Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

I think I’m Out on Ya-Sin


Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Aren't all 2nd rounds picks a project in some manner?

 

They are...but some are definitely more of a projects than others. I was more referring to either being drafted for a position change...a player that is athletic but really raw...and/or a player that played against lesser competition. Like I don't consider Pittman or Taylor to be projects...but the rest largely have fit under the "project" description.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

rock is the colts highest graded corner what stats are you looking at .  Its hard to grade a corner based on eye test during games .  if burrow throws it 40 times and rock is in perfect postion for 36

I like the way he plays

I think some of you forget the Greg Toler days...

7 hours ago, Nesjan3 said:

Seems like he is always getting spotlightled whether it be for a dumb mistake, getting burned, or a nice play. Either way a good trait of a corner is when you dont hear about him. That means he is doing his job. Rock is getting targeted as a weak spot on our team for sure.

 

I'm not really sure that Rock is a 'weak link.'  Personally, I think Willis is the 'weak link' of our secondary.  That said, Rhodes seems like he's back to probowl form after a down year last year and I imagine after his pick six and other INT that teams are more likely to pick on Rock that Rhodes.

 

7 hours ago, Two_pound said:

I don't think any of our defensive backs look very good when they are playing stand around zone defense. The more aggressive they play the better they are(Kenny Moore especially). We actually have a pretty solid group of db's.

 

Agreed -- though, the problem with Kenny Moore is he is really not very good when he has to line up outside.  I know he typically only does that if an injury happens, but he becomes a liability out there (IMO).  However, as a nickelback, I think he's one of the best in the entire NFL.  Just hoping we don't have any injuries to Rhodes or Rock so that Kenny can stay on the inside, which is where I think he belongs.

 

Overall, I'm happy with our starting secondary.  I think Willis is the week link in the backfield, but he's a pretty solid 'weak link' (much like Glow on the OL).  I have liked what I've seen from Tavon Wilson at S and trust Odum.... I also have liked most of what I've seen from Carrie.. but do think we'll have to continue addressing CB depth this off season.

 

6 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Two weeks in a row now the Colts defensive has played poorly in the 1st half only to come back and allow only a FG in the 2nd half.  The defense is for real but they need to come out of the gate faster.  To me it shows that Flus is not a very good game planner but he is good and reading the game and making adjustments.  I'm sure they do this but if not, I think Flus needs to figure out how other teams are going to game plan against his defense and then develop the game plan on that.  It seems like all he does his look at the opposing team film and develops his game plan from that, he does not take into account the adjustments the other team will make based on the Colts game film.

 

The D definitely seemed to be much better in the 2nd half the past two weeks.  To 'Flus (and the D's) credit - the offense did them no favors by fumbling on our own 43 last week on the opening drive, aside from killing momentum, that gave Cincy a short field to start with.  The Browns were averaging 39.3 points per game the 3 matchups prior to the game against Indy and they have a very solid O (two pro-bowl caliber WRs in OBJ, Landry, a solid OL and a solid running attack).  

 

I agree with you, the D needs to start out faster, but I don't know that I credit the slower starts to Flus' game plan the past two weeks as much as I do to they started in very poor field position against Cincy and the Browns area legitimate offense when Mayfield's healthy and on his game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, CurBeatElite said:

I'm not really sure that Rock is a 'weak link.'  Personally, I think Willis is the 'weak link' of our secondary.  That said, Rhodes seems like he's back to probowl form after a down year last year and I imagine after his pick six and other INT that teams are more likely to pick on Rock that Rhodes.

I’ve actually noticed that Willis doesn’t seem to be particularly good in coverage either but he’s a solid tackler. My issue with him is he doesn’t make as many negative plus as he did last year. I’d still say Ya-Sin is a the weak link. Bengals game gave me flashbacks of that game he had against the Broncos last year. Funny enough, the same excuses about officiating that were made then are being recycled again. Rhodes is now playing well but Blackmon has been the standout in the secondary for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

I’ve actually noticed that Willis doesn’t seem to be particularly good in coverage either but he’s a solid tackler. My issue with him is he doesn’t make as many negative plus as he did last year. I’d still say Ya-Sin is a the weak link. Bengals game gave me flashbacks of that game he had against the Broncos last year. Funny enough, the same excuses about officiating that were made then are being recycled again. Rhodes is now playing well but Blackmon has been the standout in the secondary for me.

Keep in mind Rock was out with whatever mystery injury/illness. 

Not saying he's playing great or anything, but not sure he's back to 100%. 

 

I'd also note that Kenny Moore has played as bad if not worse. Both have given up the same %, both have given up similar passer ratings, and both have 3 missed Ts.

 

Willis is a liability in deep coverage, but they seem to be keeping him closer to the box this year. He's got about the same DADOT (average depth of target) as Moore. 

 

Rock, Kenny, and Xavier look to all get about 5-6 targets per game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love the Rock. A young second year player with an attitude hence the suplex. 

 

Cornerbacks are going to get torched. He got torched twice in the Bengals game but kept his head up and kept playing.

 

Dion Sanders once said the greatest asset a CB can have is a short memory. 

 

As Colts fans let's be patient with the Rocks development.  The raw talent is obviously there 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PrNum1 said:

Love the Rock. A young second year player with an attitude hence the suplex. 

 

Cornerbacks are going to get torched. He got torched twice in the Bengals game but kept his head up and kept playing.

 

Dion Sanders once said the greatest asset a CB can have is a short memory. 

 

As Colts fans let's be patient with the Rocks development.  The raw talent is obviously there 

I couldn’t agree more. He was covering AJ Greene last game. He was going to get beat. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to see a bit more consistency from him. I feel like he's either solid or really bad. He's only in his second year and the transition to playing corner in the NFL is very difficult. I'll wait and see how he plays the rest of the season before making an opinion on him. At least he's not as bad as Wilson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was playing at a high level the last half of 2019, and has been injured/sick to start 2020. He's still similar in stats (completion % allowed, passer rating allowed, yards allowed) to Moore. So if you're done with Rock, are you done with Moore too?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I think what will ultimately cap Ya Sins potential, is his ball playing ability. Its just not his game. He'll rarely ever actually turn to find the ball and make a play, always the man. With the league the way its going, thats just going to lead to more and more penalties (although he's kept those in check this season).

 

Plus, think logically. If you're a QB, and you got a sticky man CB against one of your best WR, but you know he's not a real threat to pick you off, are you scared to throw there? No, probably not. But if you have a ball hawk against your WR, you're going to think twice about making that throw. Against the 1st CB, its likely worst case an incompletion. 2nd CB, a potential pick.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 07dleigh said:

Really wish Marvell Tell was in the mix to apply some pressure. I was very fascinated by him. He looked very promising at corner!

Same. I liked what I saw out of him last year. His combine stats were ridiculous too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 07dleigh said:

Really wish Marvell Tell was in the mix to apply some pressure. I was very fascinated by him. He looked very promising at corner!

Wow.  I forgot about him.  He was surprisingly good last year 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 07dleigh said:

Really wish Marvell Tell was in the mix to apply some pressure. I was very fascinated by him. He looked very promising at corner!

Yeah I thought he was solid depth too. He opted out due to Covid-19, which I have no issues with. One of Ballard’s projects that I actually liked the upside.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Fluke_33 said:

Wow.  I forgot about him.  He was surprisingly good last year 

He had both good and bad moments. Still not sure where he fits in. The position change leads to even more questions. Regardless, he should be good depth if nothing more.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about Kenny, no matter what the numbers might say.  I think he'll be fine.  Still the best slot in the league IMHO.

 

Rock, as East said, had the illness which probably didn't help him.  I'm still in wait-and-see mode with him.  

 

Rhodes I think is going to be boom or bust by design.  He is physical and very gifted, maybe to a fault.  I think he uses those traits to play aggressive and sometimes it will pay off like in the Jets game and sometimes it will not like in the Jags game.  I think he's been mostly good to this point though.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NorthernColt said:

Same. I liked what I saw out of him last year. His combine stats were ridiculous too.

His shuttle and cone were great, but he didn't do all the combine drills. His 40 was pretty pedestrian that he did at the pro day for a corner. So he's really quick, but not fast. Bodes well for NB or SS, but not a CB1/2. And one of the biggest knocks on him is toughness/physicality, which are big factors for NB and SS. He does have an interesting mix of measurables if he can improve in some areas. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

I'm not worried about Kenny, no matter what the numbers might say.  I think he'll be fine.  Still the best slot in the league IMHO.

 

Rock, as East said, had the illness which probably didn't help him.  I'm still in wait-and-see mode with him.  

 

Rhodes I think is going to be boom or bust by design.  He is physical and very gifted, maybe to a fault.  I think he uses those traits to play aggressive and sometimes it will pay off like in the Jets game and sometimes it will not like in the Jags game.  I think he's been mostly good to this point though.

I wouldn't go as far as saying I'm not worried about Kenny, cause I've seen some bad play from him. But I'm not overly concerned about it. Part of the issue is also that Kenny has been playing CB (not NB) sometimes (when Rock was out, and some when Rock returned in base D). Not sure if that is a perm thing, or just something we're doing until Rock is back to 100%. We should have those answers after the bye. 

 

Either way, there's enough to think they will both be fine once Rock is back to 100%, and Kenny is back to playing only NB. If Kenny can get back to doing what he does best, and Rock returns to his form from the second half of 2019 (he graded out top 10 CB), the DBs could be formidable with Rhodes playing the way he is playing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I wouldn't go as far as saying I'm not worried about Kenny, cause I've seen some bad play from him. But I'm not overly concerned about it. Part of the issue is also that Kenny has been playing CB (not NB) sometimes (when Rock was out, and some when Rock returned in base D). Not sure if that is a perm thing, or just something we're doing until Rock is back to 100%. We should have those answers after the bye. 

 

Either way, there's enough to think they will both be fine once Rock is back to 100%, and Kenny is back to playing only NB. If Kenny can get back to doing what he does best, and Rock returns to his form from the second half of 2019 (he graded out top 10 CB), the DBs could be formidable with Rhodes playing the way he is playing.

Agreed.  And safety looks to be one of the strengths of the team right now.  So much so that we may not even bring back a first round pick from just a few years ago.  Blackmon has been a (I say this cautiously) revelation thus far.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Agreed.  And safety looks to be one of the strengths of the team right now.  So much so that we may not even bring back a first round pick from just a few years ago.  Blackmon has been a (I say this cautiously) revelation thus far.

I love what Blackmon has done, but I'm still a bit cautious long term. When we play a good QB with legit deep capability, we'll see. So far, Blackmon's plays have been mostly "help", and things in front of him. And they've been great. Still we haven't seen him challenged deep in single coverage. 

 

I still think Willis is our weak link. When in cover 2 and he is playing split S, he struggles outside of the box. He's much better as a SS, or as more LBish in rip/liz. His coverage stats have improved a lot this year, but IMO it's more a product of scheme, than actual improvement. It's still an issue, just masked.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ^This^   Another way to look at it is this:  considering the production that Ballard is getting out of his draft picks while they're still on their rookie contracts... why over-spend on re-signing anybody?   If Ballard can continue hitting on draft picks the way he has, then it's almost better to just keep accumulating draft picks, draft well, and let the young guys go out and make plays.   Let other teams over-spend on proven talent while Indy keeps providing an opportunity for young hungry players to prove their talent.   Save the money for slam-dunk moves like Buckner.
    • I bet you are 1000% wrong.   Nelson is the biggest name in the league at G, and it's not even close.  A "bad" Nelson (that gets called for ticky-tack holds that happen on every single NFL play) is still better than 90% of the guards in the NFL.   Your hot-take posts are getting very tiresome.  
    • They have contributed as much their rookie year as the entire group maybe by end of the season, but I doubt there's even a tiny chance of 2 all pros. Even 1 is a major stretch.  I am not sure we have any all pro's on the team since the most deserving one is Buckner (who I count as our first round pick in every way) has impact but no stats to wow anyone not intimately aware of his impact. If he misses this game we may painfully see how valuable.  But their collective impact has certainly added up. 4 starters and 2 solid special teamers in a so far playoff level team is quite a haul for any draft pick class in history.  It is at least adjacent to 2018, unless you don't count Buckner in any way.
    • Nothing against you and I like you as a poster but counting Ballard's 2017 season is a stretch. I realize he was the GM that year (1st year) but he didn't have the Coach he wanted and Luck was out for the year. We went 4-12 that year so his record is a bit skewed because of that. Others have posted the same thing about Ballard's record so you are not the only one and I just don't see how anyone can count that season legitimately. I pretty much go by 2018-this year when he hired Frank and his record would be 25-19 counting the playoffs. Is he the best GM in the league, probably not but he is good. He is responsible for drafting Nelson, Leonard, Mack, signing Houston, signing Rivers and trading for Buckner = great work there. Luck just retiring on the team and McDaniels dissing him even made his job that much harder. 
    • I am late to the party but it doesn't matter because I would've been 1-1 anyway. I had the Lions and Washington so it offsets     Here are my Sunday picks/Monday pick: Ravens 17 Steelers 24 Chargers 19 Bills 27 Titans 27 Colts 30 Panthers 20 Vikings 21 Browns 27 Jags 17 Giants 24 Bengals 10 Cards 27 Pats 23 Dolphins 99 Jets 0 (Fluke's original quote) Saints 24 Broncos 13 49ers 17 Rams 30 Chiefs 34 Bucs 24 Bears 17 Packers 27 Seahawks 31 Eagles 17
  • Members

    • JackOLantin

      JackOLantin 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 5,036

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark_Indy

      Dark_Indy 287

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Caffrey

      Caffrey 118

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisbeldridge

      chrisbeldridge 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,799

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 33

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • zibby43

      zibby43 1,563

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...