Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ESPN Power Ranking (merge)


Recommended Posts

For what it’s worth....

 

This week, after we got spanked good, the Colts are now ranked.....   9th.   Last week we were ranked ....   8th.   Yes, we lost bad and yet we only fell one spot. 
 

Just posted this to show you what the outside world thinks of the Colts.   They still like us.

 

Ranked behind us are the Rams, who are 10th, the Ravens, who beat us, are 11th, and the Browns, who also beat us, are 12th.  
 

It would appear the people who cover the NFL for a living like the Colts more than many in this fan base. 
 

Just saying. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not directed at either above comment just a general thought about this...

 

Do you think Chris Berman, Tony Gonzalez, Jim Nanz, etc watch all 16 NFL games each week or do you think they watch 2 or 3 and someone (an intern) watches the games and provides them summary notes? I wonder if a personality, like Phil Simms, actually does know more about the Colts than a regular fan. Guys like Nate Burelson make me think they watch all or at least most of the games but others I'm not so sure.

 

Thoughts?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think its any secret that the reason we looked bad is because of a relative anomaly, we were without two of our best players.  But one will contribute this week and hopefully AC will be back soon.

 

(And those two great players are probably at the 2nd and 3rd most important positions on the team, LT and 3T (for a 43 zone)...for those who don't appreciate the concept of positional value)

 

Its what happens when you lose your talented players and have to play with backups at important positions, you look bad but it doesn't necessarily mean you'll stink every week.

 

You know, when our best player at the most important position,  Luck, wasn't 100% we'd go 8-8, and when he, our best player at our most important position played, we made the playoffs.  Then when he was out for the year, you know like last year when we had JB at our most important position, we stunk again.

 

I assume when a team's best players are expected to be gone for a short time, it doesn't impact their power rankings that much. 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Its what happens when you lose your talented players and have to play with backups, you look bad but it doesn't necessarily mean you'll stink every week.

Specifically, in a year when your best players can be out due to positive testing results and not injury. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

For what it’s worth....

 

This week, after we got spanked good, the Colts are now ranked.....   9th.   Last week we were ranked ....   8th.   Yes, we lost bad and yet we only fell one spot. 
 

Just posted this to show you what the outside world thinks of the Colts.   They still like us.

 

Ranked behind us are the Rams, who are 10th, the Ravens, who beat us, are 11th, and the Browns, who also beat us, are 12th.  
 

It would appear the people who cover the NFL for a living like the Colts more than many in this fan base. 
 

Just saying. 

That’s quite a change for ESPN.
 

The lesser known “Jawbone of an A**” poll dropped us to 31st. :funny:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Random thought, but just a couple weeks ago we were talked about as one of those “getting hot at just the right time” teams.

 

Then, at least last week, we became that “hurt at the wrong time” team key with guys like AC, Kelly, and Buck out.

 

With Buck coming back for sure, hopefully our D can step back up. As for our offense? I think we lose until AC comes back. When he does, I’ll have much more confidence in W’s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you take into account we were missing Buckner, Autry, Okereke, JT, Kelly, and Castonzo, 6 of our starters, we really weren’t all that awful. We definitely shouldn’t be ranked number 9, but that loss was kinda to be expected imo

 

Also, if Rock doesn’t get that hands to the face penalty and doesn’t allow the AJ Brown touchdown, I think we at least keep that game close; those two mistakes opened the floodgates

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Like I said in another thread it’s very unlikely the Colts and every team they are fighting with is going to win every game they should here on out so let’s just wait and see what happens.

I mentioned in another thread about there being 5 games left and plenty of time.

 

Let's go Colts!

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

We actually don't have to but it helps

 

If we lose to the raiders, then we're behind them, the browns and the Ravens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine changed the title to ESPN Power Ranking (merge)
8 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Still a 7th seed means an away game against the Chiefs.  We would need a significant amount of luck to beat the chiefs.  

A cold, windy January day at Arrowhead would negate some of their "track star" speed, and we could probably beat anyone just once in a relatively low scoring, run dominated game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We’ve spent the last 15 years going on about not putting any stock in power rankings because they never rated the Colts high enough and they never gave us respect when we were winning, and now because they didn’t ding us for a loss it’s suddenly a barometer of where we are?
 

GIF by Giphy QA

 

Nah. Pass that garbage off on someone else. Power rankings are still for rubes. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/2/2020 at 7:38 AM, Mitch Connors said:

Not directed at either above comment just a general thought about this...

 

Do you think Chris Berman, Tony Gonzalez, Jim Nanz, etc watch all 16 NFL games each week or do you think they watch 2 or 3 and someone (an intern) watches the games and provides them summary notes? I wonder if a personality, like Phil Simms, actually does know more about the Colts than a regular fan. Guys like Nate Burelson make me think they watch all or at least most of the games but others I'm not so sure.

 

Thoughts?

 

Phil Sims?

Football knowledge?

The Office Lol GIF

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IDK. Sounds like some folks are trying to create a boogie man. First it was O'Brien, now it's Easterby lol...    And I don't think Houston treated DW bad. Allowing him to be part of the process, or weighing his input, doesn't automatically equate to doing what he says, or taking his suggestions. He's an employee, not the owner, and not part of FO management. We'll never know exactly what words were used, or what exactly the agreement was. Houston FO's intent may have been to simply keep him informed and allow him to give input. And honestly, a player should have more than that. To me, sound like he was kept informed, and was allowed to provide input. He was just unhappy when they hired the GM he didn't pick.   Anyway, it was Watson that went outside of the team and leaked and tweeted. That's diva behavior to me. Houston FO may have been bad, but DW wasn't in the right either. They just purged the FO, and have a new GM and HC. They should now cleanse the locker room too and use the picks to start fresh.
    • Goff would be interesting if Stafford fell through. That contract would have to be torn up. He is very young still so you could have him for ten years.  Not sure why the rams said what they did. He had thumb surgery and came  back to play like a week or two later so he wasn’t 100%. What kind of run game do the rams have. Goff has been to a SB too.
    • I mean O’Brien was the last hurdle for him to clear, right? When he was hired he was given the reign. But as Easteby became more and more engrained to McNair it was clear that despite all of that the balance of power was shifting. I’m sure O’Brien was given a chance to be the head coach under Easterby, and that is ultimately why he signed on for the Hopkins trade, even though the writing was already on the wall. As soon as the season ended and the dominoes started falling who was pushing them? It’s not McNair... He’s just along for the ride. I think Easterby is giving him the instructions.    Whatever it is down there, it’s out of the ordinary. 
    • he needs Sean McVay to be successful, because Sean McVay is a genius   I know he is, because ESPN told me so 
  • Members

    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 6,308

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Qcolts

      Qcolts 28

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • M1873

      M1873 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rolltide_gocolts

      Rolltide_gocolts 64

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sumo63

      Sumo63 527

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Southern Cal

      Southern Cal 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KSColt

      KSColt 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AustinnKaine

      AustinnKaine 279

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Starlord

      Starlord 7

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Cujo54

      Cujo54 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...