Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Strange thing happened towards the end of the game..


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

  • Like 3
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

It was odd

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah, I noticed that to and joked with my kids about they knew the outcome.

 

 

I also appreciate you calling that fumble by Watson what it was.

 

I keep seeing botched snap floated around. While it may not of been the best snap Watson lost thw ball, can't blame Center for that.

Maybe it is the C and OL coach in me but 90% of the bad snap fumbles are because of the  person at the QB position 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

That was really weird. I noticed it as well. They had Colts 8-4 and Texans 4-8 BEFORE the fumble.

 

Conspiracy theorists would say this is proof the NFL is fixed

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, w87r said:

Thinking back, Im pretty sure is was literally the play before rhe fumble as well.

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

No it was definitely before.

 

I was thinking "why do they have us at 8-4 when we're about to lose this game ?"

 

Texans had the ball at the 6 yard line and a first down.

 

They flash the graphic and then magically the fumble happens.

 

No joke

Thats what I said.

 

The play before the fumble.

 

 

Wasnt saying after, just not multiple plays before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

that's what i thought the announcer's were about to talk about when it popped up but they seemed like they didn't even know it was up there

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CamMo said:

Sometimes they do a “if things stay the same as they are right now” and throw up a graphic. Could that be it?

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, w87r said:

It definitely wasnt the time for it. At the moment it looked as of the Texans were going in for the win

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CamMo said:

Agreed. Just know I’ve seen them do stuff like that before. And we were technically ahead. 
 

Either way, no way Watson gave up that fumble on purpose. :scratch: 

No doubt he didnt, but it definitely was weird for sure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it was a message from the football gods that the Colts are receiving divine assistance. We have a particularly spiritual team and coaching staff. Perhaps the team’s prayers are being answered....:lecture:

 

That botched snap was so bizarre that I can’t help wondering if there was some divine intervention. Spirits can absolutely manipulate energy and objects. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a thing I do when the Colts have the ball...I light a candle on my table.  I had just said Lord help us win this and as soon as I said that the ball was hiked and fumbled!  I jumped up and down of course screaming!  It was in the stars?! LOL!

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely interesting it's most likely a mess-up, but it may have also been  meant as a "if the Colts can hold on here is how the standings shake up" but something got messed up or abandoned and the broadcast just ignored the graphic either intentionally or accidentally.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Mistakes happen. Remember when Fox News showed that one Supreme Court justice had died when she was alive? She lived like another 3 years after.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

One time a local newspaper years ago in a Sunday edition printed Mondays lottery results instead of Saturdays results. 

The results they printed for Monday, 24 hours ahead of time, were the exact numbers that drew in. :thinking:

How does anyone here explain this? 
in the spirit world, there is no “time”.  Spirits can see what’s going to happen in the “future.” 
Perhaps they didn’t interfere but were broadcasting to the praying Colts fans that all would be okay. :console:

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

So i was watching the game towards the end of the 4th quarter and noticed something strange before the fumble by Watson. A screen popped up showing our team already at 8-4 and Tenn with a loss. i remember thinking to myself it was kind of odd for them to show that before the game was over plus the Texans were still driving and even the announcers seemed oblivious to it  they just kept talking regularly then the fumble happened. i wonder did any of y'all noticed that as well?

Yeah I saw that as well.  Made a comment to one of my kids watching the game with me.  it was probably innocent enough.  They probably changed it when Hines returned the free kick to the 5 and didn't change it back when the refs tried to give the game to Houston.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

While that is true youd never keep it under wraps, on the other hand, who would believe them if they said anything? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

 

My shares in tin foil don't approve of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

It would have to be a conspiracy involving players on the field, at the right moment.  What, like 57 human beings on 32 teams keeping a lid on the NFL managed outcomes?  Good luck with that.

 

Sounds like a coincidental error where the folks in the "truck" couldn't adjust their new graphics quick enough to capture how fast HOU went down the field.

Watson knew the REFS were cheating for him all game so he gave the game away hahalmao :sarcasm: happy homer simpson GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That sounds good.    I would be fine with 6-8 pm and 9-11 pm ET with a 5 minute window for picks, so 16 picks should be done in 120 minutes. It would be like the real draft starting Day 3, where they get only 5 minutes between picks.     Would you have time around the beginning of April to help moderate this along with me? If it is a small window of time, it is a smaller time commitment on my front and yours, so I like this idea.   I can ask @NFLfan @csmopar and @danlhart87 again if they would be willing to make themselves available for those small windows of time thus giving us plenty of options. Let us bring this thread back up then.
    • First of all, I'd say bad fit for us. He's a 3-4 DE. In our system he'd be a tweener, or maybe even a 3T.  Great against the run, average vs the pass. Very solid 3 down guy overall in a 3-4.   IMO, even if he was a fit, we don't need run D help, and he'd be too expensive. Overall just not the benefit and value we need.    
    • Here's what we did on another board a few years ago. Worked out pretty good. 1 Round per evening 2 windows each night... picks 1-16, and then 17-32 (I think it was 7p-8p and 9-10, but could have been 8-9 and 10-11). That way, guys new pretty much when they needed to be there, and only needed to pay attention for roughly an hour per day. Really not even that long. Also gave the mods some time between windows to tidy up. 3 minute clock hence the "flash" term. If you miss a pick, you drop 5 spots (basically giving them an extra 15 minutes). If they missed it a second time, they get bumped to the end of the round and have up to an hour before the next days round starts. If they miss that, they get best player based on their primary needs.  We had 3 threads going at once, and 3 moderators. One thread for the pick announcements and general comments, one with a constantly updated order and big board, and one to manage trades. The big board management was great in terms of keeping it going and checking off who is gone. We also published team needs, but I can't remember if we tracked it except for using it when folks missed their window. Only trades allowed are pick for pick(s) so very little approval needed. No picks for existing players (We did the mock post FA fury, I think we started about 2 weeks prior to the draft).
  • Members

    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 2,607

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • nfatta

      nfatta 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 4,895

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Maxwell2

      Maxwell2 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts1324

      Colts1324 395

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • fawnlebowitz

      fawnlebowitz 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CurBeatElite

      CurBeatElite 1,308

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 7,379

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 2,031

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...