Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Keep your head up


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Today's loss is awful but the Ravens are a very tough playoff caliber team.   Lets try our best to move forward and get ready to play the Titans!    

This is more on Ballard.  He assembled this team through drafting and free agency. He picked this style of D and the D coach. This O line is not getting it done. The offence is playing left handed bec

It’s pretty obvious Reich and Rivers both are not getting the job done. Tough to be optimistic after watching today’s game against a team that is dealing with significant injuries. This is one that should’ve went our way but we refuse to beat legit teams. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just didn’t play well in the second half anywhere.  The Colts hand energy and playing really well in the first half while the Ravens were flat and then they flipped sides in the second half.  Going to be hard going to Tennessee on a short week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game was very winnable, questionable calls all game. Ravens with no Marlon no Stanley and half the defense didn’t even practice this week but they come to Lucas Oil and get the win that’s frustrating.... Defense played strong until they got too tired because the offense was pathetic. But short week and must win on thursday!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mick12Maher said:

It’s pretty obvious Reich and Rivers both are not getting the job done. Tough to be optimistic after watching today’s game against a team that is dealing with significant injuries. This is one that should’ve went our way but we refuse to beat legit teams. 

This is more on Ballard.  He assembled this team through drafting and free agency. He picked this style of D and the D coach. This O line is not getting it done. The offence is playing left handed becuase the Oline has not forced its will on anyone. Reich can only do so much. That Taylor turn over was huge.  No one on this board ever puts any responsibility on Ballard

  • Like 1
  • Confused 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mick12Maher said:

It’s pretty obvious Reich and Rivers both are not getting the job done. Tough to be optimistic after watching today’s game against a team that is dealing with significant injuries. This is one that should’ve went our way but we refuse to beat legit teams. 

Doyle went out and no one was catching anything deep when needed. Rivers played well enough but the entire team was flat in the 2nd half. This narrative of Reich and Rivers not cutting it is getting old. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Moosejawcolt said:

This is more on Ballard.  He assembled this team through drafting and free agency. He picked this style of D and the D coach. This O line is not getting it done. The offence is playing left handed becuase the Oline has not forced its will on anyone. Reich can only do so much. That Taylor turn over was huge.  No one on this board ever puts any responsibility on Ballard

Definitely more on Reich. Can’t adjust. Can’t put players into position besides his 10+ scripted plays to come out. Should’ve made a move at the deadline if they wanted to contend this year. Pretty clear Ballard is fine being mediocre this year and will hopefully make some moves this offseason. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd half was rough. Bad calls usually even out but that didn't happen for us today. The no call on the Doyle shot and that INT/fumble nonsense. The other turnovers sealed it. I never felt like we were completely outclassed by the Ravens.

 

That being said, this offense is tough to watch. I did think #12 looked really good in that Campbell role though... so there's that...

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bert Johns said:

Rivers looked horrible today throwing off his back for off the mark. Can't win  like that

Nope I was disappointed with him today.  I will say looked the young WRs were running wrong routes a lot today which is to be expected with so many guys who were on PS and Pittman being a rookie.  Really only Pascal has been here all year.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve said it all year, the Colts are an average team.  They will win some games but have games or halves that leave you scratching your head.  They are a fringe playoff team that really has no chance to win a championship.  Yeah yeah, any given Sunday.  I still enjoy watching this team but until a franchise QB is on the roster this team will remain average or get worse as the core ages. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, coltfaninnewyork said:

I’m more mystified by our failure to run ball all year ,ultimately that will be our downfall 

O-line isn't dominant and we are feeding a rookie who doesn't know how to run the ball. Wilkins is JAG. Hines is just a pass catcher.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Indyfan4life said:

Doyle went out and no one was catching anything deep when needed. Rivers played well enough but the entire team was flat in the 2nd half. This narrative of Reich and Rivers not cutting it is getting old. 

Did you watch the same rivers as I? He did not play close to well enough whether that’s the receivers being off page with him or not. Throwing ducks out there. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, coltfaninnewyork said:

I’m more mystified by our failure to run ball all year ,ultimately that will be our downfall 

 

Well, sadly teams know they can stack the box and take away the running game.  Force Rivers to chuck it around all game, pressure him, ect.  The offense is extremely limited. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem was and is JT. First his fumble, that’s on him, but after that, Reich held him out all game. That is one Reich. That switched the play calling and combined with the bogus int call, no way that was a catch, refs screwed us. There also should have been an ejection for Peters coming off the bench and onto the field, that didn’t happen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AwesomeAustin said:

I’ve said it all year, the Colts are an average team.  They will win some games but have games or halves that leave you scratching your head.  They are a fringe playoff team that really has no chance to win a championship.  Yeah yeah, any given Sunday.  I still enjoy watching this team but until a franchise QB is on the roster this team will remain average or get worse as the core ages. 

I trust Ballard to continue drafting guys to keep us young especially on the defensive end. The biggest peice of this is finding that franchise QB. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

The problem was and is JT. First his fumble, that’s on him, but after that, Reich held him out all game. That is one Reich. That switched the play calling and combined with the bogus int call, no way that was a catch, refs screwed us. There also should have been an ejection for Peters coming off the bench and onto the field, that didn’t happen. 

Refs were bad but more importantly so were the Colts in the second half.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

2nd half was rough. Bad calls usually even out but that didn't happen for us today. The no call on the Doyle shot and that INT/fumble nonsense. The other turnovers sealed it. I never felt like we were completely outclassed by the Ravens.

 

That being said, this offense is tough to watch. I did think #12 looked really good in that Campbell role though... so there's that...

Pittman did look the best I’ve seen him yet this year. 
 

as for the D, we held yet another very explicit offense to 17 points. That’s not terrible. That’s pretty good infact. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Taylor fumble was tough. Good strip by Ravens. The 2 plays that killed me were the pick that Rivers threw right after we stripped ball from Raven RB. That was a questionable call by Refs but it was just an awful throw by Rivers. The 2nd terrible play was the 4th and 1 call by Colts. Rivers tried to throw and nearly got sacked on a terrible play.  My sense of Rivers is that he is past his prime. I did not realize how terrible his arm strength is. I thought Michaels, Pittman, Pascal and AMC played well.  Colts pretty much sat Taylor after fumble. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't expect much out of this game so I'm not incredibly disappointed. If anything it reinforces what we already know - the offense is incredibly inconsistent and the playcalling has been suspect most of the season. Right now it's the offense that's not pulling its weight and the defense has actually continued to play well even against the better teams we've seen. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not a big Brissett fan.  I don’t think he’s our long term answer at QB.  But I do think we’d be a better team the rest of the way this season with him under center.

 

Rivers wasn’t the only guy to play poorly today.  So it’s not like the loss is all on him.  But I have almost no confidence in him.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My thinking are the Colts are a pretty good team. I like what they are building on defense, and the speed ,sideline to sideline ,is impressive. Like the Flacco led Ravens , the Colts look very similar with a great defense and average offense. It’s hard to take that next step with a stop gap like Rivers. That’s not to say that the Colts can’t make the playoffs or make some noise, but they are going to have to hope lightning strikes three times, the other two being Manning and Luck , in the future. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Pittman did look the best I’ve seen him yet this year. 
 

as for the D, we held yet another very explicit offense to 17 points. That’s not terrible. That’s pretty good infact. 

 

How DARE you identify bright spots!!!!

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are likely kicking the can down the road, and the negative consequence is higher cap numbers for those players in future seasons, and greater cap penalties to move on from those players in future seasons. The thing is there's no much else they can do. they're set to be nearly $70m over the cap in 2021, and other than these restructures, they would not be able to get under the cap by the start of the new league year. They would have to cut or trade all of their highly paid players.
    • I feel the hype about Carl Lawson is from a combination of people who haven't really watched him play, and who overrate "pressures" by assuming that all pressures are equally disruptive.    Lawson is a tough, physical, high effort guy, he tackles well, plays the run reasonably well, he has decent size, and he would fit nicely as a DE for us. He's not a dynamic pass rusher, and I don't think he ever would be a dynamic pass rusher.   He has some quickness and speed, good speed to power, but he's not the kind of explosive pass rusher that blows up the other team's blocking schemes. He has below average bend and closing speed, and he takes a lot of steps, which explains his tragically poor three cone. He also has below average length, and gets neutralized by good blockers. This is all obvious on his tape, it was obvious on his college tape, and it's why he went in the 4th round.   TomDiggs mentioned Lawson's knockdowns/hits and hurries. PFF recorded six edge rushers with at least QB 15 hits; despite the fact that Lawson had 24 hits, he only had five sacks, which is the least sacks among those six players. In fact, there were ten edges with fewer than 15 QB hits, but with at least ten sacks. PFF has 24 edges with at least 30 pressures; Lawson had 34 hurries, but was tied for fifth fewest sacks among those 24 players. In fact, there were five edges with fewer hurries than Lawson, but at least ten sacks.   My point is that QB hits and pressures only show a player that manages to get near the QB at some point during the play. Without context, they don't necessarily show a player that makes a definite impact on the play. That's why I value PFF's pass rush productivity (PRP) stat, because sacks are weighted more heavily than hits and pressures. And that makes sense because a sack ends the play. A QB can be pressured, even hit, and still make a positive play. Recognizing a sack as nearly always a negative play for the offense, PRP shows the difference between a guy who gets near the QB, and a pass rusher who makes plays for the defense. Sometimes the overlap is not as great as you might think.   Lawson's PRP was 8.5, tied for #18, well separated from guys like Bosa (10.6) and Watt (9.7). In general, a player with a bunch of total pressures, but low sack numbers, like Lawson, is a guy who gets a bunch of pass rush snaps but doesn't have the length, bend and closing speed to get home often enough. This is why guys like Trey Hendrickson and Leonard Floyd can have a third fewer total pressures, but twice as many sacks as Lawson (Hendrickson also had 80 fewer pass rush snaps). And Lawson gets a ton of pass rush snaps because he plays for a bad team with no other good edge rushers, so as long as he's healthy he'll have a lot of pressures, but he'll probably never be a big sack guy.   He's Trey Flowers. Better 40, same agility, not as long, mid level edge rusher who is well rounded and a good guy to have on your team, but not a dominant pass rusher. I can't see offering him $14m/year to not sack the QB. Any projection that has him as a big time sack guy is unrealistic, IMO.
    • It's nice to see Pittman, Smith and Okereke get some love.
    • Did I misread your post?   Did you not say you were in favor of moving Nelson to LT?   That if we’re going to pay him top dollar, it would be better to do it with him as our LT instead of at LG?    That wasn’t you?    I’m sorry, I thought that’s what I responded to.... 
    • With me, road whites are off-limits.  As to the blue tops, as much as i do dig the color rush blues, I’m an old-school-uni guy, and would lean to white pants.   I’m in Penn State country, and there are some similarities i guess.   I do think improvements can be made in the striping.  Minimal enough cahange to keep purists happy, but could “update the uni.  Perhaps 3 stripes down the leg and middle of helmet.  Middle one thicker than sides.  Not crazy wide.... tasteful like the stripes on a shelby. The middle stripe could be horseshoes similar to the way seattle uses imagry.  Maybe a large horseshoe on each shoulder that circles down around the number.  Minimal...... but updated..... without losing the “brand.”   Remember that outdated font that was recently retired?  A small “refresh” might be nice.   I’d like to see a “ghosted” image of like padding texture or like metalplate image (barely noticeable) at shoulder pads, knee and thigh pads.  Like a 3d effect.   I remember oregon once had ghosted wings on the shoulders that were cool, bit not “too much.”
  • Members

    • PeacefulEasonFeeling

      PeacefulEasonFeeling 21

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 8,404

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,060

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • White shoes

      White shoes 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gyworks

      Gyworks 13

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 425

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 196

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...