-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By funktacious2 · Posted
This is such an overreaction. He was clearly only extended in 2019 because we were wining games and we had no plan yet for life after Luck. It made sense at the time and most of us knew that it made very little sense to cut him last off season either as his cap hit was still fairly high, so it was better to have him as a backup who could win some games if needed. His usage in 2019 was fine by me too. It worked out more often than not. He is more mobile than Phil and gives us more options than we had with Phil on 3rd and short. I don't think I would be super surprised if we re-signed him as a backup again, but he's not been treated like a starter with the exception of when he abruptly became the starter because our real starter retired. So what are you even complaining about? As someone else said, he's better than Kelly. Which is to say, he's a backup who was a better choice than most other backups. And there aren't a whole lot of backups who have a better fit for this team than the guy who already played and won games and was already under contract. -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
Actually a better word would've been 'Questionable' and we would've had 1 page instead of nearly 6 -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
Yep, that is why I mocked it a lot last night. 1 word changes everything sometimes, funny but true. I also know this OP has a habit of bashing JB so that added to it for me. -
Exactly!!! I would pay him for the back up behind Rivers if I had to pay someone since Eason would still be under the rookie contract. Alex Smith is most likely let go in the off season, IMO. -
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
-
-
Members
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
Recommended Posts