Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Reflecting on 2018 coaching search- Matt Nagy


Recommended Posts

 

Just going back to these reports back in ‘18 when Nagy thought the Bears were a better situation. I know the Colts denied ever offering or the like, but there’s no way Nagy was not one of the top picks for them at that time. Nevertheless, I hope we blow the Bears out of the water so I can see Matt Nagy’s face. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just don't see the success continuing over their in Chicago when you have two starting quarterbacks creating all sorts of drama and distraction. If you watch any of the abundance of former players doing podcasts and stuff like that, they all say distractions play a huge part in a teams success. Chances are half the team wants Foles, half the team wants Trubisky. The coaches obviously want Foles... who really knows what the front office really wants. The locker room has to be an interesting place. It has disaster written all over it,

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

 

Just going back to these reports back in ‘18 when Nagy thought the Bears were a better situation. I know the Colts denied ever offering or the like, but there’s no way Nagy was not one of the top picks for them at that time. Nevertheless, I hope we blow the Bears out of the water so I can see Matt Nagy’s face. 

 

You can't really blame any coach for wanting to know the way the team he's inheriting is trending.  It's part of the decision process.  After all, the leash is very short in the NFL to be a winner.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

You can't really blame any coach for wanting to know the way the team he's inheriting is trending.  It's part of the decision process.  After all, the leash is very short in the NFL to be a winner.


I understand. He also has to perform this year after a 3-0 start or else he’s heading into year 4 on the hot seat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I understand. He also has to perform this year after a 3-0 start or else he’s heading into year 4 on the hot seat. 

 

It's always fun reading the other teams boards.  They have their writer's predictions on the SB Nation site, Windy City Gridiron, and 7 out of 10 picked Da Bears (no surprise).

 

I think you're right, Nagy is probably the only 3-0 coach on the hot seat.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Smonroe said:

 

It's always fun reading the other teams boards.  They have their writer's predictions on the SB Nation site, Windy City Gridiron, and 7 out of 10 picked Da Bears (no surprise).

 

I think you're right, Nagy is probably the only 3-0 coach on the hot seat.  


I doubt very seriously any coach is on the hot seat this year. What franchise wants to go through the hiring process in the middle of covid? It’ll be easier to chalk a bad season up to covid and a difficult offseason and hope ‘21 is more normal (not likely) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I doubt very seriously any coach is on the hot seat this year. What franchise wants to go through the hiring process in the middle of covid? It’ll be easier to chalk a bad season up to covid and a difficult offseason and hope ‘21 is more normal (not likely) 

 

Probably not during the season (although I wouldn't put money on that).  But there will be a black Monday, the day after the last game of the regular season.  Covid cure or not.  I'd put money on that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, PManTheGreatest said:

Matt Nagy is 23-12 and that's with having Trubisky as his QB for the first 2 years. I doubt very much that Nagy is on the hot seat.


He was 8-8 last year and many are saying this team is a fraud starting 3-0. My comment simply stated if he blows this season after starting 3-0 and with the whole qb situation. He WILL be on the hot seat heading into 4th year which is basically a contract year. Ryan Pace too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

Probably not during the season (although I wouldn't put money on that).  But there will be a black Monday, the day after the last game of the regular season.  Covid cure or not.  I'd put money on that.


we’ll see. I just don’t see the usual coaching carousel post season (if we even get there). 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


He was 8-8 last year and many are saying this team is a fraud starting 3-0. My comment simply stated if he blows this season after starting 3-0 and with the whole qb situation. He WILL be on the hot seat heading into 4th year which is basically a contract year. Ryan Pace too. 

His worst ever record in a season is 8-8 and again, that's with Mitch, a QB he found on the roster. At already 3-0, they can go 6-7 the rest of the way and still make the playoffs. Personally, I think 8-8 makes the playoffs in the NFC since they added the number of playoff spots. He still has yet to play the Panthers, Jaguars, Texans, Vikings(twice), and the Lions once more. Again, there would have to be some catastrophe for him to get fired. They would have to finish the season with less than 5 wins for that to happen. I don't see that happening. I think their team actually got slightly better with Foles. There's no way he's on the hot seat. 

 

I only know so much about this team because my wife is a Bears fan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The firings may or may not be as prevalent this year, but there will definitely be some. I can't see Gase getting another year unless the Jets are trying to pull a Bengals.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I really doubt Nagy would be on the hot seat post season. Purely my opinion, but they should be better without MT behind center. They really stayed the course with him, when they probably shouldn't have. Not saying Foles is the answer, but I'd take him over MT. 

 

As far as our coaching search, saw Simms either this AM or yesterday talking about Reich, and mentioned that really no teams wanted him. Simms wasn't bashing Reich at all, and actually said he was impressed with the job Frank has done.

 

For me, the jury is still out. I've seen good and bad. He gets a pass for last year. He has no excuses this year. I love him as a guy though.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I really doubt Nagy would be on the hot seat post season. Purely my opinion, but they should be better without MT behind center. They really stayed the course with him, when they probably shouldn't have. Not saying Foles is the answer, but I'd take him over MT. 

 

As far as our coaching search, saw Simms either this AM or yesterday talking about Reich, and mentioned that really no teams wanted him. Simms wasn't bashing Reich at all, and actually said he was impressed with the job Frank has done.

 

For me, the jury is still out. I've seen good and bad. He gets a pass for last year. He has no excuses this year. I love him as a guy though.

 

 

Pretty much agree with everything.  I was thinking, has there ever been a great coach without a great QB, or instead, a great defense?  I remember my buddies in Cleveland hated BB.  Gruden won a SB with a game manager, but with a great D (thanks to TD).  Contrary to that, we've seen quite a few great QBs with bad coaches, so the inverse isn't necessarily true.

 

I'm not saying it's easy to coach when you have a franchise QB, but it sure helps.  Reich had one year with one.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet you Ballard really wants to win this game. That line about Chicago having the better roster probably bothered him. This is his chance to show who’s roster is better. Go Colts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I doubt very seriously any coach is on the hot seat this year. What franchise wants to go through the hiring process in the middle of covid? It’ll be easier to chalk a bad season up to covid and a difficult offseason and hope ‘21 is more normal (not likely) 

I would think that Adam Gase, who's Jets lost 2 games in embarrassing fashion within 5 days and were easily defeated by a previously winless team, has got to be on the chopping block.

 

Another would probably be Atlanta's Dan Quinn, who also leads a winless team that has completely imploded in some of those losses.

 

Both Gase & Quinn were surprisingly hired by their current teams after unsuccessful stints coaching other NFL teams, Miami & Jacksonville - I feel this gives the both of them a shorter rope than most coaches would normally have and if their teams don't show marked improvement in a hurry, their Owners may believe that teams has quit on the coach and that would be fatal for either of them going forward.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lancer1 said:

I would think that Adam Gase, who's Jets lost 2 games in embarrassing fashion within 5 days and were easily defeated by a previously winless team, has got to be on the chopping block.

 

Another would probably be Atlanta's Dan Quinn, who also leads a winless team that has completely imploded in some of those losses.

 

Both Gase & Quinn were surprisingly hired by their current teams after unsuccessful stints coaching other NFL teams, Miami & Jacksonville - I feel this gives the both of them a shorter rope than most coaches would normally have and if their teams don't show marked improvement in a hurry, their Owners may believe that teams has quit on the coach and that would be fatal for either of them going forward.


I agree that Gase is likely gone. Quinn made it to the Super Bowl, and his teams have blown big leads (esp this year)  or else they would be considered a successful franchise. I think eventually they will move on from Matt Ryan and bring a whole new change in including GM/HC. But that could be pushed back. Who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Lancer1 said:

I would think that Adam Gase, who's Jets lost 2 games in embarrassing fashion within 5 days and were easily defeated by a previously winless team, has got to be on the chopping block.

 

Another would probably be Atlanta's Dan Quinn, who also leads a winless team that has completely imploded in some of those losses.

 

Both Gase & Quinn were surprisingly hired by their current teams after unsuccessful stints coaching other NFL teams, Miami & Jacksonville - I feel this gives the both of them a shorter rope than most coaches would normally have and if their teams don't show marked improvement in a hurry, their Owners may believe that teams has quit on the coach and that would be fatal for either of them going forward.

 

I think you have Dan Quinn confused with Gus Bradley as the Jaguars coach. Probably because of their previous defensive coaching in Seattle.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BrickHead said:

 

I think you have Dan Quinn confused with Gus Bradley as the Jaguars coach. Probably because of their previous defensive coaching in Seattle.

You're right, I did confuse the 2. Bradley is now the Chargers' DC, and he's been doing a decent job.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Smonroe said:

 

 

Pretty much agree with everything.  I was thinking, has there ever been a great coach without a great QB, or instead, a great defense?  I remember my buddies in Cleveland hated BB.  Gruden won a SB with a game manager, but with a great D (thanks to TD).  Contrary to that, we've seen quite a few great QBs with bad coaches, so the inverse isn't necessarily true.

 

I'm not saying it's easy to coach when you have a franchise QB, but it sure helps.  Reich had one year with one.

He's got one in year 3 too. I'm still a little down on him for 2020 still due to the Jax game plan, but still optimistic. Some of the game plans/personnel/play calls still makes me scratch my head. It's early though. After the next two games, my expectations will be high.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/1/2020 at 4:16 PM, ColtStrong2013 said:


I doubt very seriously any coach is on the hot seat this year. What franchise wants to go through the hiring process in the middle of covid? It’ll be easier to chalk a bad season up to covid and a difficult offseason and hope ‘21 is more normal (not likely) 


Well, I guess those seats can get hot even with COVID.  I’m still surprised Gase has a job today. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


Well, I guess those seats can get hot even with COVID.  I’m still surprised Gase has a job today. 


I hoped O’Brien stayed (lol) but I also did not expect them to start 0-4. They’ve had plenty of issues organizationally in the last few years and made some really bad moves. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I hoped O’Brien stayed (lol) but I also did not expect them to start 0-4. They’ve had plenty of issues organizationally in the last few years and made some really bad moves. 

 

I'm with you on O'Brien.  As a Colts fan, you have to love how he's running that team as a GM.  He'd make Grigson proud.  I also hope that Marrone and Caldwell stick around.

 

The Titans have a good coach in Vrabel (I may be a bit prejudice for an OSU guy)  And you have to say Robinson has them being consistent, if anything.

 

I won't be surprised if Quinn and Gase follow shortly.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, RollerColt said:

Nagy will be 3-2 on the season by end of Thursday night.
 

Brady knows how to shred Pagano’s defense like parmesan cheese. 

Don't bet the farm on it. :hat:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No beers for me. I haven't had an alcohol related drink in over 30 years.  Now I may hit the bullet a couple of times? 
    • Nail biter for several reasons. Pre-game beers may be needed for the nerves.
    • If I had to guess, Rivers will be back on the books.
    • Typically to be a HOFer you have to be dominant for ~a decade.  Leonard and Q are ~2.5 years into their careers (about a quarter of the way there).  Leonard has not played 16 games in a season yet, which is somewhat concerning to me.  This year, while he and Q both look very good, I don't think either is deserving of an all-pro award.     So yes, very impressive that Q has been 1st team all-pro 2x and Leonard has a 1st and 2nd team all-pro under his belt.  That is very rare (Gale Sayers and Dick Butkus are the only other 2 teammates who made 1st team all-pro as rookies).  In no way am I knocking Q or Leonard, they're both critical pieces to this team and at the elite level in the NFL at their respective positions.  Labeling them as HOFers this early into their career is a bit of a stretch, though -- let's give them another 3.5-4 years to see if they're still healthy and performing at an all-pro level.  They're certainly off to a good start, but there are a lot of players who have made 2 all-pro teams in their career and are not HOFers (heck, LeRoy Butler was a 4x 1st-team all-pro and has been eligible for HOF induction for ~15 years and isn't in, Steve Wisniewski was 2x 1st team, 6x 2nd team and not in, etc.).  Also, the vast majority of HOFers were not first team all-pro as rookies.  These 2020 rookies are in perhaps the strangest year of the modern era, with limited training camps, no pre-season games, missing games due to COVID (see Taylor), etc.... Pittman, Taylor, Blackmon have all shown flashes of excellence and all have had their own obstacles on top of a weird off-season as rookies (Blackmon coming off injury getting thrown into starting line-up due to HOoker going down, Taylor having Mack go down and now missing a game on the COVID list, and Pittman with compartment syndrome).   No reason to expect any of them to be HOFers, but also no reason why if they stay healthy and continue improving that we don't start talking about them being at the HOF level in 4-5 more years.     In all honesty, it is way too early to tell if this class will stack up to the 2018 class.  We really won't know for another 4-5 years when we see which guys from the 2018 draft are given/not given contract extensions and when the current class is at the same point.      As far as just judging by rookie season alone, it's not unreasonable to think it won't be another >30 years before we see rookie teammates on the first team all-pro squad together (believe Butkus and Sayers was 1965).  That said, aside from Q and Leonard we got solid contributions from Smith and Hines on O, saw solid ST contributions from Franklin and Adams (with Franklin playing a minimal D role as a fill-in starter 2 games and Adams basically invisible on D), got very little from Turay and Lewis and basically nothing from Fountain, Cain.  Wilkins was OK as a 3rd RB and OK as a kick returner and our only UDFA who did anything noteworthy wad Odum as a solid STer and with a couple decent starts when he was needed due to injury.   Overall we had 4 of 11 picks (or 4 of 12 rookies who contributed) who really didn't do much as rookies (33% vs. 66% percent who contributed significantly in some aspect of the game).     So in short, the 2018 class as rookies had 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 2 guys who contributed solidly on O (Hines and Smith), 4 solid ST contributors (Odum, Adams, Franklin, Wilkins), 4 guys who really did nothing (Turay, Lewis, Cain, Fountain).   Three years later, we still have 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 1 very solid RT (Smith),  2 guys who are doing well in a RB rotation (Hines and Wilkins), 2 unknowns on the DL (Lewis and Turay - by far Lewis' best year, but he hasn't really been great), and 3 solid STers (Odum, Franklin, Adams and 4 if you count Hines).   Then we have Cain (gone) and Fountain (still pretty much doing nothing).  Again, about 2/3 of these guys are still contributing solidly in some way on the team, with the other 1/3 still unknown or not doing much (Turay started to come on last year and Lewis is recently coming on this year, so if they both continue, we may see 83% of that class as solid contributors moving forward).     The 2020 class as rookies -- we have 1 borderline stud (Blackmon), 2 very solid  O contributors (Taylor and Pittman), 3 very solid ST contributors (Rodgers, Glasgow, Blankenship), 1 guy who has been OK in a pinch as a backup or extra lineman (Pinter), 1 guy who has made the active roster after mostly being on the PS (Windsor - IMO, he's about as valuable to this year's team as Lewis was at the same point in 2018), 1 guy who has been very solid the past few weeks (Harris) and 2 guys (Eason and Patmon) who have been on the roster but inactive.  That puts us at 7 or 8 guys who have been solid contributors out of 11 as rookies (63% or 72%) and 3 or 4 guys (Eason, Patmon, Windsor, maybe Pinter) for a total of 27-36% of rookies who are not doing much at this point of the season (this could change moving forward if Pinter has to fill in for Kelly for a while and/or if Windsor takes on a bigger role down the stretch, it is not coincidence to me that he was activated the week we cut Day).  So right now, we're looking at 30-40% of our rookies not producing too much, but this could change to 20% (assuming Eason and Patmon don't play this year and Pinter and Windsor see increasing roles).     Overall, Ballard is >60% in both drafts in terms of having productive players as rookies.  It is very unlikely we'll see any team have 2 first team all-pros as rookies again in the near future (or ever).  We may see a DROY from the 2020 draft class like we saw in the 2018 draft class on this team.  Both Leonard and Blackmon have been criticized for being picked too early, etc... Ballard has proven those doubters wrong.     When we look back in a few years, if Eason is a franchise QB and Pittman and Patmon are a solid WR duo (perhaps Harris is still performing well), Taylor is a bellcow >1,200 yard rusher, Blackmon is an all-pro, Pinter is a starter (RG or RT), Rodgers is giving us a TD or more per year as a return guy, Glasgow is a solid STer, Hot Rod is a probowl K, and Windsor is still in the DL rotation and this draft could be better than the 2018 draft.  Again, too early to tell.  If we want to consider Buckner a part of the 2020 draft (the 13th pick), I think there's a good argument that the 2020 draft will exceed the 2018 draft.   Also, something to keep in mind -- our team was in very bad shape when Ballard took over.  In 2017, he was drafting for a team with a coach we pretty much all knew was going to be gone in a year.  In 2018, it was a lot easier to get significant playing time on the roster (at least IMO) because it was so bad.  In a short time, Ballard has put a lot of solid pieces together and this team is a much more difficult team to make the final roster, let alone get significant playing time as a rookie.     I agree with you on your Blackmon assessment.  It'd be cool if he got DROY... and he has made several key plays at critical times (e.g., forced fumble in OT last week)... but he's not perfect.  TBH, I think it was kind of disappointing that the long ball from Rodgers to MVS was not broken up near the end of the 4th quarter.  Blackmon was a step or two behind, but I think most very high end safeties would have broken that play up.     McDaniels dissing Ballard may have actually made Ballard's job easier.  I think Reich was the right guy for this team and after seeing Patricia fired from DET, and looking at stats of Belichick's coordinators who went on to head coaching jobs, they have a pretty poor track record.     Yes, I think Q and Leonard's play has been solid this year, but I don't think either of them deserve to be all-pros (at least not 1st team).  Won't be shocked if Q gets selected though, mainly because of his name and the fact Baldy and other reporters like to really focus on his positive plays.  He's been beaten more this year than I can remember (which is still not a lot) and has more holds than I remember in his first 2 years.     Agree, the most deserving of all-pro on this roster is Buckner (though, I can't see him getting the nod due to lack of stats and the fact that Donald and other interior DL in the league are playing at very high levels).  Second most deserving, IMO, is Hot Rod -- he's likely to be leading the league in points scored after tomorrow's game.  Just hit a big game winner.  Has a solid chance of ending the season >90% FG made and leading the league in points scored -- it'd be hard to vote against him for at least 2nd team K if he finishes the year >90% FG made and leads league in points.
  • Members

    • Happy2BeHere

      Happy2BeHere 813

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltpwr

      Coltpwr 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 2,732

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 14,224

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SicWhitted

      SicWhitted 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,770

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,814

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 2,454

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...