Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Nick Foles will start vs Colts


Recommended Posts

Based off of their career stats, it's hard to choose who I'd rather the Colts face.

 

Pass completions

Foles - 61.8%

Trubs - 63.1%

 

TD's/INT's

Foles - 74/36

Trubs - 54/32

 

Rating

Foles - 88.3

Trubs - 85.9

 

Win/loss

Foles - 26/22

Trubs - 26-18

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Myles said:

Based off of their career stats, it's hard to choose who I'd rather the Colts face.

 

Pass completions

Foles - 61.8%

Trubs - 63.1%

 

TD's/INT's

Foles - 74/36

Trubs - 54/32

 

Rating

Foles - 88.3

Trubs - 85.9

 

Win/loss

Foles - 226/22

Trubs - 26-18

 

 

 

I think Trubisky can move around much better in the pocket and having him out against Foles favors Indy

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Myles said:

Based off of their career stats, it's hard to choose who I'd rather the Colts face.

 

Pass completions

Foles - 61.8%

Trubs - 63.1%

 

TD's/INT's

Foles - 74/36

Trubs - 54/32

 

Rating

Foles - 88.3

Trubs - 85.9

 

Win/loss

Foles - 226/22

Trubs - 26-18

 

 

Damn... Foles is a freakin winner.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Myles said:

Based off of their career stats, it's hard to choose who I'd rather the Colts face.

 

Pass completions

Foles - 61.8%

Trubs - 63.1%

 

TD's/INT's

Foles - 74/36

Trubs - 54/32

 

Rating

Foles - 88.3

Trubs - 85.9

 

Win/loss

Foles - 226/22

Trubs - 26-18

 

 

The Win/Loss stat I see for Foles is 30/24 as a starter...

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Myles said:

Based off of their career stats, it's hard to choose who I'd rather the Colts face.

 

Pass completions

Foles - 61.8%

Trubs - 63.1%

 

TD's/INT's

Foles - 74/36

Trubs - 54/32

 

Rating

Foles - 88.3

Trubs - 85.9

 

Win/loss

Foles - 226/22

Trubs - 26-18

 

 

I bet 150-180 of those wins are with him riding the pine 

Did Trubs get hurt or is this a performance type switch up?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, csmopar said:

I bet 150-180 of those wins are with him riding the pine 

Did Trubs get hurt or is this a performance type switch up?

It was to spark the team yesterday, but since it worked they are sticking with Foles for at least this week.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, shakedownstreet said:

 

I think Trubisky can move around much better in the pocket and having him out against Foles favors Indy

I found their sack % opposite of what I thought I would see:

Foles - 5.3%

Trubs - 6.8%

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lancer1 said:

Let's see if the defense can record a safety in the 3rd straight game!

 

 

 Could happen, but teams don't just score safeties 3 weeks straight. It was extremely exciting to see number one versus the Vikings. It was just flat out crazy to see it happen again this week.

 

I'll bet your bank account versus mine it doesn't happen again :goodluck:

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, shakedownstreet said:

Seeing a team get a safety 3 weeks consecutively is about as likely as a an NFL one point play (yes it's possible but has never happened) 

A little-noticed aspect of the NFL’s new extra point rule is that we could see, for the first time in league history, a one-point safety.

If the defense gets the ball in the field of play on a conversion attemp, and then a defensive player takes the ball into his own end zone and is tackled, the result will be a one-point safety: The offensive team will get one point. That has never happened before in NFL history.

It had never happened before because it was virtually impossible: In the past, any time the defense took possession of the ball on a point-after attempt (either a one-point kick or a two-point conversion), the play was blown dead. A one-point safety was theoretically possible before, but it would have happened only if the defensive team had illegally batted a fumbled ball in the end zone.

One-point safeties have happened in college football, most notably in the 2013 Fiesta Bowl, when Kansas State blocked an Oregon extra point and a Kansas State player picked up the ball and ran it into his own end zone. The college rule that gives the defense the opportunity to score two points by returning an interception, fumble or blocked kick to the opposite end zone means that defensive teams that take possession of the ball will try to run it back for a score, and sometimes those players end up getting tackled after backtracking into their own end zones.

With that rule now in place in the NFL, it will happen in the NFL eventually as well: Some defensive player is going to reverse field, get caught in his own end zone, and give up the first one-point safety in NFL history.

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/22/nfl-may-see-its-first-one-point-safety/#:~:text=If the defense gets the,happened before in NFL history.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Myles said:

A little-noticed aspect of the NFL’s new extra point rule is that we could see, for the first time in league history, a one-point safety.

If the defense gets the ball in the field of play on a conversion attemp, and then a defensive player takes the ball into his own end zone and is tackled, the result will be a one-point safety: The offensive team will get one point. That has never happened before in NFL history.

It had never happened before because it was virtually impossible: In the past, any time the defense took possession of the ball on a point-after attempt (either a one-point kick or a two-point conversion), the play was blown dead. A one-point safety was theoretically possible before, but it would have happened only if the defensive team had illegally batted a fumbled ball in the end zone.

One-point safeties have happened in college football, most notably in the 2013 Fiesta Bowl, when Kansas State blocked an Oregon extra point and a Kansas State player picked up the ball and ran it into his own end zone. The college rule that gives the defense the opportunity to score two points by returning an interception, fumble or blocked kick to the opposite end zone means that defensive teams that take possession of the ball will try to run it back for a score, and sometimes those players end up getting tackled after backtracking into their own end zones.

With that rule now in place in the NFL, it will happen in the NFL eventually as well: Some defensive player is going to reverse field, get caught in his own end zone, and give up the first one-point safety in NFL history.

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/22/nfl-may-see-its-first-one-point-safety/#:~:text=If the defense gets the,happened before in NFL history.

I'm still a bit confused by this.  It sounds like if there is a fumble on a 2 point conversion and the defense grabs it in the endzone and doesn't get out of the endzone it would be a 1 point safety.  Wouldn't it be a touchback?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Myles said:

I'm still a bit confused by this.  It sounds like if there is a fumble on a 2 point conversion and the defense grabs it in the endzone and doesn't get out of the endzone it would be a 1 point safety.  Wouldn't it be a touchback?

 

Yes but in that scenario it's only a one point play

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Myles said:

I'm still a bit confused by this.  It sounds like if there is a fumble on a 2 point conversion and the defense grabs it in the endzone and doesn't get out of the endzone it would be a 1 point safety.  Wouldn't it be a touchback?

Yes, that would be a touchback. What the article is stating is that if the defensive player picks up the ball in the Endzone goes into the field of play, then retreats back into the end zone and his tackled, that is considered a safety.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

Yes, that would be a touchback. What the article is stating is that if the defensive player picks up the ball in the Endzone goes into the field of play, then retreats back into the end zone and his tackled, that is considered a safety.

That makes sense.  I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

From what I read Foles would of been in competition with Brissett. He wouldn’t of been handed the job like Rivers.

That would have stunk.  Rivers is who I wanted and am glad we went that direction.   Good bridge.   I don't really think he makes the team a Superbowl threat, but if we can get to the playoffs, anything can happen.  Best case is that he stays next season as well and we make sure the QB of the future is on the roster.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Myles said:

That would have stunk.  Rivers is who I wanted and am glad we went that direction.   Good bridge.   I don't really think he makes the team a Superbowl threat, but if we can get to the playoffs, anything can happen.  Best case is that he stays next season as well and we make sure the QB of the future is on the roster.  

**** that. Colts win the SB this season

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, shakedownstreet said:

 

 

 Could happen, but teams don't just score safeties 3 weeks straight. It was extremely exciting to see number one versus the Vikings. It was just flat out crazy to see it happen again this week.

 

I'll bet your bank account versus mine it doesn't happen again :goodluck:

There is that small chance, mostly cuz of Rigo punting and the guys who get downfield to down it. It does make it more possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well thought out mock. Some of the additions I am not the biggest fan of(Ertz), but I can see them happening so, can't really beef with it too much.    I would also prefer we didn't spend a R2 pick on a run stuffing DT after paying 2 DTs long-term big money last year.    Other than that - love Newsome pick up, love Christiansen at that spot in the draft. Like the Patrick Jones pick. Love Deatrich Wise at that money. Overall very solid mock. Good job. 
    • Braden Smith allowed 1 QB hit and 0 sacks in 2020 with Rivers as QB.    
    • To the bolded, the point of having cap room and draft picks is to add good players. I don't think good roster management necessitates getting rid of good players when their contracts come up, not when you have the resources to keep them. Especially not if you're a good team, with contention in reach.    I think some overstate how "close" the Colts are, but I do think we're closer to being a contender than we are to being a team that should be stocking up picks to reshape the roster. And that's why 'forward-thinking Ballard' has been rolling forward tens of millions of cap every year.   As for the five players taking half the cap, that's not really where the Colts are, or will be. To keep it simple, once you factor in the pending cap increases -- the cap will be at $240m/year within the next two years, from the players' revenue split going up from 47% to 48.5%, from the TV contracts that are projected to nearly double to $10b/year, and from the 17th regular season game + 2 more playoff games -- having five $20m/year players is about 42% of your team's cap. And that's without going into contract structure and doing a year by year analysis of how your spending compares to the projected cap.   Teams with highly paid veteran QBs typically have about 40-50% of their cap tied into 6-8 players. Packers, Saints, Rams, Bucs, Chiefs, Steelers, Titans, etc. Pretty soon, you can add the Bills and Ravens to this list (and they're already close). The Cardinals are already there.    Right now, the Colts only have four guys above $10m/year (Wentz, Buckner, Kelly, Stewart). We have some room to add highly paid players, and still supplement the roster in free agency. Admittedly, my perspective is based on projected dramatic increases to the cap, but I would assume the Colts are factoring in those same increases. And because the Colts have some wiggle room right now, they might use a unique cap climate in 2021 to take advantage of their flexibility over the next 2-3 seasons, and structure contracts in a way that allows them to keep their young guys and still add a couple of veterans in free agency.  
    • I didn't think it that bad.   In hindsight it is.   Colts gave up the 22nd pick in the draft for the previous years #3 pick in the draft. In his rookie year, Richardson had good numbers - 950 yards rushing, 11 TD's, 51 receptions and 1 TD.  That was in 15 games with Weeden as the QB.  I thought with Luck as the QB his game would step up.      Was it a mistake - YES.   Was it the worst trade in Colts history - Not even close.   Let me remind you of this bad trade:   In search of a franchise QB, the Colts swung a deal with Atlanta for the top pick in the 1990 NFL Draft and used the pick on George, a homegrown product from Warren Central. The cost was steep. The Falcons received OT Chris Hinton, WR Andre Rison, a 1991 first round pick and a fifth round pick in 1990. A six-time Pro Bowler for the Colts, Hinton started 80 more games, including a Pro Bowl season in 1991 and an All-Pro nod in 1993.   Rison started for the Colts as a rookie and caught 52 passes in 1989. With the Falcons, Rison exploded, eclipsing 1,000 receiving yards in four of his five seasons in Atlanta. He finished his Falcons career with 5,633 yards and 56 touchdowns before bouncing around with five other teams in his final six seasons. The 1991 first round pick turned into WR Mike Pritchard, who spent nine solid, but unspectacular seasons in the NFL, finishing with 5,187 receiving yards. As for George, he spent four uninspiring seasons with the Colts with a 14-35 record as a starter, more interceptions than touchdowns (46 to 41) and was traded in 1994 to Atlanta.
    • You're kidding right? So Chris Hinton is worthy but AC isn't?
  • Members

    • BlackTiger

      BlackTiger 66

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 132

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • #12.

      #12. 1,065

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 396

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 556

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James

      James 354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • iuswingman

      iuswingman 41

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,514

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...