Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

If the season ended today... (merge)


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheLegend87 said:

Those losses to the Ravens and Browns really hurt.

I’d argue the Jags one was worse; losing to the Browns, Ravens, and Titans are understandable, they’re good teams; we shouldn’t have lost to the Jags. We weren’t prepared enough, if we had beaten the Jags we’d be neck in neck with Tenn right now

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chickenMan said:

We’d be facing KC and it would be a tough game, but any given Sunday. I still believe in this team, I think Sunday was due to injuries and not being prepared defensively. If we can get everyone but Castonzo back and come out of the gates swinging on D, we stand a chance against anybody, even a small chance

If taylor runs like he did at Wisconsin  we could beat kc, but can't  without  a good rg

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Stephen said:

If taylor runs like he did at Wisconsin  we could beat kc, but can't  without  a good rg

IMO the offensive scheme we use has more to do with Taylor's success. (or lack of)

Having Rivers use the shot gun hampers Taylor from doing what he does best. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

IMO the offensive scheme we use has more to do with Taylor's success. (or lack of)

Having Rivers use the shot gun hampers Taylor from doing what he does best. 

 

Shouldn't  using the shotgun make taylor hit the hole at full speed versustaking the ball directly  under center. I wonder how henry gets most his carries 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, danlhart87 said:

Colts barely sneak into the playoffs at 9 - 7 and grab the 7th Seed.

 

Their first opponent is the 14 - 2 KC Chiefs and nobody gives us a shot.

 

Colts go in and win pulling off the upset of the ages!

 

Ok wake me up :peek:

25 years after doing the same thing.  Now that would be cool

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Colts barely sneak into the playoffs at 9 - 7 and grab the 7th Seed.

 

Their first opponent is the 14 - 2 KC Chiefs and nobody gives us a shot.

 

Colts go in and win pulling off the upset of the ages!

 

Ok wake me up :peek:

I mean, if we’re going by history and superstition the Chiefs definitely don’t want to play us in the first round... 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Colts barely sneak into the playoffs at 9 - 7 and grab the 7th Seed.

 

Their first opponent is the 14 - 2 KC Chiefs and nobody gives us a shot.

 

Colts go in and win pulling off the upset of the ages!

 

Ok wake me up :peek:

It's not that far-fetched (other than us making the playoffs at 9-7, cause we'd probably lose all the tiebreakers) but in 2010 the Seahawks won the NFC West with a 7-9 record, and beat the defending Superbowl Champion Saints in the 1st playoff game.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

If both finish 15 - 1 who gets 1 seed

Depends who Steelers would lose to.

 

If they lost to either Buffalo, Denver or LAC then KC would have the tie breaker.

 

Tie breaker:

1.No h2h

2.Same conference record

3. Common opponents

 

Would go to 3rd tie breaker and KC would have better record vs common opponents

 

If PItt loses to Washington, Pitt would have tie breaker with better conference record.

 

 

If Steelers lose to Colts then it would go to 

Tie breaker:

4. Strength of victory

Currently - KC -.420/ PIT - .413

5. Strength of Schedule

Currently - KC .431/PIT - .413

 

 

Those are definitely subject to change so to hard to know at this point.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine changed the title to If the season ended today... (merge)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah it is expensive and I'm generally against trading up in the draft, and I'm much more a fan of trading down, but as I've said before there is one exception for that rule. It's the QB. Like with many things QBs tilt the conversation on its head. Just the value if you hit is SO BIG, that you have to do it if you get the chance(and you love the QB sitting there of course). There is practically no bad trade value if you trade up for a QB and he hits.    Also, about the hit rates of QBs. my opinion is that it's not just about the QB and his talent/drive/determination/work ethic. The environment, teammates, coaching, etc. play a big role in whether they succeed or fail. There are very few Andrew Lucks who will succeed no matter what garbage you throw at them(and he was thrown into one of the biggest piles of garbage in the league when it comes to GM-coach combo + the talent around him). For most QBs, even highly drafted, their talent needs to be guided and nurtured in the right direction. And in this line of thoughts - I think some of those QBs could have been successful in another environment and/or with a bit more luck(Darnold/Wentz), while others were probably doomed from the start because of their own failings(Rosen, Trubisky). And here is where I think we actually have somewhat of an advantage. I like our GM and our FO. I like our coach generally(even if I have some playcalling beefs with him). I like our roster and the foundations of our OLine. I think this situation gives better than average chance to a young QB to succeed. It's still no guarantee, but again... at some point you will have to make a move of some sort. We cannot keep rethreading the Rivers' of the world.  At some point Ballard will have to trust his evaluation of a QB he loves and just do what it takes to get him. 
    • Sorry, but no, our window is not closing.   Almost all of Ballard's top players are still on their rookie contracts.   This team is EARLY in it's window.    There is still great opportunity for the Colts.   Your viewpoint is a fan's viewpoint.    It is not the view of how an NFL front office person thinks.   There is still time.   Patience can be your friend.  
    • I can only think of one team that did that....    New Orleans traded their whole draft for Ricky Williams I think in the early 2000's.  And I don't think it's been done since.   Trading up that far is really,  really expensive.    There's good reason why he doesn't like the idea of trading up that far.  First, it's incredibly expensive.    Second,  hitting on the right quarterback in in the first round,  even high in the first round is roughly a 50-50 proposition.   Look at Phily and the Rams.   Both traded a bundle to move to the top of the first...   picks 1 and 2 to take Goff and Wentz.   Both have had a moments.    And as of today,  neither is comfortable in their job.   Both are on the hot seat.   Look at the top of the '18 draft.   Mayfield and Allen are winners.    Darnold and Rosen not so much.    You gotta move down to the bottom of the first to add in Lamar Jackson...    who would've thought he'd work out as well as he did.   Props to Baltimore.   But it's a huge gamble.   It's hit and miss on the most scrutinized position in Pro Sports.  
    • My hope would be a GM is blinded by the volume and the headlines rather than the absolute value. We've seen teams do that trade in the past, where it's bad value-wise but it looks good on paper. Now the question is - are the Jets or MIA this easily fooled? Probably not but yeah... it's a fun hypothetical. 
    • I mean... hopefully we are not trading up Najee Harris or Travis Etienne. Then for SURE I don't want anything to do with it. But if you can get Wilson or Fields? I'd do that any day. I think people are weirded out by the number of picks rather than by the value.    This whole Colts draft past R1 has worse value than an average additional 1st.  https://www.drafttek.com/nfl-trade-value-chart.asp   R2    Pick 54 - 360 pts R3    Pick 84 - 170 R4    Pick 117 - 60 R5    Pick 148 - 31 R6    Pick 180 - 18.2 R7    Pick  211 - 5.8   ----------------------------- The total value is 645, which is the equivalent to the 29th pick of the draft.    My solution here would be to take our future 1st and trade it for late 1st or early 2nd this year.... then trade down a bunch of times to replenish the volume of picks for this year. Seattle has done similar things in recent years when they didn't have tons of picks.   Example: Trade future 1st for no. 33...  Trade 33(580) for 50(400) and 81(185) Trade 50(400) for 58(320) and 100(100) => pick at 58 Trade 81(185) for 92(132) and 124(48) => pick at 92 Trade 100(100) for 107(80) and 169(22.6)  Trade 107(80) for 117(60) and 180(18.2) => pick at 117, pick at 124, pick at 169, pick at 180   So in essense for 21 and 2022 1st rounder you get... no.2 and your pick of a QB after Lawrence, 2nd rounder(58), 3d rounder(92), 2x 4th rounders(117 and 124) and 2x 6th rounders(169 and 180).    That's just an example of what can be done. 
  • Members

    • Pilgrim

      Pilgrim 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RDNScot

      RDNScot 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,234

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • luv_pony_express

      luv_pony_express 438

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 36

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 7,504

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SicWhitted

      SicWhitted 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...