Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Rivers getting grilled on Twitter


Recommended Posts

On 10/11/2020 at 11:53 PM, GoColts8818 said:

I can promise you this isn’t what the Colts thought they were getting.  If they had they wouldn’t have given him that contract.   

Then Ballard and Reich weren’t paying close attention. This is the Rivers I pretty much expected which is why I wasn’t high on the Colts signing him.  
 

Rivers is what he is but the biggest let down has been Reich’s regression as a play caller and game planner. That I wasn’t expecting. He doesn’t seem to use the talent we have on offense appropriately. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dan Orlovsky should never critique any quarterback play ever. 

Twitter is a cesspool.

What did we expect we were getting? This isn’t some kind of new thing for Rivers. Just new to us. 

On 10/12/2020 at 7:09 PM, John Waylon said:

Just say no to Jacoby. 
 

You realize the kind of pickle that could put us in? He’s a FA after the season. 
 

Let’s say he comes in and just tears it up. Wins MVP, even. That good. Suddenly we got a problem. What do we do? We can’t just let him walk, so we sign him for 25 million or north a season for 4 or 5 years, and then we get stuck married to 2019 Jacoby until that deal is up. Gonna be a waste of Leonard, and Nelson. By the time they compete with a QB capable of winning again they’ll be in the twilight of their careers if not the decline. They won’t hang around long-term. Free agents aren’t going to want to come.

 

Do we want to be the new Washington?

 

Just say no to Jacoby. 
 

**Edit**
Signed, 

A full blown Rivers hater that wants to see a different QB

 

I seriously doubt Brissett will tear it up and play at a mvp level.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Two_pound said:

Rivers looks as good as those 40 something qbs in Tampa and New Orleans, who, by the way, both teams are also 3-2. We completely dominated a Viking team that hung with the Packers and should have beaten the seahawks(a team many on here can't stop saying how great they are)(what a crock of crap). We crushed the Bears, took care of the jest like we should of, somehow lost to the jags even though statistically dominated them. And lost to the browns with out the best defensive player in the game or our left tackle or our starting rb, and down two young recievers in a year there were no preseason games. Hmmmmmmmm, and yet to some of you on here this team is in shambles and has no chance to compete. WWaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh, whine whine and whine some more. This team is still the best in the afc south and won't have any trouble making the playoffs

 

You know I've been a bit surprised on some of the posts I'm reading here.

 

We're 3-2 and our season is still in good shape.  

 

What is it exactly Colts fans expect ? For us to be 4-1 or 5-0 and blowing out opponents by 35 points a game ? Is that the only thing that will make Colts fans happy ?

 

Unfortunately it hasn't worked out that way. We're a good team.  We beat a good bears team on the road. We have some things to correct and I'm confident Reich will correct them.

 

Things didn't go our way in the Browns game. The oline was completely and single handedly whipped by miles Garrett. Rivers was pressured unmercifully and was forced into a bad mistake. I'm sure he regrets it.

 

As far as arm strength is concerned, Rivers can still fling it if he has a pocket to step into. The comparisons to Brady are rather silly in that Brady has looked terrible for the bucs throwing pic sixes and even forgetting what down it was.

 

Look I get it.  Some of you don't like Rivers for whatever reason. I'm not here to ask you to like Rivers, only to give him a chance and see how this season plays out.

 

If it doesn't work out then I'm sure the Colts will move on to the next qb.

 

But to give up this early in the season seems rather strange.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, PrNum1 said:

 

You know I've been a bit surprised on some of the posts I'm reading here.

 

We're 3-2 and our season is still in good shape.  

 

What is it exactly Colts fans expect ? For us to be 4-1 or 5-0 and blowing out opponents by 35 points a game ? Is that the only thing that will make Colts fans happy ?

 

Unfortunately it hasn't worked out that way. We're a good team.  We beat a good bears team on the road. We have some things to correct and I'm confident Reich will correct them.

 

Things didn't go our way in the Browns game. The oline was completely and single handedly whipped by miles Garrett. Rivers was pressured unmercifully and was forced into a bad mistake. I'm sure he regrets it.

 

As far as arm strength is concerned, Rivers can still fling it if he has a pocket to step into. The comparisons to Brady are rather silly in that Brady has looked terrible for the bucs throwing pic sixes and even forgetting what down it was.

 

Look I get it.  Some of you don't like Rivers for whatever reason. I'm not here to ask you to like Rivers, only to give him a chance and see how this season plays out.

 

If it doesn't work out then I'm sure the Colts will move on to the next qb.

 

But to give up this early in the season seems rather strange.

 

It was like that in here when Luck was QB too. I have been a member since 2015 but have been reading comments in here since roughly 2013.  There are always that handful of people that are never satisfied/can't please and are critical of the team every week. Luck was very good/borderline great but to some it was, he won the division because it was weak or he could never beat the Pats. Stuff gets old after a while. I get it, winning the SB is the ultimate goal but damn only 1 team does that every year. Bottomline is we are 3-2 and have 2 very winnable games in front of us. I am good for now. If we lose to the Bengals and people want to be upset I get that, that makes sense.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It was like that in here when Luck was QB too. I have been a member since 2015 but have been reading comments in here since roughly 2013.  There are always that handful of people that are never satisfied/can't please and are critical of the team every week. Luck was very good/borderline great but to some it was, he won the division because it was weak or he could never beat the Pats. Stuff gets old after a while. I get it, winning the SB is the ultimate goal but damn only 1 team does that every year. Bottomline is we are 3-2 and have 2 very winnable games in front of us. I am good for now. If we lose to the Bengals and people want to be upset I get that, that makes sense.

Truth. There were a couple of members who even said we should bench Luck and start Brissett. 

I understand being disappointed or even mad but losing your mind over something you have no control over is not mentally healthy. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/12/2020 at 7:59 AM, Mr.Debonair said:

How has he done that? Thru 5 games he has played, he has thrown 4 TDs and 3 INTS. Those numbers arent better than what Jacoby was doing up the same point last year and a lower QBR

Sorry I didn't reply sooner, had a busy week last week with family coming into town and moving at work, etc.  Anyways.  I don't look at or use QBR to determine the effectiveness of a QB because it's not an accurate stat.  Two major items to look at though are yards per attempt and yards per completion, both of which are significantly higher than JBs.  The other two areas are redzone efficiency and 3rd down efficiency, both of which Rivers has not done well with the Colts so far (Not counting the Cincy game since my post and the post I am responding to was before the game).  But, as I have mentioned in other threads, that is to be expected somewhat with a QB to a new team and a minimal training camp and no preseason games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said months ago, there's 12 teams OVER the cap.  Bills(right at the cap), Titans and Bears and probably the Vikings, all of which are over the cap by less than 8 million can make easy, painless moves to get back under the cap without disruption to their rosters.  Course, that's not figuring on any signings, including the upcoming draft picks so they will have to be a little bit creative.   Chiefs, Texas, Raider, Rams, Packers and Falcons are between 15 million and 33 million over the cap. Expect some more drastic moves here too, especially with some of the starters,  I see some big time movements there.   However, the Steelers only have 35 players signed and are still  31+ million over so I'm not sure how they are going to do it. So really, they're in the next category   Saints, Eagles- Lets face it, very drastic and full rebuild mode. Even if Brees retires and the Eagles move Wentz, it doesn't help them very much. at 99 million and 52 million over the cap respectively, I see a LOT of their quality players moving. Has too. May not be a super star, but they've got some solid depth and starters that will get some money elesewhere.   As for the rest of the league, there's 6 teams sitting at minimal cap space, almost none after draft picks are figured in. I don't see many drastic moves from those 6. Maybe someone likes 49ers if they restructure someone or something.   That leaves 14 teams to fight over the players those first 12 most likely releases/trade. Tampa's effective cap is just 16.8 million, again, without the rookie reserve set aside. Really, the teams in pretty decent positions to sign their own and possibly pick up a really solid starter cast away or two are really the Bengals, Washington, New England, Indy, the Jets and the Jags.    I said a while back that I think we see a record number of 1 year prove it type deals where players who normally would be getting record setting contracts, end up with less than they would in a normal year, simply due to the 30 million reduction in cap. it really narrows what teams are going to be able to get in on the action.  Less bidders, with less money, typically results in lower prices. 
    • We have to stop treating Rivers like he is some young pup who is gonna run every play just as Frank calls it.  I believe that a future HoF like Rivers has the ability to audible any and every play depending on a look he gets from the defense.  Frank will defer to Rivers' judgment more often than not.  Frank even stated after the Steelers game that runs were called and Rivers audibled out of them.    Any wonder why Frank went to Jacoby on 2nd & 11 the following week vs the Jags?  Well he told us.  He "really wanted to run the ball right there and put the game away."  Even if they had to use 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down.  Why couldn't he keep Rivers in and run it?  Because he knew Rivers would audible out of some of those runs.  It was his M.O. this season.  Jags, Ravens and Steelers games were all close games we lead in the 2nd halves.  Why would Frank abandon running the ball in those games?  
    • I thought he had a pretty good season all things considered. If there's someone else out there that's better, so be it. By all means, upgrade if possible. But Rivers did what was expected of him this season, and helped get a 7-9 team to 11-5 and back in the playoffs.    If we don't bring Rivers back, I have a feeling it's more due to cap issues than performance. 
    • You understand rivers isn't the play caller....  right?
    • I've been going over Rivers stats this season and when you really look at them deeply, he just was not very good this season.  He feasted on bad teams and against good teams he was terrible.  I'm going to make a topic that does a full breakdown of Rivers performances this season vs winning and losing teams.  It's just a lot of information and I'm not good at making charts on here but I'm still gonna give it a shot because the numbers are very telling and will prove that Rivers was just not very good this season and when we needed him to play big vs good teams he just coldn't get it done.  I'll leave you guys with just a sample of the numbers that I found:   I'm gonna pick a number that I think most would say isn't too  bad of a pass to run ratio.  60-40.  That basically comes out to 30 passes and 20 runs a game.  Our record for whenever Rivers threw 3 passes to 2 runs was 1-5.  The only win was against the lowly Bengals.  Whenever he was below that 60% pass ratio we were 10-1.   The only loss was against the Steelers where Rivers decided that in a game we held a 24-7 lead in the 2nd half, he needed to finish that game throwing 23 passes to 3 runs...    Let's break it down even more.  Let's make it an even 50/50 run vs pass split.  In those scenarios we were 4-6 in games where we even let Rivers throw it 1 more time than we ran it (Bengals & 2 fortunate Texans wins make up 3 of those wins).  Both teams picking in top 6.  Only win against a good team where we threw it more than we passed it was first Titans game.  That means that we finished 7-0 in games where we ran it more than we passed it.   In other words, Rivers was nothing more than a game manager.  He could beat teams like the Bengals, Texans, and Titans on a short week throwing it more than we ran it.  But when we needed him to carry us and beat a good team he just couldn't do it.  Unfortunately, Rivers couldn't recognize that.  He kept trying to prove that he could go out and win us games but the numbers say that he just couldn't get it done.    Sure he completed 68% of his passes but the guy couldn't put the team on his back against good teams.  If he can't humble himself and accept the fact that he is just a game manager that should never throw more than 60% of the time vs good teams then he should not be brought back.
  • Members

    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,307

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 335

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jbaron04

      jbaron04 76

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,027

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mick12Maher

      Mick12Maher 55

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 4,674

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 2,353

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 6,701

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...