Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Sirianni on Quenton Nelson


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

If that is true. Then move him to left tackle and draft a guard next year. Oh brother.

If that happened how about this...

LT Q LG Pinter OC Kelly RG Glow RT Smith

 

We would obviously draft depth beyond that 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

If that is true. Then move him to left tackle and draft a guard next year. Oh brother.

Who knows?    Maybe that’s Ballard’s long term plan?  You might just get your wish.   I suppose it’s....   possible. 
 

When AC calls it a career, we will all find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Who knows?    Maybe that’s Ballard’s long term plan?  You might just get your wish.   I suppose it’s....   possible. 
 

When AC calls it a career, we will all find out.

That could actually happen, Nelson is a lot like Larry Allen weight wise but Nelson is even taller and Allen played some LT and was great even though his main position was OG.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

If that is true. Then move him to left tackle and draft a guard next year. Oh brother.

 

Q. is a freak athlete.  He likely would do fine anywhere on the line, though I think it's pretty obvious his best position is LG for the long-term.  With AC out, our OL may look better with Q at LT, Clark at LG, Kelly at C, Glow at RG, Smith at RT... but long-term, I think we need to be investing in AC's replacement in this year's draft.  AC is still playing at a high level but had some thoughts about retirement before this year.. he's on for this year and next.  Hopefully he stays healthy, but (IMO) it'd be ideal to pick up a young LT early in the draft, let him sit behind AC for a year and takeover.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

If that happened how about this...

LT Q LG Pinter OC Kelly RG Glow RT Smith

 

We would obviously draft depth beyond that 

I'd change it to LT Pinter, LG Q., OC Kelly, RG Glow, RT Smith.  Pinter was a TE, T, G throughout his time in college.  The first time he ever played C at any level was last week.  Actually (AC replacement) LT, LG Nelson, C Kelly, RG Smith, RT Pinter would be ideal to me.  I know Glow is only 28, and he has a  high PFF grade but he reminds me of Shipley to some extent (performs to his ceiling, but has a low one).  

 

Maybe I'm wrong, I probably am.  I know Haeg left to get real playing time.... Pinter reminds me a bit of him, but a stronger/more athletic version.  Both are very cerebral.  I think Q, Kelly, Smith (LG, C, RG) would be the best interior line arguably in league-history.. give Pinter a year (he did well last week at C) and put him at RT and he's very solid.  Get a stud to back up AC and a line with AC, Q, Kelly, Smith, Pinter next year and it is a stud OL.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, CurBeatElite said:

I'd change it to LT Pinter, LG Q., OC Kelly, RG Glow, RT Smith.  Pinter was a TE, T, G throughout his time in college.  The first time he ever played C at any level was last week.  Actually (AC replacement) LT, LG Nelson, C Kelly, RG Smith, RT Pinter would be ideal to me.  I know Glow is only 28, and he has a  high PFF grade but he reminds me of Shipley to some extent (performs to his ceiling, but has a low one).  

 

Maybe I'm wrong, I probably am.  I know Haeg left to get real playing time.... Pinter reminds me a bit of him, but a stronger/more athletic version.  Both are very cerebral.  I think Q, Kelly, Smith (LG, C, RG) would be the best interior line arguably in league-history.. give Pinter a year (he did well last week at C) and put him at RT and he's very solid.  Get a stud to back up AC and a line with AC, Q, Kelly, Smith, Pinter next year and it is a stud OL.  

I would like to see what Pinter brings to the table, he is big and strong. Clark is just bad IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

It would be nice if Q just returned to last years form at LG. That would help our run game.

I think he's battling injury issues?

 

He's still playing at a high level, but I agree he seems like he's not his normal self (which involves playing at an elite level and the best in the NFL at his position).  I think he had some sort of back issue in training camp and he missed several days of practice with back/ankle injuries last week.  https://www.colts.com/news/philip-rivers-bobby-okereke-injury-report-tennessee-titans-week-12

 

The OL as a whole seems a bit different this year.  They're doing a good job keeping Rivers upright, as evidenced by him being least sacked QB in the NFL.  They just don't seem as dominant against the run.  Not sure if it's a minor scheme change, an OL coach change, predictable play calling or due to Mack going down early (Taylor seemed like he was finding his groove before going on the CoVID list, but didn't seem to be reading things properly at a very consistent level prior).  My guess is, a combination of all the above plus a weird offseason and minor or major injuries across the line.  The OL who has missed the most time is AC, followed by Kelly - so specific to Q, it should be somewhat expected that his play falls off slightly when he loses the pro-bowlers on either side of him.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

Q. is a freak athlete.  He likely would do fine anywhere on the line, though I think it's pretty obvious his best position is LG for the long-term.  With AC out, our OL may look better with Q at LT, Clark at LG, Kelly at C, Glow at RG, Smith at RT... but long-term, I think we need to be investing in AC's replacement in this year's draft.  AC is still playing at a high level but had some thoughts about retirement before this year.. he's on for this year and next.  Hopefully he stays healthy, but (IMO) it'd be ideal to pick up a young LT early in the draft, let him sit behind AC for a year and takeover.

U r assuming Castanzo is back. The injury maybe enuff to make him retire

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

U r assuming Castanzo is back. The injury maybe enuff to make him retire

Maybe but I highly doubt it.  He went through a long thought process between retiring or resigning before he signed a 2 year deal.  It's a sprain which won't require surgery or any major rehab.  My guess is he's back in the lineup by the end of this year and will be back next year as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

U r assuming Castanzo is back. The injury maybe enuff to make him retire

 

Have no idea why you're in such a negative mood?   AC's injury is a week to week variety.   It's not a season ender.

 

Why would an injury like that cause a veteran player to retire.   Especially a guy still playing at a high level and has a big contract waiting for him next year?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/5/2020 at 12:58 AM, CurBeatElite said:

I'd change it to LT Pinter, LG Q., OC Kelly, RG Glow, RT Smith.  Pinter was a TE, T, G throughout his time in college.  The first time he ever played C at any level was last week.  Actually (AC replacement) LT, LG Nelson, C Kelly, RG Smith, RT Pinter would be ideal to me.  I know Glow is only 28, and he has a  high PFF grade but he reminds me of Shipley to some extent (performs to his ceiling, but has a low one).  

 

Maybe I'm wrong, I probably am.  I know Haeg left to get real playing time.... Pinter reminds me a bit of him, but a stronger/more athletic version.  Both are very cerebral.  I think Q, Kelly, Smith (LG, C, RG) would be the best interior line arguably in league-history.. give Pinter a year (he did well last week at C) and put him at RT and he's very solid.  Get a stud to back up AC and a line with AC, Q, Kelly, Smith, Pinter next year and it is a stud OL.  

Smith has shown to be a very solid RT. I would say Pinter could be RG and keep Smith outside. Just my opinion though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean... everybody says that and right now maybe we are the best option for him, but would that be the same in 2 years time? Who knows...    About the pick compensation - yes, I would really hope Ballard doesn't go into a bidding war with other teams. Have a firm price set and don't go over it. 1st and 3d is about the max I would be willing to give for 33 year old Stafford. 
    • Stafford has been very public about his number one goal:   Winning.   (His words, not mine).   He’s not going to want to leave because we want to pay him $25m instead of $30+ million.   The Colts give Stafford the best chance of winning.   Period.  Leaving the Colts for a money grab would be the worst look possible for him.  I don’t see that as a worry.  Honestly.    My bigger concern is the cost in draft picks to acquire him.  There may be a bidding war, which could prove very expensive.   At some point, I could see Ballard dropping out.   We will likely know in the next 6 weeks. 
    • He is 33 and has 2 years left on reasonable contract. After that you will have to give him a contract in the realm of what other top QBs are getting now and he will be getting older... So you will either have to pay big or lose him and this is while all our young pieces are moving out of their rookie contracts... So we will start losing some of them. So IMO IF we get Stafford this will be the golden window to try to go all in...  Use Stafford's best remaining years at the best contract you will have him at, to try to surround him with best talent we can get while our young player are still cheap. Later he will be older/worse on worse contract and our young studs we either be paid much more (less money to get reinforcement elsewhere) or will be gone.    So... Go all in NOW. This doesn't mean you concede the later years, but IMO the best chance we have are the next 2 years if we get Stafford. This is legitimate Superbowl contender if we can get one of the top receivers, a very good pass-rusher and some solid CBs. 
    • Odds are you can’t do all that because the salary cap is going down roughly $15-20 million.    We’re likely going to need more time.   I don’t understand the 2-year window reference?   Stafford likely has 5+ years left.   With a GM like Ballard, our window should remain open longer than that. 
  • Members

    • ColtsTone

      ColtsTone 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 413

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • luv_pony_express

      luv_pony_express 452

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 7,545

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,111

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James

      James 347

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • drakau

      drakau 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,493

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 7,047

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...