-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
I wouldn't sweat it. There are folks that are realistic that realize that without a player involved, the Lions will get a first rounder at least for Stafford. Like with Buckner for 4 years, giving up a 1st rounder for 4 years at least of quality QB play, if the Colts feel they will get it after their evaluation of Stafford, is a no brainer to me. If we are getting Carl Lawson in FA and are rostering Houston, Lewis, Turay and Banogu, I would rather go for a WR in Round 3. We might get a quality one then. Also, a LB on Day 3 would be nice.
-
I read that Kansas City is 19 million over the salary cap, so they will have to make changes within the organization. A few top players will still be there, but the team will lose many to free agency. KC might not be as dominant a year or two from now. Also, other teams will eventually figure out the Chiefs' play calling and adjust accordingly.
-
https://www.si.com/nfl/lions/news/salary-cap-hit-trading-stafford Hit Cap Hit for 2021 on the team that trades for him will be $20 M and it will be $23 M in 2022.
-
In a trade the team trading the player away has to take the hit on remaining bonus money. The numbers I have say he's a 33M cap hit for next year if detroit keeps him. But 13M of that cap hit is bonus money that Detroit would have to pay. Which means his cap hit for the team receiving him would be 20M for next year.
-
By Indycrazy1287 · Posted
I completely agree man. For someone whos pretty damn mobile it was out of character imo. Ive been going through different reasons in my head but still a perplexing choice.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts