Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ballard will talk this week....


Recommended Posts

Could be today, could be tomorrow.   But he always has talked at the quarters.   After games 4, 8, 12 and 16.

 

Should be interesting to hear him address the first four games.   We’ve lost so many key acquisitions already.   

Looking forward to it. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Could be today, could be tomorrow.   But he always has talked at the quarters.   After games 4, 8, 12 and 16.

 

Should be interesting to hear him address the first four games.   We’ve lost so many key acquisitions already.   

Looking forward to it. 

I imagine the theme this year will be adversity, more so than any other year. I always enjoy hearing his input as well during this mark. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been wanting to hear him talk to us.

I always feel better, actually much better, about where the team is and is going after he speaks.

Hmmm, think we could talk him into running for a “bigger” job to be the “GM” of the country?

  • Like 4
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Could be today, could be tomorrow.   But he always has talked at the quarters.   After games 4, 8, 12 and 16.

 

Should be interesting to hear him address the first four games.   We’ve lost so many key acquisitions already.   

Looking forward to it. 

if i were him i would be thinking of a big name wr to trade for because we've got to improve in the Redzone

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

if i were him i would be thinking of a big name wr to trade for because we've got to improve in the Redzone

I don’t think adding more players is the answer to our red zone deficiency. I believe play calling like using Hines up the middle and in the red zone when Taylor is clearly the better choice 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

if i were him i would be thinking of a big name wr to trade for because we've got to improve in the Redzone

 

Word is Allen Robinson is not happy with the Bears for not giving him a contract. If the Bears keep losing, he is someone I would target. Bengals would ask too much for A.J. Green, won't even be a fair negotiation.

 

Curtis Samuel and Corey Davis might not be bad options either but I doubt the Titans would trade with a division rival once A J Brown comes back. Worth a shot though. Of course, the pipe dream is Julio Jones with a 2nd rounder if we assume his contract.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Word is Allen Robinson is not happy with the Bears for not giving him a contract. If the Bears keep losing, he is someone I would target. Bengals would ask too much for A.J. Green, won't even be a fair negotiation.

 

Curtis Samuel and Corey Davis might not be bad options either but I doubt the Titans would trade with a division rival once A J Brown comes back. Worth a shot though. Of course, the pipe dream is Julio Jones with a 2nd rounder if we assume his contract.

 

 

I like Robinson.  I wouldn't want Green or even Julio, simply because they're in the back end of their careers.  

 

If (big if) our guys would get healthy (Parris and MP) and they continue to develop the young guys on the roster, we're in decent shape.  Plus, there's are shiny new WRs every year in the draft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see us trade for Robinson or Gallup. The wide receivers we have now are just not good enough. Ty is not a no. 1 anymore and Pascal is probably a #4. And Pittman is unproven and Campbell can't stay on the field.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I don’t jump on this “we need to trade for so and so” but I do think it’s time. We need help on O, especially in the end zone. I know a lot of it is play calling and trying to force Hines up the middle, which obviously is not working. Ballard and Reich have to realize this. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

are we sure about this? Has there been press-release of some sort confirming it, or is it just a conjecture? This year is weird in many ways, I can see it being an exception to previous years with Ballard's press availability too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Smonroe said:

 

I like Robinson.  I wouldn't want Green or even Julio, simply because they're in the back end of their careers.  

 

If (big if) our guys would get healthy (Parris and MP) and they continue to develop the young guys on the roster, we're in decent shape.  Plus, there's are shiny new WRs every year in the draft.

I mean, I would take Julio any day.  But we'd never get him at a price we would be willing to pay.  Dude is just always good if he's on the field healthy.  I mean I have never seen anyone as dominant as Megatron, but Julio is pretty damn close.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

if i were him i would be thinking of a big name wr to trade for because we've got to improve in the Redzone

 

Looks like Davante Adams might be unhappy in GB...haha.

 

But I definitely think Ballard should be exploring trade options for a WR. Not only to help in the RZ (and short term)...but to also hedge against current injuries...as well as future ones.

 

BUT...it would also put me on pace to have my bold predictions come to fruition.

 

1. Ballard makes at least one significant in-season trade, involving players/picks/both. We will see...but it makes a lot of sense.

 

2. Jonathan Taylor will get 40+ targets in the passing game. He and Mack combined...will have 70+. Mack got hurt...so obviously his part isn't happening...but right now...Taylor is on pace for 40 targets...and I imagine his usage will increase.

 

3. Zach Pascal will be 1st or 2nd in WR snap share. Pascal is currently #1 in WR snap share. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I mean, I would take Julio any day.  But we'd never get him at a price we would be willing to pay.  Dude is just always good if he's on the field healthy.  I mean I have never seen anyone as dominant as Megatron, but Julio is pretty damn close.

 

Me too, even if it costs a 2nd and a 3rd across 2 drafts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BigO said:

I would like to see us trade for Robinson or Gallup. The wide receivers we have now are just not good enough. Ty is not a no. 1 anymore and Pascal is probably a #4. And Pittman is unproven and Campbell can't stay on the field.

 

 

IF DAL wanted to give away Gallup...sign me up. I can't imagine they would trade any of their WRs though...they need to score as many points as they possibly can this season.

 

The more likely route would be someone on the NYG...or perhaps MIA. Too bad Keenan Allen signed that extension in LAC...because he would be a perfect trade target IF they wanted to make a splash.

 

I think it just needs to be somebody who can immediately help. Next year's draft is once again loaded with WR talent...so they can address the position there as well. They just need help now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I just think that's a price too high for me.  But if there were a year to do that, it'd be this year (despite the fact it's probably too late for that now).

 

A bird in hand worth more than two in the bush. Just like we knew what we are getting with Buckner, Ballard and Reich will know what they are getting in Julio. I just assigned a random arbitrary value to it. They are not going to give him away, they did get a 2nd rounder, after all for Sanu last year with the Patriots. Julio is definitely worth more.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stitches said:

are we sure about this? Has there been press-release of some sort confirming it, or is it just a conjecture? This year is weird in many ways, I can see it being an exception to previous years with Ballard's press availability too. 

There’s no announcement that I’m aware of.   But he’s done this every year he’s been the GM.   He’s never missed a quarter.   He’s 12 for 12 in his first three years.    
 

It might not be today or tomorrow, maybe it happens Wednesday.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

A bird in hand worth more than two in the bush. Just like we knew what we are getting with Buckner, Ballard and Reich will know what they are getting in Julio. I just assigned a random arbitrary value to it. They are not going to give him away, they did get a 2nd rounder, after all for Sanu last year with the Patriots. Julio is definitely worth more.

Agree there.  Last receiver we drafted in the 1st was Reggie Wayne as I recall and damn man.  That worked out pretty well.  Pretty tough to argue against when you hit on guys like Reggie and Julio and it's even harder to argue why they arne't worth more than a couple 2nds, but you know you'd do it if it meant for certain, a Super Bowl.

 

EDIT: Forgot about Anthony Gonzalez and Phillip Dorsett.  Still...

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Agree there.  Last receiver we drafted in the 1st was Reggie Wayne as I recall and damn man.  That worked out pretty well.  Pretty tough to argue against when you hit on guys like Reggie and Julio and it's even harder to argue why they arne't worth more than a couple 2nds, but you know you'd do it if it meant for certain, a Super Bowl.

 

Plus, we have a QB that throws it up and lets the WR go make a play, I think it is a great match!!! Philip has played with tall WRs throughout his career with Vincent Jackson, Malcolm Floyd, Mike Williams and even Antonio Gates was a "go get the ball" type of TE that Philip utilized real well. Keenan Allen was the kind who flat out just got open like an Edelman and caught everything thrown his way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, chad72 said:

 

Plus, we have a QB that throws it up and lets the WR go make a play, I think it is a great match!!! Philip has played with tall WRs throughout his career with Vincent Jackson, Malcolm Floyd, Mike Williams and even Antonio Gates was a "go get the ball" type of TE that Philip utilized real well. Keenan Allen was the kind who flat out just got open like an Edelman and caught everything thrown his way. 

Cox is definitely of the mold of Antonio Gates.  Took the guy a couple years, but man he has balled out this year.  Blocking and running routes/catching has improved a ton.  Rivers has definitely been a part of Mo getting noticed.  Hope we don't lose him.  Not so great last year, but showed promise.  Promise getting delivered this year for sure.

3 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I would trade a 1 for Julio Jones. The biggest weakness on the team is WR and he would be a big difference maker. 

Is he worth that though?  Not sayin he's not.  But it's crazy to think anyone would give a first for a guy in his final years.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Cox is definitely of the mold of Antonio Gates.  Took the guy a couple years, but man he has balled out this year.  Blocking and running routes/catching has improved a ton.  Rivers has definitely been a part of Mo getting noticed.  Hope we don't lose him.  Not so great last year, but showed promise.  Promise getting delivered this year for sure.

Is he worth that though?  Not sayin he's not.  But it's crazy to think anyone would give a first for a guy in his final years.

IMO if he is healthy then yes he's worth it

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I would trade a 1 for Julio Jones. The biggest weakness on the team is WR and he would be a big difference maker. 

 

A 2nd and a 3rd across drafts is the most I would give, especially if the Falcons are keen to dump his salary on us.

 

Same case with Hopkins - got a player and a 2nd for him, so a 2nd and a 3rd across drafts would be very good compensation. That somewhat set the market. The Sanu trade was an outlier.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

if i were him i would be thinking of a big name wr to trade for because we've got to improve in the Redzone

Those guys are rarely available in season.  cooper is the last one I can think of.  I don't know if we are ready to give 1st rounders to try and "win this year" yet.  

We must have  QB in the near future.  Maybe Eason is the guy but who knows.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Word is Allen Robinson is not happy with the Bears for not giving him a contract. If the Bears keep losing, he is someone I would target. Bengals would ask too much for A.J. Green, won't even be a fair negotiation.

 

Curtis Samuel and Corey Davis might not be bad options either but I doubt the Titans would trade with a division rival once A J Brown comes back. Worth a shot though. Of course, the pipe dream is Julio Jones with a 2nd rounder if we assume his contract.

 

If we can get Allen for a 2nd, I'm all in. Exactly the kind of receiver we need right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard has spoken.   His interview is on the front of the website.    Been there for a while and nobody seems to know. 
 

Or....

 

You can now scroll to Andrew Walker's post which is here on this web page.  He’s posted his interview with Ballard on this page.    You can read it, or view the video link....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

He’s posted his interview with Ballard on this page.

Interestingly, it was Matt Taylor's interview of Ballard. Andrew Walker then transcribed and posted it on colts.com.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading for a guy like Julio is just what the Colts need RN. He has the ability to get up B

and make Moss type grabs.

 

Look I know of you love 1st but given our status this year we arent drafting before 15 so might as well trade for an all star like Julio. 

 

Would you take the Buckner trade back after 4 weeks? I wouldn't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Pretty uneventful interview, and really didn't expect it to be. Lot of praise but we still are working kind of stuff. All softball Qs.

 

 

I liked how he just kept reiterating basically 'we haven't done anything, we've got 12 more weeks to go.'  Our D has been playing well, for the most part... and I felt like Ballard could've easily said "well, we've played the Jags, Jets and a Vikings team who played poorly and a Bears team who was starting basically their back-up.. we're only going to be seeing better offenses as the year goes by" -- of course, that'd be an unprofessional thing to say for a GM... but he's right, we really haven't proven anything yet.  Next week vs. CLE will be the biggest test for our D to date (even if they're missing Chubb).  We have to show we can play dominant D against teams better than we've played so far.  I'm sure he'll have a more interesting interview come the half way point and 3/4 point of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Could be today, could be tomorrow.   But he always has talked at the quarters.   After games 4, 8, 12 and 16.

 

Should be interesting to hear him address the first four games.   We’ve lost so many key acquisitions already.   

Looking forward to it. 

Ah, the great and powerful OZ

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CurBeatElite said:

I liked how he just kept reiterating basically 'we haven't done anything, we've got 12 more weeks to go.'  Our D has been playing well, for the most part... and I felt like Ballard could've easily said "well, we've played the Jags, Jets and a Vikings team who played poorly and a Bears team who was starting basically their back-up.. we're only going to be seeing better offenses as the year goes by" -- of course, that'd be an unprofessional thing to say for a GM... but he's right, we really haven't proven anything yet.  Next week vs. CLE will be the biggest test for our D to date (even if they're missing Chubb).  We have to show we can play dominant D against teams better than we've played so far.  I'm sure he'll have a more interesting interview come the half way point and 3/4 point of the season.

3/4 should be the most interesting, although 1/2 will be after the Ravens game.

 

Ballard's a good GM, not a fun GM. And he's smart, keeping mostly to coach speak. I know some folks like to hang on every word, but he's just not going to give you much.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's what I was thinking
    • I think we're in good shape either way, it just adjusts our strategy with some extensions, and maybe we can't add another FA.    For a team like the Eagles, it completely changes their approach. If the cap is $175m, they can't keep Wentz without completely gutting the rest of their roster.
    • The trend is for the best offenses to be the teams contending for the Superbowl.  Are you aware of the basic Defense wins championships mantra?  You know Offense scores points?   I assume you are   Interstingly, the last really good D to win Superbowl was PHI and they had to score 44 points to do it v. No. 1 yanked Offense NE. And the Foles led offense carried them through the playoffs.  Before that it was Mannings Broncos.   Also intersesting is the 13-3 NE over LAR SB, featured the 25th and 27th ranked Ds in football.       The way to win in today's NFL is with high powered NFL passing offenses.  The rules are and have been set up that way increasingly over the last 20 years.   It's a lot different than when we were kids.   So like I said, it's usually Offense wins championships, Defense tries to hold teams to FGs.  There are occasionally anomalies but this is bascially accurate in todays' NFL.
    • There’s a good reason why defense everywhere suffered badly.   I can explain it in one word.  And you know the word.  Come on EVERYBODY say it with me!!!!   COVID!!   C-O-V-I-D!!   Defenses were poorer in the NFL and the college level as well.   Much less practice.  Much less contact.  Much less close up coaching.  Far more walk throughs.      When the world returns to normal, defenses will get better.  So will football. 
    • Not surprising at all. Here is how he ranked in other categories:   Intended Air Yards/PA - 26 Completed Air Yards/PA - 28 Completed Air Yards/Completion - 29 YAC/Completion - 2   First...it cannot be ignored that the Colts played (by far) the easiest schedule on offense. The average defense they played would have ranked ~23rd in DVOA. And that average was "deflated" somewhat by playing #1 defense PIT...when they clearly weren't the #1 defense anymore (after losing players to injury). That definitely played a factor.   Second...these numbers are as much Reich as it is anything. Reich uses the mesh concept (like he did with JB last year)...which creates open players in space and allows for YAC.    In fact, River's numbers (in the above categories) were very similar to JB's numbers last season. But Rivers is just a much better QB...and throws with better anticipation and accuracy. Throw in a HR hitter like Taylor and a young talented WR like Pittman...and you (naturally) have much better QB production with these concepts.   With the Colts offensive system, I think they could have immediate success with just about any talented QB they brought in...including a rookie. And if that QB is mobile...it will open up the playbook even more and raise the ceiling.   So I am in the minority here...but Rivers coming back doesn't move the needle for me. It's a lateral and stagnant move. I was all for the signing Rivers last off season...because it was the best of not-so-ideal situation. But if anything, it just proved that this team is ready to take the next step forward...and that means getting the right QB. Now is the time to make that move. So the only way I want Rivers back is if they get aggressive and move up to draft a QB who might need to sit for a part or all of a season.    TBH...I would rather roll the dice on Darnold and accept the risk of a reset year. I think he make a  good transition to this offense. And either he breaks out and suddenly you have a 24 year-old franchise QB...or he doesn't...and you have a reset year with the Colts in a much better position to draft a QB. Bringing back Rivers does nothing for the position long-term...and likely means another pick in the 20s.       
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,399

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 1,685

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,622

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtV

      ColtV 168

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bestQBever

      bestQBever 566

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FormerBolt

      FormerBolt 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThePowerslave

      ThePowerslave 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 6,503

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,898

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...