Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Bengals @ Colts Game Day Thread, October 18, 2020, 1:00pm ET


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr.Debonair said:

I def did, cuz until that point he hasn't consistently shown he can. Lets hope he continues

Reich's O is not a push-it-downfield offense. 

It's a dink/dunk and occasion shot O. 

Maybe you need to reset your expectations lol... 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Your Indianapolis Colts (3-2) look to return to winning ways when they face the Cincinnati Bengals (1-3-1) at home this Sunday. They will play this one without TE Mo Alie-Cox (Out), T Chaz Green (Out)

Keeping a player down when a team is running hurry up is unsportsmanlike conduct refs,  you’ve called every tricky tack call you can make against the Colts call the obvious ones on the bengals please.

Ahh Blackmon... fast becoming a gamechanger

16 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hey Crazy colts.  U still think I am super negative?????  I hate being right my dear bloggers buti was. Over rated GM.  Terrible defensive scheme.Terrible D coordinator. Over rated talent. Wow....a starement gane bout the direction of this Colts franchise. 

Word

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SR711 said:

 

Yeah , it was getting a little ridiculous over the past week hearing how Brissett can give equal play.

 

I still maintain that if the O-line (specifically run blocking) and defense played like expected, Rivers is able to function and succeed as designed

Rivers has definitely cost us, but you're spot on. There's a lot of other things contributing to our woes than just Rivers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hey Crazy colts.  U still think I am super negative?????  I hate being right my dear bloggers buti was. Over rared HM.  Terrible defensive scheme.Terrible D coordinator. Over rated talent. Wow....a starement gane bout the direction of this Colts franchise. 

 

Calm down lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

I swear. This team gets an inflated ego when they have some success.

Right? Yelling and hollering and celebrating like they’re so badass? Like look at the scoreboard hooligans... you’ve given up 24 points in one half. 
 

Hey that’s a great name for our defense! The Hooligans, or maybe Boneheads?

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Waylon said:

 

No. 99 times out of 100 a snap to your backup TE is going nowhere. Or worse. We got lucky with the play, now get rid of it because it won’t work ever again. 

 

So your focusing on what didn't happen on that play more than what did lol, that's a new level of looking at a glass half empty. It was one trick play that got the TD.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

But don’t worry if they play well in the second half when the bengals go into don’t make a mistake mode with a big lead and Rivers throws an inevitable pick when teams know he has to take chances this will all be rivers fault and there will be thread talking about how elite the defense is.

Yup. Rivers is the easy target for folks that can't see the other issues. Most folks don't understand zone from man, let alone different coverages, and have zero clue how to critique OL performance or play calling. INTs are just the bright shiny objects.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NFLfan unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all, I'd say bad fit for us. He's a 3-4 DE. In our system he'd be a tweener, or maybe even a 3T.  Great against the run, average vs the pass. Very solid 3 down guy overall in a 3-4.   IMO, even if he was a fit, we don't need run D help, and he'd be too expensive. Overall just not the benefit and value we need.    
    • Here's what we did on another board a few years ago. Worked out pretty good. 1 Round per evening 2 windows each night... picks 1-16, and then 17-32 (I think it was 7p-8p and 9-10, but could have been 8-9 and 10-11). That way, guys new pretty much when they needed to be there, and only needed to pay attention for roughly an hour per day. Really not even that long. Also gave the mods some time between windows to tidy up. 3 minute clock hence the "flash" term. If you miss a pick, you drop 5 spots (basically giving them an extra 15 minutes). If they missed it a second time, they get bumped to the end of the round and have up to an hour before the next days round starts. If they miss that, they get best player based on their primary needs.  We had 3 threads going at once, and 3 moderators. One thread for the pick announcements and general comments, one with a constantly updated order and big board, and one to manage trades. The big board management was great in terms of keeping it going and checking off who is gone. We also published team needs, but I can't remember if we tracked it except for using it when folks missed their window. Only trades allowed are pick for pick(s) so very little approval needed. No picks for existing players (We did the mock post FA fury, I think we started about 2 weeks prior to the draft).
    • I didn't say he could be as good as Leonard. I said pretty clearly that if Leonard was 95/100 That I think Oke's ceiling is about 86-90.    By in which I also added that any team would be alright that that level of play. I think you are misunderstanding. Because we both seem to agree that Oke will more than likely be a pretty darn good player. 
    • Again, I don’t doubt one bit he can turn out to be a good player. He has the traits. I watched him often when he was at Stanford... his name was not foreign to me come draft time. I was excited about Ballard loading up at linebacker which is a position we have plugged guys off the street before.    I just simply called out the inconsistency of saying he could be a good as Leonard (again, highly, HIGHLY unlikely) and then turn around saying that he could be “pretty good.”    do you know who didn’t need time to be great? Darius Leonard. THAT is the difference. Give Leonard time and see where he goes. My guess is the Hall of Fame. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...