Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Pittman Engagement ((Merge))


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, pgt_rob said:

 

I think it's tacky to come up with a plan to monetize your engagement through advertising. It doesn't really seem 100% genuine and more of a commercial/watermark slap on it all. That's my opinion though.

Personally I think you are reading too much into this.

This couple have shown to be a positive influence on how young couples need to work together. 

 

 

Pat McAfee started a whole new career that started with using social media. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Personally I think you are reading too much into this.

This couple have shown to be a positive influence on how young couples need to work together. 

 

 

Pat McAfee started a whole new career that started with using social media. 


I agree but it seems lame to be like, Hey look at us and how positive we are... **This was brought to you by Kays**
/end advertisement 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • w87r changed the title to Pittman Engagement ((Merge))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't want to play super aggressive, but don't want to be super conservative either. A happy medium between Reich and Arians is optimal to me. With the creativity of Reid....    @Nickster what did you think about Arians yesterday. His risk it biscuit was great on that one call for a TD to the left, but also was responsible for 3 INTs from Brady. It was basically a Winston game yesterday lol. Brady was just more effective short/intermediate, and in the RZ that Winston.
    • There are ways to work around it and Im about 100% sure Nelson isn't getting extension this year. He will get one next year after they pick up his 5th year option.     Ballard is not a big Signing Bonus guy.  Buckner nor Kelly got a Signing Bonus. Glowinski Doyle and Stewart are the only non rookies to have a SB on the team and they are small.     You can have big Roster Bonus guaranteed and  future base salaries. He is more of a guaranteed money guy, that way it takes away from potential dead cap down the line. Guaranteed future money is just as reassuring when risking injury.     But just for you I am going to adjust both my mocks to include an Extension for Leonard and Smith.    Only because you said you are in the fan club. 
    • I agree with most, just not on TY. He did get open some deep, but he also didn't get open deep at times. Most of his open moments were on busted coverage, or against man vs not so great CBs. He's still fast in general (wouldn't doubt if he's high 4.4s) and that's plenty to get "open", but he just doesn't have the size. He didn't need the size when he was 4.3s or low 4.4s.    And not sure why he doesn't think TY can be a slot. He's got plenty of speed left for the slot position, and his route running would create great mismatches vs LBs and SSs.    On Rodgers, I think he's a bit overly optimistic. I love his speed and athleticism, but his size is a real limitation. He'd do fine vs smaller WRs that aren't physical, but a big and/or physical WR would give him fits in a big way. IMO he needs to work on his body in the offseason. Depending on the team, or WR unit were playing, sure, but the wrong matchup would be scary. I do like him better as a CB than Moore (when he's moved from NB to CB). 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...