-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
I seriously am going to keep banging this drum. Why would Stafford and especially Rodgers want to come here when we have no wideouts who are worth a snot? You honestly think that Rodgers would leave Adams and Lazard/MVS/Tonyon for Hilton(if resigned)/Pittman/Pascal/Doyle/Burton/Cox and a chance to throw to Paris Campbell for two weeks before Campbell gets hurt again... Ha!! Not a snowballs chance in a woodstove... Come on... And to that, what's Stafford going to do with that terrible group of pass catchers....?? I'm sorry. I'm the guy that knows we need upgraded pass catchers in a serious way before any excitement can be thrown towards whatever QB might be coming this way.....
-
Probably more money/benefits involved.
-
By BProland85 · Posted
I would much rather get Rodgers over Stafford, if the compensation given to Green Bay isn't too pricey. With Rodgers already being 38, they shouldn't be asking for a large compensation package in return. And Indy only needs to 2 year QB or so until Eason is ready to take over. Everything I've heard is that Ballard and company really like Eason, he just needs more development. -
Which begs the question... If you trade for him, do you prefer him to stay on his current contract or would you be willing to give him more money and extend the contract with 2 more years?
-
Some comments here that Reich made about Stafford when we played Detroit.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now