Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jacob Eason (Thread for all Information) ((MERGE))


Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

Interesting. The way I see it though is Eason is competing against Sam Darnold, Philip Rivers 2020 performance, Jamie Newman, and Zack Wilson (BYU). Because for me, those are the most realistic starting QB options for the Colts in 2021. 

I would include Ryan Fitzpatrick in that mix. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

He just took questions from the press. Should be up on YouTube later. This kid is working his butt off. Really impressed with the quotes I saw from reporters.

but then we they have been talking up Rivers and he has looked as bad as rookies with his int's this year... Ty said that him and Rivers had a good connection and we all know how that is... I believe what this org is saying with a grain a salt... they said the same Sh.. when Pagano was here

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  I got a lot from Eason’s press conference:

 

He’s not at a place where he needs to be, to be a starter.

 

He’s learning from coaches and from watching from Rivers and Brissett and determining where he would go on the play.

 

He’s doing extra work to make up for the lack of playing.

 

There’s good communication between Rivers, Brissett, Siriani and Reich.

 

  I know there’s those out there that think we’ve got to move up in the draft to get “the Guy” but what if we already have him?

  I was checking out some QBs drafted in later rounds that turned out to be Franchise QBs:

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1154515-10-best-late-round-qb-selections-in-nfl-draft-history

 

 Eason is no Lawrence. And we know they were checking out Lance. It sounds like he’s got potential but he’s also got a small sample size to go on. If then see enough growth in Eason and feel he can take the reigns from Rivers in 2022, wouldn’t they be better off grabbing a LT, DE, CB or WR in the first? 
   
 Anyway, I was impressed by his Zoom meeting:


https://www.colts.com/video/jacob-eason-rookie-development-mental-physical-reps-bye-week

  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a chance? Of course there is. There's also a chance he's not our "Guy". Sadly, there's more evidence against him than for. Most QBs chosen in the draft don't amount to much success. 

 

That said, and this has been pointed out by other posters, development and "fit" is a major factor on how successful he becomes. The QBs who go on to lead a fulfilling career either have enormous talent (ala Aaron Rogers) or fantastic development and scheme fit (ala Tom Brady). Eason is certainly taking the right steps so far. The question now is will he continue his learning, and will the staff be able to tailor fit to his strengths and create a strong, stable environment around him. Players like Tom Brady benefitted from having a long lasting coaching staff, and early success. The early success allowed Tom to stay in the organization and continue to learn and get better. 

 

If Jacob can have early success, and the will to be a lifelong learner, he's going to go far. If he gets complacent, he'll fail.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, coltsfeva said:

  I got a lot from Eason’s press conference:

 

He’s not at a place where he needs to be, to be a starter.

 

He’s learning from coaches and from watching from Rivers and Brissett and determining where he would go on the play.

 

 

  I know there’s those out there that think we’ve got to move up in the draft to get “the Guy” but what if we already have him?

  I was checking out some QBs drafted in later rounds that turned out to be Franchise QBs:

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1154515-10-best-late-round-qb-selections-in-nfl-draft-history

 

 
   
 Anyway, I was impressed by his Zoom meeting:


https://www.colts.com/video/jacob-eason-rookie-development-mental-physical-reps-bye-week

  

 

 

 

What if he's Not the Guy??

Can the colts afford to put all their eggs in Eason's basket? The most important position in sports?

 

Do we want to go into every game and be at a Disadvantage vs the opposing teams QB?

 

I say do everything possible to get the best QB we can and keep and continue to develop Eason. And then we'll see where the chips fall.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A fair question, to be sure. I can't even speculate an answer until I see him go up against a defense comprised of NFL 1's. At the very least, he appears to be saying and doing all the right things to give himself the best shot. I would guess at the very least he will be a quality backup in the league, and potentially much more.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideally, yes. But, we have no idea where he is at as far as being ready to becoming a starter. The Colts don't even know at this point. It would be great if he pans out to be a top 15 QB. However, you can't pass up a top QB if we have the ability to get him IMO. I'm just going to assume the Colts know what they are doing, and Ballard has many plans in place. 

 

I believe a trade for a Veteran QB is most likely if we don't resign RIvers. Brissett will be gone. Eason will compete, and will be the primary backup.

 

QB depth chart: New QB, Eason, New Qb for training camp/practice squad

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

What if he's Not the Guy??

Can the colts afford to put all their eggs in Eason's basket? The most important position in sports?

 

Do we want to go into every game and be at a Disadvantage vs the opposing teams QB?

 

I say do everything possible to get the best QB we can and keep and continue to develop Eason. And then we'll see where the chips fall.

This is the exact line of thinking I am using. The opportunity cost of rolling with Eason vs. trading for a veteran/proven talent is likely not worth it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

What if he's Not the Guy??

Can the colts afford to put all their eggs in Eason's basket? The most important position in sports?

 

Do we want to go into every game and be at a Disadvantage vs the opposing teams QB?

 

I say do everything possible to get the best QB we can and keep and continue to develop Eason. And then we'll see where the chips fall.

The NFL is a business, and as such there should be a level of accountability. So, absolutely yes to this notion. There's a fine line between loyalty and being held to standards. We should continue to reward players based on their product on the field, while simultaneously always finding better talent.

 

If anything else, it will provide a push for Eason to be self-driven.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I got from this week's press-conferences regarding Eason is that he's not really getting any scout team reps. I was kind of disappointed by that. It's probably understandable that they give that role to Jacoby, but I wished he would be getting at least some proportion of them. Like you said, this probably means he's not really ready. 

 

On the other hand, the feedback we are getting from the coaching staff seems to suggest that they are very happy with his progression and it seems like he has taken the lead in his preparation and is doing extra-work to compensate for not getting much live reps(even in practice). I honestly don't know how to evaluate that though. I wish we had more information and I wish the coaching staff had more opportunities to evaluate him, but it is what it is... when you are trying to compete the evaluation of the 4th round QB is not front and center in the list of priorities... again... understandable. 

 

With all that said... there are 2-3 months more Eason will be with this coaching staff and around Rivers and Jacoby before the season's over... I'm no NFL GM and no coach, but IMO the approach they have to take is - you need to have relatively high level of confidence that Eason has the chance to be your franchise QB by the end of that time... OR, if not, you just have to bite the bullet and draft your next QB(this of course is with the caveat that you actually love some of the QBs in the draft and think one of them can be your franchise QB) and let them compete in case Eason takes a big step forward in the off-season. You cannot postpone that decision indefinitely. The QB decision needs to be relatively clear and you have to be confident with that decision... You cannot be wishy-washy with it and this is especially true at a time when the rest of the team seems good enough to compete in the league. 

 

tl;dr: yes, he can be the guy, but you better be confident in that by draft time... otherwise - draft a QB of the future if you like one. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, stitches said:

What I got from this week's press-conferences regarding Eason is that he's not really getting any scout team reps. I was kind of disappointed by that. It's probably understandable that they give that role to Jacoby, but I wished he would be getting at least some proportion of them. Like you said, this probably means he's not really ready. 

 

On the other hand, the feedback we are getting from the coaching staff seems to suggest that they are very happy with his progression and it seems like he has taken the lead in his preparation and is doing extra-work to compensate for not getting much live reps(even in practice). I honestly don't know how to evaluate that though. I wish we had more information and I wish the coaching staff had more opportunities to evaluate him, but it is what it is... when you are trying to compete the evaluation of the 4th round QB is not front and center in the list of priorities... again... understandable. 

 

With all that said... there are 2-3 months more Eason will be with this coaching staff and around Rivers and Jacoby before the season's over... I'm no NFL GM and no coach, but IMO the approach they have to take is - you need to have relatively high level of confidence that Eason has the chance to be your franchise QB by the end of that time... OR, if not, you just have to bite the bullet and draft your next QB(this of course is with the caveat that you actually love some of the QBs in the draft and think one of them can be your franchise QB) and let them compete in case Eason takes a big step forward in the off-season. You cannot postpone that decision indefinitely. The QB decision needs to be relatively clear and you have to be confident with that decision... You cannot be wishy-washy with it and this is especially true at a time when the rest of the team seems good enough to compete in the league. 

 

tl;dr: yes, he can be the guy, but you better be confident in that by draft time... otherwise - draft a QB of the future if you like one. 

How could he not be ready for "scout team reps?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dingus McGirt said:

How could he not be ready for "scout team reps?"

I meant he's not ready to be playing in the league, not "not ready for scout reps"... IMO if he was ready to be put in games, he probably would be getting some of the scout team reps... 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s saying all the right things, let’s just hope he’s doing it too. 
 

He could be the guy and the Coach’s will probably know if he is, by the end of this season or by OTAs during the off-season because it’s easy to do the right things when you are in season.

 

Let’s see if he continues to work on his game during the offseason, when he isn’t meeting with coaches everyday

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, stitches said:

I meant he's not ready to be playing in the league, not "not ready for scout reps"... IMO if he was ready to be put in games, he probably would be getting some of the scout team reps... 

There's some reason this regime is locked at the hip to Brissett until he's out the door.  Partly it's the contract he has, and partly it's because they know they can grind out a few tedious wins with him if it comes down to it.  It's like having a backup plan for a Friday night out..... She's nothing to look at, but shes nice and fun to hang out with.... So you do enough to keep her interested and you'd rather spend the evening with her than take a shot at the pretentious looking 9+10 in the corner that could be amazing, but likely knows she's a looker and is a major pain in the * 

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Dingus McGirt said:

How could he not be ready for "scout team reps?"

He's not going to get any scout team reps as long as Brissett is the backup. Brisset is the one that will be active game day not Eason.  Brissett should be getting the reps.  He has to be ready.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say it's a dubious proposition at best...given some of the issues he had in college. But he certainly has the arm...and Day 3 QBs have become starters before. I just find it hard to believe he is currently Plan A for this team. They need a long-term QB solution...and they liked the guy so much that they waited until the middle of 4th round to draft him? Either Ballard has a crystal ball OR Eason was more of an opportunistic pick that someone they had to have. 

 

And per his own words (paraphrasing)...Ballard gets (probably) one shot at this. He has to be really sure about Eason before he goes down that path...because it will require a 2-3 year commitment to Eason...during a time which the Colts have a good roster.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine changed the title to Jacob Eason (Thread for all Information) ((MERGE))
3 hours ago, richard pallo said:

He's not going to get any scout team reps as long as Brissett is the backup. Brisset is the one that will be active game day not Eason.  Brissett should be getting the reps.  He has to be ready.   

Reich actually said earlier in the week he will start getting scout team reps.

 

I don’t think the colts even know yet if they will look for the future in the draft. Eason still has half a season to show what he has in practice and by working. I don’t think the colts would be shy about trading up if they felt that a sure fire can’t miss guy is there they really love.  The best thing for this team I believe is to have Rivers have a great season and come back next year and have Eason as the backup. Then he could be ready in 2022. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We’ll see some of Eason at the end of the season probably. Regardless of outcome, because if we clinch a playoff spot early, we’ll want to sit our starters, and since Jacoby won’t be on the team next year, you probably let Eason start or at least play the 2nd half of those games. If we’re terrible and it we get eliminated from playoff contention then you definitely play Eason.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

We’ll see some of Eason at the end of the season probably. Regardless of outcome, because if we clinch a playoff spot early, we’ll want to sit our starters, and since Jacoby won’t be on the team next year, you probably let Eason start or at least play the 2nd half of those games. If we’re terrible and it we get eliminated from playoff contention then you definitely play Eason.

Won't that hurt the locker room leader's feelings?

 

On 10/23/2020 at 1:11 PM, shasta519 said:

I would say it's a dubious proposition at best...given some of the issues he had in college. But he certainly has the arm...and Day 3 QBs have become starters before. I just find it hard to believe he is currently Plan A for this team. They need a long-term QB solution...and they liked the guy so much that they waited until the middle of 4th round to draft him? Either Ballard has a crystal ball OR Eason was more of an opportunistic pick that someone they had to have. 

 

And per his own words (paraphrasing)...Ballard gets (probably) one shot at this. He has to be really sure about Eason before he goes down that path...because it will require a 2-3 year commitment to Eason...during a time which the Colts have a good roster.

AKA - "the paralysis of analysis."

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2020 at 12:28 PM, stitches said:

I meant he's not ready to be playing in the league, not "not ready for scout reps"... IMO if he was ready to be put in games, he probably would be getting some of the scout team reps... 

 

Personally, I don't necessarily agree with Eason not being ready next season. Brissett and his roll on the team has hampered Eason development.  

If Rivers don't play good enough to resign, slate Eason in as the starter and let's roll. 

No matter how that turns out we still have to address another QB or two on the roster. 

 

 Eason has the physical tools and will not get the mental down without getting his feet wet. 

 I don't have a clue on where we will be picking in the draft but there are some interesting QBs who may be available outside the draft. 

Hopefully we don't have to go the route of 'a seasoned veteran" on the downside of their career. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

 

Personally, I don't necessarily agree with Eason not being ready next season. Brissett and his roll on the team has hampered Eason development.  

If Rivers don't play good enough to resign, slate Eason in as the starter and let's roll. 

No matter how that turns out we still have to address another QB or two on the roster. 

 

 Eason has the physical tools and will not get the mental down without getting his feet wet. 

 I don't have a clue on where we will be picking in the draft but there are some interesting QBs who may be available outside the draft. 

Hopefully we don't have to go the route of 'a seasoned veteran" on the downside of their career. 

 

 

 

I agree with you. Jacoby does kind of hamper Eason’s development. I’m looking at Miami’s decision to start Tua and thinking that Eason also NEEDS to play in some form this year as I noted earlier.  Even though I’m on board (but not 100% locked into) the Darnold idea, it’s imperative for the Colts to know what they have in Eason.

 

It’s no secret that come 2022 the latest, the Colts will have someone not named Phillip Rivers or Jacoby Brissett starting for them. When that time comes, you need to make sure you’ve exhausted all options to get to that decision. You can’t do that if 2022 comes and Jacob Eason hasn’t started 6-10 NFL games. He doesn’t need to redshirt this year and then just hold a clipboard next year. Maybe it was lack of talent, but that didn’t work for Brock Osweiler. And yes blah blah Aaron Rodgers. I know 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2020 at 11:42 AM, chad72 said:

They are "Eas(o)n him into a starting role". Your guess is as good as mine.

 

I truthfully still don't know much about him. But there are 2 seasoned veterans on the 53, and a rookie (especially in Covid 2020) working his way past both in rank seems highly unlikely under any circumstance.

 

On 10/20/2020 at 11:42 AM, chad72 said:

If Rivers is not the answer, might as well have Eason play 1 year with a good backup not named Rivers or JB, and a drafted QB, and go from there. 

 

On 10/20/2020 at 11:42 AM, chad72 said:

Let us talk in December, more answers will appear.

 

Hmmm, yes. Let's see how things go.

 

On 10/20/2020 at 11:42 AM, chad72 said:

Tua was just made the Dolphins starter and Fitzmagic is backup, perplexing move because the Dolphins were still in AFC East race.

 

On 10/20/2020 at 12:53 PM, Stephen said:

Yea Fitzpatrick  was doing good, but he normally  follows up with bad games

Interesting factoid. In 16 years in the NFL, Ryan Fitzpatrick has appeared in 162 NFL games, playing either for or against every team in the NFL except for the Green Bay Packers. Yet he has never played a single game in the NFL postseason. Ever.

 

I've heard some call him Fitzmagic, but I've heard others (like Rex Ryan for one) call him Fitztragic too. He can be and is both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you don’t really agree with most?
    • Whether I've heard of them or not is irrelevant. What's relevant is that our coaches can lead our team to a SB win. You can bash me because of my lack of knowledge all you want. The real question is, do you trust Ballard to hire coaches over 31 other teams? Do you trust Frank Reich's word that these guys are good? You are being positive and trustworthy just for the sake of it too. I don't trust anyone for us until they prove they can do their job at the highest level, in the NFL and on the Indianapolis Colts.
    • Joe Tiller coached future HOFer Drew Brees at Purdue.  He's the father of "basketball on grass."  One of the most brilliant offensive coaches of his generation with an outstanding coaching tree.    I say this with no disrespect, but the fact that you haven't heard of someone is pretty meaningless.    Your responses regarding the listing of several coaching legends, together with your reactions toward the several up-and-coming NFL coaches that have been named in this thread, has established you're pretty much only familiar with a few household names that virtually every casual NFL fan is familiar with.   If that was the criterion by which all coaching decisions and hires were made, no coach would ever move up the ranks and have the chance to become successful.    Sirianni was pretty much a nobody before the Colts hired him.  He's still only 39 years old.  Now he's the HC of the Eagles.  Eberflus had never coordinated a defense before he got to Indy.  I'm guessing you had no idea who Gannon was until he was hired away.    In sum, there's no reason to be overly negative about things just for the sake of being overly negative.  It may be more rewarding to expand your horizons and learn more about the game and how many great coaches permeate every level of it.  Some coaches that you perceive as "bad" because of their tenure with a certain team go on to do great things in a different environment.  Same can be said for coaches that you've never heard of (which is seemingly a pretty big list).  That's the nature of the business. 
    • I've never heard of any of these guys besides Levy and Kush, so I have no idea if they are even good or not.
    • No problem on the length of the post.   I did know of Dodds in 2012 when I started following the NFL Draft closely most because of the draft that the Seahawks did that got them Wagner and Wilson. It was looked very poorly upon early and criticized before being graded the best draft in 2012 after the season was over. You are correct I didn't know of Morocco Brown until Ballard signed him from the Redskins.    To me, it is pretty much SB or bust now. I went through 14 years on the Colts with Peyton, a top 3 QB of all time, and only won one SB because we shared the conference with the greatest coach/QB combination of all time. Fast forward a year when we are fortunate to get another franchise QB, Irsay hires a GM/Coach combo that has no idea what they are doing, we don't protect Luck, he gets injured, and he retires not only halfway into his career at 29.   Now QBs like Mahomes, Watson, Mayfield, Allen, and Lamar are either elite QBs for other teams in the conference, or leading their teams to the playoffs every year. Meanwhile, we had a one year band-aid with Rivers, and he retired on us. We lost our LT to an early retirement, we lost a decent amount of coaches, and we'll probably lose at least one of Dodds and Brown next year. For what? A playoff win in 2018?   I paid my dues as a fan with Manning and Luck. A top 3 QB of all-time and a top 5 QB that retired in his twenties. 20 years combined and one SB win. That's it. I was robbed of 10 years of QB play from a top 5 QB that would of kept us contending right now if it weren't for a shoddy GM. I don't want to go through this part of the journey anymore. I want to contend every year. I want to win another SB. 1 SB win with 20 combined years of Manning and Luck isn't good enough. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...