-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
The upside of hiring someone as prominent as a head coach trumps the league giving a 3rd round pick to a contender when drafting is an inexact science with most GMs hitting below .500, IMO. Most hires are being done by teams with terrible records anyways. They aren’t worried about a team that’s a contender, they just are worried about getting back to the playoffs. I do agree giving 2 third rounders increases the odds of hitting, this might just be a kickstarting move that might get reduced to 1 third rounder eventually. Worrying about the Chiefs will only happen for an NFC team when they get to the SB. There’s that too. -
Will have to research Turner. Another LDE prospect looks good for a 7th year player is Justus Reed. Probably go in around 3. -
Maybe the state should rename its motto to crossRhodes of America to entice him to stay. sorry! Dad joke. -
By hoosierhawk · Posted
2006, nobody is hating on Brissett, just getting tired of Reich and CB drooling over him. I personally don't get the 'great backup' label either but that is just me. Great locker room guy? From all I hear he is a good locker room guy and that shows when he runs off the bench for a TD celebration. -
By Lucky Colts Fan · Posted
Right I understand that. Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "giving" those picks to another team. And like you said, what if this rule is actually hurting the chances Bienemy gets hired as a HC? Even if you're a bottom feeder in the NFC cleaning house and looking for a new HC, if you narrow it down to Bienemy and some white guy, or even another minority candidate, the fact that the best team in the league right now would be awarded two extra picks might tip the scale in favor of the other candidate instead of Bienemy... I get the sentiment of the rule, but it seems flawed...
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts