Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2020 Titans at Colts Matchup Info


Recommended Posts

Notes/Comments - 

  1. Just by pure abundance of GREEN below, advantage Colts
  2. The Titan D is just not that good. Their pass D is pretty bad.
  3. Our O is trending up. Only one punt for us in game 1, which was at the end of the game.
  4. The only strong advantage the Titans have is their RZ O (6th) vs our RZ D (18th). We're mediocre, and they are top 10.
  5. Too early for anything meaningful from the injury report for either team. I'll update tomorrow once the league is back at work. Titans do have 5 starters on O (2 WRs, 3 OL) banged up, and 1 starter on D (CB). Bottom line, we need our O healthy and good to go, more than our D.

 

Keys to the game - 

  1. Don't get too cute with the game plan. 
  2. We won two weeks ago by passing, and rushing the edge. 
  3. We had little success up the gut early, but made adjustments late and had more luck hitting the edge. Start with some edge runs this week, and also spread things out a little more, which will loosen things up in the middle. 
  4. No need to change a lot in passing game. Rivers was 300+ and 74% completion rate. Their pass D is bottom 10. They don't get a lot of pressures, sacks, etc. No need to be risky, just lots of high % passes and an occasional shot to make the defend the entire field. Pittman could have another big game.
  5. We let Henry run for about his average YPG, but his AVG was up a decent amount. Need to do better vs him. 
  6. Our D didn't show up till the 2nd half vs them, or last week either. Need a better game plan this weekend, and quicker adjustments. I have a feeling they might throw more this week.
  7. Biggest thing is to play with the lead, and win the ToP battle. Don't be overly conservative on O.

 

Green - significant advantage  (8 or more spots)

Red - significant disadvantage (8 or more spots)

 

Colts O vs Titans D
Points/PG: 10th vs 18th
Total Yards/PG: 13th vs 25th
Passing Yards/PG: 10th vs 27th
Rushing Yards/PG: 19th vs 20th
3rd Down %: 29th vs 32nd
RZ % (TD): 25th vs 25th
Sack %: 1st vs 30th
Pressure %: 2nd vs 32nd 
INT % thrown vs % INT'd: 17th vs 11th
Time of *: 9th vs 29th


Colts D vs Titans O
Points/PG: 5th vs 9th 
Total Yards/PG: 2nd vs 10th
Passing Yards/PG:  4th vs 23rd
Rushing Yards/PG: 3rd vs 5th
3rd Down %: 14th vs 10th
RZ % (TD) : 18th vs 6th
Sack %: 12th vs 9th
Pressure %: 16th vs 20th
% INT'd vs INT % thrown: 3rd vs 5th

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

It's a division game.   Throw most of that out the window.  They have already played against each other this year.   

meh. I don't see their D doing any better. 

 

Our D wasn't great 2 weeks ago, so nothing would surprise me this week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

Exactly.    In division games previous stats don't matter

I don't really agree. Unless Reich substantially changes the game plan (he'd be silly to given the weakness of TN), we should be fine unless individuals just sheet the bed. It's just like any other game. And TN's O will likely rely on their strengths as well. 

 

Injuries/covid could play a part, but that's not really "division" game impact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They lost their leading tackler for the season in J Brown and their left tackle position was bad already because Lewan went down for the season several weeks back BUT now they even lost his backup Ty Sambrailo so pulling their practice squad LT David Quesenberry to start he has in 7 years in NFL played 12 games with zero starts.....feeling a lot of pressure and multiple sacks coming. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's what I was thinking
    • I think we're in good shape either way, it just adjusts our strategy with some extensions, and maybe we can't add another FA.    For a team like the Eagles, it completely changes their approach. If the cap is $175m, they can't keep Wentz without completely gutting the rest of their roster.
    • The trend is for the best offenses to be the teams contending for the Superbowl.  Are you aware of the basic Defense wins championships mantra?  You know Offense scores points?   I assume you are   Interstingly, the last really good D to win Superbowl was PHI and they had to score 44 points to do it v. No. 1 yanked Offense NE. And the Foles led offense carried them through the playoffs.  Before that it was Mannings Broncos.   Also intersesting is the 13-3 NE over LAR SB, featured the 25th and 27th ranked Ds in football.       The way to win in today's NFL is with high powered NFL passing offenses.  The rules are and have been set up that way increasingly over the last 20 years.   It's a lot different than when we were kids.   So like I said, it's usually Offense wins championships, Defense tries to hold teams to FGs.  There are occasionally anomalies but this is bascially accurate in todays' NFL.
    • There’s a good reason why defense everywhere suffered badly.   I can explain it in one word.  And you know the word.  Come on EVERYBODY say it with me!!!!   COVID!!   C-O-V-I-D!!   Defenses were poorer in the NFL and the college level as well.   Much less practice.  Much less contact.  Much less close up coaching.  Far more walk throughs.      When the world returns to normal, defenses will get better.  So will football. 
    • Not surprising at all. Here is how he ranked in other categories:   Intended Air Yards/PA - 26 Completed Air Yards/PA - 28 Completed Air Yards/Completion - 29 YAC/Completion - 2   First...it cannot be ignored that the Colts played (by far) the easiest schedule on offense. The average defense they played would have ranked ~23rd in DVOA. And that average was "deflated" somewhat by playing #1 defense PIT...when they clearly weren't the #1 defense anymore (after losing players to injury). That definitely played a factor.   Second...these numbers are as much Reich as it is anything. Reich uses the mesh concept (like he did with JB last year)...which creates open players in space and allows for YAC.    In fact, River's numbers (in the above categories) were very similar to JB's numbers last season. But Rivers is just a much better QB...and throws with better anticipation and accuracy. Throw in a HR hitter like Taylor and a young talented WR like Pittman...and you (naturally) have much better QB production with these concepts.   With the Colts offensive system, I think they could have immediate success with just about any talented QB they brought in...including a rookie. And if that QB is mobile...it will open up the playbook even more and raise the ceiling.   So I am in the minority here...but Rivers coming back doesn't move the needle for me. It's a lateral and stagnant move. I was all for the signing Rivers last off season...because it was the best of not-so-ideal situation. But if anything, it just proved that this team is ready to take the next step forward...and that means getting the right QB. Now is the time to make that move. So the only way I want Rivers back is if they get aggressive and move up to draft a QB who might need to sit for a part or all of a season.    TBH...I would rather roll the dice on Darnold and accept the risk of a reset year. I think he make a  good transition to this offense. And either he breaks out and suddenly you have a 24 year-old franchise QB...or he doesn't...and you have a reset year with the Colts in a much better position to draft a QB. Bringing back Rivers does nothing for the position long-term...and likely means another pick in the 20s.       
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,399

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 1,685

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,622

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtV

      ColtV 168

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 566

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FormerBolt

      FormerBolt 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThePowerslave

      ThePowerslave 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 6,503

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,898

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...