Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Big Grover gets a three year extension


Recommended Posts

Would have been interesting to see this signing occur after this upcoming game without Buckner. If he has a terrible game without him, would his contract offer go down a bit saying yeah, let’s see your tape with Buck and without. Idk. Of course if he dominates tomorrow, the player can do the same and say I need a little more cash. Glad he is successful in his contract 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very much deserved. Love his story too. Small school guy drafted right around where he should have been, and with hard work and time developed himself into a good starter. Definition of a lunch pail and hard hat type of guys.

 

Heres to hoping we find more Grover Stewart’s in the draft.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jdubu said:

Would have been interesting to see this signing occur after this upcoming game without Buckner. If he has a terrible game without him, would his contract offer go down a bit saying yeah, let’s see your tape with Buck and without. Idk. Of course if he dominates tomorrow, the player can do the same and say I need a little more cash. Glad he is successful in his contract 

You don't hire/fire people or make salary decisions based off of one day at work...you look at the overall picture. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very happy to have him locked up. As to all the comments about this signing being a "friendly contract" though. It's not really "friendly" at all... Makes him the 16th highest paid interior DL in the league, which includes 3 tech guys. I didn't go through the list and split out who is 3 tech and who are NTs, but I'm guessing it puts Grover in the top 3-5ish paid NTs. I also think it's also fair to question the impact of adding Buckner, like @Jdubu mentioned.

 

Here's the list if anyone wants to go and break down the 3 techs vs NTs.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/rankings/average/defensive-tackle/

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Very happy to have him locked up. As to all the comments about this signing being a "friendly contract" though. It's not really "friendly" at all... Makes him the 16th highest paid interior DL in the league, which includes 3 tech guys. I didn't go through the list and split out who is 3 tech and who are NTs, but I'm guessing it puts Grover in the top 3-5ish paid NTs. I also think it's also fair to question the impact of adding Buckner, like @Jdubu mentioned.

 

Here's the list if anyone wants to go and break down the 3 techs vs NTs.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/rankings/average/defensive-tackle/

It is $3m cheaper/yr than DJ Readers deal though.

 

I get your point though.

 

 

Would call it a mildly friendly deal, because it could of been more,l for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, w87r said:

It is $3m cheaper/yr than DJ Readers deal though.

 

I get your point though.

 

Would call it a mildly friendly deal, because it could of been more,l for sure.

Reader was a monster though. Current health challenges aside, he was high 70s and 80s (PFF) for several years to earn that contract. And even then, a lot of folks were a bit surprised he got the contract. Grover has yet to break into the 70s. 

 

I just wouldn't call the contract friendly at all. If anything, I'd call it mildly unfriendly. Don't get me wrong, I love the fact we have him locked up. I love some of the things we've seen from him this year. That play a few games ago when he chased a RB down from behind was tremendous for a NT. He's been pretty good at Ts so far. The only ding on him this year is I don't think he's registered a sack yet. Reader has 13 QBHs last year, and some sacks. Only point is, he'll be another top 5ish paid guy at the position. We're going to have a lot of those.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

Reader was a monster though. Current health challenges aside, he was high 70s and 80s (PFF) for several years to earn that contract. And even then, a lot of folks were a bit surprised he got the contract. Grover has yet to break into the 70s. 

 

I just wouldn't call the contract friendly at all. If anything, I'd call it mildly unfriendly. Don't get me wrong, I love the fact we have him locked up. I love some of the things we've seen from him this year. That play a few games ago when he chased a RB down from behind was tremendous for a NT. He's been pretty good at Ts so far. The only ding on him this year is I don't think he's registered a sack yet. Reader has 13 QBHs last year, and some sacks. Only point is, he'll be another top 5ish paid guy at the position. We're going to have a lot of those.

 

 

Yeah I get it.

 

Couple that with now we will have around $65m in cap space next year. Things will be getting tight.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah I get it.

 

Couple that with now we will have around $65m in cap space next year. Things will be getting tight.

Very tight. I've been wanting to look at salary cap closer with some of the big contracts coming up in the next two years. I'm just really happy that Ballard is hitting on a lot of the draft picks. Even so, you have to think there will be some casualties.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Very tight. I've been wanting to look at salary cap closer with some of the big contracts coming up in the next two years. I'm just really happy that Ballard is hitting on a lot of the draft picks. Even so, you have to think there will be some casualties.

I think we will probably be moving on from Glowinski and Doyle next year. That alone will free up about $12m.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, w87r said:

I think we will probably be moving on from Glowinski and Doyle next year. That alone will free up about $12m.

 

Didn't someone post recently that Glow was enjoying a bounceback year and is one of the highest graded O-lineman?

 

And you think we're moving on?    Why?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, w87r said:

I think we will probably be moving on from Glowinski and Doyle next year. That alone will free up about $12m.

You think? Doyle is a hometown guy that we just extended. I know there's a contract out, but his cap hit the next two years is actually less than this year and years past. Glow is having his best year and is under contract through 21. He's probably the last guy I'd see us cutting after the season.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Didn't someone post recently that Glow was enjoying a bounceback year and is one of the highest graded O-lineman?

 

And you think we're moving on?    Why?

 

Because money will be to tight. Cap casualty. Not that I want to move on from him.

 

 

Sometimes you have to make tough decisions.

 

As of now we are down to $65m to spend, with Eason as our only QB and 23 FAs.

 

Releasing him gives us $5.25m more cap space.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

You think? Doyle is a hometown guy that we just extended. I know there's a contract out, but his cap hit the next two years is actually less than this year and years past. Glow is having his best year and is under contract through 21. He's probably the last guy I'd see us cutting after the season.

I dony want to cut/trade them either but how are we going to fill out the roster?

 

As I posted above Glow clears $5.25m and Doyle clears $4.35m in space.

 

 

Tough decisions need to be made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Stewart is an interesting story here...

 

Drafted at the bottom of the 4th round in Ballard's first draft for us, 2017, along with Mack and the giant OL from USC.

 

But it's taken Stewart 4 years to show this much.   There's no one in this thread who 6 months ago was predicting that Stewart was going to be rewarded with a deal for $10 Mill a year.    No one.    Now, he's played really well and he's getting paid.   Great.

 

I hope this is a lesson for those who love to proclaim that certain players from the 2018, 19 or even the 2020 draft aren't ever going to be good because they've seen enough to know.    No one saw enough about Stewart to know.   Fans are notoriously impatient.   If the player isn't Nelson or Leonard, who were great on Day 1,  fans get impatient waiting for a player to develop.  

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, w87r said:

Because money will be to tight. Cap casualty. Not that I want to move on from him.

 

 

Sometimes you have to make tough decisions.

 

As of now we are down to $65m to spend, with Eason as our only QB and 23 FAs.

 

Releasing him gives us $5.25m more cap space.

 

I agree on Doyle.   I'm not there yet with Glow.     You may be right....   but I wouldn't put this better than 50/50 at this point.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, w87r said:

Also those are the o ly 2 thay provide substantial cap relief.

 

I'm not sure how much salary cap relief we're going to need?    If any.....

 

I'd also float that I think TYH's contract number is going to be much smaller.   So, there's some relief coming.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm not sure how much salary cap relief we're going to need?    If any.....

 

I'd also float that I think TYH's contract number is going to be much smaller.   So, there's some relief coming.

 

We have $65-$67m in space as of now.

 

No QB other than Eason, 23 FAs and our draft picks($5-$7m).

 

TYs contract is not included in the cap number, we have no relief there.

 

 

I dont see how TY will be brought back unless he takes lile $5m a season.

 

If Rivers is brought back that will be $20-$25m by it's self.

 

 

Given there is a small chance the cap won't drop to the $175m floor, but we are going to need cap relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's what I was thinking
    • I think we're in good shape either way, it just adjusts our strategy with some extensions, and maybe we can't add another FA.    For a team like the Eagles, it completely changes their approach. If the cap is $175m, they can't keep Wentz without completely gutting the rest of their roster.
    • The trend is for the best offenses to be the teams contending for the Superbowl.  Are you aware of the basic Defense wins championships mantra?  You know Offense scores points?   I assume you are   Interstingly, the last really good D to win Superbowl was PHI and they had to score 44 points to do it v. No. 1 yanked Offense NE. And the Foles led offense carried them through the playoffs.  Before that it was Mannings Broncos.   Also intersesting is the 13-3 NE over LAR SB, featured the 25th and 27th ranked Ds in football.       The way to win in today's NFL is with high powered NFL passing offenses.  The rules are and have been set up that way increasingly over the last 20 years.   It's a lot different than when we were kids.   So like I said, it's usually Offense wins championships, Defense tries to hold teams to FGs.  There are occasionally anomalies but this is bascially accurate in todays' NFL.
    • There’s a good reason why defense everywhere suffered badly.   I can explain it in one word.  And you know the word.  Come on EVERYBODY say it with me!!!!   COVID!!   C-O-V-I-D!!   Defenses were poorer in the NFL and the college level as well.   Much less practice.  Much less contact.  Much less close up coaching.  Far more walk throughs.      When the world returns to normal, defenses will get better.  So will football. 
    • Not surprising at all. Here is how he ranked in other categories:   Intended Air Yards/PA - 26 Completed Air Yards/PA - 28 Completed Air Yards/Completion - 29 YAC/Completion - 2   First...it cannot be ignored that the Colts played (by far) the easiest schedule on offense. The average defense they played would have ranked ~23rd in DVOA. And that average was "deflated" somewhat by playing #1 defense PIT...when they clearly weren't the #1 defense anymore (after losing players to injury). That definitely played a factor.   Second...these numbers are as much Reich as it is anything. Reich uses the mesh concept (like he did with JB last year)...which creates open players in space and allows for YAC.    In fact, River's numbers (in the above categories) were very similar to JB's numbers last season. But Rivers is just a much better QB...and throws with better anticipation and accuracy. Throw in a HR hitter like Taylor and a young talented WR like Pittman...and you (naturally) have much better QB production with these concepts.   With the Colts offensive system, I think they could have immediate success with just about any talented QB they brought in...including a rookie. And if that QB is mobile...it will open up the playbook even more and raise the ceiling.   So I am in the minority here...but Rivers coming back doesn't move the needle for me. It's a lateral and stagnant move. I was all for the signing Rivers last off season...because it was the best of not-so-ideal situation. But if anything, it just proved that this team is ready to take the next step forward...and that means getting the right QB. Now is the time to make that move. So the only way I want Rivers back is if they get aggressive and move up to draft a QB who might need to sit for a part or all of a season.    TBH...I would rather roll the dice on Darnold and accept the risk of a reset year. I think he make a  good transition to this offense. And either he breaks out and suddenly you have a 24 year-old franchise QB...or he doesn't...and you have a reset year with the Colts in a much better position to draft a QB. Bringing back Rivers does nothing for the position long-term...and likely means another pick in the 20s.       
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,399

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 1,685

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,622

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtV

      ColtV 168

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 566

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FormerBolt

      FormerBolt 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThePowerslave

      ThePowerslave 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 6,503

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,898

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...