-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By ChuggaBeer · Posted
I am kinda leaning toward your thinking. But. Most yrs Ballard has a number of how many players have 1st round talent. Question for you historians. Isnt 11-14 or what ever he said. More than normal? Isnt it usually around 8-10? If he doesn't get who he wants. I am guessing/sure/mostly guessing he has some feelers out on a player or two. Aiuk (sp?) is very intriguing to me after a trade back -
Colts get Powers-Johnson in R2 and you get a call from the Cowboys or Steelers asking for Ryan Kelly. They are offering #87(#84) for Kelly. Do you take it? -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
Plus, you dont think that Ballard would have been pushing for a long term deal if he was a play making safety? Signing players to an extension is seen as a sign that as a GM, you made a good pick because the player made it to a 2nd contract. I dont consider a one year deal a second contract plus Ballard boasts that you want to make the effort to keep your guys. Plus, if Blackmon was worth it, another team would have signed him to a deal. The interest wasnt there and he came back to the Colts -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
Players dont want to play on a one year deal. If he was seen as a valuable safety, the Colts would have signed him to a long term extension. There is no doubt that Blackmon wanted one as well, but he has not proved anyting that would warrant a raise and/or a long term deal. Look at the players they resigned to extensions this year. The ones they signed long term, were seen as no brainers by the front office. Blackmon is not a stellar safety. When you listen to Blackmon's comments, I never get the sense that he wanted to a one year deal. -
By Dobbinblitz · Posted
How do you see it then? Post June cuts more likely?
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.