Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Oh boy. Chad Kelly cut


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, stitches said:

I expect him to be back in a similar fashion to how we handled Phillip Walker several years ago. Release him and get him back on the roster depending on whether we have any immediate need this current week for another position(with WR getting hit with injuries we need more WRs these days it seems)

 

edit: well, that of course is unless he's done something stupid behind the scenes to lose Reich and Ballard's trust. 

 

You are probably right...so people should hold off their celebrations for a week or so. On the surface level...cutting Kelly to make room for Krishawn Hogan makes little sense. I would think Kelly has a mobile scout team QB would be more valuable than some guy who has one career NFL catch in three seasons...and has been on IR every season he has played. So we will see.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Cutting Kelly might mean the FO is pleased with Eason's progress.  The cut could be a sign of good things.

Obviously,  Ballard is making room for Scott tolzien to come back.

Posted Images

17 minutes ago, Myles said:

Darn.  I was thinking that if Rivers retired after this season and Brissett went elsewhere that Eason would be the starter and Kelly the backup.  

Its early in the season to say this, more speculation:  Rivers seems to be playing with some pop, not showing his age too much, so the projection cold be that Rivers could start next year too, with Eason as backup.  

 

The Kelly cut could simply be an isolated move not related to Rivers or Eason, or maybe he fell off the wagon again, but I'd like to think that its a sign that management  believes that both Rivers and Eason have the ability to be here next season, with Eason having more of a presence than this year. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess between the 2 Super Bowl QB's nephews Mark Rypien is having a better week than Jim Kelly.  Brett starting tomorrow in nationally televised game , I always liked mark long before he came to Indy and his comeback 3 seasons after his sons tragic death was a great storyline. I expect Brett to rip it up tomorrow, Chad well like some have said he may get the Phillip (He wasnt P.J. when he was here) Walker treatment unless someone else grabs him for their p.s. (Possibly Chargers).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DougDew said:

Cutting Kelly might mean the FO is pleased with Eason's progress.  The cut could be a sign of good things.

That's pretty likely.  Why people are so hungry for Chad Kelly has never made sense to me.  Without the "connection" he may not have sniffed our practice squad or any other after being released by Denver. With the PDM, he might make #3 somewhere after an injury.  He's a low end Practice squad guy. The love affair some have had seems baseless like a little girl gazing into her Justin Bieber poster. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JPFolks said:

That's pretty likely.  Why people are so hungry for Chad Kelly has never made sense to me.  Without the "connection" he may not have sniffed our practice squad or any other after being released by Denver. With the PDM, he might make #3 somewhere after an injury.  He's a low end Practice squad guy. The love affair some have had seems baseless like a little girl gazing into her Justin Bieber poster. 

That's a pretty good analogy and sums it up quite well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DougDew said:

Its early in the season to say this, more speculation:  Rivers seems to be playing with some pop, not showing his age too much, so the projection cold be that Rivers could start next year too, with Eason as backup.  

 

The Kelly cut could simply be an isolated move not related to Rivers or Eason, or maybe he fell off the wagon again, but I'd like to think that its a sign that management  believes that both Rivers and Eason have the ability to be here next season, with Eason having more of a presence than this year. 

It wouldn't completely shock me to end up with Brissett as our long term back up here. For the first time it seems like th NFL is pretty stable at QB, especially with 2 more top quality QBs at least coming out.  Perhap if Jacoby gets no solid offers to start, and if Eason is a Go, they keep those two. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Four2itus said:

On no, trust me. The legend of the most talked about practice squad player in the history of Colt message boarding shall live on and continue to raise the bar........

 

200.gif

 

Don't forget Roy Hall and Mike Hart. Our memories are too short lived, unfortunately!!! :) 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JPFolks said:

It wouldn't completely shock me to end up with Brissett as our long term back up here. For the first time it seems like th NFL is pretty stable at QB, especially with 2 more top quality QBs at least coming out.  Perhaps if Jacoby gets no solid offers to start, and if Eason is a Go, they keep those two. 

 

Even backups get paid $7-8 mil. a year, Jacoby should give us back money, just kidding. :) 

 

If that is his ballpark, it is money better spent elsewhere for us. I think Eason learning in the line of fire is the best thing for him should Rivers return and Eason ever had to play backup. If Covid sticks around for a while which it likely could, might be wise to carry 3 QBs that know the system now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh, no on will really miss him

 

just got tired of watching jacoby struggle so bad late last year.  3-4 of those games were awful, chad could have done no worse.  re watch the saints and jaguars games if you dont believe me

 

rivers is the present and near future

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheMose said:

Why would we want a team to take JB off our hands?

because he is horrible .  2942 yards passing 18 tds  6 picks in a season is really bad .  i bet the worse rated QB in the nfl this year puts up better numbers .  I dont get what people see in him. I gave him a chance we saw him play two full seasons and he is trent dilfer 2.0.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Even backups get paid $7-8 mil. a year, Jacoby should give us back money, just kidding. :) 

 

If that is his ballpark, it is money better spent elsewhere for us. I think Eason learning in the line of fire is the best thing for him should Rivers return and Eason ever had to play backup. If Covid sticks around for a while which it likely could, might be wise to carry 3 QBs that know the system now. 

Oh, I agree. If Rivers comes back, then it is him and Eason. If JB goes elsewhere for a year, it also wouldn't shock me for him to come back as our backup. 7-8 million for holding a clipboard and stepping in to be the hero now and then is a good gig if you can get it. This staff LOVES them some JB. If they can make him the next Frank Reich, and the reality being he is not a legit starter, and at best would be a one year placeholder elsewhere, he may be back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, JPFolks said:

wouldn't completely shock me to end up with Brissett as our long term back up here.

 

It's time to move on. Brissett is a good teammate and solid backup, but he's easily replaceable.  

 

On this type of team, with what he's being asked to do, Rivers could easily play two more years.  Just go with Rivers and Eason.  It gives you a few years to decide whether you want to turn it over to Eason or not.  If not, keep drafting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, coming on strong said:

because he is horrible .  2942 yards passing 18 tds  6 picks in a season is really bad .  i bet the worse rated QB in the nfl this year puts up better numbers .  I dont get what people see in him. I gave him a chance we saw him play two full seasons and he is trent dilfer 2.0.

Perhaps because he's not likely to get arrested for home invasion or drunk driving.  He's a functional backup who fits in with a tight knit team, doesn't cause strife and accepts his role like a professional.  He can go in for a game or two and play functional game manager with low turnovers.  They gave Kelly way more chances to impress than most any other Mr Irrelevant ever gets.  He didn't impress even an overly friendly and supportive staff towards him as the #4 QB.  AND we desperately need WRs in the house as we're in some trouble there.  

 

It's funny, I thought perhaps folks were simply trolling for a chuckle.  But it seems we have some true believers in the Church of Chad.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, #12. said:

 

It's time to move on. Brissett is a good teammate and solid backup, but he's easily replaceable.  

 

On this type of team, with what he's being asked to do, Rivers could easily play two more years.  Just go with Rivers and Eason.  It gives you a few years to decide whether you want to turn it over to Eason or not.  If not, keep drafting.

Of course.. but would it TRULY shock you if they found a way to bring him back? They love them some JB just like some love them some CK.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys can bet on jacoby give me chad kelly , he can make it work . He has that tim tebow magic , he doesnt need to be in a system and go through progressions . Just give him a couple of his mates and the ball and he will move the chains , they dont call him swag kelly for nothing .  I love  chads ability to just wing it like tebow does . it may make his coaches mad but it works .

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They didn’t give up their 21 1st round draft pick. They got fields with the pick br moving up. I don’t think the bears gave much at all.   There was no guarantee we would of been able to outbid the bears. Moving up higher then where the bears moved up too would of cost more.  I think Wentz  is perfect for this team. Still young with a team who is still young. So it still gives us a big window to win a SB.     
    • It's because it doesn't make sense, for multiple reasons.    First, it's really hard for an NFL team to have cash flow issues, just due to revenue sharing alone. The Packers reported having a $400m slush fund for team expenses last year, and they are a similar small market team, with similar pricing models, they have a less favorable stadium deal, and they pay their coaches more than the Colts do. If the Packers have $400m socked away, imagine the mismanagement it would take for the Colts to have cash flow issues. And then think about how long it's been since the Colts have been even close to going over the cap. There would be a lot of missing money.   Second, the pay-go player pay system doesn't save the Colts cash. Buckner didn't get a signing bonus, but he did get big roster bonuses in the first two years of his deal. HIs two year cash pay is $40m. The same year, Kenny Clark received a similar four year extension, less total value, but he got a $25m signing bonus. His two year cash pay is $28m. Clark's cap hits start out low for two years, then increase 300% in Year 3, while Buckner's cap hits stay even for the entirety of his contract; in fact, his cap hit goes down in Years 2 and 3. This formula applies to almost any contract/structure comparison you make between similarly paid players.   This is a cap management strategy, not a cash flow strategy. It affects cap hits and dead money, not cash spent. These different strategies have their advantages and drawbacks, but none of those elements speak to a team's cash flow standing. Buckner -- and anyone else -- agreed to that structure because it didn't affect his bottom line. From a cash flow standpoint, there's basically no difference.   Third, Irsay has never had a problem spending money on players, facilities, or anything else related to this team. That's been true over the several decades he's been running the show. So the fiscal restraint of recent seasons -- while NFL financials have been increasing year over year, except for during Covid -- is likely due to the strategies of the GM. And Ballard has very clearly explained his approach to spending money and building his roster, and every move the team has made has been in line with that approach.   Whether the Colts have cash flow restraints is unknown. But there's really no evidence that they do.
    • This will be an interesting question to revisit next February at the earliest. Kinda hard to answer with a sample size of zero.
    • Only need 6-12 months of data for FDA approval. Clinical trial happened last March-April. Long term effects usually only take 2 months to show up. Plus real world data will probably speed the process up to sometime before September for approval 
    • Not to be contrite or over abrasive here, but what exactly do we know now that we didn't before the draft or before we made the trade for Wentz? Neither have taken a snap for their respective teams, we know absolutely nothing about their worth/value compared to what was given up for each. Let's talk at the end of the season, that's when we will be able to say "Knowing what we know now" and not really a moment before then.
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 338

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,148

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mel Kiper's Hair

      Mel Kiper's Hair 2,446

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 5,690

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 7,967

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 166

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NodakColt

      NodakColt 32

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 928

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...