Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Packers @ Colts, November 22, 2020, 4:25pm EST


Message added by Nadine,

FYI, chat isn't working and I'm doubtful it will be fixed by game time

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Fixed it for you

Wow! This thread got more than 2000 replies and 53 pages so far. 

Your Indianapolis Colts (6-3) started the second half of their season with a bang last week, beating their division rivals Tennessee Titans 34-17. They look to show that this was not a fluke when they

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, John Waylon said:


The only defense he considers elite is one that never loses any downs. Even when you point out a defense doesn’t win every single down that’s just “not elite”. 


He has an obsession of some kind. :) 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Holden89 said:

Well, it was off a D-linemen's hand. I suppose it can be argued that it's on Rivers, but I don't think I'd agree.

Yeah, I get that, but with this being a game day thread, it must be somebody's fault!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you identify the guy in the draft, I'm all about going up for him. But if -- IF -- he turns out to be a foundational kind of QB, that's still a play that's more likely to benefit us in 2023 than in 2021. So we have to acknowledge that. (And that's on top of the possibility that he never quite hits as a franchise QB, which is statistically the more likely outcome with a drafted player.)   And a nitpick, 'going to the SB' isn't the only way to judge whether a veteran QB acquisition worked out well for the team that acquired him. The 2020 Colts are a specific example. There's no question that we were closer to contending with Rivers than we were with JB. Tannehill is working out well for the Titans, etc. Alex Smith was looking good for Washington before his injury (which had nothing to do with age; Teddy Bridgewater's career got derailed similarly).   The reason the list is so short is because historically, good QBs don't leave the team that drafted them, at least not until their old and/or broken (Manning, Favre, Warner, Brees, etc.) The idea of trading for a player like Stafford at 32, and having a reasonable expectation that he could play at a high level for another five years, isn't something that generally has happened a lot in the NFL.   I think it's interesting that you say a draft pick has a better chance of being a Josh Allen-level player. I think either we disagree on how good Allen is, or we disagree on how good Stafford is. As a passer, I think Allen still has some work to do to be as good as Stafford has already been. He has a bigger arm (obviously), and he does more with his legs, but Stafford is a really good passer, even dynamic, and he's no slouch with his movement ability.   I think trading up is more risky than we're acknowledging (collectively). Doesn't mean I'm against it, but when you're talking about risk/reward, even with the higher salary for Stafford, the risk is significantly lower to get him.     I don't think the Lions are in any hurry, nor should they be. 
    • Definitely my favorite game of the season.  Loved that Rivers came back twice from 14-pt deficits. That’s rare vs Green Bay.     Felt bad for MVS for fumbling in OT. Glad it didn’t mess up your #1 seed. 
    • Sorry back to Stafford. Hopefully either way it goes something comes out soon unofficially. Either coming here or going somewhere else.   Just put us at ease.
    • 2015 DEN: #9 in yds per game #4 in rush yds per game #10 in pass yds per game #3 in pts per game. #4 in QBR against #1 in sacks   A little better in 2015 than 2014.   2014 DEN: #8 in yds per game #5 in rush yds per game #9 in pass yds per game #7 in pts per game. #2 in QBR against #12 in sacks
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...