Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Cowboys might turn to Cooper Rush


chad72

Recommended Posts

He played very well, almost pulled off one of most shocking upsets of the season. In fact have to wonder why Ben Dinucci even started last week (I know Gilbert was recently signed but even with half a playbook these two QB's arent close).  Almost have to speculate even with Dalton is cleared do you let Garrett stay in the starting spot ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, holeymoley99 said:

He played very well, almost pulled off one of most shocking upsets of the season. In fact have to wonder why Ben Dinucci even started last week (I know Gilbert was recently signed but even with half a playbook these two QB's aren't close).  Almost have to speculate even with Dalton is cleared do you let Garrett stay in the starting spot ? 

 

It felt like having a root canal, watching Ben DiNucci play QB last Sunday night. Garrett Gilbert is SO MUCH better even if he might level out just as a backup QB in this league. Ben DiNucci was absolute trash. Gilbert was so composed, read and hit his hot reads well and kept them in the game by moving the ball well to give his defense rest on the sidelines. I am tempted to stick with Garrett as well if he continues playing the way he did. He was very composed.

 

That is all it is about, how well you believe in yourself, your composure, confidence and execution when you get that chance. That is why Brady replaced Bledsoe, Romo replaced Bledsoe, Prescott replaced Romo etc. - they seized their chance and executed under bright lights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone else seeing the Cowboys-Steelers game feel the refs were trying to keep the Cowboys from winning the game with several questionable penalty calls in favor of the Steelers? 5 accepted penalties for Steelers all in the 4th quarter. It is almost like they had money betted on the game, I felt.

 

It wouldn't be the first time - Jerome Bettis swan song in 2005 season SB, a subtle push off to negate a Seahawks TD in the SB and several other things. Steelers tend to be NFL darlings more often than not on this front, just my observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2020 at 10:44 AM, chad72 said:

Did anyone else seeing the Cowboys-Steelers game feel the refs were trying to keep the Cowboys from winning the game with several questionable penalty calls in favor of the Steelers? 5 accepted penalties for Steelers all in the 4th quarter. It is almost like they had money betted on the game, I felt.

 

It wouldn't be the first time - Jerome Bettis swan song in 2005 season SB, a subtle push off to negate a Seahawks TD in the SB and several other things. Steelers tend to be NFL darlings more often than not on this front, just my observation.

 

You are 100 million % right. Before Kraft came along the Steelers were indeed the NFL darlings. They've had to lay down/take a backseat to the Patriots corruption.  But this season that's not the case. I feel it's their turn this year and the Football Gods probably like to give Big Ben another SB appearance before he retires. 

 

My SB prediction still stands Big Ben vs Brady. 

The media, league, sponsors and networks would all love that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Gilbert isn't a rookie, been around several years and starred in other pro league just first time stars aligned for him to play. Most know about his dad and him playing in NCAA title game,some even know he was highest ranked Texas h.s QB of decade but few know he was Baker mayfield's idol growing up and Baker actually tagged along as a 14 year old with Gilbert the star 18 year old senior QB and Gilbert's crew.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2020 at 10:44 AM, chad72 said:

Did anyone else seeing the Cowboys-Steelers game feel the refs were trying to keep the Cowboys from winning the game with several questionable penalty calls in favor of the Steelers? 5 accepted penalties for Steelers all in the 4th quarter. It is almost like they had money betted on the game, I felt.

 

It wouldn't be the first time - Jerome Bettis swan song in 2005 season SB, a subtle push off to negate a Seahawks TD in the SB and several other things. Steelers tend to be NFL darlings more often than not on this front, just my observation.

Yep.   First time in a long time I felt that there was substance to the typical claim of rigging a game.  Its been a feeling with many things this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...