Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Most will probably disagree with this


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

I feel like a 1 year deal tops. Eventually Ballard is gonna strike gold in the draft or at least I hope. Its the one position he's struggling with. 

Personally, I'd go 2 if it was team friendly.

 

Yup, agree on the position he's most struggling with.  Lot of capital used over 4 years not to have a starter. Right now, looks like we have two situational specialist or depth guys.

 

Banogu - 2R, has looked horrible. Probably got too cute with the LB stuff. Too early to write off, but trending bad.

Turay - 2R, has looked best as a rusher, even though was known more for run D in the draft. Needs to stay healthy.

Lewis - 2R, and is a tweener. More productive this year, but not likely ever a 3 down starter kind of DE. 

Basham - 3R, waived by Indy year 2. Starting for NYJ. Not great, but cut too soon?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Personally, I'd go 2 if it was team friendly.

 

Yup, agree on the position he's most struggling with.  Lot of capital used over 4 years not to have a starter. Right now, looks like we have two situational specialist or depth guys.

 

Banogu - 2R, has looked horrible. Probably got too cute with the LB stuff. Too early to write off, but trending bad.

Turay - 2R, has looked best as a rusher, even though was known more for run D in the draft. Needs to stay healthy.

Lewis - 2R, and is a tweener. More productive this year, but not likely ever a 3 down starter kind of DE. 

Basham - 3R, waived by Indy year 2. Starting for NYJ. Not great, but cut too soon?

The only thing I’d add is that I don’t think Lewis was ever drafted to be a pass rusher like Houston is.  He’s more a run stopper.  I think they were hoping he could fill the role that Shread played and now Autry plays.  The good news is he’s coming on even if he didn’t play well last week.  I still expect the. To let Autry walk at seasons end and have Lewis take over Autry’s role.

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The only thing I’d add is that I don’t think Lewis was ever drafted to be a pass rusher like Houston is.  He’s more a run stopper.  I think they were hoping he could fill the role that Shread played and now Autry plays.  The good news is he’s coming on even if he didn’t play well last week.  I still expect the. To let Autry walk at seasons end and have Lewis take over Autry’s role.

Autry is playing at much higher level than Sheard. Sheard was a better run stopper, but that's about it. Autry is at his best when he's playing DE, where he's had his most productive years. Moving him back outside (like 2018) was a good move. He was not near as productive last year when they had him playing DT. 

 

While Autry is a tweener like DE/DT guy, he's closer to DE on the spectrum. Lewis is a tweener too, but he's on the other end of the spectrum (better rushing from DT) IMO. Lewis likely could not fill the role that Autry is playing this year. He was more productive rushing inside at OSU too.

 

Autry in his 3 years with Colts

2018 at DE (12 games/11 starts) -  9 sacks / 13 TFLs = 0.81 sacks/start & 1.21 TFL/start

2019 at DT (14 games/14 starts) - 3.5 sacks / 4 TFLs = 0.25 sacks/start & 0.29 TFL/start

2020 at DE (9 games / 8 starts) - 6 sacks / 7 TFLs = 0.75 sacks/start & 0.88 TFL/start

 

Meanwhile, Lewis has only registered sacks against two teams, with very bad OLs.

 

I'd add that Autry's production this year is even more impressive because we've now got Buckner eating too.

 

In short, letting him walk would be silly. He won't be expensive.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Autry is playing at much higher level than Sheard. Sheard was a better run stopper, but that's about it. Autry is at his best when he's playing DE, where he's had his most productive years. Moving him back outside (like 2018) was a good move. He was not near as productive last year when they had him playing DT. 

 

While Autry is a tweener like DE/DT guy, he's closer to DE on the spectrum. Lewis is a tweener too, but he's on the other end of the spectrum (better rushing from DT) IMO. Lewis likely could not fill the role that Autry is playing this year. He was more productive rushing inside at OSU too.

 

Autry in his 3 years with Colts

2018 at DE (12 games/11 starts) -  9 sacks / 13 TFLs = 0.81 sacks/start & 1.21 TFL/start

2019 at DT (14 games/14 starts) - 3.5 sacks / 4 TFLs = 0.25 sacks/start & 0.29 TFL/start

2020 at DE (9 games / 8 starts) - 6 sacks / 7 TFLs = 0.75 sacks/start & 0.88 TFL/start

 

Meanwhile, Lewis has only registered sacks against two teams, with very bad OLs.

 

I'd add that Autry's production this year is even more impressive because we've now got Buckner eating too.

 

In short, letting him walk would be silly. He won't be expensive.

I am not attempt to compare Autry’s play to Sheard.  Just using them as examples of primarily run stopping ends which is what I think Lewis was seen as when the idea of him playing end comes up.  Just that he’s a different type of end from Houston is all.  
 

I am also not saying they should let Autry walk.  I am just saying the presence of Lewis makes it a possibility is all.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Autry is playing at much higher level than Sheard. Sheard was a better run stopper, but that's about it. Autry is at his best when he's playing DE, where he's had his most productive years. Moving him back outside (like 2018) was a good move. He was not near as productive last year when they had him playing DT. 

 

While Autry is a tweener like DE/DT guy, he's closer to DE on the spectrum. Lewis is a tweener too, but he's on the other end of the spectrum (better rushing from DT) IMO. Lewis likely could not fill the role that Autry is playing this year. He was more productive rushing inside at OSU too.

 

Autry in his 3 years with Colts

2018 at DE (12 games/11 starts) -  9 sacks / 13 TFLs = 0.81 sacks/start & 1.21 TFL/start

2019 at DT (14 games/14 starts) - 3.5 sacks / 4 TFLs = 0.25 sacks/start & 0.29 TFL/start

2020 at DE (9 games / 8 starts) - 6 sacks / 7 TFLs = 0.75 sacks/start & 0.88 TFL/start

 

Meanwhile, Lewis has only registered sacks against two teams, with very bad OLs.

 

I'd add that Autry's production this year is even more impressive because we've now got Buckner eating too.

 

In short, letting him walk would be silly. He won't be expensive.

With five games to go Autry could easily wind up with double digit sacks.  I can't forsee Ballard letting him walk. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

With five games to go Autry could easily wind up with double digit sacks.  I can't forsee Ballard letting him walk. 

Yup. Jax and Houston give up sacks (both top 10 in sacks allowed), so he could get 4 more with a little luck in those 3 games. 

LVR and Pitt don't give up many.

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I noticed that Autry is FA too in 21' so if Ballard loses both that becomes easily one of the Colts biggest needs. 

Given that Oakland didn't know what they had with Autry and Ballard did and signed him to a team friendly FA contract,  I'm confident that Ballard knows this. 

 

Ballard won't **lose** anyone.   He will determine the value he is willing to pay.   He'll either re-sign the players to a deal he's comfortable with,  or he will let them walk.    That's what he's done every time.   He has a plan and pretty much sticks to it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Given that Oakland didn't know what they had with Autry and Ballard did and signed him to a team friendly FA contract,  I'm confident that Ballard knows this. 

 

Ballard won't **lose** anyone.   He will determine the value he is willing to pay.   He'll either re-sign the players to a deal he's comfortable with,  or he will let them walk.    That's what he's done every time.   He has a plan and pretty much sticks to it.

 

I'm fine keeping both i dont wanna overpay to keep them 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I'm fine keeping both i dont wanna overpay to keep them 

 

I'm with you.   100%.

 

Ballard is very, very price sensitive.     I tend to be as well.

 

But you have to have a backup plan.    So, if he lets one or both of them walk,  who is he bringing in?

 

And, we likely won't know until the moment the team announces the signing.    Damn, but the Colts are really good at not leaking.    We are TIGHT with info!

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2020 at 7:33 AM, danlhart87 said:

Colts should let Justin Houston walk next year. His numbers have been declining and I am concerned why since he has been playing next to Buckner this whole year.

 

The only issue really is who will replace him which might be the ultimate reason he is brought back for a year as a stop gap.

 

What are your thoughts?

 

 

 

Guy got a safety today. He might be getting on in years but if he signs for less than his current I'm all for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

 

 

Yea, this thread didn't age very well lol... 

 

But hey @danlhart87, perhaps Houston read your post and took it personally. Perhaps you should do the same type of thread for Oke who has been down, or Autry who didn't have a sack today. 

 

It really wasn't a positive thread though :goodluck:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EastStreet said:

 

Yea, this thread didn't age very well lol... 

 

But hey @danlhart87, perhaps Houston read your post and took it personally. Perhaps you should do the same type of thread for Oke who has been down, or Autry who didn't have a sack today. 

 

It really wasn't a positive thread though :goodluck:

Enh happens to us all.  We’ve all said something that makes us look foolish in retrospect.  Being man enough to admit it like @danlhart87 did or just moving on like most do is good enough.  It’s when people keep doubling down on wrong opinions because they can’t admit they got something wrong is when people start looking dumb which is ironic because most of the time when they double down on wrong opinions it’s because they want to be right so they can say look at how smart I am.  
 

My post here wasn’t an attempt to show up Danlhart as I like him I just thought it was cool information (how often do we get to talk about all time safety records) and this seemed like the best thread for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Enh happens to us all.  We’ve all said something that makes us look foolish in retrospect.  Being man enough to admit it like @danlhart87 did or just moving on like most do is good enough.  It’s when people keep doubling down on wrong opinions because they can’t admit they got something wrong is when people start looking dumb which is ironic because most of the time when they double down on wrong opinions it’s because they want to be right so they can say look at how smart I am.  
 

My post here wasn’t an attempt to show up Danlhart as I like him I just thought it was cool information (how often do we get to talk about all time safety records) and this seemed like the best thread for it.

I like Dan too, but did enjoy the positive joke. I'm serious though. I think he should post a negative thread (since he's Mr. Positive) on one player per week, and see if that player does better like Houston did. :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I like Dan too, but did enjoy the positive joke. I'm serious though. I think he should post a negative thread (since he's Mr. Positive) on one player per week, and see if that player does better like Houston did. :D

Better yet can he bash the hand off to Hines out of the gun into the middle of the line?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I like Dan too, but did enjoy the positive joke. I'm serious though. I think he should post a negative thread (since he's Mr. Positive) on one player per week, and see if that player does better like Houston did. :D

The week of the Steelers game we need this post:

 

”Rivers is washed and will never have a 5 TD game with the Colts.  We should move on from him after this season”

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread was started based on some misinformation.

 

In 2019  Houston had

44 tackles, 11 sacks, 13 TFL  18 QB hits and 1 safety

 

In 12 games he has

16 tackles 7.5 sacks 7 TFL 11 QB hits 2 safeties 

 

His tackle numbers are down but the rest are in line with the previous year and he has been playing roughly 53% of the snaps, similar to last year.

 

Whether or not the Colts sign him to a new a contract next year, I don't know.  But his play has not drastically dropped off, the Colts just have more guys along the line to make plays.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2020 at 9:33 AM, danlhart87 said:

Colts should let Justin Houston walk next year. His numbers have been declining and I am concerned why since he has been playing next to Buckner this whole year.

 

The only issue really is who will replace him which might be the ultimate reason he is brought back for a year as a stop gap.

 

What are your thoughts?

 

 

 

 

What are your thoughts after this game? 

 

firefly GIF

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Although this doesn't apply strictly to the DE position, I am really interested to see what happens with the cap dropping next year.  The Colts are in pretty good shape but there are many teams that are going to have serious cap issues on their hands.

 

What are the chances we pick up a couple of quality guys that other teams have to let go? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I think this thread was started based on some misinformation.

 

In 2019  Houston had

44 tackles, 11 sacks, 13 TFL  18 QB hits and 1 safety

 

In 12 games he has

16 tackles 7.5 sacks 7 TFL 11 QB hits 2 safeties 

 

His tackle numbers are down but the rest are in line with the previous year and he has been playing roughly 53% of the snaps, similar to last year.

 

Whether or not the Colts sign him to a new a contract next year, I don't know.  But his play has not drastically dropped off, the Colts just have more guys along the line to make plays.

 

Yup. I think the biggest factor is he's having to share, more than ever, at the dinner table. Adding Buchner made it pretty obvious that he'd have competition for sacks, etc.. And moving Autry back to DE was also taking a lot of food off his plate.

 

He's still #1 on the team in pass rush win rate (as of a few weeks ago). Haven't looked this week (not sure if those numbers are out), but going to guess he might even pop back on the top 10 list (in the NFL) too (he fell out of the top 10 last week).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's common knowledge that so far Luck has sucked? I know you can't link a podcast...but do you have any other links that talk about Love sucking? The last time I heard anything to that effect was during TC.   All I have found since that time (regarding Love's development) was an article from October...where Rodgers said Love was doing well...learning and opening up. And then another from a month ago that GB was pleased with his progress.    The narrative about adding GB hurting because they drafted Love should be dead...as they get ready to enter the NFCCG. And with Rodgers playing at an MVP level...it's impossible to know how Love will turn out because we won't see him in a Packer uniform for a couple of years at least.  
    • They are still in first round interview mode. I'd expect that to continue assuming they want to interview guys still in the playoffs. Keep in mind the Texans had to get special approval to interview Bieniemy when they did, because they failed to interview him on the off week. They can't interview him again till they are done (unless they seek a waiver from the NFL again).   Purely my opinion, but I think it's simple to me.   If Watson stays, Bieniemy will be the HC. Anyone other than Bieniemy is a signal that Watson is gone. That assumes though that there are teams willing to mortgage their future...   
    • TO's stats absolutely warranted first ballot... but he had antics on the field (e.g., the Dallas Star incident, spitting in DeAngelo Hall's face) and was also a cry-baby who was often in conflict with the media and front offices of teams he played on, and thought by many to be a subpar teammate (at least for portions of his career).  He also did other things (e.g., the Desparate Housewives skit before MNF, OD on pain meds) which made him unpopular with the media, who are ultimately who vote players into the HOF.   Marvin also deserved to be a 1st ballot HOFer.  Although he got in before TO, I firmly believe Marv's alleged shooting incidents and the allegations of him punching a younger fan at a pro-bowl game were held against him in voting.  I know it's said that the HOF is for what players did on the field, and off field stuff shouldn't come into play -- but it's voted on by people (i.e., sports writers) and there surely is some sort of human element that goes into the vote casting process.     You're right... Reggie will get in, just a matter of when.  While I do think some of Marv's off-field issues hindered him, there were also guys like Andre Reed (who had been eligible for almost a decade) and Tim Brown who were waiting to get into the HOF... both deserving HOFers who got overlooked previous years as guys like Jerry Rice and Cris Carter got in.   While I think the main knock on Reggie will be that he was WR#2 to Marvin for a decent part of his career, and the fact he wasn't all-decade team and only a 1x First-team All Pro (and 2x 2nd team).  That said, he's one of the most prolific WRs in NFL history and has some of the best post-season stats of any WR in NFL history.  Megatron definitely was a physical freak who changed the game, but his career was not long enough to put him in the record books like Reggie (who is top 10 in just about every category and top 5 in several post-season categories).  The only other WR on the ballot is Torry Holt who is a 2x finalist -- Reggie has more all-pro appearances, 1 less probowl than Holt, though Reggie has more yards, TDs and receptions.  They both have 1 SB ring, with Reggie having greater post-season success with individual stats, and Holt was 2nd team 2000s all-decade which Reggie wasn't.  Holt was also 2nd fiddle to Isaac Bruce for a decent part of his career.   Not making any guarantees, but compared to the WR classes when Marv and TO were finalists (including guys like Reed and Tim Brown who had been on the wait-list for a while) as well as studs across the board (e.g., Jerome Bettis, Derrick Brooks, Michael Strahan, Aeneas Williams, Junior Seau, WIll Shields, Favre, Orlando Pace, etc..).... I think this class is pretty weak.  After Peyton and Woodson, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, I don't see any guy in this class who clearly deserves to be a HOFer more than Reggie does.      He has to retired first and if he keeps taking his Benjamin Button diet, that may not happen.
    • Personally I think the future QB is already on the roster in Eason. To be honest we don't have a clue on his abilities in the NFL. He has all the physical tools. In this offense he wouldn't have to be superman to be successful.  I am pretty sure Ballard will pull some surprises out of his little black book. He seems to do that every season so far. 
    • Or your bling "Love" of him has altered yours... 
  • Members

    • Douzer

      Douzer 512

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bert Johns

      Bert Johns 99

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fourstar40

      Fourstar40 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 227

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 2,140

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sikma

      Sikma 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeacefulEasonFeeling

      PeacefulEasonFeeling 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James

      James 347

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 6,561

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 8,681

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...