Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The problem at Lt


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

According to SBNation Frank is considering switching Braden Smith to LT. 

 

 

They should move Mo Allie Cox to RT then since he is a good blocker, ask him to load up on 10 Big Macs a day the next few days :) , a lot of OL have been former TEs before, Joe Reitz was one and was a basketball player too like MAC. Maybe that should be MAC in the off season, becoming a utility OL than a utility TE and put on some weight and more muscle.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Stephen said:

How will we fix the Lt situation  with constanzo  out

I know this is a great forum to second guess every decision, but golly, isn't there a plan for this already or did the FO just realize that its possible for our starting LT to get rolled up on?

 

And that he's old and may want to retire?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

They should move Mo Allie Cox to RT then since he is a good blocker, ask him to load up on 10 Big Macs a day the next few days :) , a lot of OL have been former TEs before, Joe Reitz was one and was a basketball player too like MAC. Maybe that should be MAC in the off season, becoming a utility OL than a utility TE and put on some weight and more muscle.

I actually think that is a good idea.  At 6.7 he's a nice target, but he's a bit of a lumbering giant in open space. (although somebody will tell me he runs a 4.7 40)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DougDew said:

I know this is a great forum to second guess every decision, but golly, isn't there a plan for this already or did the FO just realize that its possible for our starting LT to get rolled up on?

 

And that he's old and may want to retire?

Isn't that what you are doing? Second guessing? haha

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I know this is a great forum to second guess every decision, but golly, isn't there a plan for this already or did the FO just realize that its possible for our starting LT to get rolled up on?

 

And that he's old and may want to retire?

I'm sure there has been a contingency plan, but I'm sure plan #A was for AC to play as much of the season as healthy as possible and then try to find the permanent fix in the off season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

I'm sure there has been a contingency plan, but I'm sure plan #A was for AC to play as much of the season as healthy as possible and then try to find the permanent fix in the off season. 

Immortal words...

 

There is no try.  There is either do, or not do.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

If AC can't go

 

LT Smith 

LG Q

OC Kelly

RG Glow

RT Pinter 

 

My solution 

 

...and Braden Smith's off season contract just got that much more expensive.

 

Also, if Braden Smith exceeds expectations at LT, drafting an RT can be accomplished as late as Round 3. Might be able hit 2 birds with one stone. :) 

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, PaulSTL said:

Better fix it soon.  Been watching Rivers for years and when his LT goes down, Rivers’ play declines substantially.  We saw that on Sunday.  

Huh?

 

This happens to Phillip Rivers?

 

No!   This happens to every quarterback in the history of football when their left tackle.  Thus isn’t a Phillip Rivers thing, it’s a quarterback thing.   I get that Rivers is a statue.   I get he’s not mobile, he’s not going to spin out if the grasp.   But come on..  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

...and Braden Smith's off season contract just got that much more expensive.

 

Also, if Braden Smith exceeds expectations at LT, drafting an RT can be accomplished as late as Round 3. Might be able hit 2 birds with one stone. :) 

Most people thought Ballard was scouting Lance but perhaps Radunz was the one he was looking at

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Thebrashandthebold said:

They should have prepared for this last year. I think it was a very slim chance that AC would not have a season ending injury at some point. Perhaps for him it is career ending.

Apparently you’re not following the info coming out.   It’s a week to week thing.  Not a career thing.   So says the head coach, Frank Reich.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Hold on

We got a winner 

 

10 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Apparently you’re not following the info coming out.   It’s a week to week thing.  Not a career thing.   So says the head coach, Frank Reich.  

I doubt any of the statements are true. I doubt AC will be back this season and probably permanently. But, I hope you are right but that position needs to be shored up quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

...and Braden Smith's off season contract just got that much more expensive.

 

Also, if Braden Smith exceeds expectations at LT, drafting an RT can be accomplished as late as Round 3. Might be able hit 2 birds with one stone. :) 

 

If Braden Smith can play even halfway decent at LT he will prove to be IMO just as much of a draft steal as Leonard was.  He is already close as it is.  

 

He is already one of the most under-rated Colts.  Gets overshadowed by Q on the OL but tackles are harder to find than guards.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Thebrashandthebold said:

 

I doubt any of the statements are true. I doubt AC will be back this season and probably permanently. But, I hope you are right but that position needs to be shored up quickly.

If I may ask...   

 

Why do you doubt the statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sherman, please set the Way Back Machine for the offseason.

 

Ok, everybody remember when AC was contemplating retirement?  And we all swallowed our collective tongues because we knew that we could not go an entire season with LeRaven Clark at LT?  And that we had No Answer for a LT problem without AC?

 

Yeah.  Talk about coming home to roost.

 

Here we are, with at least a game or two without AC, and the season on the line.

 

The only solution we left ourselves with was drafting a player.  Nothing else.  The solution is a future solution.  Right now, it's AC or boy howdy.  Yeah.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

Sherman, please set the Way Back Machine for the offseason.

 

Ok, everybody remember when AC was contemplating retirement?  And we all swallowed our collective tongues because we knew that we could not go an entire season with LeRaven Clark at LT?  And that we had No Answer for a LT problem without AC?

 

Yeah.  Talk about coming home to roost.

 

Here we are, with at least a game or two without AC, and the season on the line.

 

The only solution we left ourselves with was drafting a player.  Nothing else.  The solution is a future solution.  Right now, it's AC or boy howdy.  Yeah.

Smith is plenty capable of playing LT

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Huh?

 

This happens to Phillip Rivers?

 

No!   This happens to every quarterback in the history of football when their left tackle.  Thus isn’t a Phillip Rivers thing, it’s a quarterback thing.   I get that Rivers is a statue.   I get he’s not mobile, he’s not going to spin out if the grasp.   But come on..  

It didn't  happen  to tannehill.  They let go of a Lt  got two sent to ir and the still not skipping  a beat

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DougDew said:

I know this is a great forum to second guess every decision, but golly, isn't there a plan for this already or did the FO just realize that its possible for our starting LT to get rolled up on?

 

And that he's old and may want to retire?

You are right! Great second guess. So we should have passed on Buckner and got a developmental LT who could have come in in game 11 to replace an injured Constanzo! What if our team is 4-11 because our DL sucks. Do we second guess because we needed a  three technique tackle and we chose a backup OT? Can't fill ever position in every draft. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Stephen said:

It didn't  happen  to tannehill.  They let go of a Lt  got two sent to ir and the still not skipping  a beat

 

Not skipping a beat?

 

Tell that to the Titans.     It's not like they're 10-2.

 

It's not like we didn't just beat them a few weeks ago.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, hoosierhawk said:

You are right! Great second guess. So we should have passed on Buckner and got a developmental LT who could have come in in game 11 to replace an injured Constanzo! What if our team is 4-11 because our DL sucks. Do we second guess because we needed a  three technique tackle and we chose a backup OT? Can't fill ever position in every draft. 

Looking back at things Ballard made a brilliant move trading for Buckner.

 

He alone has completed changed the DL and is the Colts MVP for 2020.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DougDew said:

I know this is a great forum to second guess every decision, but golly, isn't there a plan for this already or did the FO just realize that its possible for our starting LT to get rolled up on?

 

And that he's old and may want to retire?

 

No Doug!    No one in the Colts front office has ever thought of this.   In fact, no other poster has ever thought of this.   You, in all your unique skills are the first person to EVER think of this.

 

I'm sure some intern working in the front office and closely monitoring this website for great insight, is going to flag this, print it,  and run it into Ballard's office.   I suspect he'll have a V-8 moment and slap his forehead!

 

Genius!    Brilliant!    Why didn't anyone else think of that?!?

 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ballard didn't say it was definite.   He didn't rule it out.   He just said as of this minute.    I think he's hoping to find out in April and May.      He still might end up deciding Eason is OK as the back-up.   I was only trying to impress upon those in the "Throw Jacob Eason in and see what we have" crowd that Ballard has crushed that dream for 2021.    But I wouldn't rule out 2022....  at least not yet.  
    • TY - 2Y/22M - he can still play but he’s not Tyreek Hill taking the top of defenses anymore, and with his disappearing act at the beginning of the year I’m afraid to sign him any longer or with too much guaranteed. Partly for sentimental reasons I want him to stay, but I do think he’s still got some juice.    Mack - 1Y/1M - Likable player but due to his position and injury, no way can I justify giving him much more than vet minimum.    Houston - 1Y/8M - Fell off a lot this year compared to his first year. Still our best edge player, basically by default and I’d be hoping we can get a more 2019 performance out of him at arguably our weakest position on the team.    Autry - Walk. He will price himself out with an inflated sense of value because he’s gotten decent sack numbers, but he is the definition of JAG and I’d only keep him if he agreed to a minimum contract.    Rhodes - 1Y/6M - He was a stud this year. If we could guarantee that he won’t revert back to his last two years in Minnesota I would be willing to go longer and higher. With how much he fell off after getting paid the first time, I’m not giving him a long term deal.    Walker - 1Y/2M - He was playing a very small percentage of downs at the end of the year so I’m keeping him less based on ability and more based on leadership and football savvy.    Hooker - Walk. Both sides need to just move on. I’d keep him at minimum too but I think both sides want a fresh start. Also a little miscast in the current defense so no reason to force a square peg into a round hole.    Brissett - 1Y/5M - Too big of a fan of Brissett as a man to want to see him leave. I don’t want him starting but he’s a very solid backup and compared to the 20M we gave him last year, I can live with his salary being at 1/4 of that this year.    Pascal and MAC both tendered at 2.24M. I want to bring in Kenny Golladay or Allen Robinson and Pascal is JAG so he’s not falling into my future plans much. I’m a big fan of MAC and I wouldn’t mind seeing him play the Jack Doyle role. He’s a better blocker, has better hands, and is more explosive.    I may be lowballing some guys but I’d hate to fall into the trap of overvaluing our guys and keeping them just because you want to keep your own. Unfortunately, I think the five most important positions on the team also coincide with our five weakest positions on the team; QB, WR, CB, DE, and LT. Fortunately we’ve got a good cap situation and this is the perfect year to be needing a QB. 
    • If we let Walker Walk, (and I think it’s likely) it’s not because we want an upgrade.   It’s because we simply don’t play him enough.   I think East Street has the numbers in snaps, but I think Walker is roughly playing 25-30 percent of the snaps.   That’s it.    We can't pay him enough for that.   Some other team will PLAY him more so they will PAY him more.    When Walker is off the field, we are either playing a 4-2-5 or a 4-1-6.   Leonard plays basically 100 percent of the snaps and I think Oke is about 55-60 percent.     There is a method to our madness.  
    • I'm surprised some folks want to resign Walker. Imo we definitely need an upgrade.... I'd let him walk.
    • Colts have won one playoff game in 6 seasons. Some more losing seasons and this team is no longer even in the top half of NFL franchises. They would be mostly irrelevant. I can’t imagine Irsay going for that.   Ballard is definitely safe...but this is year 5 and I am assuming there is a bit more urgency than just waiting for the perfect opportunity to come along.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...