Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Decision to go for it on 4th down

Recommended Posts

I definitely would've taken the points in that situation, but overall I like Reich's 4th down aggressiveness...that said, I'd rather have some 12 year old playing Madden call the actual play.


It's not just us, I'd love to see a league wide stat of how often running between the tackles works on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1, especially out of shotgun...it can't be better than 20%

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I’ve been very outspoken about Frank’s aggressiveness and what a breath of fresh air it was compared to conservative Pagano (Chicago fans are saying the same about the lack of aggressive playcalling t

I hate to complain after a win, so this is just an observation.  I agree they had the wrong personnel on that play.   My other “observation” was the third and three.  Instead of setting up f

Hard to argue that taking the FG to go up by 7 would've been the correct call.    What kills me is the decision to run up the middle, using Hines.    I'm happy with the Win, but le

Alot of things Frank does drives me crazy but going for it on 4th down is not one of them. What most people do not understand is that football is a turn based game. Each team takes a turn with the football. When it is your turn you do one of three things. Score a TD, Score a FG or turn the ball over (yes a punt is a turnover, you are using one of your downs to give the ball back to the other team).   There is a 90% chance that we would covert on 4th and 1 (although that is in general as I beleive that bunching up players and running up the middle probably reduces the chance to about 80%.).


There is about a 35 % chance on average that Texas would have scored after we kicked a field goal assuming that they start around the 25 yard line (chance to score is higher if we go prevent defense).  So if we convert on our 90% chance and score a TD we win the game or we kick a field goal and our overall chances to win go from 90% to 60-65% based on going for it vs the field goal. 


The right decision was made we just fell into the 10% of did not make it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Yes, Reich lucked out and the Colts got a W instead of a L...no thanks to Frank's dumb decisions... 1) to go for it and 2) to give the ball to Hines up the middle.

Frank has balls unlike many lmao , just the wrong play call. It still even worked out, we got a safety out of it but the offense failed to put the game away after the safety. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, Dogg63 said:



So far, the Colts have gone for it on 4th down 24 times, which is 4th most in the league.


We have converted 15 times, which is 3rd best in the league. 


Go Colts!!

And it was still a bad call :thmup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A number of websites have projected the size of the free agent contracts.    On PFF,  they will even show you their comparisons and the math used to make the final prediction for years and dollars.   BUT....   No where am I seeing anything that reflects the fact that teams are dealing with a lowered salary cap,  and they're all going to have roughly $15 million less to spend.    I don't see any predictions that reflect that world.    Seems counter-intuitive to me.    With all the talk we've all read about how the middle class players are going to bear the burden of smaller contracts,  I'm not seeing that anywhere in these predictions.     And frankly,  I don't understand it?   If you didn't know about how Covid has hurt the NFL,  you couldn't tell by the salary predictions anywhere.    To me,  it reads pretty much as business as usual.   So.....   is it just me?     Or has anyone else noticed this?     Your thoughts?  
    • Zierlein is always a good read.   And given he's tight with Ballard,  I always recommend that you read everything he says.   It's as close as we're going to get inside Ballard's head, other than hearing from CB ourselves.   Here, he lists 10 prospects, who, for a variety of reasons, he thinks they need a really good pro day to bump up their draft status.    On a personal note,  I was surprised to NOT see two of my Stanford kids on this list.    Neither Walker Little or Paulson Adebo are on his list.    Maybe he doesn't think either needs a great pro day.   But I'd disagree.    Frankly,  I think every player who opted out needs a very good pro day.    As good as they can make it.    The absence of the combine is seriously going to hurt a big number of kids.   Here's his article.    And it includes a hyper-link to the latest updated Pro Day Schedule.   Those get under way full speed this coming week.   https://www.nfl.com/news/2021-nfl-draft-ten-prospects-who-could-use-a-pro-day-boost
    • Trade her in.   Every 3 - 4 years...... like a car. Make her think it was HER idea.
    • Imagine the players just running around in jocks with cups for their pants  
  • Members

  • Create New...