Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

State of the Franchise


Recommended Posts

Ballard and his staff, as good as I think they are in most areas, appear to be very weak at evaluating the skill positions. 
 

Maybe Eason pans out. Maybe Campbell and Pittman get healthy and tear it up, but those are big maybes. 
 

I’m not thrilled with Reich, but look at the QB’s, WR’s, and TE’s Reich has had the past two seasons. Is it any wonder our offense is struggling. 


 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Lose a game ::::> the sky is falling. Win a game ::::>  and it's super bowl bound. 

Indiana.  Nailed it!

I am happy about: - our owner - our GM with a slight criticism to follow in the "not happy about part"  - the overall talent and depth on the roster(position-agnostic) - the LB cor

15 minutes ago, coltsva said:

Ballard and his staff, as good as I think they are in most areas, appear to be very weak at evaluating the skill positions. 
 

Maybe Eason pans out. Maybe Campbell and Pittman get healthy and tear it up, but those are big maybes. 
 

I’m not thrilled with Reich, but look at the QB’s, WR’s, and TE’s Reich has had the past two seasons. Is it any wonder our offense is struggling. 


 

It could be a case where smart people fall in love with their brains too much, have a little too much confidence in their analytical processes, and over think position evaluations.  Look for players that fit into their scheme and current roster with defined roles and play calls in mind rather than simply selecting a good football player.

 

Its easy to second guess, but without using any additional capital on what we already did on receivers, we could have DK Metcalf, Claypool, and TY (in the slot).   We have been in the market for receivers and actually drafted two in the same area of the draft.

 

I think Rivers would look a lot better then.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, buccolts said:

I'm concerned about the QB play, and pleased with everything else, at this time. 

Same.  I think Ballard's silence about Rivers tells me what I need to know.  I think Ballard has two plans this off-season:

 

1) Sign the many impending FA's this team has

2) Find and fix the QB position

 

That is really the most glaring need on this team, followed by another WR/TE.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

WHat about dressing Eason and getting him a few play a game. Just to give the offense a jolt and to see what he can do.

He looks so good. 

He has as many touchdown passes in one game as Rivers has in the whole season!

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Same.  I think Ballard's silence about Rivers tells me what I need to know.  I think Ballard has two plans this off-season:

 

1) Sign the many impending FA's this team has

2) Find and fix the QB position

 

That is really the most glaring need on this team, followed by another WR/TE.

And don't forget LT.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

You talk to Ballard about releasing Rivers or trading him in a deal for Haskins or Darnold. If that doesn't work, trade him for a pick, and try to trade for Haskins or Darnold. If Haskins or Darnold are unattainable, then re-sign Chad Kelly (since he knows the playbook), and have two weeks of practice during the bye week as a QB competition to determine who is the starting QB for the rest of the season. Whether it's Brissett, Kelly, Eason, Haskins, or Darnold, get a starter besides Rivers, play up his strengths, and go out there with a strategy and find your starting QB for the future between those guys.


I like your idea but only Darnold on that list may be worth scrapping the season for.  Rivers is still the best chance to make the playoffs.   It’s kinda pointless bc we will get bounced by most teams anyways.  Darnold would give us hope for the future but he is probably unobtainable right now without the first pick locked up for them.  I still think Irsay told Ballard that he needs to start winning now.  That’s what all the moves this offseason point towards.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:


I like your idea but only Darnold on that list may be worth scrapping the season for.  Rivers is still the best chance to make the playoffs.   It’s kinda pointless bc we will get bounced by most teams anyways.  Darnold would give us hope for the future but he is probably unobtainable right now without the first pick locked up for them.  I still think Irsay told Ballard that he needs to start winning now.  That’s what all the moves this offseason point towards.  

I think even irsay understands Ballard needs a little time to find the right fit at QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think even irsay understands Ballard needs a little time to find the right fit at QB.

Maybe.  My statement is 100% speculation without anything to back it up.  I believe there were reports that Irsay presses Grigson to trade for Richardson.  He may have told Ballard to get a Qb in the building but left drafting or signing one up to Ballard.  The fan base was rightfully angry bc Luck left and Brissett didn’t live up to his contract.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, it'll be interesting to see how the selection committee decides.   It's not a particularly loaded class, which may be good for Reggie.   Calvin Johnson was such a freakish athlete that I think he's got a strong case at WR, too... though Reggie has ~3k more yards than him and ~1k more yards than the other WR on the ballot, Torry Holt.  Megatron has 83 TDs to Reggie's 82 (both trump Holt's 74).  Reggie's got 150 more receptions than Holt (1070 to 920), which both trump Megatron's 731.  So regular season wise, Reggie's 10th in yards and receptions... post-season wise the only more productive WRs than him in league history have been Jerry Rice and Julian Edelman in terms of receptions, and he's top 5 in yards and top 10 in TDs. Holt was also on the 2nd team 2000's all-decade team whereas Reggie and CJ were not 1st or 2nd team.   Not guaranteeing it, but it'd be very cool to see Reggie and Peyton go in together.  I don't really see anyone else on the list aside from Peyton and Woodson who are clearly more deserving than Reggie.  IMO, Reggie's biggest critiques will be that he was WR 2 to Marv for a decent chunk of his career.  He also wasn't on the 2000's all decade team and has just 1 first team all-pro and 2 2nd team all pro appearances.   John Lynch (8x), Faneca (6x) and Boselli (5x) have all been on the ballot a while, which may help their case over Reggie... and Jared Allen's 136 sacks are pretty impressive as well as his 4x first-team all pro (but his sacks are only 12th all time - whereas Reg is top 10 in two WR categories and one of best post-season WRs in history).  Richard Seymour was on the first team 2000's all decade team and has multiple (3) 1st team and (2) 2nd team all-pros and multiple SB rings.  Ronde Barber and Zach Thomas were both 2nd team 2000's all decade team and multiple 1st and 2nd team all-pros.  LeRoy Butler has 4x first-team all pros and was on the 1990's all decade team.  I don't think Clay Matthews Jr. or Sam Mills really have a shot, other than their age.. but IMO they didn't have HOF worth careers (CM Jr. 1x 2nd team all pro, Sam Mills 1x first team, 2x 2nd team all-pro and has a cool story of coming from a D3 school and playing in the USFL before making it to NFL.. but his numbers don't really scream HOF to me).
    • Because if you don't have your long-term solutions at QB you should be searching for him and this is a good QB class. 36 year old Matt Ryan should not stop you from drafting your QB of the future and Teddy Bridgewater should definitely not stop you from drafting a QB if you think he can be the franchise QB.
    • The size of the bubble indicates quality of player, based on an advanced metric. Not saying it's infallible, but it tries to account for how good the player is.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...