Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Patmon a TE possibility for 2021?


Recommended Posts

 He’s 6’4”, 225lbs and ran a sub-4.5 40

Maybe he could put on 10lbs and replace Burton?

  Don’t know if he’s any good blocking or if that’s something that would need to be developed, but they say he’s been impressive. 

 

  Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • coltsfeva changed the title to Patmon a TE possibility for 2021?
9 minutes ago, coltsfeva said:

 He’s 6’4”, 225lbs and ran a sub-4.5 40

Maybe he could put on 10lbs and replace Burton?

  Don’t know if he’s any good blocking or if that’s something that would need to be developed, but they say he’s been impressive. 

 

  Thoughts?

 

My thoughts - It is bad idea that will never happen.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, crazycolt1 said:

Why replace Burton? He has shown he can make plays when he is used. 

 I’m talking about next year but you’re right, if Burton has a big year, the Colts might just want to keep him.
  But Patmon does have some talent and is close to TE size, should the Colts decide to cut strings with Burton. 
   They’re going to have to pay Allie Cox.

Maybe they’ll get a good one in the draft. Whatever they decide to do, this group could be a strength next year.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

 

My thoughts - It is bad idea that will never happen.

 At one time, conventional wisdom would say, making a basketball player into a TE wouldn’t work. There may be a situation where it would make sense to consider it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, coltsfeva said:

 At one time, conventional wisdom would say, making a basketball player into a TE wouldn’t work. There may be a situation where it would make sense to consider it.


Erm..... 

Jimmy Graham
Tony Gonzalez
Antonio Gates
Julius Thomas (had a couple dominating years in Denver)
Mo Alie-Cox (on the rise)

Some decent ex-basketball players turned TE there....

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, coltsfeva said:

 At one time, conventional wisdom would say, making a basketball player into a TE wouldn’t work. There may be a situation where it would make sense to consider it.

 

Tell me - name a time when a WR drafted out of college became a TE in the league?  Has it happened - sure but just by odds alone, it is     unlikely for Patmon.

 

They drafted him because they liked his skillsets, one of which is his size for a WR.  That has not all of the sudden changed.  

  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this is ever gonna happen.

 

But as it turns out, Trey Burton himself was a swiss army knife for the Gators in college. He played option QB (which is why he was the trigger man in the Philly Special), and lined up all over the place as a playmaker, including as a wide receiver. Coming out, he was 6'2, 224 pounds, 4.6 forty, 22 reps on the bench... I liked him and wanted the Colts to sign him as a UDFA.

 

Patmon's measurables and workout numbers aren't far off of from Burton's. He's bigger, longer, faster, more explosive, which is why he plays WR and not TE. He's impressive on the bench for a WR, 15 reps, with 33" arms. Like I said, I don't see him moving to TE, but he's big and strong enough to be a factor in the run game; in fact, he should dominate as a run blocker from any WR spot. The question is whether he'll make the most of his physical traits.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jskinnz said:

 

Tell me - name a time when a WR drafted out of college became a TE in the league?  Has it happened - sure but just by odds alone, it is     unlikely for Patmon.

 

They drafted him because they liked his skillsets, one of which is his size for a WR.  That has not all of the sudden changed.  

  

Darren Waller was a WR at Ga Tech. Ricky Seals-Jones did it in AZ. Eagles are trying Hakeem Butler at TE but don’t remember it happening very often. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Burton is starting to get a rhythm going with Rivers so Ballard might just bring him back on another short deal if he continues to ball out. In a mock draft I did a month ago I had Ballard selecting Freiermuth in the first round. I don't think that is going to happen because he will not reach for a Tight End in the first round when the position is not a #1 priority.

 

Patmon is a WR, and converting him to TE would be a mistake. Whether he's on this team going forward or not he will never be a TE  in the NFL. Playing the TE position is a lot more than just catching the Football so thats why I say no. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

 He’s 6’4”, 225lbs and ran a sub-4.5 40

Maybe he could put on 10lbs and replace Burton?

  Don’t know if he’s any good blocking or if that’s something that would need to be developed, but they say he’s been impressive. 

 

  Thoughts?


What’s the obsession with playing guys out of position on this forum? He was drafted as a WR and I’m sure he will remain one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

 He’s 6’4”, 225lbs and ran a sub-4.5 40

Maybe he could put on 10lbs and replace Burton?

  Don’t know if he’s any good blocking or if that’s something that would need to be developed, but they say he’s been impressive. 

 

  Thoughts?

I'd prefer to see what he can do at WR first. It's hard to find a 6-4/225 guys that runs 4.5 well. The big dig on him is he doesn't play to his size. That would not bode well for him in the TE space...

 

Burton is more a bully slot/HB than TE, so very different skillset. 

 

I like Doyle and Mo as prototypical TEs. Mo needs more snaps when he's back and healthy. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

 I’m talking about next year but you’re right, if Burton has a big year, the Colts might just want to keep him.
  But Patmon does have some talent and is close to TE size, should the Colts decide to cut strings with Burton. 
   They’re going to have to pay Allie Cox.

Maybe they’ll get a good one in the draft. Whatever they decide to do, this group could be a strength next year.

 

 

MAC is a RFA next year. To keep him , I would think the Colts will need to put a 2nd round tender on him. That would mean right around a 3 mill salary for 2021.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dw49 said:

MAC is a RFA next year. To keep him , I would think the Colts will need to put a 2nd round tender on him. That would mean right around a 3 mill salary for 2021.

Keep in mind we have right of first refusal regardless of tender level if another team offers.

 

Since he was a UFA we can offer him anything IIRC. It comes down to do we think a team will offer him 2.9 or more, and would we take a 2nd for him. 

 

If we're smart, we extend him before the season is over to a team friendly deal. We should have done that this offseason IMO. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, bertjones7 said:

Darren Waller was a WR at Ga Tech. Ricky Seals-Jones did it in AZ. Eagles are trying Hakeem Butler at TE but don’t remember it happening very often. 

 

I remember I had Waller in my mock with intentions to make him a TE. I was disappointed colts didn't draft him but pleased a top organization,Ravens did and made him a TE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, bertjones7 said:

Darren Waller was a WR at Ga Tech. Ricky Seals-Jones did it in AZ. Eagles are trying Hakeem Butler at TE but don’t remember it happening very often. 

Waller is 6-6 and 255 though. He was really too tall/big to play WR in the NFL. RSJ is 6-5 and 245, kinda the same deal as Waller.

 

Not saying 6-4 is too short for TE or anything, but he's criticized for not playing up to his 6-4 lol. The two guys you mentioned are just kinda outside of the typical WR parameters.

 

Funchess is a guy I always thought should of stuck to TE. IMO, it was bad for his career when he switched to WR. I think he would have been far more of a weapon at TE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Chucklez said:


Erm..... 

Jimmy Graham
Tony Gonzalez
Antonio Gates
Julius Thomas (had a couple dominating years in Denver)
Mo Alie-Cox (on the rise)

Some decent ex-basketball players turned TE there....

you misinterpreted his comment. Try reading it again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting idea. If he gets some playing time it'd be easier to make an informed opinion on the subject. But with not seeing any snaps is impossible to tell from a fan perspective. I'm sure the coaches and Ballard would explore that route of they think it could work. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, EastStreet said:

Keep in mind we have right of first refusal regardless of tender level if another team offers.

 

Since he was a UFA we can offer him anything IIRC. It comes down to do we think a team will offer him 2.9 or more, and would we take a 2nd for him. 

 

If we're smart, we extend him before the season is over to a team friendly deal. We should have done that this offseason IMO. 

 

 I would think the Colts would probably take a 2nd for him . If they valued him more than that for another million or so , they could put a first on him or just extend him like you mentioned.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/30/2020 at 9:53 AM, crazycolt1 said:

Why replace Burton? He has shown he can make plays when he is used. 

 

for 1 burton sucks or for the hypersensitive... Below Average 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dw49 said:

 

 I would think the Colts would probably take a 2nd for him . If they valued him more than that for another million or so , they could put a first on him or just extend him like you mentioned.

I think they just offer him a team friendly deal, let him shop, and match if not too much. Not totally sure how the "original round tender" works with UDFAs, but I don't see many if any offering a 2nd round for him. That is, unless he balls out the rest of the year. Giving snaps will likely be split pretty evenly between Doyle and Burton too, so not sure how much of a chance he'll have to shine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MFT5 said:

 

for 1 burton sucks or for the hypersensitive... Below Average 

He's not a great prototypical TE, but he is a decent slot bully/HB/gimmick guy.

I don't really even see him as a TE. More of a multipurpose guy. He's probably taking more or as many snaps away from slot as he is from TE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Horse dung

 

trey burton has 1200 yds receiving en 5 years of a nfl career as a specialty receiving te ... he's definitely below avg

 

your talent evaluation is on par w his career if yu think burton is anything other than novelty

 

novelty - a small inexpensive toy/ornament 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

He's not a great prototypical TE, but he is a decent slot bully/HB/gimmick guy.

I don't really even see him as a TE. More of a multipurpose guy. He's probably taking more or as many snaps away from slot as he is from TE.

 

thank yu he's nothing special 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

thank yu he's nothing special 

I think he can be very productive, just not as a typical TE.

There are plenty of uses for him. I just don't want him to take a lot of snaps away from 2 TE sets with Doyle and Mo.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I think they just offer him a team friendly deal, let him shop, and match if not too much. Not totally sure how the "original round tender" works with UDFAs, but I don't see many if any offering a 2nd round for him. That is, unless he balls out the rest of the year. Giving snaps will likely be split pretty evenly between Doyle and Burton too, so not sure how much of a chance he'll have to shine. 



Yeah , I pretty much agree with that.

 

oh.. the deal is teams are returned a draft pick which was the round the player was drafted in. For UFAs , it would be zippo. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, dw49 said:

Yeah , I pretty much agree with that.

 

oh.. the deal is teams are returned a draft pick which was the round the player was drafted in. For UFAs , it would be zippo. 

I tried to look it up. It wasn't really clear on UDFAs. As long as we can offer whatever, and have right of refusal, I'm fine. 

 

If he does end up balling out, he might have serious suitors, and we might have to think about a 2nd round tender. Either way, got options. I really do hope he gets more snaps/targets though. He was absolutely a beast downfield. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I don't think anyone said he was special but he better than your "he sucks and below average". 

 

explain how a receiving TE 5 year career going on 6 adds up to a good season and he's not below avg ... burton trash and this is enough discussing the bum 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MFT5 said:

 

explain how a receiving TE 5 year career going on 6 adds up to a good season and he's not below avg ... burton trash and this is enough discussing the bum 

It's called being injured. 

But don't let that get in the way of you knowing everything. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

It's called being injured. 

But don't let that get in the way of you knowing everything. 

 

excuses, he's always injured that's part of being burton ... he sucks that's that ... undrafted for a reason lol

 

1200 yards en 5 years that's pitiful by any  deductive reasoning 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

 

excuses, he's always injured that's part of being burton ... he sucks that's that ... undrafted for a reason lol

 

1200 yards en 5 years that's pitiful by any  deductive reasoning 

Sorry, I will trust Ballard's judgment over yours anytime. 

He had 3 pretty good years with Chicago till injuries took him out of games. 

There is no reasoning with you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Sorry, I will trust Ballard's judgment over yours anytime. 

He had 3 pretty good years with Chicago till injuries took him out of games. 

There is no reasoning with you. 

he had two years in Chicago. the last was not good at all. 

he had 4 with Philly, and wasn't anything the first two, and mediocre the last two.

was more gadget than anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

he had two years in Chicago. the last was not good at all. 

he had 4 with Philly, and wasn't anything the first two, and mediocre the last two.

was more gadget than anything.

 

Glad someone here knows what's going on lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

Glad someone here knows what's going on lol 

I don't think he's trash.

I just think it's improper to think of him, or try to use him, as a prototypical TE.

 

We used him well last game. He can be beneficial situationally.

He's not a guy you want posting in the EZ though, or trying to fight for a ball out wide.

He's best as a bully slot and gimmick guy. 

Pretty simple.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

he had two years in Chicago. the last was not good at all. 

he had 4 with Philly, and wasn't anything the first two, and mediocre the last two.

was more gadget than anything.

2014- special teams - 4 tackles, blocked punt returned for a TD

2015- special teams- 13 tackles- offense 3 catches 18 yd average

2016- special teams- 8 tackles 2 forced fumbles- offense 37 catches 327 tds 1 td 20 first downs

2017- special teams= 6 tackles- offense 248 tds 5 tds 14 first downs

2018- offense 54 catches 569 yds 6 tds 29 first downs

2019- injury filled season

I think his value is more that giver credit for.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What good is this back and forth for anyone on this topic?

 

Is there any fulfillment about the end result?

 

If you notice a disagreement with someone and it keeps going back and forth just stop posting and responding to said poster. It literally does nothing.

 

It will eventually lead to intervention and potential warnings. Also, if you choose to interact in such activity, please don't come crying wolf on something when you are just as guilty.

 

Colts are coming off a bye week, everyone should just be excited about the game coming up tomorrow.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct. And we need to win that game because if we lose, it is highly unlikely we win the last 5, but I think it is likely they win at least 3 since they play Hou. Jax and a floundering Det.  And they may even be favored against Cle.  That leaves GB for them to upset to sweep into the playoffs and could make it very tough for us to get in at all with our tie breaker status.  This is the more important than any further game this season.  Win and our path to the playoffs is so much more wide open.  But we will still likely need to win at least 3 games to get in unless TN craters somehow.  Those tiebreakers are really going to challenge us in wildcard scenarios.    I could see Hou winning one against us, they usually do and they are on a major upswing.  Their offense is no joke and they do not depend at all on the run so our run defense is less effective obviously.  Pitt and the Raiders are also no joke and both games are away.  This is a critical one if we hope to win the division. If we lose, finishing 9-7 is realistically still in play and I don't see TN losing 3 out of 5.  In fact, I don't see them losing more than 2 of 5.  If we win they'll likely have to win 4 of 5 or sweep to catch us for the division.  I called the Raiders game as being key to make the playoffs and go 10-6 before the season started. With a loss, the desperate WC tie breaker situation, that is especially true.  It's possible for a 10-6 team to miss the playoffs even with the extra team.  Cleveland will almost surely get 10 wins with their easy finish.  Baltimore is also likely.  (Their divisional matchups are really favorable this time around).  Then again maybe we'll sweep the season and get the #1 seed.  Pitt still has to play 5 current playoff teams in their final 6 and KC has to play 3.     Just speculation as always, but that is the fun of a football message board.  Go Colts!
    • ^This^   Another way to look at it is this:  considering the production that Ballard is getting out of his draft picks while they're still on their rookie contracts... why over-spend on re-signing anybody?   If Ballard can continue hitting on draft picks the way he has, then it's almost better to just keep accumulating draft picks, draft well, and let the young guys go out and make plays.   Let other teams over-spend on proven talent while Indy keeps providing an opportunity for young hungry players to prove their talent.   Save the money for slam-dunk moves like Buckner.
    • I bet you are 1000% wrong.   Nelson is the biggest name in the league at G, and it's not even close.  A "bad" Nelson (that gets called for ticky-tack holds that happen on every single NFL play) is still better than 90% of the guards in the NFL.   Your hot-take posts are getting very tiresome.  
    • They have contributed as much their rookie year as the entire group maybe by end of the season, but I doubt there's even a tiny chance of 2 all pros. Even 1 is a major stretch.  I am not sure we have any all pro's on the team since the most deserving one is Buckner (who I count as our first round pick in every way) has impact but no stats to wow anyone not intimately aware of his impact. If he misses this game we may painfully see how valuable.  But their collective impact has certainly added up. 4 starters and 2 solid special teamers in a so far playoff level team is quite a haul for any draft pick class in history.  It is at least adjacent to 2018, unless you don't count Buckner in any way.
    • Nothing against you and I like you as a poster but counting Ballard's 2017 season is a stretch. I realize he was the GM that year (1st year) but he didn't have the Coach he wanted and Luck was out for the year. We went 4-12 that year so his record is a bit skewed because of that. Others have posted the same thing about Ballard's record so you are not the only one and I just don't see how anyone can count that season legitimately. I pretty much go by 2018-this year when he hired Frank and his record would be 25-19 counting the playoffs. Is he the best GM in the league, probably not but he is good. He is responsible for drafting Nelson, Leonard, Mack, signing Houston, signing Rivers and trading for Buckner = great work there. Luck just retiring on the team and McDaniels dissing him even made his job that much harder. 
  • Members

    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 1,459

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 5,792

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JPFolks

      JPFolks 1,032

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 136

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 10,789

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,909

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...