Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Strange thing happened towards the end of the game..


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

  • Like 3
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

It was odd

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

Maybe it is the C and OL coach in me but 90% of the bad snap fumbles are because of the  person at the QB position 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, w87r said:

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

Thats what I said.

 

The play before the fumble.

 

 

Wasnt saying after, just not multiple plays before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

that's what i thought the announcer's were about to talk about when it popped up but they seemed like they didn't even know it was up there

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, w87r said:

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CamMo said:

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

No doubt he didnt, but it definitely was weird for sure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it was a message from the football gods that the Colts are receiving divine assistance. We have a particularly spiritual team and coaching staff. Perhaps the team’s prayers are being answered....:lecture:

 

That botched snap was so bizarre that I can’t help wondering if there was some divine intervention. Spirits can absolutely manipulate energy and objects. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a thing I do when the Colts have the ball...I light a candle on my table.  I had just said Lord help us win this and as soon as I said that the ball was hiked and fumbled!  I jumped up and down of course screaming!  It was in the stars?! LOL!

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely interesting it's most likely a mess-up, but it may have also been  meant as a "if the Colts can hold on here is how the standings shake up" but something got messed up or abandoned and the broadcast just ignored the graphic either intentionally or accidentally.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Mistakes happen. Remember when Fox News showed that one Supreme Court justice had died when she was alive? She lived like another 3 years after.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

One time a local newspaper years ago in a Sunday edition printed Mondays lottery results instead of Saturdays results. 

The results they printed for Monday, 24 hours ahead of time, were the exact numbers that drew in. :thinking:

How does anyone here explain this? 
in the spirit world, there is no “time”.  Spirits can see what’s going to happen in the “future.” 
Perhaps they didn’t interfere but were broadcasting to the praying Colts fans that all would be okay. :console:

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah I saw that as well.  Made a comment to one of my kids watching the game with me.  it was probably innocent enough.  They probably changed it when Hines returned the free kick to the 5 and didn't change it back when the refs tried to give the game to Houston.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

While that is true youd never keep it under wraps, on the other hand, who would believe them if they said anything? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

My shares in tin foil don't approve of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

Watson knew the REFS were cheating for him all game so he gave the game away hahalmao :sarcasm: happy homer simpson GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TRADE 9:   Steelers get pick No.111 from Jaguars via Bengals Jaguars get pick No.128 and No.140   @EastStreet @NFLfan
    • Hey everyone.  I wasn't able to commit to participating in this, but have read through all the rounds of the draft you've done.  I don't follow college football overall that closely, mainly watch IU games and other big games I'm able to watch.   Just wanted to thank you all for educating me on this year's draft prospects so I'll be able to watch the Draft with a bit of knowledge on some of these players.   It's really helpful when I see names in the draft that I've read about on these mock drafts.   Again, thanks to all of you!  GO COLTS!!!
    • Honestly?    I have no idea?   I think this may be unprecedented...   a QB dealing with epilepsy?    I think it’s unknown.   My fear, is that teams don’t like Big Question marks at that position.   I wouldn’t begin to know.   I hope for the best...  (but I fear the worst — draft wise).  
    • I don't understand the bolded one.   Why do this.     https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/31303703/nfl-owners-approve-replay-change-other-new-rules-2021-season Approved a relaxation of rules for the numbers that players of certain positions can wear because of expanded practice squads. Running backs, wide receivers, tight ends, defensive backs and linebackers can all wear numbers in the single digits now if they choose. Based on preexisting NFL rules, players who want to change their numbers this season will have to buy out the inventory of the NFL's manufacturing partners. This wouldn't apply to players who give notice in 2021 that they want to change numbers in 2022.   Approved a one-year experiment in an attempt to make it easier to recover onside kicks. In 2021, the receiving team on kickoffs will be limited to nine players within 25 yards of the ball. Last season, NFL teams recovered only three of 67 onside kicks, the lowest total and recovery rate since at least 2001. As a result, the Philadelphia Eagles proposed that teams be given an option to gain 15 yards on one offensive play from their own 25-yard line to retain possession after a score. Tabled a rule that would have expanded the area where players are prohibited from blocking below the waist. McKay said that there is enough support to pass the rule now but that several teams had questions that will take some time to address. It could be revisited next month. Eliminated overtime in preseason games.   Changed a rule that will now force a loss of down if two passes are completed behind the line of scrimmage.   Approved a rule change that ensures the enforcement of all accepted penalties during successive try attempts, defined as an opportunity for a team to score one or two additional points during one scrimmage down.   Did not act on a "spot or choose" proposal from the Ravens for the winner of the overtime coin toss. In that scenario, the team would have the option to choose either which team will have the first possession of overtime or where the ball would be spotted.   Decided to include taunting among its points of emphasis for 2021. McKay clarified that the emphasis would be directed not at celebrations but toward acrimonious interaction among players.   Tabled a proposal from the Buffalo Bills that would have pushed back interviews for general manager and head-coaching positions until after the championship round of the playoffs and would have prevented hires until after the Super Bowl. It will be further studied.   Completed a study of the sharp drop in offensive holding during the 2020 season. McKay said that Walt Anderson, the NFL's senior vice president of training and development, would clarify the standard and put together a video for teams to consume before the 2021 season.
    • Need to edit something: the only restriction I had was driving. I couldn't get a license until I went at least 6 months with no problems. Then I had to get a doctor's permission to try for a driver's license. 
  • Members

    • #12.

      #12. 1,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 3,916

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 512

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • polk_high_allstar

      polk_high_allstar 16

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JoeThornburg

      JoeThornburg 150

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 684

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 4,200

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 546

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 7,544

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,676

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...