Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Packers Colts Predictions


Recommended Posts

I think we just need to put pressure on Rodgers, the running game can easily be stopped by our run defense.  They're not in Derek Henry's league.  I'll hold off my prediction, last prediction I made was the Titans to win, boy was I wrong on that one....But I'm hoping the Colts will prevail on this game....There's hope for our Colts!!!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Not entirely accurate. His INT% has dropped over a whole point from 3.4% to 2.2%. That's lower than his 2018 INT% (2.4%), in which his year was very very good.   Reich's game plan also signi

With our defense I think we can win this game on the road. 31-21 Colts

I believe we are at home next week.     Packers 24-13.  I can see it going the opposite way but until Rivers can produce in a big game against an elite team I will remain skeptical.  If the off

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

That is sound logic and I see your point. I 100% agree the Colts could win this one easily.  They need to play ball control with a solid running game and working the screens.  Maybe they can catch GBs linebackers peeping into the backfield and hit MAC in the seam or Pittman on an intermediate crossing route for chunk plays. I’m confident the defense will do their part if the offense limits three and outs and doesn’t turn over the ball.  Buuuuuuttttt....I still don’t trust Rivers and it’s a coin flip if he will throw two TDs or two interceptions. 


I still don’t understand the not trusting Rivers.  In 9 games, he had 2 bad game INT wise(Jags, Browns).  In the Ravens game, the throw was a bad throw, but shouldn’t have been called a INT.  
 

I get people are worried because of last year, but last year was different.  He was having 3 & even 4 INT games.  He seems to be playing better than last year, aside from the terrible pick 6 in the browns game & the INT into double coverage in the Jags game.  I think it just stands out a lot because they both are losses.  
 

QBs are going to have INT, unless they’re named Mahomes or Rodgers.  I’m hoping for a positive 2nd half of the season, and hoping we don’t see any dumb INT like the jags and browns game. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a gettable game at home.  It really is.  They have a great HOF QB.  They have a possible HOF WR.  The rest can be dealt with.  Their OL isn't that great and I think even though this may be the best passing offense we will have faced thus far, I think it's also safe to say this may be the best defense they have faced.  I would bet both sides are looking at this as a true challenge.  I also look at common opponents.  Lions game score was VERY similar, except we played in Detroit whereas they played them at Lambeau.  The numbers for Stafford in both games were also very similar.

 

They played Viking twice, who we absolutely SHUT DOWN.  They have played them twice and split with them, giving up 34 points in the win and 28 points in the loss.  Cousins had a 118.6 rating in the loss, and a 138.1 rating in the win.  He had a 15.9 rating vs. us.  Dalvin Cook only had 50 yards but 2 TD's in the loss and absolutely went WILD in the win with 163 yards and 3 TD's with another 63 yards receiving and another TD.  Cook had 63 yards and a TD and 8 yards receiving vs. us.  

 

Ranks:  GB offense is 7th in total yards, Colts 17th.  GB is 8th in passing yards, Colts 10th (surprised me).  GB is 10th in rushing yards, Colts 22nd.  GB is 3rd in ppg, Colts 15th.  Defensively, GB is 11th in total yards, Colts 1st.  GB is 13th in passing defense, Colts 3rd.  GB is 12th in rushing defense, Colts 3rd.  GB is 16th in ppg allowed, Colts 3rd.

 

Records: GB is 6-2 overall, Colts 6-3.  Their combined opponent record is 30-37, Colts 31-43.  GB is 4-1 on the road, Colts 3-1 at home.  GB is 1-1 vs. teams with winning records (win vs. Saints, loss vs. TB), Colts are 2-2 vs. teams with winning records (wins vs. Bears & Titans, Losses vs. Browns and Ravens).  Interestingly both of the Packers' tough games have been on the road while 3 of the Colts' tough games have also been on the road.

 

GB is +3 on turnover diff., Colts +4. 

 

So what does all this mean?  IDK, but I think it's doable if the Colts can protect the football.  I think the Colts defensive trend is to allow more points in the 1st half then make adjustments and shut down offenses in the 2nd half.  I wouldn't be shocked if GB leads at the half only to watch the Colts put the clamps on them in the 2nd and pull it out.  I also like the Colts overall ST much better and that 3rd unit COULD be the difference here.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, SpanosSucks said:


I still don’t understand the not trusting Rivers.  In 9 games, he had 2 bad game INT wise(Jags, Browns).  In the Ravens game, the throw was a bad throw, but shouldn’t have been called a INT.  
 

I get people are worried because of last year, but last year was different.  He was having 3 & even 4 INT games.  He seems to be playing better than last year, aside from the terrible pick 6 in the browns game & the INT into double coverage in the Jags game.  I think it just stands out a lot because they both are losses.  
 

QBs are going to have INT, unless they’re named Mahomes or Rodgers.  I’m hoping for a positive 2nd half of the season, and hoping we don’t see any dumb INT like the jags and browns game. 

 

Rivers is on pace for a statistically similar season as last year and the general consensus was that wasn’t a good year. He isn’t a bad QB.  Again, Rivers is not a bad QB but he isn’t great.  Ive said this all year and my opinion is not changing, this team is average bc they have an average QB.  Rivers QB rating has now dipped into lower 90s and I expect it fall some more as the competition increases as the playoffs approach.  Rivers is a roller coaster and it’s hard to predict what he will do.  A beatable ravens team comes to Indy and he puts up a 60 QBs rating, 10pts and shut down in the 2nd half.  Goes to TN and throws 200yds in the first half and puts up 27pts.  Some of it is play calling, some of it is skill players or OL not executing and some of it is the hot/cold style of Rivers. 
 

The Colts are very capable of winning this game.  They could also only play 2quarters of solid football and that is not enough to beat a playoff caliber team. Hopefully the TN game was enough to springboard some momentum for the big push in these final 7 games.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, AwesomeAustin said:

 

Rivers is on pace for a statistically similar season as last year and the general consensus was that wasn’t a good year. He isn’t a bad QB.

Not entirely accurate. His INT% has dropped over a whole point from 3.4% to 2.2%. That's lower than his 2018 INT% (2.4%), in which his year was very very good.

 

Reich's game plan also significantly limited his attempts/game for a stretch, and that seems to have changed now, He's averaging almost 40 per game the last 4 games.

 

The average y/g for those 4 games is 292, which is up significantly from the 4 prior. He had 4600 in 2019, so that wasn't his problem anyway.

 

His Y/A (7.9) is also up to 2018 levels (7.92), and should get better unless Reich puts the training wheels back on.

 

He's also had 7 TDs the last 4 games, vs 3 TDs in the prior 4.

 

His QBR is also up 14 points and is getting better every week.

 

He's not trending towards 2019, he's now trending toward 2018..

Quote

 

 Again, Rivers is not a bad QB but he isn’t great.  Ive said this all year and my opinion is not changing, this team is average bc they have an average QB.  Rivers QB rating has now dipped into lower 90s and I expect it fall some more as the competition increases as the playoffs approach.  

His rating has improved in the last 4 games. Three of four games have been 105+. He's now 93.6 and climbing. He was 88 last year. Passer rating isn't really a thing these days. QBR is the better metric. And that's a whole 14 points better than 2019. His QBR is actually his 2nd best QBR in the last 7 years. He's only had 4 years in his whole career that had a better QBR.

Quote

Rivers is a roller coaster and it’s hard to predict what he will do.  A beatable ravens team comes to Indy and he puts up a 60 QBs rating, 10pts and shut down in the 2nd half.  Goes to TN and throws 200yds in the first half and puts up 27pts.  Some of it is play calling, some of it is skill players or OL not executing and some of it is the hot/cold style of Rivers. 

I agree it's been a roller coaster, but it should be expected given the following.... 

New team

New offense/terminology

New coaches

A running game that has taken a step back due to injury and rook entry

New pass catchers

Musical chairs of pass catchers due to injury

Covid camp

No preseason

Quote

The Colts are very capable of winning this game.  They could also only play 2quarters of solid football and that is not enough to beat a playoff caliber team. Hopefully the TN game was enough to springboard some momentum for the big push in these final 7 games.  

Yup. I have no clue what will happen. I thought we'd beat Baltimore. I blame the game plan for that. I though our D would carry us vs TN, but it was our offense and special teams.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Not entirely accurate. His INT% has dropped over a whole point from 3.4% to 2.2%. That's lower than his 2018 INT% (2.4%), in which his year was very very good.

 

Reich's game plan also significantly limited his attempts/game for a stretch, and that seems to have changed now, He's averaging almost 40 per game the last 4 games.

 

The average y/g for those 4 games is 292, which is up significantly from the 4 prior. He had 4600 in 2019, so that wasn't his problem anyway.

 

His Y/A (7.9) is also up to 2018 levels (7.92), and should get better unless Reich puts the training wheels back on.

 

He's also had 7 TDs the last 4 games, vs 3 TDs in the prior 4.

 

His QBR is also up 14 points and is getting better every week.

 

He's not trending towards 2019, he's now trending toward 2018..

His rating has improved in the last 4 games. Three of four games have been 105+. He's now 93.6 and climbing. He was 88 last year. Passer rating isn't really a thing these days. QBR is the better metric. And that's a whole 14 points better than 2019. His QBR is actually his 2nd best QBR in the last 7 years. He's only had 4 years in his whole career that had a better QBR.

I agree it's been a roller coaster, but it should be expected given the following.... 

New team

New offense/terminology

New coaches

A running game that has taken a step back due to injury and rook entry

New pass catchers

Musical chairs of pass catchers due to injury

Covid camp

No preseason

Yup. I have no clue what will happen. I thought we'd beat Baltimore. I blame the game plan for that. I though our D would carry us vs TN, but it was our offense and special teams.


Love the stats!   Tons of information to back up Rivers can carry this team when needed.  I think he is more than capable.  I still don’t trust him tho.  It’s not entirely on Rivers bc I think he has average play calling by Reich to contend with.  Hopefully the TN game was enough to send this team on a bit of a run.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a key will be not letting Rogers go 31 of 33 for 289 yards. In other words dinking all day into the soft zone with his dominant receiver. This could easily be a repeat of last years New Orleans game with a much more mobile QB.   

 

We will have to be diverse on defense until/unless we have a double digit lead. I would love to continue to develop the RBs with runs and passes past the line of scrimmage. Too often our RBs get hit twice behind the line.  The rise of Pittman Jr. and the relative health of Hilton made a giant difference in TN.  I also hope we take the points.  Though we had  great game, bad punting accounted for 2 of our TD's and we left 6 points in field goals on the field because we lost on 4th down.  Sure we want to score TDs. but scoring nothing is simply a spiral against a high scoring QB like Rogers.  He is never out of a game, so even if we get a lead, unless it is 21 points or more, if there's more than 8 minutes left, we need to keep up the fire.  

 

Green Bay is beatable and so are we.  Let hope we play to our ability and keep the positive playcalling going.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, danlhart87 said:

No they dont

Oh yea they do. This O line has under performed all year. It was suppose to b thr strength of the team. Tons of assests invested in this group. Top in pass protection and last in rushing. Hell, they were suppose to b elite. I dont even know if they are average. Teams r running on Green Bay. Keep Rodgers off the field. I wouldnt b surprised if Taylor comes out in this game. Frank is going to pound the rock like never before lol.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:


Love the stats!   Tons of information to back up Rivers can carry this team when needed.  I think he is more than capable.  I still don’t trust him tho.  It’s not entirely on Rivers bc I think he has average play calling by Reich to contend with.  Hopefully the TN game was enough to send this team on a bit of a run.  

Rivers is very capable. He's been best this year when Reich has allowed him to be himself. If we get behind though, I'm afraid bad Philip will show up, so I'd prefer to just let him get in his groove from the start. Our running game isn't good enough right now to carry the team. And our D likely won't be enough to carry us vs Rodgers. He'll tear our soft up if that's what we play. Packers aren't good vs the run, but still we can't rely on our running game to be something it's not. We'll need to use the pass to set up the run. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

As of now I see us going 10-6. If we sweep the Titans the division is pretty much over. I had us 6-3 at the beginning of the season and finishing 10-6 so I am right on cue so far.

I won't say division is wrapped til its official 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

As of now I see us going 10-6. If we sweep the Titans the division is pretty much over. I had us 6-3 at the beginning of the season and finishing 10-6 so I am right on cue so far.

we should sweep the Titans, sweep the Texans, and beat Jax. That's 10 there. Packers, at Raiders, and at Pitt will be the games that can take us up a notch in terms of playoff position. 

 

I like our chances vs GB at home. Raiders have been very up and down, so who knows which team will show up. I think we match up well with Pitt.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

we should sweep the Titans, sweep the Texans, and beat Jax. That's 10 there. Packers, at Raiders, and at Pitt will be the games that can take us up a notch in terms of playoff position. 

 

I like our chances vs GB at home. Raiders have been very up and down, so who knows which team will show up. I think we match up well with Pitt.


I think GB and Pitt are losses.  Tenn and LV are coin flips, depends which teams show up that day including ours.  I think we should win both games vs the Texans but a split wouldn’t surprise me.  Jacksonville should be a win.  11-5 or 10-6 and division champs is very possible with this team.  9-7 is very realistic as well but that may be good enough to get into the post season. Main goal is for the defense to stay playing at high level while Rivers and the run game find their groove.  Should be a great finish to the season. I’m really enjoying this team win or lose bc players are flashing all over the roster.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

we should sweep the Titans, sweep the Texans, and beat Jax. That's 10 there. Packers, at Raiders, and at Pitt will be the games that can take us up a notch in terms of playoff position. 

 

I like our chances vs GB at home. Raiders have been very up and down, so who knows which team will show up. I think we match up well with Pitt.

Yeah if we get the unexpected sweep vs Tenn, we could go 11-5. I had us splitting with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Anything can happen 

True, still a ways to go but it's weird how %'s change. After Thursday had we lost our chances of winning the division was 20/80, now we are favored 55/45. That was such a huge win, one of the bigger ones in our recent history. Rivers was really focused and didn't turn the ball over and was firing some nice passes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

True, still a ways to go but it's weird how %'s change. After Thursday had we lost our chances of winning the division was 20/80, now we are favored 55/45. That was such a huge win, one of the bigger ones in our recent history. Rivers was really focused and didn't turn the ball over and was firing some nice passes.

Rivers is key and not throwing picks 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Nah

 

We will win 1 we arent suppose to and lose 1 we are supposed to win 

you're not making sense. You said we're going to go 3-4 in the final 7. If Reich collapses like that after going 6-3, he's got issues. And that's after already losing 2-3 we shouldn't have.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

you're not making sense. You said we're going to go 3-4 in the final 7. If Reich collapses like that after going 6-3, he's got issues. And that's after already losing 2-3 we shouldn't have.

All we can do is take it 1 week at a time.

 

PTWTG-450x244.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AwesomeAustin said:


I think GB and Pitt are losses.  Tenn and LV are coin flips, depends which teams show up that day including ours.  I think we should win both games vs the Texans but a split wouldn’t surprise me.  Jacksonville should be a win.  11-5 or 10-6 and division champs is very possible with this team.  9-7 is very realistic as well but that may be good enough to get into the post season. Main goal is for the defense to stay playing at high level while Rivers and the run game find their groove.  Should be a great finish to the season. I’m really enjoying this team win or lose bc players are flashing all over the roster.  

We have TN at home. There's no excuse for losing to them in Indy. Jax should be automatic. 

 

Not sure 9-7 will get us there. 9 AFC teams have 3 or few losses right now. 9-7 means we lose 4 out of the 7 remaining, likely elevates TN back in 1st in the AFCS, and makes it very difficult to lock up a spot. We already are on the loser side of tie breakers to Cleveland and Baltimore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Reich will at least go 10-6 now, if he doesn't I will do this homer falling GIF

IMO, we should win the rest of the AFCS games. TN and Jax at home. And both Houston games. They're just bad. Their only two wins are vs the Jags. And we need to take one of the GB/LV/Pitt games if not 2. 

 

10-6 at worst, but we should go 11-5

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
    • Let me know when you need me to assist. 
  • Members

    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 1,988

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HungarianColtsFan

      HungarianColtsFan 491

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 80

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Orioles22

      Orioles22 280

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BillHill

      BillHill 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 572

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JoeThornburg

      JoeThornburg 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...