Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

colts offense predictability


CurBeatElite

Recommended Posts

Nice article by Andrew Walker here on the Colts.com front page:  https://www.colts.com/news/jonathan-taylor-nick-sirianni-cleveland-browns-2020-week-5

 

The last section, I'm a bit concerned about:

 

"

» The Colts' offensive coaching staff is obsessed with staying on top of its tendencies on a weekly basis: While it's important to simply do what you do best at times, at the NFL level it's also important to make sure as an offense you're not too predictable in your play calling.

The Colts, Sirianni said, are obsessed with being as unpredictable as they can be throughout any given ballgame.

"That is something that is constantly on our minds," Sirianni said. "We know how we look at defenses and we know how our defense looks at other teams. We don't want to tip our hand in any way. In any sport, you don't want to let the person trying to defend you any little tell. We're really obsessed with that."

Sirianni said offensive quality control coach Parks Frazier has been tasked with evaluating the Colts' offensive play calls on a weekly basis and then, usually on Tuesdays, reporting his findings back to the staff.

"Parks Frazier does a phenomenal job of giving us our tendencies when we start the week," Sirianni said. "As a matter of fact, that's the meeting I'm about to go to after we talk right here, just talking through tendencies and how we cover tendencies. A huge part of what we do, a huge thought of what we do – just as much as we think about plays and players for our team and their team, we think about our tendencies and how we can break any tendency we have that can tip our hand.""

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

In my opinion, our offense has been very predictable at times this year.  Especially with Hines at RB in the shotgun formation.  I don't study every game tape like opposing D-coordinators do, but from my television I can pretty often predict when a run up the middle is coming and most of the times, it seems like opposing defenses can, too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, horseshoecrabs said:

You are right , but this is a progression . The play calling has been a little vanilla, hope we can learn from that and learn to  adjust as the game goes on  . This week will be a big adjustment as the game goes on against the Browns. 

 

Right, the play calling has been a bit vanilla.  To Sirianni/Reich's credit we had no preseason with a new QB, and between Doyle, Burton, Campbell, Pittman, Mack all missing time with injuries so early in the season, it's probably hard to get to sophisticated.  Also, we haven't really had the need to 'open the offense up'.  We moved the ball very well against JAX, other than a couple untimely interceptions, our offensive game plan was very solid.  The past 3 weeks our D has played so well that our offense's job was just to stay on the field.  I expect when we play a team with an explosive offense who can put up points on our D (I think the Browns may be able to), we'll see more wrinkles unfold in the offense and things will open up a bit more.

 

16 minutes ago, Dogg63 said:

Glad you agree with me, CBE. :)

 

 

 

 

I sure do!  Sorry, I didn't see your post prior to posting this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

58 minutes ago, Dogg63 said:

Glad you agree with me, CBE. :)

 

 

 

Expand  

 

I sure do!  Sorry, I didn't see your post prior to posting this thread.

No worries! I never know if something is better off as a new thread or not. I wasn't being snarky, I am glad we agree. I respect your perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, horseshoecrabs said:

You are right , but this is a progression . The play calling has been a little vanilla, hope we can learn from that and learn to  adjust as the game goes on  . This week will be a big adjustment as the game goes on against the Browns. 

Why would we keep it vanilla though? We don't have that many new pieces on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr.NotSoCreative said:

Why would we keep it vanilla though? We don't have that many new pieces on offense.

We don't have many now (JT, Burton, Noah), but my guess is that these early games give us a chance to do work on the core offense.  This is our pre-season work.  No need to get too fancy with the play calling since we're winning.  Let's get the basics down and work on the fundamentals and relationships/timings.  Also, no need to tip our hand so teams get a lot of film on us to see what we run with certain looks, etc.  If we look predictable now it's not actually a bad thing IF we can surprise teams by doing something out of our norm at a crucial time of the game.  That's a big if...

 

I think I felt the same way last year with how Frank was running the O with JB last year.  The big difference this year is that PR has already shown he can toss the longer ball with some success.  JB never got there much last year and we were never able to get to the next level.  I have much more optimism this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CurBeatElite said:

Right, the play calling has been a bit vanilla.  To Sirianni/Reich's credit we had no preseason with a new QB, and between Doyle, Burton, Campbell, Pittman, Mack all missing time with injuries so early in the season, it's probably hard to get to sophisticated.  Also, we haven't really had the need to 'open the offense up'. 

 

^Very Much This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2020 at 3:21 PM, CurBeatElite said:

 

Right, the play calling has been a bit vanilla.  To Sirianni/Reich's credit we had no preseason with a new QB, and between Doyle, Burton, Campbell, Pittman, Mack all missing time with injuries so early in the season, it's probably hard to get to sophisticated.  Also, we haven't really had the need to 'open the offense up'.  We moved the ball very well against JAX, other than a couple untimely interceptions, our offensive game plan was very solid.  The past 3 weeks our D has played so well that our offense's job was just to stay on the field.  I expect when we play a team with an explosive offense who can put up points on our D (I think the Browns may be able to), we'll see more wrinkles unfold in the offense and things will open up a bit more.

 

 

I sure do!  Sorry, I didn't see your post prior to posting this thread.

If Campbell and Pittman were playing, I beleive things would be quite different. U take any teams #2 and #3 receivers oit of the game plan and they become less predictable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2020 at 11:25 AM, J@son said:

 

^Very Much This

 

11 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

If Campbell and Pittman were playing, I beleive things would be quite different. U take any teams #2 and #3 receivers oit of the game plan and they become less predictable.

 

Going into the year, I think it was pretty clear cut that our offensive weapons 6 of the top receiving targets (arguably through Hines here or Pascal) were TY, Campbell, Burton, Doyle, Pittman, Mack  -- we have seen in the first quarter a lot of time without Mack, Campbell, Burton and Doyle and now Pittman (that's 5/6 or 5/8 if you add Hines/Pascal).  That's pretty significant losses and cannot help the coaching strategy, especially when week 1 was Rivers' first game with all those guys.  Rivers has shown a lot of professionalism by being able to put Mo Alie-Cox in there as a top receiving TE in the league after he lost Doyle and Burton for a stretch.  And like @Moosejawcoltsaid, losing Campbell and Pittman doesn't help at all - the fact that Rivers is still making plays with Marcus Johnson (off the PS), Pascal and others is a good thing.  I expect Pittman to be back around the bye week and hope we get Campbell back... imagine if our offense attack stays as steady as it has been (with room for improvement on 3rd Down and in the RZ) with our 'back-ups' and we get our #2 and #3 back and TY starts being TY again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2020 at 2:50 PM, CurBeatElite said:

Nice article by Andrew Walker here on the Colts.com front page:  https://www.colts.com/news/jonathan-taylor-nick-sirianni-cleveland-browns-2020-week-5

 

The last section, I'm a bit concerned about:

 

"

» The Colts' offensive coaching staff is obsessed with staying on top of its tendencies on a weekly basis: While it's important to simply do what you do best at times, at the NFL level it's also important to make sure as an offense you're not too predictable in your play calling.

The Colts, Sirianni said, are obsessed with being as unpredictable as they can be throughout any given ballgame.

"That is something that is constantly on our minds," Sirianni said. "We know how we look at defenses and we know how our defense looks at other teams. We don't want to tip our hand in any way. In any sport, you don't want to let the person trying to defend you any little tell. We're really obsessed with that."

Sirianni said offensive quality control coach Parks Frazier has been tasked with evaluating the Colts' offensive play calls on a weekly basis and then, usually on Tuesdays, reporting his findings back to the staff.

"Parks Frazier does a phenomenal job of giving us our tendencies when we start the week," Sirianni said. "As a matter of fact, that's the meeting I'm about to go to after we talk right here, just talking through tendencies and how we cover tendencies. A huge part of what we do, a huge thought of what we do – just as much as we think about plays and players for our team and their team, we think about our tendencies and how we can break any tendency we have that can tip our hand.""

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

In my opinion, our offense has been very predictable at times this year.  Especially with Hines at RB in the shotgun formation.  I don't study every game tape like opposing D-coordinators do, but from my television I can pretty often predict when a run up the middle is coming and most of the times, it seems like opposing defenses can, too.  

Run, screen or a 7 yd out. Not hard to defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
    • I was too hahaha  Why’s that
    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,241

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 1,041

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 588

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...