Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

A Message From Jim Irsay


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

I agree - one of the best owners in sports. I get the feeling he wants to see the Colts win as much as some of the fans like me who have lived and died with the team for 50 years.

The Colts have been in Jims life for 48 years. No doubt he wants to win just like the fans do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

The Colts have been in Jims life for 48 years. No doubt he wants to win just like the fans do. 

Yea,kinda funny.

The worst owner in the league wants to-win as bad as any fan.  
Even if only for financial reasons. 
Which are,in themselves pretty big reasons.   hundreds of thousand dollar big.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Yea,kinda funny.

The worst owner in the league wants to-win as bad as any fan.  
Even if only for financial reasons. 
Which are,in themselves pretty big reasons.   hundreds of thousand dollar big.

 

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

I haven't met many successful people who were’t passionate about what  they do.

i guess this guy backs up that philosophy.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

I haven't met many successful people who were’t passionate about what  they do.

i guess this guy backs up that philosophy.

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

Yeah, his statement was along the lines of “as long as we continue to make money we’re content”. 
 

Joe Burrow is a money maker for them, but they might not have a care in putting a complete team around him. 
 

We could do a lot worse than Irsay. He’s honestly on the positive side of the spectrum. I’ll take him as CEO any day of the week over someone like Dan Snyder.

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

If you cut Jim's arm, little blue horses run out of his veins.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Orioles22 said:

I agree - one of the best owners in sports. I get the feeling he wants to see the Colts win as much as some of the fans like me who have lived and died with the team for 50 years.

Love your screen name 

. I am with ya buddy colts and os and over 50 years 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Is PTO like a PS(Post script).  Addition at the end of a letter after the signature?

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

If you cut Jim's arm, little blue horses run out of his veins.

What is bad is that the Bengals owner has been around the NFL since he was 12 and has been associated with the Bengals since Day 1

 

@RollerColt
 

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

So it is like BTW in the states

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Is PTO like a PS(Post script).  Addition at the end of a letter after the signature?

 

13 hours ago, CanuckColtsFan said:

What

 

I feel so old for knowing the answer to this, but PTO stands for "Please Turn Over" and was a common acronym used at the end of a letter for when you ran out of space on the first page. It basically let people know there was more on the back side of the paper for them to read.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chucklez said:

 

I feel so old for knowing the answer to this, but PTO stands for "Please Turn Over" and was a common acronym used at the end of a letter for when you ran out of space on the first page. It basically let people know there was more on the back side of the paper for them to read.

I only know thanks to the Harry Potter series. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, braveheartcolt said:

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

Yeah, us yanks just draw an arrow in the bottom right corner of the page. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

I'm not sure if I follow your logic on this one, especially since, in football, winning equates to more money.

 

Additionally there is nothing wrong with a business owner turning a profiit... that is why most business owners, you know own a business.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I'm not sure if I follow your logic on this one, especially since, in football, winning equates to more money.

 

Additionally there is nothing wrong with a business owner turning a profiit... that is why most business owners, you know own a business.

Look at how the bengals are run it’s not a secret or controversial to say they don’t go above and beyond to try to win like Irsay does with the Colts.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

Look at how the bengals are run it’s not a secret or controversial to say they don’t go above and beyond to try to win like Irsay does with the Colts.  

I guess I don't have the inside information about the Bengals organization that you do to determine if they go above and beyond to try and win.  I can see from the outside they are not very good at it, but that does not mean it is from a lack of trying.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

We have the bestest owner, the bestest GM, and bestest coach.... EVER. 

To say we don't is outrageous and you should turn in your fan card.

 

Yes, that was sarcasm. Too many people hang too hard on owner-speak, GM-speak, and coach-speak.

 

In all seriousness, I do really like Irsay though. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I guess I don't have the inside information about the Bengals organization that you do to determine if they go above and beyond to try and win.  I can see from the outside they are not very good at it, but that does not mean it is from a lack of trying.

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

and that's why they cant win a playoff game to save themselves :violin: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

 

2 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

and that's why they cant win a playoff game to save themselves :violin: 

The Bengals have less cap room than the Colts. 

So spending the money is not the problem. 

The problem is <::::::> it's the Bengals. :hat:

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

Classic overreaction. Like taking too many happy pills I guess. And sure, a case can be made for a lot of other owners. But Jim is pretty dang good in my book. At least we're not "The Indiana Football Team". 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RollerColt said:

Classic overreaction. Like taking too many happy pills I guess. And sure, a case can be made for a lot of other owners. But Jim is pretty dang good in my book. At least we're not "The Indiana Football Team". 

He also leaves the football operations to football people

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

What is bad is that the Bengals owner has been around the NFL since he was 12 and has been associated with the Bengals since Day 1

 

@RollerColt
 

So, what you're saying is; losing is in his veins.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

 

The Bengals have less cap room than the Colts. 

So spending the money is not the problem. 

The problem is <::::::> it's the Bengals. :hat:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

heres an article from 2018 from a former player talking about it.

 

https://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2018/7/11/17552714/former-nfl-wr-t-j-houshmandzadeh-reveals-just-how-cheap-the-bengals-used-to-be-pittsburgh-steelers

 

he’s not an owner willing to take a chance to win if it could hurt the bottom line.  If they happen to win then great.  
 

Jim Irsay is the exact opposite.  He’s willing to take just about any chance he can to win.  That attitude has rewarded him with a nice profit but that hasn’t been his primary goal in running the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

I wonder if the Raiders will do the same thing with Gruden.

 

A ten-year $100-million contract?  That's crazy.

 

Not even Belichick gets 10-year contracts from Bobby Kraft.  :loco:

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

heres an article from 2018 from a former player talking about it.

 

https://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2018/7/11/17552714/former-nfl-wr-t-j-houshmandzadeh-reveals-just-how-cheap-the-bengals-used-to-be-pittsburgh-steelers

 

he’s not an owner willing to take a chance to win if it could hurt the bottom line.  If they happen to win then great.  
 

Jim Irsay is the exact opposite.  He’s willing to take just about any chance he can to win.  That attitude has rewarded him with a nice profit but that hasn’t been his primary goal in running the team.

The cap and what the coaches are paid are two different things.

 

You wrote a paragraph pretty much saying the same thing I did. 

The Bengals being the Bengals. :thinking:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I bet you are 1000% wrong.   Nelson is the biggest name in the league at G, and it's not even close.  A "bad" Nelson (that gets called for ticky-tack holds that happen on every single NFL play) is still better than 90% of the guards in the NFL.   Your hot-take posts are getting very tiresome.  
    • They have contributed as much their rookie year as the entire group maybe by end of the season, but I doubt there's even a tiny chance of 2 all pros. Even 1 is a major stretch.  I am not sure we have any all pro's on the team since the most deserving one is Buckner (who I count as our first round pick in every way) has impact but no stats to wow anyone not intimately aware of his impact. If he misses this game we may painfully see how valuable.  But their collective impact has certainly added up. 4 starters and 2 solid special teamers in a so far playoff level team is quite a haul for any draft pick class in history.  It is at least adjacent to 2018, unless you don't count Buckner in any way.
    • Nothing against you and I like you as a poster but counting Ballard's 2017 season is a stretch. I realize he was the GM that year (1st year) but he didn't have the Coach he wanted and Luck was out for the year. We went 4-12 that year so his record is a bit skewed because of that. Others have posted the same thing about Ballard's record so you are not the only one and I just don't see how anyone can count that season legitimately. I pretty much go by 2018-this year when he hired Frank and his record would be 25-19 counting the playoffs. Is he the best GM in the league, probably not but he is good. He is responsible for drafting Nelson, Leonard, Mack, signing Houston, signing Rivers and trading for Buckner = great work there. Luck just retiring on the team and McDaniels dissing him even made his job that much harder. 
    • I am late to the party but it doesn't matter because I would've been 1-1 anyway. I had the Lions and Washington so it offsets     Here are my Sunday picks/Monday pick: Ravens 17 Steelers 24 Chargers 19 Bills 27 Titans 27 Colts 30 Panthers 20 Vikings 21 Browns 27 Jags 17 Giants 24 Bengals 10 Cards 27 Pats 23 Dolphins 99 Jets 0 (Fluke's original quote) Saints 24 Broncos 13 49ers 17 Rams 30 Chiefs 34 Bucs 24 Bears 17 Packers 27 Seahawks 31 Eagles 17
    • Yes, love the limited stuff from Harris. I really want to see more routes from him, but overall, love what he's doing. I'd love for him to be a long term answer at slot if Campbell moves to Z.    I'm up in the air on specs. I need to see him hit some long ones, as well as some additional clutch kicks. Glasgow, like I said, I just don't expect much from. Doubt he's ever a contributor on D, but if he kills it on ST, I'm happy.    A buddy of mine (a Ball State grad/fan), thinks Pinter develops into a RT, and the Colts will eventually move Smith over to LT (when AC retires), and let Pinter take RT. I don't know about all that, but I do agree Pinter might develop into more than we think.    I think Pittman will develop into a long term and consistent WR for us. I know he's just starting to emerge, but he just has the look. Good/willing blocker, good hands, etc.. He might not be the 50/50 guy I want, but I also think he might be better at in-stride catching than I thought.    JT, I think he'll be fine once he gets acclimated and use to the run blocking scheme. I don't want to diminish his talent, but most RBs should be able to be successful behind our OL, and he's better than most.    Blackmon is the most interesting to me. He's always been a hammer which I love. He's struggled though in coverage in college, and as we saw, got burnt deep a few games ago. Not sure if he's too aggressive forward, or just struggles with coverage and range. I hope it's just aggressiveness. It definitely helped him when they moved him from CB to S in college, but at the same time, Utah ran a ton of man, which we do not. Love most of what I've seen thus far. I just hope it's not a case where teams get film on him, and start testing him deep a lot. We've been fortunate to play some bad Os early that simply don't go deep a bunch. Will be interesting to follow.
  • Members

    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 769

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CurBeatElite

      CurBeatElite 1,133

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SpanosSucks

      SpanosSucks 70

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 2,494

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 586

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 33

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nancy

      Nancy 81

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lucky Colts Fan

      Lucky Colts Fan 6,658

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 1,117

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 540

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...