-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
I thought that way last week then thought about the trade deadline and new year and I don't think it is possible. -
I think Frank and the OC knew his strengths and weaknesses and didn't put in too many plays that they knew Rivers would have a hard time executing. They did let him take a deep(ish) shot sometimes. I'm not sure they were overly conservative at all. -
-
Rodgers only has himself to blame for not running that ball in on 3rd down. He had a clear lane to the EZ. The decision to go for it should have been mostly irrelevant because 4th down wouldn’t have happened if he did run. And if he doesn’t get there...it’s going to be 4th and short...which makes the case for going for it even stronger. Rodgers is a great QB...but he made a critical mistake. -
By CurBeatElite · Posted
You seem bitter after a tough loss. New Orleans is likely to lose Brees (if not a retirement in the coming weeks, likely after next year). That leaves Tampa Bay, a team you guys could have very well beaten yesterday (dominated time of possession, won the turnover battle, etc... that TD at the end of the half and a few other plays really changed that game, though if you looked at that stat sheet aside from the score, you'd probably have thought GB won). The rest of the NFC South isn't too big of a threat in the next couple years. The NFC East is a dumpster fire. The NFC North is a division you should win for a few more years if Rodgers is your QB. The NFC West seems like the toughest overall division in the NFC, but they underperformed this year - the Seahawks seem to be on the decline, I don't think Goff is good enough to get the Rams over the hump on an annual basis, not really sure what to think of the 9ers and the Cardinals have a good young coach and QB. No reason why Rodgers can't at least get back into the SB in the coming years in GB. The other top QBs in that conference (Brees and Brady) are on the wrong side of 40. Wilson, Murray and a couple other QBs seem to be a level below those two and Rodgers. Matt Ryan's getting old, Dak Prescott's coming off a bad injury, and after those 2 I see a pretty big decline in NFC QBs (especially if Stafford leaves the conference). The AFC on the other hand had 4 QBs who were 26 or younger in the divisional round. It looks like the Chiefs and Bills with Mahomes and Allen are going to be very tough for a long time coming. Herbert looks to be the real deal with the Chargers as does Burrow with Bengals, the Ravens and Titans have ridiculous running games and solid Ds and likely will be threats for years to come. Really, aside from having a hard time believing a few teams (i.e., NYJ, HOU, DEN) will be any good in the foreseeable future (I'd throw Jax in there, but who knows if they get Trevor). Otherwise, I can see perennial powerhouse PITT declining as Roethlisberger ages/retires. Overall, I think Rodgers has a much better shot of getting to the SB if he stayed in Green Bay than if he came to the AFC. The AFC, at least for the next few years, seems like a much stronger conference than the NFC overall and has multiple up-and-coming QBs, whereas several of the top dogs in the NFC have QBs who will likely be retiring before A-Rod does, and definitely before A-Rod is 'washed up'.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now