Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Strange thing happened towards the end of the game..


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

  • Like 3
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

It was odd

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

Maybe it is the C and OL coach in me but 90% of the bad snap fumbles are because of the  person at the QB position 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, w87r said:

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

Thats what I said.

 

The play before the fumble.

 

 

Wasnt saying after, just not multiple plays before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

that's what i thought the announcer's were about to talk about when it popped up but they seemed like they didn't even know it was up there

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, w87r said:

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CamMo said:

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

No doubt he didnt, but it definitely was weird for sure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it was a message from the football gods that the Colts are receiving divine assistance. We have a particularly spiritual team and coaching staff. Perhaps the team’s prayers are being answered....:lecture:

 

That botched snap was so bizarre that I can’t help wondering if there was some divine intervention. Spirits can absolutely manipulate energy and objects. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a thing I do when the Colts have the ball...I light a candle on my table.  I had just said Lord help us win this and as soon as I said that the ball was hiked and fumbled!  I jumped up and down of course screaming!  It was in the stars?! LOL!

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely interesting it's most likely a mess-up, but it may have also been  meant as a "if the Colts can hold on here is how the standings shake up" but something got messed up or abandoned and the broadcast just ignored the graphic either intentionally or accidentally.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Mistakes happen. Remember when Fox News showed that one Supreme Court justice had died when she was alive? She lived like another 3 years after.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

One time a local newspaper years ago in a Sunday edition printed Mondays lottery results instead of Saturdays results. 

The results they printed for Monday, 24 hours ahead of time, were the exact numbers that drew in. :thinking:

How does anyone here explain this? 
in the spirit world, there is no “time”.  Spirits can see what’s going to happen in the “future.” 
Perhaps they didn’t interfere but were broadcasting to the praying Colts fans that all would be okay. :console:

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah I saw that as well.  Made a comment to one of my kids watching the game with me.  it was probably innocent enough.  They probably changed it when Hines returned the free kick to the 5 and didn't change it back when the refs tried to give the game to Houston.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

While that is true youd never keep it under wraps, on the other hand, who would believe them if they said anything? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

My shares in tin foil don't approve of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

Watson knew the REFS were cheating for him all game so he gave the game away hahalmao :sarcasm: happy homer simpson GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And by that measure, he's going to want to draft a replacement for Rhodes, Doyle, and possibly Glowinski (Pinter?).
    • Ballard made the responsible decisions in FA period by filling holes that had blanks so if the draft totally fell apart, he could still field a team.  It wasn't really about getting better through free agency.  The OT signings are strictly backup material or being able to start someone come week 1.     I don't think the quality of the free agents signed has any bearing on how much he's going to want to draft a LT.  And its a lot, IMO.   I also think he's going to want a plug n play DE.  No projects or ceiling guys but a day one starter who has experience in their college career.  Basham or Payton Turner fit that mold  They are the most like Autry, who left.  Choosing not to match Autry's contract tells me he's probably figuring on getting the replacement in the draft.  (maybe Lewis?...I doubt it) The other edge college candidates all seem to be replicates of Turay/Banogu, athletic and high ceiling but raw and with questions.
    • i think part of what we will be paying Leonard and Nelson for is their leadership on the team.   Both have great character and are respected by the players on this team.  They both make other players play harder and better.   That just cannot be replaced easily.  
    • Ballard drafts 2-3 years down the line. So they were definitely needs...we just don’t see those future needs and/or aren’t privy to their true roster construction goals.    But Smith was definitely not meant to be depth...he was drafted to be the starting RG.   Hines was drafted to add a pass-catching RB to the RBC they were building.   Okereke was drafted to take Walker’s spot because he didn’t fit the defense.   Taylor was drafted to make the offense more explosive. They talked about it all  that offseason...so taking a RB early shouldn’t have been the shock that it was...especially with Mack entering his final rookie deal season and missing 2-4 games per year. I don’t think Mack is supposed to still be here...he was supposed to have a good season and net a decent comp pick.   Similarly to Taylor and Oke, Blackmon was drafted to replace Hooker, who didn’t fit the defense and was supposed to net a comp pick in FA.   I think you might even see Ballard draft a S again this year, though it likely won’t in the first two rounds. But it could happen.   Really there are a few positions he could draft early. But I am certain they will take an OT at some point early.
  • Members

    • DEFENSE

      DEFENSE 294

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher2

      LJpalmbeacher2 1,982

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 2,604

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Wentzszn

      Wentzszn 10,036

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 687

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 2,617

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 5,359

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 691

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 454

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...