Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Titans, Nov. 12, 2020, 8:20pm EST


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, IinD said:

That 4th down was pathetic... Sorry I'm still annoyed. 

 

Let's put the smallest guy in the backfield and run it up the gut which they blew up a couple times already ....cmon man. 

1st rounder at center. 1st round at left guard. 1st rounder at left tackle. High 2nd rounder at right tackle. I think it is a great move to run it at the defence in short yardage situations. They should win the battles. The problem is that they r failing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bestQBever said:

Also why was braden in on the left side for that 4th down? Just put our guys at their best spots and get 1 damn yard

Yea, I wasn't a fan of that at all. Why shift him to the left and replace him with 2 TE's? Thats asking for problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

1st rounder at center. 1st round at left guard. 1st rounder at left tackle. High 2nd rounder at right tackle. I think it is a great move to run it at the defence in short yardage situations. They should win the battles. The problem is that they r failing.

Agreed. I know you aren't afraid to kill the team and I'm usually positive or at least try to be, but they're struggling when they need a yard or run it up the gut.

They can't impose their will on teams like the last couple years..

 

Cmon need a td here guys...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Shhh, the more he is "overlooked" the better off Downs and the Colts will be.
    • Dude diving for that catch made a fan of me. 
    • He is superbly quick, nearly unguardable. A very high % as a extension of our run game. With the speed to wheel them over the top. The guy should perform as a 9/10 in our offense.    
    • I think PFF is useful for analyzing individual players. But if I want to analyze the team's pass rush performance, I don't want to know how many times the individual players pressured the QB; I want to know the number of plays we managed to pressure the opposing QB.    For example, the QB drops back 50 times in a game, and he's pressured 15 times, and sacked three times. Let's say each of those 15 plays where he's pressured, there are two defenders getting pressure. PFF would count that as 30 pressures for the defense, because they're acknowledging that two players got a pressure on one play. Same process if each sack was shared among two players; they'd count six sacks, even though the QB was only sacked on three plays.   And that's fine, because that's their focus. But I think that context needs to be acknowledged when we're talking about team performance. Because, as we know with our pass rush last year, we feasted against bad offenses, but there were too many situations where we failed to get pressure at all.    So I like to use PFR when talking about team performance, because their sack/pressure stats are on a per-play basis, rather than per-player. Both metrics can be used together, I just think PFR tells us 'the opposing QBs dropped back this many times, faced pressure on this many plays, and were sacked this many times.' And now we can clearly see how frequently the pass rush is affecting the QB. Or in the case of the 2023 Colts, how infrequently... 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...