Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

A Message From Jim Irsay


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

I agree - one of the best owners in sports. I get the feeling he wants to see the Colts win as much as some of the fans like me who have lived and died with the team for 50 years.

The Colts have been in Jims life for 48 years. No doubt he wants to win just like the fans do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

The Colts have been in Jims life for 48 years. No doubt he wants to win just like the fans do. 

Yea,kinda funny.

The worst owner in the league wants to-win as bad as any fan.  
Even if only for financial reasons. 
Which are,in themselves pretty big reasons.   hundreds of thousand dollar big.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Yea,kinda funny.

The worst owner in the league wants to-win as bad as any fan.  
Even if only for financial reasons. 
Which are,in themselves pretty big reasons.   hundreds of thousand dollar big.

 

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

I haven't met many successful people who were’t passionate about what  they do.

i guess this guy backs up that philosophy.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

I haven't met many successful people who were’t passionate about what  they do.

i guess this guy backs up that philosophy.

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Bengals owner has made it known they are just interested in turning a profit.  

Yeah, his statement was along the lines of “as long as we continue to make money we’re content”. 
 

Joe Burrow is a money maker for them, but they might not have a care in putting a complete team around him. 
 

We could do a lot worse than Irsay. He’s honestly on the positive side of the spectrum. I’ll take him as CEO any day of the week over someone like Dan Snyder.

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

If you cut Jim's arm, little blue horses run out of his veins.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Orioles22 said:

I agree - one of the best owners in sports. I get the feeling he wants to see the Colts win as much as some of the fans like me who have lived and died with the team for 50 years.

Love your screen name 

. I am with ya buddy colts and os and over 50 years 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Is PTO like a PS(Post script).  Addition at the end of a letter after the signature?

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

If you cut Jim's arm, little blue horses run out of his veins.

What is bad is that the Bengals owner has been around the NFL since he was 12 and has been associated with the Bengals since Day 1

 

@RollerColt
 

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

So it is like BTW in the states

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Is PTO like a PS(Post script).  Addition at the end of a letter after the signature?

 

13 hours ago, CanuckColtsFan said:

What

 

I feel so old for knowing the answer to this, but PTO stands for "Please Turn Over" and was a common acronym used at the end of a letter for when you ran out of space on the first page. It basically let people know there was more on the back side of the paper for them to read.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chucklez said:

 

I feel so old for knowing the answer to this, but PTO stands for "Please Turn Over" and was a common acronym used at the end of a letter for when you ran out of space on the first page. It basically let people know there was more on the back side of the paper for them to read.

I only know thanks to the Harry Potter series. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, braveheartcolt said:

Sorry pal, must be a British thing. ‘Please turn over’.

 

Meaning there is some additional info on the other side of the page, or there is another page to read etc. 
 

I was just being foolish. 

Yeah, us yanks just draw an arrow in the bottom right corner of the page. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Well the bengals owner literally inherited his money and team from his father and has just been interested in maintaining it.  Jim Irsay who also inherited his team has gone above and beyond to make sure the Colts win.  It’s pretty clear one values the dollar while the other values winning.  

I'm not sure if I follow your logic on this one, especially since, in football, winning equates to more money.

 

Additionally there is nothing wrong with a business owner turning a profiit... that is why most business owners, you know own a business.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I'm not sure if I follow your logic on this one, especially since, in football, winning equates to more money.

 

Additionally there is nothing wrong with a business owner turning a profiit... that is why most business owners, you know own a business.

Look at how the bengals are run it’s not a secret or controversial to say they don’t go above and beyond to try to win like Irsay does with the Colts.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

Look at how the bengals are run it’s not a secret or controversial to say they don’t go above and beyond to try to win like Irsay does with the Colts.  

I guess I don't have the inside information about the Bengals organization that you do to determine if they go above and beyond to try and win.  I can see from the outside they are not very good at it, but that does not mean it is from a lack of trying.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

We have the bestest owner, the bestest GM, and bestest coach.... EVER. 

To say we don't is outrageous and you should turn in your fan card.

 

Yes, that was sarcasm. Too many people hang too hard on owner-speak, GM-speak, and coach-speak.

 

In all seriousness, I do really like Irsay though. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I guess I don't have the inside information about the Bengals organization that you do to determine if they go above and beyond to try and win.  I can see from the outside they are not very good at it, but that does not mean it is from a lack of trying.

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

and that's why they cant win a playoff game to save themselves :violin: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are countless reports on it over the years.  The Bengals ownership has made it known they don’t want to spend money beyond what they have too.  Again this is not news or controversial.

 

2 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

and that's why they cant win a playoff game to save themselves :violin: 

The Bengals have less cap room than the Colts. 

So spending the money is not the problem. 

The problem is <::::::> it's the Bengals. :hat:

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Why is it just about every time irsay releases a statement we're told on this forum that he's  the Best and greatest owner of all time??

I'm not knocking him or anything,  I know it must be difficult for him fighting his demons for most his life and all so god bless him going forward. 

But really the greatest sports owner of all time?  Lol

Classic overreaction. Like taking too many happy pills I guess. And sure, a case can be made for a lot of other owners. But Jim is pretty dang good in my book. At least we're not "The Indiana Football Team". 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RollerColt said:

Classic overreaction. Like taking too many happy pills I guess. And sure, a case can be made for a lot of other owners. But Jim is pretty dang good in my book. At least we're not "The Indiana Football Team". 

He also leaves the football operations to football people

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

What is bad is that the Bengals owner has been around the NFL since he was 12 and has been associated with the Bengals since Day 1

 

@RollerColt
 

So, what you're saying is; losing is in his veins.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

 

The Bengals have less cap room than the Colts. 

So spending the money is not the problem. 

The problem is <::::::> it's the Bengals. :hat:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

heres an article from 2018 from a former player talking about it.

 

https://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2018/7/11/17552714/former-nfl-wr-t-j-houshmandzadeh-reveals-just-how-cheap-the-bengals-used-to-be-pittsburgh-steelers

 

he’s not an owner willing to take a chance to win if it could hurt the bottom line.  If they happen to win then great.  
 

Jim Irsay is the exact opposite.  He’s willing to take just about any chance he can to win.  That attitude has rewarded him with a nice profit but that hasn’t been his primary goal in running the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

I wonder if the Raiders will do the same thing with Gruden.

 

A ten-year $100-million contract?  That's crazy.

 

Not even Belichick gets 10-year contracts from Bobby Kraft.  :loco:

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GoColts8818 said:

There are other ways to spend money than besides salary cap and that’s the spending they haven’t been willing to do.  Example it was reported one of the reasons they held on to Lewis for so long was because they didn’t want to pay him what they owed on his contract and another coach.

 

heres an article from 2018 from a former player talking about it.

 

https://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2018/7/11/17552714/former-nfl-wr-t-j-houshmandzadeh-reveals-just-how-cheap-the-bengals-used-to-be-pittsburgh-steelers

 

he’s not an owner willing to take a chance to win if it could hurt the bottom line.  If they happen to win then great.  
 

Jim Irsay is the exact opposite.  He’s willing to take just about any chance he can to win.  That attitude has rewarded him with a nice profit but that hasn’t been his primary goal in running the team.

The cap and what the coaches are paid are two different things.

 

You wrote a paragraph pretty much saying the same thing I did. 

The Bengals being the Bengals. :thinking:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd throw Pittsburgh in there too. 
    • The red zone % can be misleading. Looking at that, one would not expect 7-3.  I find our offensive rz % more concerning than our defensive #. However, ifYOUR offense is in rz more often than opponent, and THEIR offense is kept out of rz more than your offense, you can better afford these #s.   Concerning, yes, but i would argue, at 7-3, there is more going on than rz % by itself. 
    • ? Rivers is the QB and the leader of this team. Yes the strong point of our team is the defense but it it still the offense that scores the points to win.  I agree that no one player is responsible but his veterans leadership means more than you want to give any credit.  Just because he is not a Mahomes or a Wilson does not devalue what he is to this team.  With the help of the defense he pretty much equaled Rogers this last week.  He has already done more for this team than a lot of fans thought he would. 
    • I don’t mean to split hairs....   But while freely admitting 2020 Rivers isn’t 2010 Rivers or even 2018 Rivers, he’s certainly much better than 2019 Rivers.  He’s having a very good year, and he’s doing that without the weapons that other QB’s have.   And he’s doing it without the expected running game until this week.      2020 Rivers is also clearly better than 2019 Brissett, so I’m not ready to discount his responsibility for our current 7-3.  I agree things could still come off the rails.   I agree that the defense and ST get equal or greater credit, but still...   Rivers is driving our offensive train in a way JB could not.  So it feels that at least thru 10 weeks, at least, he’s deserving of more credit than you’re currently offering.    Did I thread that very small needle?    
    • When I was watching it on TV it seemed like there were a lot of Packers there but it seemed like 50/50 to me. Our crowd got loud when we were on defense at the end of regulation and in OT. 50/50 is still bad for a home team but it was noisy for the Colts at times too.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...