to add highly paid players, and still supplement the roster in free agency. Admittedly, my perspective is based on projected dramatic increases to the cap, but I would assume the Colts are factoring in those same increases. And because the Colts have some wiggle room right now, they might use a unique cap climate in 2021 to take advantage of their flexibility over the next 2-3 seasons, and structure contracts in a way that allows them to keep their young guys and still add a couple of veterans in free agency.  
    • I didn't think it that bad.   In hindsight it is.   Colts gave up the 22nd pick in the draft for the previous years #3 pick in the draft. In his rookie year, Richardson had good numbers - 950 yards rushing, 11 TD's, 51 receptions and 1 TD.  That was in 15 games with Weeden as the QB.  I thought with Luck as the QB his game would step up.      Was it a mistake - YES.   Was it the worst trade in Colts history - Not even close.   Let me remind you of this bad trade:   In search of a franchise QB, the Colts swung a deal with Atlanta for the top pick in the 1990 NFL Draft and used the pick on George, a homegrown product from Warren Central. The cost was steep. The Falcons received OT Chris Hinton, WR Andre Rison, a 1991 first round pick and a fifth round pick in 1990. A six-time Pro Bowler for the Colts, Hinton started 80 more games, including a Pro Bowl season in 1991 and an All-Pro nod in 1993.   Rison started for the Colts as a rookie and caught 52 passes in 1989. With the Falcons, Rison exploded, eclipsing 1,000 receiving yards in four of his five seasons in Atlanta. He finished his Falcons career with 5,633 yards and 56 touchdowns before bouncing around with five other teams in his final six seasons. The 1991 first round pick turned into WR Mike Pritchard, who spent nine solid, but unspectacular seasons in the NFL, finishing with 5,187 receiving yards. As for George, he spent four uninspiring seasons with the Colts with a 14-35 record as a starter, more interceptions than touchdowns (46 to 41) and was traded in 1994 to Atlanta.
    • You're kidding right? So Chris Hinton is worthy but AC isn't?
  • Members

    • BlackTiger

      BlackTiger 66

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 132

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • #12.

      #12. 1,065

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 396

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 556

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James

      James 354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • iuswingman

      iuswingman 41

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,514

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...