Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

The Holding Calls. The right calls or a conspiracy?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

They were right by the law but my problem is the Packers were doing the same thing and the flags weren’t coming.  I mean they tackled a guy about to sack Rodgers on the last drive.  

The refs definitely tried to give the Packers a way to stay in the game - pathetic 

Lets put it this way...how often does a potentially game sealing drive end w 6 offensive holds in the final 2 minutes?

Just now, csmopar said:

Dude, I literally chunked the remote across the room and I rarely ever get mad.

Haha....man! I know. Me too, I rarely get mad, BUT, I had never seen anything like that before. Even the broadcasters couldn’t believe what they were seeing.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, poaponies said:

this almost feels like the no pass interference on the hail marry. In some ways  

Its what should happen. You could call hold or pass interference, or defensive holding on the vast majority of plays,  but its never called that way. So when it actually is called that way, there's an appearanxe of unfairness, or impropriety... disproportionately at the very least.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Archangel said:

The sad thing now that the Refs did the holding calls. they will be watching the colts extremely close the next few games.

I hope it means the league will be watching this reffing crew extremely close the next few games.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dunk said:

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

That’s the kind of thing reich should be yelling to the refs.  It’s my only complaint about him.  I haven’t seen him plea for calls.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d hate for the NFL to turn into the NBA when it comes to penalties.  In that league, it depends on the time of the game and the player involved if the ref will call the foul.  The NBA is unwatchable for me because of that.  
 

Those were good calls, but like everyone has said, they can call holding (and pass interference) on just about every play if they wanted.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Dunk said:

Not to hijack your thread Statesman, but another call I wondered about was the kick off that landed on the goal line. Yeah it hit the goal line but he picked it up out of the end zone and tried to advance it. How was that ruled a touchback? Seems it would be the same thing as returning a kick that you caught in the end zone?

Once he gave himself up/called for a fair catch in the endzone, and it hit in the endzone?

 

The ball is dead.  Doesn't matter what happens after.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive never seen that many calls made in a clutch point in the game. They definitely didnt call the whole game like that, nor did they call the Packers the same way.

 

On that deep shot to MVS the next drive there was the same type hold in the endzone that got called 3 times against us...it seems like they tried to hand it to the Packers.

 

Whatever we won , i question the integrity of the NFL sometimes though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, StatesmanN said:

Once he gave himself up/called for a fair catch in the endzone, and it hit in the endzone?

 

The ball is dead.  Doesn't matter what happens after.

I would have to see the play again. I don't think he called for a fair catch, he didn't think the ball entered the end zone, picked it up and tried to advance it. No one else questioned the overturn, so I'm probably wrong, but thought I'd ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, StatesmanN said:

Even Tony Dungy just said that the Reich were terrible with the passing calls under 2 minutes that went incomplete.

 

 

 

Yeah, but Tony always played it conservative, personally I've really liked how Frank calls plays aggressive. Any other coach would of punted it on 4th and 4 and Rodgers would of probably scored having the extra time. So you gotta take the good with the bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought most were legit.  The one on Pascal I would have let go because it appeared *to me* that the defender actually ran Pascal over and he was just trying to keep from falling down and both were literally out of the play at that point.  The rest I don't have a problem with.  Pittman looked like he was trying to makeout with the guy.  The ones on the OL were legit to me.  Just a bad bad bad drive there.

 

What I have most problem with are several I saw the Packers committing that weren't called.  At least make it equal there.  But not much of a problem with the Colts penalties.  And no, while I'm sure the league and the general NFL fan would like to see the Packers do well, I don't think there is any agenda there.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, superrep1967 said:

Yeah, we need a new o-line coach. 

I have been of that opinion for a while now.  I think Nelson may still be hampered from the back issues he was having before the start of the season, but that asside, the O line is shell of what they were last year. 

Im opinion they have been on a steady decline sence they changed coaches.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2017 rule: The ball is dead if it is downed in the end zone by the receiving team.
New rule: The ball is dead for a touchback if it touches the ground in the end zone, even if hasn't been touched by the receiving team. The returner doesn't have to down the ball in the end zone to get the touchback. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Dunk said:

I would have to see the play again. I don't think he called for a fair catch, he didn't think the ball entered the end zone, picked it up and tried to advance it. No one else questioned the overturn, so I'm probably wrong, but thought I'd ask.

This. I think the refs went with “what the player meant” to do. But he still advanced it. So even if he did intimate a fair catch, he ran out with it. Which in the even of a fair catch, it’s a flag for unsportsmanlike conduct. 
 

Edit: see above. Apparently it’s a new rule.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What confounded me was the lack of calls on GB and the suddenness of all the calls.

 

Ive watched enough games to know that these holds happen on almost every play. The fact that the refs could see all of these on the colts side leads me to believe they are pretty keen observers so they willfully did not call any on the pack.

 

Additionally another item has to be brought up, did the colts o line play this way all game and the flags weren’t thrown any other time (that many flags) or did the o line suddenly regress for just one series?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

Not so much the holding being called, it was blatant lack of consistency and the timing.

The timing is true.  They didn’t call the holding that way anywhere else in the game.  Yes they made some other holding calls but they weren’t that tight the rest of the day.  That’s unacceptable.  You can’t call the game one way one drive and another way the rest or the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone that thinks the refs were pulling for the Pack is full of playdough. Get over yourselves. Pathetic number of holding violations that Reich should fine his players for. But to the real issue is the Colts appear to be playing better every week. There was a time when they failed to comeback to win games. Every player is getting the job done and as pointed out in the game there re no weak spots.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, King Colt said:

Anyone that thinks the refs were pulling for the Pack is full of playdough. Get over yourselves. Pathetic number of holding violations that Reich should fine his players for. But to the real issue is the Colts appear to be playing better every week. There was a time when they failed to comeback to win games. Every player is getting the job done and as pointed out in the game there re no weak spots.

I don’t think the refs were pulling for the Packers.  I do think they called the game differently on that drive than they did the rest of the day.  Yes they were holds but other than one or two of them they were holds you could call on any play but officials don’t because the league doesn’t want it called like that.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

They had to do something they were getting flagged anytime they tried to run.  The passing was working and they were a first down away from either being in field goal range or running out the clock.  

 

Right, it was 1st and 20, and the refs were throwing a flag every run play, literally. Throwing was reasonable. 

 

Also, I don't care about Dungy's opinion when it comes to play calling and game management. He's incredible conservative and risk averse, and I don't think he would be able to handle the recent data trends regarding pass/run, 4th downs or two point attempts. So offering Dungy as an authority here doesn't work for me. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good post on Hilton: One critical element, regarding Hilton is; who’s going to be throwing to him? People say he’s declining and to some degree that’s true but he really hasn’t had a “gunslinger” throwing to him since Luck and I believe that effects people’s perception of him.       I like Mack but he may warrant better money elsewhere. If Taylor went down, it would be nice to plug him in and having running backs with “fresh legs” at the end of the year, would be key in making a postseason run.      Hooker is expendable. I hope they find a way to keep Rhodes. (It’s going to be interesting to see how the secondary shakes out).     I think they’ll keep Autry and/or Houston but that could change if they think Lewis could step in.      I disagree that MAC is a “one note player”. He’s an above average blocker, a good route runner and good at 50/50 balls. He was hampered by injury, so he looks lumbering in his receiving game but I don’t think we’ve seen the best of his game yet.      
    • I believe Houston was on the feild more than Autry too. Never mind Autry was played a bit more.
    • TY Hilton - If he's not willing to take a paycut down to WR2 money then I'm fine with moving on from him.  Loved what he's done for the org but he's not a WR1 anymore.  I'd rather pay him WR2 money and sign a True #1.   Marlon Mack - His spot at this point is taken.  I'm fine with moving forward with JT, Hines, and possibly drafting a young bruiser or signing a vet for cheap.  If he's willing to come back on a prove it deal then fine, otherwise he can test the market.   Justin Houston - Resign him.  2yr deal with an option.  Coming off one of his best years.  He was definitely our best pass rusher.  Health isn't a concern but age is.  I'd say bring him back.  Not too expensive however.  That may prove to be a problem if he's looking to cash out before retirement.   Denico Autry - I want to bring him back, but if another team try to force us to overpay for him then we should let him walk.   Xavier Rhodes - I was impressed by Rhodes this year.  Bring him back, but not for #1 CB money.  I don't think he's there.  #2 CB money for him and I'm ok.   Anthony Walker Jr. - He can walk.  We need an upgrade.  I'd be fine with drafting his replacement.  But if we can't find anyone I'm down to bring him back.   Malik Hooker - Same as Marlon Mack.  JB has taken his spot.  Either come back on a prove it deal or he can walk also.   Jacoby Brissett - We need to wait and see how our QB search plays out.  If we are able to grab Wentz, Staff, or Wats, then I'm ok with Eason being the backup.  But if we fail on the 3 mentioned and Ballard isn't sold on Eason, I'm fine with JB being a stopgap.  He'll play good enough to keep us competitive but not so good where we have trash draft capital.   Zach Pascal - IDK about this one.  We need to upgrade at WR but due injuries depth is a concern.  50/50.   Mo-Alie Cox - Resign ASAP!  I think MAC is a diamond in the rough.  I honestly think he can be the next Antonio Gates.  Not sure why we don't utilize him more.  
    • The short term future unless they trade a kings ransom to trade or trade up. 
    • I see that also.  He has a great relationship with the team and staff.  I can honestly see this happening if they aren't sold on Eason or can't make any moves.  I wouldn't like this move if we overpay however.
  • Members

    • colts8718

      colts8718 125

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 67

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ipljeff

      ipljeff 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts.sb41

      Colts.sb41 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 3,978

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Imgrandojji

      Imgrandojji 1,248

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 209

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 4,724

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 448

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...